Review published in:
Review of Cognitive Linguistics
Vol. 19:2 (2021) ► pp. 596601
References

References

Divjak, D., & Arppe, A.
(2013) Extracting prototypes from exemplars: What can corpus data tell us about concept representation? Cognitive Linguistics 24(2), 221–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Evans, V.
(2019) Cognitive Linguistics A complete guide (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.
(1993) Quantitative studies and probabilities in grammar. In M. Hoey (Ed.), Data, description, discourse: Papers on the English language in honour of John McH. Sinclair (pp. 1–25). London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Isac, D., & Reiss, C.
(2013) I-Language: An introduction to linguistics as cognitive science (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Janda, L. A.
(2013) Quantitative methods in Cognitive Linguistics: An introduction. In L. A. Janda (ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: The quantitative turn (pp. 1–32). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Köhler, R.
(2012) Quantitative syntax analysis. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H.
(2008) Dependency distance as a metric of language comprehension difficulty. Journal of Cognitive Science 9(2), 159–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2017) An introduction to quantitative linguistics. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Liu, H., Xu, C., & Liang, J.
(2017) Dependency distance: A new perspective on syntactic patterns innatural languages. Physics of Life Reviews, 21, 171–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Müller, S.
(2018) Grammatical theory: From transformational grammar to constraint-based approaches (2nd ed.). Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Pothos, E. M., & Wills, A. J.
(Eds.) (2011) Formal approaches in categorization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmid, H.-J.
(2000) English abstract nouns as conceptual shells: From corpus to cognition. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2020) The dynamics of the linguistic system: Usage, conventionalization, and entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. D.
(2014) Prototypes, exemplars, and the natural history of categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21(2), 312–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A., & Flach, S.
(2017) The corpus-based perspective on entrenchment. In H.-J. Schmid (Ed.), Entrenchment and the psychology of language learning: How we reorganize and adapt linguistic knowledge (pp. 101–127). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vanpaemel, W., & Storms, G.
(2008) In search of abstraction: The varying abstraction model of categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(4), 732–749. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 601 ]