Article published In:
Register Studies
Vol. 3:1 (2021) ► pp.88114
References
Archer, D., Wilson, A., & Rayson, P.
(2002) Introduction to the USAS category system. Retrieved from [URL].
Baker, P.
(2009) The question is, how cruel is it? Keywords, fox hunting and the house of commons. In D. Archer (Ed.), What’s in a word-List?: Investigating word frequency and key word extraction (pp. 125–136). Aldershot: Ashgate. Google Scholar
Biber, D.
(1988) Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R.
(1998) Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bigi, B., Brun, A., Haton, J. P., Smaïli, K., & Zitouni, I.
(2001) A comparative study of topic identification on newspaper and e-mail. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on String Processing and Information Retrieval (pp. 238–241). Retrieved from [URL]. DOI logo
Blaxter, T. T.
(2014) Applying keyword analysis to gendered language in the Íslendingasögur. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 37(2), 169–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Camiciottoli, B. C.
(2016) “All those Elvis-meets-golf-player looks”: A corpus-assisted analysis of creative compounds in fashion blogging. Discourse, Context & Media, 121, 77–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cochran, W. G.
(1977) Sampling techniques (3rd Ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
Cselle, G., Albrecht, K., & Wattenhofer, R.
(2007) Buzztrack: Topic detection and tracking in email. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (pp. 190–197). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, J.
Ferret, O., & Grau, B.
(2000) A topic segmentation of texts based on semantic domains. Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 426–430). IOS Press. Google Scholar
Gabrielatos, C., & Marchi, A.
(2012) Keyness: appropriate metrics and practical issues. Critical Approaches to Discourse Studies. Bologna. Retrieved from [URL].
Gardner, D.
(2007) Validating the construct of word in applied corpus-based vocabulary research: A critical survey. Applied Linguistics, 28(2), 241–265. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Geluso, J., & Hirch, R.
Gerbig, A.
(2010) Key words and key phrases in a corpus of travel writing. In M. Bondi & M. Scott (Eds.), Keyness in texts (pp. 147–168). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, A., & Millar, N.
(2018) The language of civil engineering research articles: A corpus-based approach. English for Specific Purposes, 511, 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goh, G. Y.
(2011) Choosing a reference corpus for keyword calculation. Linguistic Research, 28(1), 239–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harvey, K., Churchill, D., Crawford, P., Brown, B., Mullany, L., Macfarlane, A., & McPherson, A.
(2008) Health communication and adolescents: What do their emails tell us?. Family Practice, 25(4), 304–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K.
(2004) Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar
Jones, C., Byrne, S., & Halenko, N.
(2018) Successful spoken English: Findings from learner corpora. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, A., & Berber Sardinha, T.
(2000) Proceedings of the Workshop on Comparing Corpora. Hong Kong. Google Scholar
Kotzé, E. F.
(2010) Author identification from opposing perspectives in forensic linguistics. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 28(2), 185–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loudermilk, B. C.
(2007) Occluded academic genres: An analysis of the MBA thought essay. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(3), 190–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meier, H. E., Rose, A., & Hölzen, M.
(2017) Spirals of signification? A corpus linguistic analysis of the German doping discourse. Communication & Sport, 5(3), 352–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meltzer, E. O., Wallace, D., Dykewicz, M., & Shneyer, L.
(2016) Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in allergic rhinitis: Agency for healthcare research and quality or anchor-based thresholds?. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, 4(4), 682–688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nkechinyere, E. M., Andrew, I., & Idochi, O.
(2015) Comparison of different methods of outlier detection in univariate time series data. International Journal for Research in Mathematics and Statistics, 1(1), 55–83. Google Scholar
Paquot, M., & Bestgen, Y.
(2009) Distinctive words in academic writing: A comparison of three statistical tests for keyword extraction. Papers from the 29th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 29) (pp. 247–269). Retrieved from [URL]. DOI logo
Pojanapunya, P.
(2017) A theory of keywords. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from [URL].
Pojanapunya, P., & Watson Todd, R.
(2018) Log-likelihood and odds ratio: Keyness statistics for different purposes of keyword analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 14(1), 133–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scharl, A., & Weichselbraun, A.
(2008) An automated approach to investigating the online media coverage of US presidential elections. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 5(1), 121–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, M.
(1997) PC analysis of key words – and key key words. System, 25(2), 233–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2006) In search of a bad reference corpus. Paper presented at Word Frequency and Keyword Extraction: AHRC ICT Methods Network Expert Seminar on Linguistics., Lancaster University, UK. Retrieved from [URL].
Scott, M., & Tribble, C.
Swales, J.
(1990) Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Willis, R.
(2017) Taming the climate? Corpus analysis of politicians’ speech on climate change. Environmental Politics, 26(2), 212–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xiao, Z., & McEnery, A.
(2005) Two approaches to genre analysis: Three genres in modern American English. Journal of English Linguistics, 33(1), 62–82. DOI logoGoogle Scholar