Part of
Romance Linguistics 2013: Selected papers from the 43rd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), New York, 17-19 April, 2013
Edited by Christina Tortora, Marcel den Dikken, Ignacio L. Montoya and Teresa O'Neill
[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 9] 2016
► pp. 361378
References (49)
References
Anderson, Stephen. 2005. Aspects of the Theory of Clitics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bafile, Laura. 1993. Fonologia prosodica e teoria metrica. PhD dissertation, University of Florence.Google Scholar
. 1994. “La riassegnazione postlessicale dell'accento nel napoletano.” Quaderni del dipartimento di linguistica dell’università degli studi di Firenze 5: 1-23.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola and Guglielmo Cinque. 1993. “Su alcune differenze tra enclisi e proclisi.” Omaggio a Gianfranco Folena, 2313-2326. Padova: Editoriale Programma.Google Scholar
Bolognesi, Roberto. 1998. The Phonology of Campidanian Sardinian: A Unitary Account of a Self-organizing Structure. Dordrecht: ICG Printing.Google Scholar
Bonet, Eulàlia. 2009. “Stem Extensions in Catalan Encliticized Imperatives.” Manuscript.
Bonet, Eulália and Maria-Rosa Lloret. 2005. “More on Alignment as an Alternative to Domains: The Syllabification of Catalan Clitics.” Probus 17: 37-78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2008. “On Different Types of Clitic Clusters.” In The Bantu -Romance Connection, ed. by Cécile De Cat, and Katherine Demuth, 41-82. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. “Morphologically Complex Clitic Pronouns and Spurious se Once Again.” In Movement and Clitics: Adult and Child Grammar, ed. by V. Torrens, et al., 238-259. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna and Lori Repetti. 2008. The Phonology and Syntax of Preverbal and Postverbal Subject Clitics in Northern Italian Dialects. Linguistic Inquiry 39: 523-563. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. “Phrase-level and Word-level Syllables: Resyllabification and Prosodization of Clitics.” In Phonological Domains: Universals and Derivations, ed. by Janet Grijzenhout, and Baris Kabak, 79-104. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna and Michael Starke. 1999. “The Typology of Structural Deficiency: A Case Study of the Three Classes of Pronouns.” In Clitics in the Languages of Europe, ed. by Henk van Riemsdijk, 145-233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cattaneo, Andrea. 2009. It Is All About Clitics: The Case of a Northern Italian Dialect Like Bellinzonese. PhD dissertation, NYU.Google Scholar
Colantoni, Laura, María Cristina Cuervo and José Ignacio Hualde. 2010. “Stress as a Symptom.” Paper presented at LSRL 40, University of Washington, March 26-28, 2010.
Garrapa, Luigia. 2011. Vowel Elision in Florentine Italian. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gioscio, Joseph. 1985. Il dialetto lucano di Calvello. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Grice, Martine. 1995. The Intonation of Palermo Italian: Implications for Intonation Theory. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Grice, Martine, D. Robert Ladd and Amalia Arvaniti. 2000. “On the Place of Phrase Accents in Intonational Phonology.” Phonology 17: 143-185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halpern, Aaron L. 1998 Clitics. In (eds.), Handbook of Morphology, ed. by Andrew Spencer, and Arnold M. Zwicky, 101-122. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Huidobro, Susana. 2005. “Phonological Constraints on Verum Focus in Argentinian Spanish.” Manuscript.
Iannace, Gaetano. 1983. Interferenza linguistica ai confini fra stato e regno: Il dialetto di San Leucio del Sannio. Ravenna: Longo.Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, Michael. 1991. “Base-Identity and Uniform Exponence: Alternative to Cyclicity.” In Current Trends in Phonology: Models and Methods (vol. 1), ed. by J. Durand and B. Laks, 363-393. Manchester: ESRI.Google Scholar
Kim, Miran and Lori Repetti. 2013. “Bitonal Pitch Accent and Phonological Alignment in Sardinian.” Probus 25: 267-300.Google Scholar
Klavans, Judith. 1995. On Clitics and Cliticization: The Interaction of Morphology, Phonology, and Syntax. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Lai, Jean-Pierre. 2002. L'intonation du parler de Nuoro (Sardaigne). PhD dissertation, Université Stendhal (Grenoble).Google Scholar
. 2004. “Le sarde de Nuoro au sein du nouvel Atlas Multimédia Prosodique de l'Espace Roman (AMPER).” Gólinguistique 9: 145-187.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam. 2009. Grammatica diacronica del napoletano. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele. 1997. L’origine del raddoppiamento fonosintattico: saggio di fonologia diacronica romanza. Tübingen: Francke.Google Scholar
. 2000. “Stress Stability under Cliticization and the Prosodic Status of Romance clitics.” In Phonological Theory and the Dialects of Italy, ed. by Lori Repetti, 137-168. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lüdke, Helmut. 1979. Lucania. Pisa: Pacini.Google Scholar
Manzini, Maria R., and Leonardo M. Savoia (2005). I dialetti italiani e romanci: Morfosintassi generative (3 volumes). Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Monachesi, Paola. 1996. “On the Representation of Italian Clitics.” In Interfaces in Phonology, ed. by U. Kleinhenz, 83-101. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Moyna, María Irene. 1999. “Pronominal Clitic Stress in Rio de la Plata Spainish: An Optimality Account.” The SECOL Review 23: 15-44.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina and Irene Vogel. 1986. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Ordóñez, Francisco and Lori Repetti. 2006. “Stressed Enclitics?” In New analyses in Romance linguistics, ed. by Jean-Pierre Montreuil, and Chiyo Nishida, 167-181. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. “Morphology, Phonology and Syntax of Stressed Enclitics in Romance.” Paper presented at NYU Workshop on Clitics, New York, May 2-3. Manuscript.
Ordonez, Francisco and Lori Repetti. 2014. “On the Morphological Restriction of Hosting Clitics in Italian and Sardinian Dialects.” Italia dialettale 75: 173-199.Google Scholar
Ordóñez, Francisco and Lori Repetti. in progress. “Clitic Order and Stress Shift.”
Peperkamp, Sharon. 1997. Prosodic Words. The Hague: HAG.Google Scholar
Pescarini, Diego. 2013. “The make-up of clitic clusters in the history of (Gallo-)Romance.” Talk presented at LSRL 43.
Pierrehumbert, Janet and Mary Beckman. 1988. Japanese tone structure. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pittau, Massimo. 1972. Grammatica del sardo-nuorese: Il più conservativo ei parlari neolatini. Bologna: Pàtron.Google Scholar
Prieto, Pilar, Mariapaola D'Imperio and Barbara Fivela Gili. 2005. “Pitch Accent Alignment in Romance: Primary and Secondary Associations with Metrical Structure.” Language and Speech 48: 359-396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Repetti, Lori and Francisco Ordóñez. 2011. Clitics of Romance Languages (CRL). [URL].Google Scholar
Romanello, Emily and Lori Repetti. 2014. “Special Characteristics Involving Imperatives in Romance Varieties Spoken in Italy.” Italian Journal of Linguistics 26: 135-163.Google Scholar
Ruggieri, Donato and Antonio Batinti. 1992. Lingua e dialetto ad Anzi: Potenza. Potenza: Il Salice.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1995. “The Prosodic Structure of Function Words.” In Papers in OT (UMOP 18), ed. by Jill N. Beckman, Laura Walsh Dickey, and Suzanne Urbanczyk, 439-469. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar
Torres-Tamarit, Francesc. 2010. “Stress Shift under Encliticization in Formenteran Catalan: A Case of an Unmarked Stress Pattern.” Manuscript.
Vogel, Irene. 2009. “The Status of the Clitic Group.” In Phonological Domains: Universals and Deviations, ed. by Janet Grijzenhout and Baris Kabak,15-46. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (18)

Cited by 18 other publications

Pescarini, Diego
2018. Chapter 13. Stressed enclitics are not weak pronouns. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 14 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 14],  pp. 231 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Romance Object Clitics, DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Properties of Romance object clitics. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Deriving enclisis in ‘V1’ clauses. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. 213 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Historical overview. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Introduction. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. ‘V2’ and clitic placement. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Theoretical preliminaries. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Syntactic evidence against deficiency. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. 107 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Clitics in embryo. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. 151 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Morphophonological evidence against deficiency. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Clitic combinations. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Clitic climbing. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. The rise ofadverbalclitics. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. 165 ff. DOI logo
Pescarini, Diego
2021. Conclusions. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. 295 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Series preface. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. ix ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Copyright Page. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. iv ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. List of abbreviations. In Romance Object Clitics,  pp. xiii ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.