Variability in French word-final schwa
Effects of focus and speaker
The production of schwa in French is highly variable. Some of this variability is predictable based on sociolinguistic (e.g., dialects), phonological (e.g., segments, word position), and stylistic (e.g., reading) factors. We investigate the effect of prosodic structure on the production of word-final schwa in Parisian French, while controlling for the other factors. We also investigate variability in schwa production within and between speakers of the same variety. Our findings show that prosody does affect the production of schwa: the stronger the prosodic boundary, the more probable schwa production is. While this is true for all the speakers, we also found considerable variation in the rates of schwa production, despite our controlling for dialect and style.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.French schwa
- 3.Present study
- 4.Method
- 4.1Participants
- 4.2Stimuli
- 4.3Procedure
- 4.4Analyses
- 5.Results
- 6.Discussion
- 7.Conclusions
-
References
References (24)
References
Bayles, A., A. Kaplan, and A. Kaplan. 2016. “Inter- and Intra-speaker Variation in French Schwa.” Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 1 (1): 19, 1–30.
Carton, F. 1999. “L’épithèse vocalique en français contemporain: étude phonétique.” Faits de Langue 13: 35–45.
Côté, M.-H. 2001. “Schwa Deletion and Epenthesis in French.” In Consonant Cluster Phonotactics: A Perceptual Approach, ed. by M.-H. Côté, 79–133. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.
Côté, M.-H. 2007. “Le rôle des représentations sous-jacentes et des contraintes de surface dans la distribution de différentes catégories de schwa en français.” In Schwa(s): 5e Journées d’études linguistiques de Nantes, 205–210. Université de Nantes.
Dell, F. 1985. Les règles et les sons. Coll. Savoir, Paris: Hermann.
Dell, F. 1977. “Parametres syntaxiques et phonologiques qui favorisent 1’epenthese de schwa en franqais moderne.” In Actes du Colloque franco-allemand de linguistique thorique, ed. by C. Rohrer, 141–153. Tiibingen: Niemeyer.
Eychenne, J. 2005. “The Emergence of Prosodic Schwa in French.” Presentation at Bilbao-Deusto Student Conference in Linguistics.
Eychenne, J. 2006. “Aspects de la phonologie du schwa dans le français contemporain: Optimalité, visibilité prosodique, gradience.” Université de Toulouse-Le Mirail dissertation.
Eychenne, J. 2009. “La pronunciation du français au Pays Basque.” In Phonologie, variation et accents du français, ed. by J. Durand, B. Laks, and C. Lyche, 231–258. Paris: Hermès.
Eychenne, J. 2015. “Observations on the Phonetic Realization of Opaque Schwa in Southern French.” Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 21 (3): 457–494.
Fónagy, I. 1989. “Le français change de visage?” Revue Romane 24 (2): 225–254.
Hansen, A. B. 1994. “Etude du E caduc – stabilisation en cours et variations lexicales.” Journal of French Language Studies 4: 25–54.
Hansen, A. B. 1997. “Le nouveau [ә] prépausal dans le français parlé à Paris.” In Polyphonie pour Iván Fónagy, ed. by J. Perrot, 173–198. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Hansen, A. B., and M.-B. M. Hansen 2003. “Le [ә] prépausal et l’interaction.” In Structures linguistiques et interactionnelles dans le français parlé, ed. by A. B. Hansen, and M.-B. M. Hansen, 89–109. Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.
Lacheret, A., and C. Lyche 2008. “Looking at French Schwa through the Glasses of Prosody.” Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2008.
Léon, P. R. 1993. Précis de phonostylistique. Parole et expressivité. Paris: Nathan Université.
Lucci, V. 1983. Etude phonétique du français contemporain à travers la variation situationnelle: Débit, rythme, accent, intonation, ə muet, liaisons, phonèmes. Université des langues et lettres de Grenoble.
Pulgram, E. 1961. French /a/: Statics and Dynamics of Linguistic Subcodes.” Lingua 10: 305–325.
Pustka, E. 2009. “PFC et la phonologie du français en Vendee.” In Phonologie, Variation et accents du français, ed. by J. Durand, B. Laks, and C. Lyche, 307–335. Paris: Hermès.
Tranel, B. 2000. “Aspects de la phonologie du français et la théorie de l’optimalité.” Langue Française 126: 39–72.
Vogel, I., A. Athanasopoulou, and N. Pincus 2016. “Prominence, Contrast and the Functional Load Hypothesis: An Acoustic Investigation.” In Dimensions of phonological stress, ed. by J. Heinz, R. Goedemans, and H. van der Hulst, 123–167. Cambridge: University Press.
Walter, H. 1990. “Une voyelle qui ne veut pas mourir.” In Variation and Change in French. Essays Presented to Rebecca Posner on the Occasion of her Sixtieth Birthday, ed. by J. Green, and W. Ayres-Bennett, 27–36. London and New York: Routledge.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Zellou, Georgia, Ioana Chitoran & Ziqi Zhou
2023.
Real-time intelligibility affects the realization of French word-final schwa.
Speech Communication 152
► pp. 102962 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.