Article published In:
Living Metaphors and Metonymies
Edited by Mario Brdar and Rita Brdar-Szabó
[Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20:1] 2022
► pp. 104129
References
Barcelona, A.
(2003) The case for a metonymic basis of pragmatic inferencing. Evidence from jokes and funny anecdotes. In K. U. Panther & L. Thornburg (Eds.) Metonymy and pragmatic inferencing (pp. 81–122). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004) Metonymy behind grammar: The motivation of the seemingly “irregular” grammatical behavior of English paragon names. In G. Radden & K-U Panther (Eds.) Studies in Linguistic Motivation (pp. 357–374). Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(2008) The multilevel operation of metonymy in grammar and discourse, with particular attention to metonymic chains. In F. Ruiz de Mendoza & M. S. Peña (Eds.) Cognitive linguistics: Internal dynamics and interdisciplinary interaction (pp. 313–352). Berlin & New York: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Barnden, J. A.
(2010) Metaphor and metonymy: Making their connections more slippery. Cognitive Linguistics, 21(1) 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) Open-ended elaborations in creative metaphor. In T. R. Besold, M. Schorlemmer & A. Smaill (Eds.), Computational creativity research: Towards creative machines (pp. 217–242). Paris: Atlantis Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2016) Mixed metaphor: Its depth, its breadth, and a pretence-based approach. R. Gibbs (Ed.), Mixing metaphor (pp. 75–111). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barnden, J. A., Glasbey, S. R., Lee, M. G., & Wallington, A. M.
(2003) Domain-transcending mappings in a system for metaphorical reasoning. In Conference Companion to the 10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL 2003), 57–61, Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brdar, M.
(2018) Novel metonymies, wine and wineskins, old and new ones. In S. Gudurić & B. Radić-Bojanić (Eds.), Jezici i kulture u vremenu i prostoru VII/1 (pp. 123–134). Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet/Pedagoško društvo Vojvodine.Google Scholar
Carter, R.
(2015) Language and creativity: The art of common talk (2nd ed.). London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Colston, H. L., & Gibbs, R. W.
(2021) Figurative language communicates directly because it precisely demonstrates what we mean. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feng, W. D.
(2017) Metonymy and visual representation: Towards a social semiotic framework of visual metonymy. Visual Communication, 16(4), 441–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frisson, S., & Pickering, M. J.
(1999) The processing of metonymy: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(6), 1366.Google Scholar
(2007) The processing of familiar and novel senses of a word: Why reading Dickens is easy but reading Needham can be hard. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(4), 595–613. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuoli, M., Littlemore, J., & Turner, S.
(2022)  Sunken ships and screaming banshees: metaphor and evaluation in film reviews. English Language and Linguistics, 26(1), 75–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Genovesi, C.
(2020) Metaphor and what is meant: Metaphorical content, what is said, and contextualism. Journal of Pragmatics, 1571, 17–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grady, J.
(1997) Foundations of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Retrieved from [URL]
Hidalgo Downing, L. & Kraljevic Mujic, B.
(2020) Performing metaphoric creativity across modes and contexts. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keskinen, M.
(2002) Hearing voices in dreams: Freud’s tossing and turning with speech and writing. PsyArt: A Hyperlink Journal for Psychological Study of the Arts, 6(1).Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M.
(1980) Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M.
(2009) More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago press.Google Scholar
Littlemore, J.
(2015) Metonymy: Hidden shortcuts in language, thought and communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Littlemore, J., & Tagg, C.
(2018) Metonymy and text messaging: A framework for understanding creative uses of metonymy. Applied Linguistics, 391, 481–507.Google Scholar
Littlemore, J., Turner, S., & Tuck, P.
(2022) Creative metaphor, emotion and evaluation in conversations about work. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pérez-Sobrino, P., Semino, E., Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I., Koller, V., & Olza, I.
(2021) Acting like a hedgehog in times of pandemic: Metaphorical creativity in the #ReframeCovid collection. Metaphor and Symbol.Google Scholar
Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z.
(1999) Towards a theory of metonymy. In K. Panther and G. Radden (Eds.), Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 17–60). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J.
(2012) The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R., Cabrelli Amaro, J., & Kang, S. K.
(2013) Regular and novel metonymy in native Korean, Spanish, and English: Experimental evidence for various acceptability. Metaphor and Symbol, 28(4), 275–293. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R., Cabrelli Amaro, J., & Kyun Kang, S.
(2016) Regular and novel metonymy: Can you curl up with a good Agatha Christie in your second language? Applied Linguistics, 37(2), 175–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Herwegen, J., Dimitriou, D., & Rundblad, G.
(2013) Development of novel metaphor and metonymy comprehension in typically developing children and Williams syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(4), 1300–1311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar