Article published In:
Pragmatics and Society: Online-First Articles

When the discourse of strategy meets the discourse of spirituality

A study of the recontextualization of strategy discourse in a Church organization

ORCID logo | Aalto University School of BusinessEspoo
 | University of JyväskyläJyväskylä
A well-established body of research in organizational studies shows how business-oriented strategy discourse has spread to different organizations and to society at large. Drawing insights from this research, we in this paper study how strategy discourse intertwines with the spiritual and religious discourse in a specific case of a Finnish Church organization. The interdiscursive analysis focuses on the Church’s formal strategy text, employees’ written reflections regarding the implementation of the strategy, and one-on-one leadership conversations where the manager-employee dyads discussed these texts. Thus, the data set makes a rare case of an intertextual chain of text and talk through which strategy discourse was recontextualized from the field of strategic management to a religious realm. Our analysis specifically highlights how both the organization of textual practices and the conversational practices — and their orchestration — contribute to the transfer and transformation, i.e., recontextualization of strategy discourse.
Keywords: recontextualization, strategy discourse, interdiscursivity, text, conversation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The recontextualization of strategy discourse
  • 3.Data and methods
  • 4.Findings
    • 4.1Organizational strategy plan as the nexus of the discourses of strategy and religious spirituality
    • 4.2Strategy and spirituality in written documentation of personal strategic goals
    • 4.3Connecting spirituality to strategy in leadership conversations
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 21 November 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.20038.pal
References (31)
References
Aggerholm, Helle, Birte Asmuß, and Christa Thomsen. 2012. “The role of recontextualization in the multivocal, ambiguous process of strategizing.” Journal of Management Inquiry 211: 413–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Antaki, Charles. 1994. Explaining and Arguing: The Social Organization of Accounts. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay. 2010. “Interdiscursivity in professional communication.” Discourse and Communication 41: 32–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duvallon, Outi, and Sara Routarinne. 2005. “Parenthesis as a resource in the grammar of conversation.” In Syntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-interaction, ed. by Auli Hakulinen and Margret Selting, 45–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2003. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. “Discourse Analysis in Organization Studies: The Case for Critical Realism.” Organization Studies 261: 915–939. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greckhamer, Thomas, and Sebnem Cilesiz. 2022. “The extension of strategic management discourse into public education administration: A critical analysis.” Organization 291: 619–652. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hepburn, Alexa, and Galina B. Bolden. (2012). “The conversation analytic approach to transcription.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 57–76. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Houtkoop, Hanneke. 1987. Establishing Agreement: An Analysis of Proposal-acceptance Sequences. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jalonen, Kari, Henri Schildt, and Eero Vaara. 2018. “Strategic concepts as micro-level tools in strategic sensemaking.” Strategic Management Journal 391: 2794–2826. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knights, David, and Glenn Morgan. 1991. “Strategic Discourse and Subjectivity: Towards a Critical Analysis of Corporate Strategy in Organizations.” Organization Studies 121: 251–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kornberger, Martin. 2012. “Governing the City. From Planning to Urban Strategy.” Theory, Culture and Society 291: 84–106. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kornberger, Martin, and Stewart Clegg, S. 2011. “Strategy as performative practice: The case of Sydney 2030.” Strategic Organization 91: 136–162. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lilley, Simon. 2001. “The language of strategy”. In The Language of Organization, ed. by Robert Westwood, and Stephen Linstead, 66–88. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linell, Per. 1998. “Discourse across boundaries: On recontextualizations and the blending of voices in professional discourse.” Text 181: 143–157.Google Scholar
Mantere, Saku. 2013. “What Is Organizational Strategy? A Language-Based View.” Journal of Management Studies 501: 1408–1426. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mantere, Saku, and Eero Vaara. 2008. “On the problem of participation in strategy: A critical discursive perspective.” Organization Science 191: 341–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Penttilä, Visa. 2020. “Aspirational talk in strategy texts: A longitudinal case study of strategic episodes in corporate social responsibility communication.” Business and Society 591: 67–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pälli, Pekka. 2018. “Ascribing materiality and agency to strategy in interaction: A language-based approach to the material agency of strategy.” Long Range Planning 511: 436–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pälli, Pekka, Eero Vaara, and Virpi Sorsa. 2009. “Strategy as text and discursive practice: a genre-based approach to strategizing in city administration.” Discourse and Communication. 31: 303–318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paroutis, Sotirios, and Loizos Heracleous. 2013. “Discourse Revisited: Dimensions and Employment of First-Order Strategy Discourse During Institutional Adoption.” Strategic Management Journal 341: 935–956. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita, and John Heritage. 2012. “Preference.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 210–228. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samra-Fredericks, Dalvir. 2005. “Strategic practice, ‘discourse’ and the everyday international constitution of “power effects”. Organization 121: 803–841. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spee, Paul and Paula Jarzabkowski. 2011. “Strategic planning as communicative process.” Organization Studies 321: 1217–1245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stevanovic, Melisa. 2012. “Establishing joint decisions in a dyad.” Discourse Studies 141: 779–803. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2012. “Sequence organization.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 191–209. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vaara, Eero. 2010. “Taking the linguistic turn seriously: Strategy as a multifaceted and interdiscursive phenomenon.” In The globalization of strategy research: Advances in strategic management Vol. 271, ed. by Joel Baum and Joseph Lampel, 29–50. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vaara, Eero, Virpi Sorsa, and Pekka Pälli. 2010. “On the force potential of strategy texts: a critical discourse analysis of a strategic plan and its power effects in a city organization.” Organization 171: 685–702. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vaara, Eero, and Richard Whittington. 2012. “Strategy-as-Practice: Taking Social Practices Seriously.” The Academy of Management Annals 61: 1–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vásquez, Consuelo, Nicolas Bencherki, Francois Cooren, and Viviane Sergi. 2018. “From ‘matters of concern’ to ‘matters of authority’: Studying the performativity of strategy from a communicative constitution of organization (CCO) approach.” Long Range Planning 511: 417–435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar