Part of
Corpus-based Approaches to Register Variation
Edited by Elena Seoane and Douglas Biber
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 103] 2021
► pp. 118
References (71)
Corpora
BAWE – British Academic Written English Corpus
Heuboeck, A., Holmes, J., & Nesi, H. 2008. The BAWE corpus manual. <[URL]>
BL – British Library Newpapers
Gregory, Ian Norman, Atkinson, Paul David, Hardie, Andrew, Joulain-Jay, Amelia, Kershaw, Daniel, Porter, Catherine, Rayson, Paul Edward & Rupp, Christopher John. 2016. From digital resources to historical scholarship with the British Library 19th Century Newspaper Collection. Journal of Siberian Federal University: Humanities and Social Sciences 9(4): 994–1006. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
BNC2014 – British National Corpus 2014
Love, Robbie, Dembry, Claire, Hardie, Andrew, Brezina, Vaclav, & McEnery, Tony. 2017. The Spoken BNC2014: Designing and building a spoken corpus of everyday conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(3): 319–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
CED – A Corpus of English Dialogues
Kytö, Merja & Culpeper, Jonathan. 2006. A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760.Google Scholar
CHELAR – Corpus of Historical English Law Reports
Rodríguez-Puente, Paula, Fanego, Teresa, López-Couso, María José, Méndez-Naya, Belén, Núñez-Pertejo, Paloma, Blanco-García, Cristina & Tamaredo, Iván. 2018. Corpus of Historical English Law Reports 1535–1999 (CHELAR), v.2.Google Scholar
COCA – The Corpus of Contemporary American English
Davies, Mark. 2008–. The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): One Billion Words, 1990–2019. <[URL]>
CORE – Corpus of Online Registers of English
Davies, Mark. 2016–. Corpus of Online Registers of English (CORE). <[URL]>
Crown – The China-Brown Corpus of English
Xu, Jiajin & Liang, Maocheng. 2013. A tale of two C’s: Comparing English varieties with Crown and CLOB (The 2009 Brown family corpora). ICAME Journal 37: 175–183.Google Scholar
GloWbE – The Corpus of Global Web-Based English
Davies, Mark. 2013. Corpus of Global Web-Based English: 1.9 billion Words from Speakers in 20 Countries. Available at [URL]
House of Commons Corpus
Marx, Maarten & Schuth, Anne. 2010. DutchParl: The parliamentary documents in Dutch. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Linguistic Resources (LREC-2010), 3670–3677. European Language Resources Association. <[URL]>
ICE – International Corpus of English
Greenbaum, Sidney (ed.) 1996. Comparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press/OUP. <[URL]>
ICLE – International Corpus of Learner English
Granger, Sylviane, Dagneaux, Estelle, Meunier, Fanny & Paquot, Magali. 2009. The International Corpus of Learner English, Version 2. Handbook and CD-Rom. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
JSI Newsfeed Corpus
Bušta, Jan, Herman, Ondřej, Jakubíček, Miloš, Krek, Simon & Novak, Blaž. 2017. JSI Newsfeed Corpus. Paper presented at the 9th International Corpus Linguistics Conference, University of Birmingham. <[URL]>
LOCNESS – Louvain Corpus of Native English Essays
LOCRA – Louvain Corpus of Research Articles
LYPOP – A Corpus of Contemporary English Pop Lyrics
Werner, Valentin. 2019. Lyrics and language awareness. Nordic Journal of Modern Language Methodology 7(1): 4–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MICUSP – Michigan Corpus of Upper-Level Student Papers
Römer, Ute & O’Donnell, Matthew B. 2011. From student hard drive to web corpus (part 1): The design, compilation and genre classification of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Corpora 6(2): 159–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
PPCEME – Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English
Kroch, Anthony, Santorini, Beatrice & Delfs, Lauren. 2004. The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English (PPCEME). Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
RSC – Royal Society Corpus
Kermes, Hannah, Degaetano-Ortlieb, Stefania, Khamis, Ashraf, Knappen, Jörg & Teich, Elke. 2016. The Royal Society Corpus: From uncharted data to corpus. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), 1928–1931, Portorož, Slovenia, May. <[URL]>
VESPA – Varieties of English for Specific Purposes Database
Paquot, Magali, Hasselgård, Hilde & Oksefjell Ebeling, Signe. 2013. Writer/reader visibility in learner writing across genres: A comparison of the French and Norwegian components of the ICLE and VESPA learner corpora. In Twenty Years of Learner Corpus Research. Looking Back, Moving Ahead. Proceedings of the First Learner Corpus Research Conference (LCR 2011), Sylviane Granger, Gaëtenelle Gilquin & Fanny Meunier (eds), 377–387. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain. <[URL]>
References
Bakhtin, Mikhail. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin TX: University of Austin.Google Scholar
Berry, Margaret. 1995. Thematic options and success in writing. In Thematic Development in English Texts, Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), 55–84. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1986. Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings. Language 62(2): 384–414. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1989. A typology of English texts. Linguistics 27: 3–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany. 2013a. Nominalizing the verb phrase in academic science writing. In The Verb Phrase in English: Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora, Bas Aarts, Joanne Close, Geoffrey Leech & Sean Wallis (eds), 99–132. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013b. Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics 41(2): 104–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Grammatical Complexity in Academic English. Linguistic Change in Writing. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Reppen, Randi (eds) 2015. The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, Cueni, Anna, Nikitina, Tatiana & Baayen, R. Harald. 2007. Predicting the dative alternation. In Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation, Gerlof Boume, Irene Kraemer & Joost Zwarts (eds), 69–94. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Ford, Marilyn. 2010. Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English. Language 86(1): 168–213. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Gillian & Yule, George. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Claridge, Claudia. 2010. News discourse. In Historical Pragmatics, Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), 587–620. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Crystal, David & Davy, Derek. 1969. Investigating English Style. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Beaugrande, Robert & Dressler, Wolfgang U. 1981. Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degaetano-Ortlieb, Stefania & Teich, Elke. 2019. Toward an optimal code for communication: The case of scientific English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope & Rickford, John R. (eds) 2001. Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles. 1968. Language development. In Language Problems of Developing Nations, Joshua A. Fishman, Charles A. Ferguson & Jyotirindra Das Gupta (eds), 27–36. New York NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Francis, W. Nelson & Kucera, Henry. 1967. Computational Analysis of Present-Day American English. Providence RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar
Gray, Bethany & Biber, Douglas. 2015. Phraseology. In The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics, Douglas Biber & Randi Reppen (eds), 125–145. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gregory, Michael. 1967. Aspects of varieties differentiation. Journal of Linguistics 3(2): 177–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1968. The users and uses of language. In Readings in the Sociology of Language, Joshua A. Fishman (ed), 139–69. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 1989. Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1978. Text in the Systemic-Functional model. In Current Trends in Textlinguistics, Wolfgang U. Dressler (ed), 228–246. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyland, Ken. 2015. Corpora and written academic English. In The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics, Douglas Biber & Randi Reppen (eds), 292–308. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hymes, Dell. 1964a. Introduction: Toward ethnographies of communication. American Anthropologist 66(6): 1–34. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1964b. Directions in (ethno-) linguistic theory. American Anthropologist 66(3): 6–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1967. Models of the interaction of language and social setting. Journal of Social Issues 23(2): 8–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1974. Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia PA: The University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Joos, Martin. 1961. The Five Clocks. New York NY: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
Kermes, Hannah, Degaetano-Ortlieb, Stefania, Khamis, Ashraf, Knappen, Jörg & Teich, Elke. 2016. The Royal Society Corpus: From uncharted data to corpus. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), 1928–1931, Portorož, Slovenia, May.Google Scholar
Kolbe-Hanna, Daniela & Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2015. Grammatical variation. In The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics, Douglas Biber & Randi Reppen (eds), 161–179. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kytö, Merja & Smitterberg, Erik. 2015. Diachronic registers. In The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics, Douglas Biber & Randi Reppen (eds), 330–345. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 2015. Descriptive grammar. In The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics, Douglas Biber & Randi Reppen (eds), 146–160. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, Maryellen C. 2013. How language production shapes language form and comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology 4: 226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahlberg, Michaela. 2015. Literary style and literary texts. In The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics, Douglas Biber & Randi Reppen (eds), 346–361. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mair, Christian. 2006. Twentieth-century English: History, Variation and Standardization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, James R. 1993. Genre and literacy – Modeling context in educational linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 13(1): 141–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matthiessen, Christian M. I. M. 2019. Register in systemic functional linguistics. Register Studies 1(1): 10–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mauranen, Anna. 1993. Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Miller, Carolyn R. 1984. Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70(2): 151–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reid, Thomas B. W. 1956. Linguistics, structuralism, and philology. Archivum Linguisticum 8: 28–36.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Staples, Shelley. 2015. Spoken discourse. In The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics, Douglas Biber & Randi Reppen (eds), 271–291. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Swales, John M. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, Grafmiller, Jason, Heller, Benedikt & Röthlisberger, Melanie. 2016. Around the world in three alternations: Modeling syntactic variation in varieties of English. English World-Wide 37(2): 109–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2015. Historical pragmatics. In The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics, Douglas Biber & Randi Reppen (eds), 252–268. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tardy, Christine M. & Swales, John M. 2014. Genre analysis. In Pragmatics of discourse, Klaus P. Schneider & Anne Barron (eds), 165–187. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ure, Jean. 1982. Introduction: approaches to the study of register range. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 35: 5–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wierzbicka, A. 1985. A semantic metalanguage for a crosscultural comparison of speech acts and speech genres. Language in Society 14(4): 491–513. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Prawati, Maria Tamarina & Andrew Steven Puika
2023. 2023 IEEE 15th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, and Management (HNICEM),  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Sun, Ya & Qiong Wang
2023. Mapping the Field of Register Studies: A Bibliometric Analysis. Sage Open 13:4 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.