Article published in:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 19:2 (2021) ► pp. 429464
References

References

Bybee, J. L.
(1988) The diachronic dimension in explanation. In J. A. Hawkins (Ed.), Explaining language universals (pp. 350–379). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2001) Phonology and language use. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. L., Perkins, R. D., & Pagliuca, W.
(1994) The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
[ p. 462 ]
Chafe, W.
(2005) The relation of grammar to thought. In C. S. Butler, M. d. l. Á. Gómez-González & S. M. Doval-Suárez (Eds.), The dynamics of language use: Functional and contrastive perspectives (pp. 57–78). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2008) Syntax as a repository of historical relics. In A. Bergs & G. Diewald (Eds.), Constructions and language change (pp. 261–268). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
(2013) Toward a thought-based linguistics. In S. T. Bischoff & C. Jany (Eds.), Functional approaches to language (pp. 107–130). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1957) Syntactic structures. Berlin: Mouton. The Hague. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1975) Reflections on language. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
(1995) The minimalist program. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clark, A.
(1997) Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N.
(1990) The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In J. Kingston & M. E. Beckman (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology: Between the grammar and physics of speech (pp. 283–333). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, W.
(1991) Syntactic categories and grammatical relations: The cognitive organization of information. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(2000) Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. London: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
(2007) The origins of grammar in the verbalization of experience. Cognitive Linguistics, 18(3), 339–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crothers, J.
(1978) Typology and universals of vowel systems. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language, volume 2: Phonology (pp. 93–152). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Du Bois, J. W.
(1985) Competing motivations. In J. Haiman (Ed.), Iconicity in syntax (pp. 343–365). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, V.
(2003) The structure of time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T.
(1979) On understanding grammar. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C., & Jacobs, H.
(2017) Understanding phonology. London/New York: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
(1999) Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1985) Observations and speculations on subjectivity. In J. Haiman (Ed.), Iconicity in syntax (pp. 109–150). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 463 ]
(1987a) Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites (Vol. 1). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(1987b) Nouns and verbs. Language, 63(1), 53–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1990) Subjectification. Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 5–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1993) Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1), 1–38. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1995) Viewing in cognition and grammar. In P. W. Davis (Ed.), Alternative linguistics: Descriptive and theoretical modes (pp. 153–212). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1999) Losing control: Grammaticization, subjectification, and transparency. In A. Blank & P. Koch (Eds.), Historical semantics and cognition (pp. 147–175). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) Grammar and conceptualization. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2008) Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2015) How to build an English clause. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 1–45. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2016) Baseline and elaboration. Cognitive Linguistics, 27(3), 405–439. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2019) Levels of reality. Languages, 4(2). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liljencrants, J., & Lindblom, B.
(1972) Numerical simulation of vowel quality systems: The role of perceptual contrast. Language, 48(4), 839–862. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, B.
(1990) Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In W. J. Hardcastle & A. Marchal (Eds.), Speech production and speech modelling (pp. 403–439). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, B., & Engstrand, O.
(1989) In what sense is speech quantal? Journal of Phonetics, 17(1–2), 107–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mandler, J. M.
(2004) The foundations of mind: Origins of conceptual thought. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J.
(1992) Alternatives to the sonority hierarchy for explaining segmental sequential constraints. In M. Ziolkowski, K. Deaton & M. Noske (Eds.), Papers from the parasession on the syllable in phonetics and phonology (pp. 319–338). Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Piaget, J.
(1995) Egocentric thought and sociocentric thought. In L. Smith (Ed.), Sociological studies (pp. 276–286). London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rochat, P.
(2003) Five levels of self-awareness as they unfold early in life. Consciousness and Cognition, 12(4), 717–731. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2010) Emerging self-concept. In J. G. Bremner & T. D. Wachs (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of infant development (Vol. 1, pp. 320–344). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sandler, J., Person, E. S., & Fonagy, P.
(Eds.) (2012) Freud’s “on narcissism: An introduction”. London: Karnac Books.Google Scholar
[ p. 464 ]
Stern, D. N.
(1998) The interpersonal world of the infant: A view from psychoanalysis and developmental psychology. London: Karnac Books.Google Scholar
Suleiman, C.
(2010) Contending visions of Arabic linguistics and their historical roots. Middle East Critique, 19(2), 115–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C.
(2010) (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In K. Davidse, L. Vandelanotte & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization (pp. 29–71). Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. B.
(2002) Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E.
(1991) The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar