Cover not available
Part of
Ethical Issues in Applied Linguistics Scholarship
Edited by Peter I. De Costa, Amr Rabie-Ahmed and Carlo Cinaglia
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 7] 2024
► pp. 296–309

Chapter 16
Managing publication expectations and collaborations

On the ethics of co-authoring in Applied Linguistics

 | Utrecht University
 | University of CaliforniaIrvine
Collaborative research and co-authoring are ubiquitous work practices in higher education. With current funding models and promotion expectations, research is becoming more collaborative with publications co-authored by two or more scholars. Macro-level ethical guidelines established by professional organizations are a useful starting point for understanding how to approach collaborations and co-authorships, as much has been already said about how to work responsibly within a given discipline. However, questions of ethics in research need be pursued by tempering macro-level guidelines with micro-level considerations, such as the unique and specific challenges that are involved in working on diverse empirical topics. To this end, we draw on our experiences co-authoring publications to explore the relationship between micro-level considerations and macro-level guidelines in applied linguistics research. We explore the complexities of distributing responsibilities to a team of researchers, managing uneven power dynamics, and negotiating the authorship order for contributors. By grounding our discussion within the context of actual work done in collaboration by both authors, we provide readers with concrete examples of how to attend to the ethics of collaborative research and co-authoring.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Macro-ethics versus micro-ethics in applied linguistics research
  • Macro-ethics of co-authorship in applied linguistics
  • Micro-ethics of co-authorship in applied linguistics
    • Selecting collaborators
    • Roles and responsibilities
    • Ethics specialist
    • Power dynamics
  • Conclusion
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 21 November 2024
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.7.19jen
References (22)
References
American Association for Applied Linguistics. AAAL promotion and tenure guidelines (n.d.). Retrieved on 26 June 2024 from [URL]
American Association for Applied Linguistics. (n.d.). AAAL ethics guidelines. Retrieved on 26 June 2024 from [URL]
American Educational Research Association. (February 2011). Research ethics. Retrieved on 26 June 2024 from [URL]
Aliukonis, V., Poškutė, M., & Gefenas, E. (2020). Perish or publish dilemma: Challenges to responsible authorship. Medicina, 56(3), 123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
American Educational Research Association. (2011). Code of ethics. Educational Researcher, 40(3), 145–156.Google Scholar
Baralt, M., & Darcy Mahoney, A. (2020). Bilingualism and the executive function advantage in preterm-born children. Cognitive Development, 55, 100931. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Castellano, S., & Cermelli, P. (2015). Preys’ exploitation of predators’ fear: When the caterpillar plays the Gruffalo. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 282(1820), 20151786. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conference on College Composition and Communication. (31 March 2015). CCCC guidelines for the ethical conduct of research in composition studies. Retrieved on 26 June 2024 from [URL]
De Costa, P. I., Lee, J., Rawal, H., & Li, W. (2020). Ethics in applied linguistics research. In J. McKinley & H. Rose (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of research methods in applied linguistics (pp. 122–130). Routledge.Google Scholar
Ductor, L. (2015). Does co-authorship lead to higher academic productivity? Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 77(3), 385–407. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Helgesson, G., Master, Z., & Bülow, W. (2021). How to handle co-authorship when not everyone’s research contributions make it into the paper. Science and Engineering Ethics, 27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kubaniyova, M. (2008). Rethinking research ethics in contemporary applied linguistics: The tension between macro-ethical and micro-ethical perspectives in situated research. The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 503–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, E. Y., Liao, C. H., & Yen, H. R. (2013). Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective. Research Policy, 42, 1515–1530. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Luiten, J. D., Verhemel, A., Dahi, Y., Luiten, E. J. T., & Gadjradj, P. S. (2019). Honorary authorships in surgical literature. World Journal of Surgery, 43, 696–703. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reisig, M. D., Holtfreter, K., & Berzofsky, M. E. (2020). Assessing the perceived prevalence of research fraud among faculty at research-intensive universities in the USA. Accountability in Research, 27(7), 457–475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shaw, D., & Elger, B. (2017). The ghost collaborator. Accountability in Research, 24(1), 43–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, S. X. (2016). Negotiating authorship in Chinese universities: How organizations shape cycles of credit in science. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 41(4), 660–685. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. (2003). Five principles for research ethics: Cover your bases with these ethical strategies. American Psychological Association. Retrieved on 26 June 2024 from [URL]
Sonnenwald, D. H. (2007). Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 643–681. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stieb, D. M., Evans, G. J., To, T. M., Lackey, P. S. J., Shiraiwa, M., Minet, L., Brook, J. R., Burnett, R. T., & Weichenthal, S. A. (2021). Within-city variation in reactive oxygen species from fine particle air pollution and COVID-19. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 204(2), 168–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Youtie, J., & Bozeman, B. (2014). Social dynamics of research collaboration: Norms, practices, and ethical issues in determining co-authorship rights. Scientometrics, 101, 953–962. DOI logoGoogle Scholar