Speaker intention is conceptualized as a property of utterances in context, not speakers; it is based on communally shared knowledge of discursive means to ends. The article’s main theoretical claim is that utterances, in addition to being produced with an intention about their pragmatic meaning, are also produced with an intention to bring about some post-interactional end result. Both types of intention bear on the utterance’s pragmatic meaning. Empirical aspects of the theoretical difference between these two types of speaker intention are shown through analysis of naturally occurring interactions; here, the analytical focus is on the scope, interdependence, recognizability, and fulfillment of each type of intention, with special attention to the functionality of an utterance’s content, composition, and sequential placement as a means of getting a response from the interlocutor(s) that goes along with what the speaker intends as regards the end result of the interaction.
2001“The Semantics of ‘Okay’ (OK) in Nigerian English.” World Englishes20 (1): 89–98.
Austin, John L
1962How to Do Things with Words. New York: Oxford University Press.
Austin, John L
1966“Three Ways of Spilling Ink.” The Philosophical Review75 (4): 427–440.
Bach, Kent
2006Impliciture vs. Explicature: What’s the Difference?Available: [URL].
Bakhtin, Mikhail M
1986Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. (Trans. byVern W. McGee and Ed. byCaryl Emerson & Michael Holquist). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bauman, Richard, and Joel Scherzer
(eds)1974Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bianchi, Claudia
(ed.)2004The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction. Stanford, Calif.: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Capone, Alessandro
2005 “Pragmemes (A Study with Reference to English and Italian).” Journal of Pragmatics37 (9): 1355–1371.
Cicourel, Aaron
1987 “On John R. Searle’s Intentionality.” Journal of Pragmatics111: 641–660.
Clark, Herbert H
2004 “Pragmatics of Language Performance.” InThe Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. byLaurence R. Horn and Gregory Ward, 365–382. Malden, Mass: Blackwell.
Drew, Paul
1992 “Contested Evidence in Courtroom Cross-Examination: The Case of a Trial for Rape.” InTalk at Work: Interactions in Institutional Settings, ed. byPaul Drew and John Heritage, 470–520. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Drew, Paul, and Kathy Chilton
2000 “Calling Just to Keep in Touch: Regular and Habitualised Telephone Calls as an Environment for Small Talk.” InSmall Talk, ed. byJustine Coupland, 137–162. Harlow, UK: Longman.
Goffman, Erving
1959The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
Grice, H. Paul
1957 “Meaning”. Philosophical Review661: 377–388.
Grice, H. Paul
1975 “Logic and Conversation.” InSyntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, ed. byP. Cole and J.L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
Grice, H. Paul
1989Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Gumperz, John
1982Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haugh, Michael
(ed.)2008Intention in Pragmatics (Special issue of Intercultural Pragmatics, v. 5 no. 2). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Haugh, Michael, and Kasia M. Jaszczolt
2012 “Speaker Intentions and Intentionality”. InThe Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. byKeith Allan and Kasia M. Jaszczolt, 87–112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, John, and Steven Clayman
2010Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions (“Gatekeeping and Entitlement to Emergency Service”, pp.69–86). Chichester, UK & Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell.
Horn, Lawrence R
2001A Natural History of Negation. Stanford, Calif.: Center for the Study of Language and Information. (Originally published 1989, University of Chicago Press). Available: [URL].
Hymes, Dell
1974Foundations of Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Jaszczolt, Kasia
2005Default Semantics: Foundations of a Compositional Theory of Acts of Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kecskes, Istvan
2000 “A Cognitive-Pragmatic Approach to Situation-Bound Utterances.” Journal of Pragmatics32 (5): 605–625.
Levinson, Stephen C
1992 “Activity Types and Language.” InTalk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings, ed. byPaul Drew and John Heritage, 66–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, Stephen C
2000Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Levinson, Stephen C
2012 “Action Formation and Ascription.” InHandbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. byJack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers, 103–130. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Mey, Jacob
2001Pragmatics: An Introduction.2nd ed. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
Philipsen, Gerry
1975“Speaking “Like a Man” in Teamsterville: Cultural Patterns of Role-Enactment in an Urban Neighborhood.” Quarterly Journal of Speech621: 13–22.
Pomerantz, Anita, and John Heritage
2012 “Preference”. InThe Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. byJack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 210–228. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Rosaldo, Michelle
1982“The Things We Do with Words: Ilongot Speech Acts and Speech Act Theory in Philosophy.” Language in Society111: 203–237.
Sanders, Robert E
1987Cognitive Foundations of Calculated Speech: Controlling Understandings in Conversation and Persuasion. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press.
Sanders, Robert E
1997“The Production of Symbolic Objects as Components of Larger Wholes.” InMessage Production: Advances in Communication Theory, ed. byJohn O. Greene, 245–277. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Sanders, Robert E
2003“Conversational Socializing on Marine VHF Radio: Adapting Laughter and Other Practices to the Technology in Use”. InStudies in Language and Social Interaction, ed. byPhillip Glenn, Curt LeBaron, and Jenny Mandelbaum, 309–326. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
1977Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Schegloff, Emanuel A
1988“Presequences and Indirection: Applying Speech Act Theory to Ordinary Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics121: 55–62.
Schegloff, Emanuel A
1995“Discourse as an Interactional Achievement III: The Omnirelevance of Action.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 281 (no. 3, Special Issue, Co-construction, ed. by Sally Jacoby & Elinor Ochs): 185–211.
Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Gene H. Lerner
2009 “Beginning to Respond: Well-Prefaced Responses to Wh-questions.” Research on Language and Social Interaction42 (2): 91–115.
Scollon, Ron, and Susan B.K. Scollon
1981Narrative, Literacy, and Face in Interethnic Communication. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.
Searle, John R
1969Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. London: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, John R
1976“A Classification of Illocutionary Acts.” Language in Society51: 1–23.
Searle, John R
1983Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, Carolyn E
1995“You Think it was a Fight?”: Co-Constructing (the struggle for) Meaning, Face, and Family in Everyday Narrative Activity. Research on Language and Social Interaction 281 (no. 3, Special Issue: Co-construction, ed. by Sally Jacoby & Elinor Ochs): 283–317.
Varonis, Evangeline M., and Susan Gass
1985 “Miscommunication in Native/Nonnative Conversation.” Language in Society141: 327–343.
2021. Speaker Meaning, Commitment and Accountability. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 48 ff.
Elder, Chi-Hé & David Beaver
2022. “We’re running out of fuel!”: When does miscommunication go unrepaired?. Intercultural Pragmatics 19:5 ► pp. 541 ff.
Elder, Chi-Hé & Michael Haugh
2018. The interactional achievement of speaker meaning: Toward a formal account of conversational inference. Intercultural Pragmatics 15:5 ► pp. 593 ff.
[no author supplied]
2021. Fundamentals of Sociopragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ► pp. 13 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.