Article published in:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 19:1 (2021) ► pp. 80110
References
Allan, K.
(2009) Metaphor and metonymy: A diachronic approach. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Arnold, J. E., Kaiser, E., Kahn, J. M., & Kim, L. K.
(2013) Information structure: Linguistic, cognitive, and processing approaches. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4(4), 403–413. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Black, M.
(1954) Metaphor. Paper presented at the meetings of the Aristotelian Society.
Bowdle, B. F., & Gentner, D.
(2005) The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112(1), 193–216. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Broccias, C.
(2013) Cognitive Grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 165–185). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L.
(2010) Language, usage and cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L. J.
(1999a) Identifying and describing metaphor in spoken discourse data. In G. Low & L. Cameron (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 105–132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999b) Operationalising ‘metaphor’ for applied linguistic research. In G. Low & L. Cameron (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 3–28). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007a) Confrontation or complementarity?: Metaphor in language use and cognitive metaphor theory. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 5(1), 107–135. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007b) Patterns of metaphor use in reconciliation talk. Discourse & Society, 18(2), 197–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L. J., & Deignan, A.
(2006) The emergence of metaphor in discourse. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 671–690. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, L. J., Maslen, R., Todd, Z., Maule, J., Stratton, P., & Stanley, N.
(2009) The discourse dynamics approach to metaphor and metaphor-led discourse analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 24(2), 63–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coulson, S., & Oakley, T.
(2000) Blending basics. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(3/4), 175–196.Google Scholar
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A.
(2004) Cognitive Linguistics. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Deignan, A.
(2005) Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Corpus linguistics and metaphor. In R. W. J. Gibbs (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought (pp. 280–294). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G.
(1997) Mappings in thought and language. Cambridg & New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2001) Conceptual blending. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 2495–2498). Oxford: Pergamon. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2018) Ten lectures on cognitive construction of meaning. Leiden & Boston: Brill. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M.
(1996) Blending as a central process of grammar. In A. Goldberg (Ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse, and language (pp. 113–129). Stanford: Center for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
(1998) Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2002) The way we think : Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gibbs, J. R. W.
(2010) The dynamic complexities of metaphor interpretation. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada, 261, 657–677. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Evaluating Conceptual Metaphor Theory. Discourse Processes, 48(8), 528–564. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2013) The real complexities of psycholinguistic research on metaphor. Language Sciences, 401, 45–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, J. R. W., & Cameron, L. J.
(2008) The social-cognitive dynamics of metaphor performance. Cognitive Systems Research, 9(1), 64–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, J. R. W., & Colston, H. L.
(2012) Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, J. R. W., & Santa Cruz, M. J.
(2012) Temporal unfolding of conceptual metaphoric experience. Metaphor and Symbol, 27(4), 299–311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grady, J.
(2005) Primary metaphors as inputs to conceptual integration. Journal of Pragmatics, 371, 1595–1614. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2007) Metaphor. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 188–213). New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grady, J., Oakley, T., & Coulson, S.
(1999) Blending and metaphor. In G. Steen & R. Gibbs (Eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 101–124). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. T.
(2013) 50-something years of work on collocations: What is or should be next …. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18(1), 137–165. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019) 15 years of collostructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 24(3), 385–412. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. T., & Stefanowitsch, A.
(2004) Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 97–129. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gundel, J. K., & Fretheim, T.
(2009) Information strucuture. In F. Brisard, J.-O. Ostman, & J. Verschueren (Eds.), Grammar, meaning and pragmatics (pp. 146–160). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefRetrieved from http://​site​.ebrary​.com​/lib​/ascc​/Doc​?id​=10335311
Hilpert, M.
(2006) Distinctive collexemes and diachrony. Corpus Linguistics & Linguistic Theory, 2(2), 243–256. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Germanic future constructions: A usage-based approach to language change. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kövecses, Z.
(2015) Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, K.
(1994) Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manning, C. D., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J., Bethard, S. J., & McClosky, D.
(2014) The Stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. Paper presented at The 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations. Crossref
Müller, C.
(2008) Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking: A dynamic view. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, C., & Schmitt, C.
(2015) Audio-visual metaphors of the financial crisis: meaning making and the flow of experience. Revista Brasileira de Lingüística Aplicada, 151, 311–342. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, C., & Tag, S.
(2010) The dynamics of metaphor: Foregrounding and activating metaphoricity in conversational interaction Cognitive Semiotics , 10(6), pp. 85–120). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spivey, M. J.
(2007) The continuity of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A., & Gries, S. T.
(2003) Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 8(2), 209–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tang, X.
(2017) Lexeme-based collexeme analysis with DepCluster. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 13(1), 165–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tang, X., & Liu, G.
(2018) Solving contradictions in semantic prosody analysis with prosody concord. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 23(4), 437–466. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. B.
(2002) Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Trausdale, G.
(2014) Constructionalization and constructional changes. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, M. B.
(2008) Frame blending. In R. R. Favretti (Ed.), Frames, corpora, and knowledge representation (pp. 13–32). Bologna: Bononia University Press.Google Scholar
Van Valin, R. D., & LaPolla, R. J.
(2002 (1997)) Syntax: Structure, meaning and function. Beijing: Beijing University Press.Google Scholar