Cover not available
Article published In:
Discourse approaches to evidentiality in Spanish
Edited by Marta Albelda Marco and María Estellés
[Pragmatics and Society 9:3] 2018
► pp. 454–484
General Section

Embodied departure from focal objects in a lingua franca campus tour

| Kanagawa University
| Kanagawa University
This conversation analytic study examines the interaction coordinated between two amateur tour guides and a guided visitor for initiating departure from various objects during a campus tour managed through Japanese as a lingua franca. The data come from a 40-minute tour at a Taiwanese university in which two Taiwanese students acted as guides for one American professor. The resulting analysis revealed the guided visitor’s active role in determining departure from focal objects through deployment of assessments and bodily movements. This study supports findings from previous research on various languages by providing empirical evidence that the following two phenomena are highly consistent across languages and that they hold true even in lingua franca interaction: (1) assessments are routinely deployed to close a sequence; and (2) assessments are made recognizable as initiating closings when they act in concert with sequential positioning, bodily movements, the environmental context, and objects in the immediate surround.
Keywords: conversation analysis, lingua franca, guided tour, mobility turn, assessments, embodied departure, Japanese
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Conversational closing
  • Closing implicative assessments
  • Interaction in mobile situations
  • Mobility and guided tours
  • Data
  • Analysis
    • Assessments at departure from focal objects
    • Assessments that resume closing
  • Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 28 June 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.16033.hos
References
Antaki, Charles
2002 “ ‘Lovely’: Turn-Initial High-Grade Assessments in Telephone Closings.” Discourse Studies 41: 5–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antaki, Charles, Hanneke Houtkoop-Steenstra, and Mark Rapley
2000 “ ‘Brilliant. Next Question…’: High-Grade Assessment Sequences in the Completion of Interactional Units.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 331: 235–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Best, Katie
2012 “Making Museum Tours Better: Understanding What a Guided Tour Really Is and What a Tour Guide Really Does.” Museum Management and Curatorship 271: 35–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bolden, Galina
2008 “Reopening Russian Conversations: The Discourse Particle -to and the Negotiation of Interpersonal Accountability in Closings.” Human Communication Research 341: 99–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broth, Mathias, and Fredrik Lundström
2013 “A Walk on the Pier: Establishing Relevant Places in Mobile Instruction.” In Interaction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion, ed. by Pentti Haddington, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 91–122. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Broth, Mathias, and Lorenza Mondada
2013 “Walking Away: The Embodied Achievement of Activity Closings in Mobile Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 471: 41–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burdelski, Matthew
2016 “ We-Focused and I-Focused Stories of World War II in Guided Tours at a Japanese American Museum.” Discourse & Society 271: 156–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burdelski, Matthew, Michie Kawashima, and Keichi Yamazaki
2014 “Storytelling in Guided Tours: Practices, Engagement, and Identity at a Japanese American Museum.” Narrative Inquiry 241: 328–346. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Button, Graham
1987 “Moving Out of Closings.” In Talk and Social Organization, ed. by Graham Button and John R. E. Lee, 101–151. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
De Stefani, Elwys, and Lorenza Mondada
2014 “Reorganizing Mobile Formations: When ‘Guided’ Participants Initiate Reorientations in Guided Tours.” Space and Culture 17(2): 157–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dersley, Ian, and Antony J. Wootton
2001 “In the Heart of the Sequence: Interactional Features Preceding Walkouts from Argumentative Talk.” Language in Society 301: 611–638. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drew, Paul, and Elizabeth Holt
1998 “Figures of Speech: Figurative Expressions and the Management of Topic Transition in Conversation.” Language and Society 271: 495–522 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1963 Behavior in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Jo Ann
2004 “The Amplitude Shift Mechanism in Conversational Closing Sequences.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 257–297. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
1984 “Notes on Story Structure and the Organization of Participation.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 225–246. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
1986 “Between and Within: Alternative Treatments of Continuers and Assessments.” Human Studies 91: 205–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000 “Action and Embodiment within Situated Human Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 321: 1489–1522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 “Environmentally Coupled Gestures.” In Gesture and the Dynamic Dimensions of Language, ed. by Susan D. Duncan, Justine Cassell, and Elena Levy, 195–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Marjorie Harness Goodwin
1987 “Concurrent Operations on Talk: Notes on the Interactive Organization of Assessments.” Pragmatics 11: 1–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992 “Assessments and the Construction of Context.” In Rethinking Context, ed. by Alessandro Duranti and Charles Goodwin, 147–189. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haddington, Pentti, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile
(eds.) 2013 Interaction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayano, Kaoru
2011 “Claiming Epistemic Primacy: Yo-Marked Assessments in Japanese.” In The morality of knowledge in conversation, ed. by Tanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jacob Steensig, 58–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heritage, John
1984 “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2002 “Oh-Prefaced Responses to Assessments: A Method of Modifying Agreement/Disagreement.” In The language of Turn and Sequence, ed. by Cecilia Ford, Barbara Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson, 196–224. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, John, and Geoffrey Raymond
2005 “The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction.” Social Psychology Quarterly 681: 15–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laurier, Eric
2008 “Drinking up Endings: Conversational Resources of the Café.” Language & Communication 281: 165–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindström, Anna, and Trine Heinemann
2009 “Good Enough: Low-Grade Assessments in Caregiving Situations.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 421: 309–328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindström, Anna, and Lorenza Mondada
2009 “Assessments in Social Interaction: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 421: 299–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Llewellyn, Nick, and Carly W. Butler
2011 “Walking out on Air.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 441: 44–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McIlvenny, Paul, Mathias Broth, and Pentti Haddington
2009 “Communicating Place, Space and Mobility.” Journal of Pragmatics 411: 1879–1886. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mehan, Hugh
1979 Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza
2009 “The Embodied and Negotiated Production of Assessments in Instructed Actions.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 421: 329–361. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011 “Understanding as an embodied, situated and sequential achievement in interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 431: 542–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 “Garden Lessons: Embodied Action and Joint Attention in Extended Sequences.” In Interaction and Everyday Life: Phenomenological and Ethnomethodological Essays in Honor of George Psathas, ed. by Hisashi Nasu, and Frances Chaput Waksler, 279–296. Plymouth: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
2013 “Displaying, Contesting and Negotiating Epistemic Authority in Social Interaction: Descriptions and Questions in Guided Visits.” Discourse Studies 151: 597–626. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017 “Walking and Talking Together: Questions/Answers and Mobile Participation in Guided Visits.” Social Science Information 561: 220–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita
1975 Second Assessments: A Study of Some Features of Agreement/ Disagreement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
1978 “Compliment Responses: Notes on the Co-Operation of Multiple Constraints.” In Studies in the Organization of Conversation Interaction, ed. by Jim Schenkein, 79–112. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1984 “Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/Dispreferred Turn Shapes.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 57–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Psathas, George
1995 Conversation Analysis: The Study of Talk in Interaction. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raymond, Geoffrey, and John Heritage
2006 “The Epistemics of Social Relations: Owning Grandchildren.” Language in Society 351: 677–705. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1987a “Analyzing Single Episodes of Interaction: An Exercise in Conversation Analysis.” Social Psychology Quarterly 501: 101–114. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1987b “Between Micro and Macro: Contexts and Other Connections.” In The Micro-Macro Link, ed. by Jeffrey C. Alexander, Bernhard Giesen, Richard Münch, and Neil J. Smelser, 207–234. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
1988 “On an Actual Virtual Servo-Mechanism for Guessing Bad News: A Single Case Conjecture.” Social Problems 351: 442–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007 Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Harvey Sacks
1973 “Opening up Closings.” Semiotica 81: 289–327. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, and Federico Rossano
2010 “A Scalar View of Response Relevance.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 431: 49–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen
2013 “Interaction and the Living Body.” Journal of Pragmatics 461: 69–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tuncer, Sylvaine
2015 “Walking Away: An Embodied Resource to Close Informal Encounters in Offices.” Journal of Pragmatics 761: 101–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
vom Lehn, Dirk
2013 “Withdrawing from Exhibits: The Interactional Organization of Museum Visits.” In Interaction and Mobility: Language and the Body in Motion, ed. by Pentti Haddington, Lorenza Mondada, and Maurice Nevile, 65–90. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whalen, Jack, Don H. Zimmerman, and Marilyn R. Whalen
1988 “When Words Fail: A Single Case Analysis.” Social Problems 351: 335–359. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waring, Hansun Zhang
2009 “Moving out of IRF (Initiation-Response-Feedback): A Single Case Analysis.” Language Learning 591: 796–824. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Burdelski, Matthew & Chie Fukuda
2019. Multimodal membership categorization and storytelling in a guided tour. Pragmatics and Society 10:3 ► pp. 337 ff. DOI logo
Hosoda, Yuri & David Aline
2021. Establishing joint attention with multimodal resources in lingua franca guided tours. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 31 ► pp. 100547 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 10 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.