Cover not available
Article published In:
Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education
Vol. 4:2 (2019) ► pp.145–167

Quantity of target language contact in study abroad and knowledge of multiword expressions

A Usage-Based approach to L2 development

| Stockholm University
This study takes a Usage-Based approach to the learning of French multiword expressions (MWEs) in Study Abroad (SA). MWEs are conventionalized form-meaning mappings, for example du coup (‘and so’) and en fait (‘actually’), and are assumed to be learned through repeated exposure. Based on this assumption, the study adopted a pretest/posttest design to explore how quantity of out-of-class target-language (TL) contact predicted the development of MWE knowledge among 41 Swedish students during a semester in France. MWE knowledge was assessed by a modified cloze test based on transcriptions of informal language use (www​.clapi​.fr) and TL contact information was obtained through the Language Engagement Questionnaire (McManus, Mitchell, & Tracy-Ventura, 2014). Contrary to expectations, the findings showed that quantity of out-of-class TL contact did not predict gains in MWE knowledge and add further counterevidence for the role of sheer quantity of TL contact for linguistic development in SA.
Keywords: usage-based approach, target language contact, multiword expressions, L2 French
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Multiword expressions
    • 2.2Usage-Based approaches to language learning
    • 2.3Previous research
  • 3.The study
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Procedure
    • 3.3Instruments
      • 3.3.1Background questionnaire
      • 3.3.2The Language Engagement Questionnaire
      • 3.3.3MWE test
        • Test construct and test format
        • Test material
        • Identification of MWEs including establishing frequency of target items
        • Piloting of test, test reliability and exemplar items
        • Scoring principles
      • 3.3.4LEXTALE_FR
    • 3.4Data analysis
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 24 July 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sar.18001.arv
References (51)
References
Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59(2), 249–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Apéritif entre ami(e)s – chat, Icor, G., & Schwartz, S. (2009). CLAPI, ICAR, Lyon2 – CNRS – ENS-LSH. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Apéritif entre ami(e)s – Glasgow, Icor, G., & Gay, J. (2009). CLAPI, ICAR, Lyon2 – CNRS – ENS-LSH. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Apéritif entre ami(e)s – rupture, Icor, G., & Duchanois, J. (2009). CLAPI, ICAR, Lyon2 – CNRS – ENS-LSH. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Arvidsson, K. (submitted). The learning of multiword expressions in a second language in a Study Abroad context – the role of individual differences.Google Scholar
Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baker-Smemoe, W., Dewey, D. P., Bown, J., & Martinsen, R. A. (2014). Variables affecting L2 gains during study abroad. Foreign Language Annals, 47(3), 464–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bastos, M. T. (2011). Proficiency, length of stay, and intensity of interaction and the acquisition of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(3), 347–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brysbaert, M. (2013). Lextale_FR a fast, free, and efficient test to measure language proficiency in French. Psychologica Belgica, 53(1), 23–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campione, E., Véronis, J., & Deulofeu, J. (2005). The French corpus. In E. Cresti & M. Moneglia (Eds.), C-ORAL-ROM: Integrated reference corpora for spoken Romance languages (pp. 111–133). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cobb, T. (n.d.). Text Lex Compare. Retrieved from <[URL]>
CLAPI (n.d.). Retrieved from <[URL]>
DeKeyser, R. M. (2014). Research on language development during study abroad. In C. Pérez-Vidal (Ed.), Language acquisition in study abroad and formal instruction contexts (pp. 313–325). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dewey, D. P., Bown, J., & Eggett, D. (2012). Japanese language proficiency, social networking, and language use during study abroad: Learners’ perspectives. Canadian Modern Language Review, 68(2), 111–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., Durow, V., & Zahran, K. (2004). Individual differences and their effects on formulaic sequence acquisition. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing and use (pp. 87–106). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Edmonds, A. (2014). Conventional expressions: Investigating pragmatics and processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(1), 69–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143–188. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). Constructions, chunking, and connectionism: The emergence of second language structure. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 63–103). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Cognitive and social aspects of learning from usage. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning, (pp. 49–73). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., Simpson-Vlach, R., & Maynard, C. (2008). Formulaic language in native and second language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 42(3), 375–396. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erman, B., & Warren, B. (2000). The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text – Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 1(20), 29–62.Google Scholar
Forsberg, F. (2010). Using conventional sequences in L2 French. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 48(1), 25–51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Forsberg, F., & Fant, L. (2010). Idiomatically speaking: Effects of task variation on formulaic language in highly proficient users of L2 French and Spanish. In D. Wood (Ed.), Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and communication (pp. 47–70). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Forsberg Lundell, F., & Lindqvist, C. (2014). Lexical aspects of very advanced L2 French. Canadian Modern Language Review, 70(1), 28–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2003). Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(5), 219–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González-Fernández, B., & Schmitt, N. (2015). How much collocation knowledge do L2 learners have? ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 166(1), 94–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gustafsson, H., & Verspoor, M. (2017). Development of chunks in Dutch L2 learners of English. In E. Tribushinina & J. Evers-Vermeul (Eds.), Usage-Based approaches to language acquisition and language teaching (pp. 235–262). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kinginger, C. (2009). Language learning and study abroad: A critical reading of research. Houndsmills: Palgrave MacMillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 1. Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lemhöfer, K., & Broersma, M. (2012). Introducing LexTALE: A quick and valid lexical test for advanced learners of English. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 325–343. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lindqvist, C., Gudmundson, A., & Bardel, C. (2013). A new approach to measuring lexical sophistication in L2 oral production. In C. Bardel, C. Lindqvist, & B. Laufer (Eds.), L2 vocabulary acquisition, knowledge and use: New perspectives on assessment and corpus analysis (pp. 109–126). Paris: Eurosla Monographs.Google Scholar
McManus, K., Mitchell, R., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2014). Understanding insertion and integration in a study abroad context: The case of English-speaking sojourners in France. Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée, 19(2), 97–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Miller, G.A. (1956). The magic number even plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 631, 91–97.Google Scholar
Milton, J. (2013). Measuring the contribution of vocabulary knowledge to proficiency in the four skills. In C. Bardel, C. Lindqvist, & B. Laufer (Eds.), L2 vocabulary acquisition, knowledge and use: New perspectives on assessment and corpus analysis (pp. 57–78). Paris: Eurosla Monographs.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. (2015). The development of social relations during residence abroad. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 22–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nattinger, J. R., & DeCarrico, J. S. (1992). Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nesselhauf, N. (2003). The use of collocations by advanced learners of English and some implications for teaching. Applied linguistics, 24(2), 223–242. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paquot, M. (2017). L1 frequency in foreign language acquisition: Recurrent word combinations in French and Spanish EFL learner writing. Second Language Research, 33(1), 13–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Vidal, C. (2017). Study abroad and ISLA. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition, (pp. 339–360). New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Attention, awareness, and individual differences in language learning. In W. M. Chank, K. N. Chin, S. K. Bhatt, & I. Walker (Eds.), Perspectives on individual characteristics and foreign language education (pp. 27–50). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N. (2013). Formulaic language and collocation. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 1–10). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N., Dörnyei, Z., Adolphs, S., & Durow, V. (2004). Knowledge and acquisition of formulaic sequences. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing and use (pp. 55–86). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N., & Redwood, S. (2011). Learner knowledge of phrasal verbs: A corpus-informed study. In F. Meunier, G. Gilquin, & M. Paquot (Eds.), A taste for corpora. A tribute to professor Sylviane Granger (pp. 173–208). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N., & Freed, B. F. (2004). Context, contact, and cognition in oral fluency acquisition: Learning Spanish in at home and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 173–199. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smiskova-Gustafsson, H. (2013). Chunks in L2 development: A usage-based perspective. Groningen University.Google Scholar
Taguchi, N., Li, S., & Xiao, F. (2013). Production of formulaic expressions in L2 Chinese: A developmental investigation in a study abroad context. Chinese as a Second Language Research, 2(1), 23–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2000). First steps toward a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Cognitive linguistics, 11(1/2), 61–82.Google Scholar
Wolter, B., & Gyllstad, H. (2013). Frequency of input and L2 collocational processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(3), 451–482. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Güvendir, Emre, Judith Borràs & Meltem Acar Güvendir
2024. The effects of study abroad on L2 vocabulary development. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 9:1 ► pp. 26 ff. DOI logo
Mroz, Aurore
2024. Do students carry their home in their pocket?. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 9:1 ► pp. 100 ff. DOI logo
Mroz, Aurore & Julia Gorham
2024. From Caterpillar to Butterfly: Story of an Ordinarily Extraordinary Generation Z L2 Student Abroad. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad 36:1 ► pp. 312 ff. DOI logo
Arvidsson, Klara
2023. Studying abroad during and before the COVID-19 pandemic. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 8:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Boone, Griet & June Eyckmans
2023. Productive Collocation Knowledge in L2 German: Study Abroad and L1 Congruency. In Vocabulary Learning in the Wild, ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Boone, Griet & June Eyckmans
2023. Exploring collocation development in L2 German from students’ perspective: A contrasting case study. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 13:3 ► pp. 571 ff. DOI logo
Mitchell, Rosamond
2023. Chapter 14. Researching study abroad. In Methods in Study Abroad Research [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 4], ► pp. 345 ff. DOI logo
Vandeweerd, Nathan, Alex Housen & Magali Paquot
2023. Comparing the longitudinal development of phraseological complexity across oral and written tasks. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 45:4 ► pp. 787 ff. DOI logo
Zhou, Siyang & Jessica Briggs Baffoe-Djan
2023. “You just picked it up”. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 8:1 ► pp. 142 ff. DOI logo
Arvidsson, Klara, Fanny Forsberg Lundell & Inge Bartning
2019. Réseaux sociaux et développement linguistique. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 10:2 ► pp. 255 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.