Chapter published in:
Corpus-based Approaches to Register Variation
Edited by Elena Seoane and Douglas Biber
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 103] 2021
► pp. 291312
References
Barron, Alexander T. J., Huang, Jenny, Spang, Rebecca L. & DeDeo, Simon
2018Individuals, institutions, and innovation in the debates of the French Revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115(18): 4607–4612. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward
1989Drift and the evolution of English style: A history of three genres. Language 65(3): 487–517. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany
2011The historical shift of scientific academic prose in English towards less explicit styles of expression: Writing without verbs. In Researching Specialized Languages [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 47], Vijay Bhatia, Purificación Sa´nchez & Pascual Pe´rez-Paredes (eds), 11–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Nominalizing the verb phrase in academic science writing. In The Verb Phrase in English: Investigating Recent Language Change with Corpora, Bas Aarts, Joanne Close, Geoffrey Leech & Sean Wallis (eds), 99–132. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Grammatical Complexity in Academic English: Linguistic Change in Writing. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bizzoni, Yuri, Degaetano-Ortlieb, Stefania, Fankhauser, Peter & Teich, Elke
2020Linguistic variation and change in 250 years of English scientific writing: A data-driven approach. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, section Language and Computation. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bochkarev, Vladimir, Solovyev, Valery D. & Wichmann, Soren
2014Universals versus historical contingencies in lexical evolution. Journal of The Royal Society Interface 11(101): 1–8. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Kytö, Merja
2010Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Degaetano-Ortlieb, Stefania, Kermes, Hannah, Khamis, Ashraf & Teich, Elke
2019An information-theoretic approach to modeling diachronic change in scientific English. In From Data to Evidence in English Language Research, Carla Suhr, Terttu Nevalainen & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), 258–281. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Degaetano-Ortlieb, Stefania & Piper, Andrew
2019The scientization of literary study. In Proceedings of the 3nd Joint SIGHUM Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, Humanities and Literature at NAACL, 18–28, Minneapolis, MN, June. East Stroudsburg PA: ACL. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Degaetano-Ortlieb, Stefania & Teich, Elke
2018Using relative entropy for detection and analysis of periods of diachronic linguistic change. In Proceedings of the 2nd Joint SIGHUM Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Cultural Heritage, Social Sciences, Humanities and Literature at COLING, 22–33, Santa Fe, NM, September. East Stroudsburg PA: ACL.Google Scholar
2019Toward an optimal code for communication: The case of scientific English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic, 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Delogu, Francesca, Crocker, Matthew & Drenhaus, Heiner
2017Teasing apart coercion and surprisal: Evidence from ERPs and eye-movements. Cognition 116: 49–59. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fankhauser, Peter, Knappen, Jörg & Teich, Elke
2014Exploring and visualizing variation in language resources. In Proceedings of the 9th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), 4125–4128, Reykjavik, Iceland, May.Google Scholar
Fischer, Stefan, Knappen, Jörg, Menzel, Katrin & Teich, Elke
2020The Royal Society Corpus 6.0. Providing 300+ years of scientific writing for humanistic study. In Proceedings of the 15th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), 794–802, Marseille, France, May.Google Scholar
Garg, Nikhil, Schiebinger, Londa, Jurafsky, Dan & Zou, James
2018Word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115(16): 3635–3644. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Bethany & Biber, Douglas
2018Academic writing as a locus of grammatical change: The development of phrasal complexity features. In Diachronic Corpora, Genre, and Language Change [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 85], Richard J. Whitt (ed.), 117–146. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K.
1985Written and Spoken Language. Melbourne: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
1988On the language of physical science. In Registers of Written English: Situational Factors and Linguistic Features, Mohsen Ghadessy (ed.), 162–177. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Martin, James R.
1993Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, William L., Leskovec, Jure & Jurafsky, Dan
2016Cultural shift or linguistic drift? Comparing two computational models of semantic change. In Proceedings of the Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), 2116–2121, Austin, Texas, November.Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig
1991A Theory of Language and Information. A Mathematical Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Robert D., Goodman, Noah D., Goldberg, Adele E. & Griffiths, Thomas L.
2020Generalizing meanings from partners to populations: Hierarchical inference supports convention formation on networks. In Proceedings of the 42nd Virtual Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin & Gries, Stefan T.
2016Quantitative approaches to diachronic corpus linguistics. In The Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguistics, Merja Kytö & Päivi Pahta (eds), 36–53. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin & Mair, Christian
2015Grammatical change. In The Cambridge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, Douglas Biber & Randi Reppen (eds), 180–200. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kawaguchi, Yuji, Minegishi, Makoto & Viereck, Wolfgang
2011Corpus-based Analysis and Diachronic Linguistics [Tokyo University of Foreign Studies 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kermes, Hannah, Degaetano-Ortlieb, Stefania, Khamis, Ashraf, Knappen, Jörg & Teich, Elke
2016The Royal Society Corpus: From uncharted data to corpus. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), 1928–1931, Portorož, Slovenia, May.Google Scholar
Klingenstein, Sara, Hitchcock, Tim & DeDeo, Simon
2014The civilizing process in London’s Old Bailey. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(26): 9419–9424. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kopaczyk, Joanna
2013The Legal Language of Scottish Burghs: Standardization and Lexical Bundles. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Roger P.
2008Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition 106(3): 1126–1177. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Roger P. & Jaeger, Tim Florian
2007Speakers optimize information density through syntactic reduction. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19, Bernhard Schölkopf, John Platt & Thomas Hoffman (eds), 849–856. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian
2006Twentieth-century English: History, Variation and Standardization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, Danielle S.
2001Reading both high and low coherence texts: Effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 55(1): 51–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, Danielle S., Kintsch, Eileen, Butler Songer, Nancy & Kintsch, Walter
1996Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction 14(1): 1–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Michel, Jean-Baptiste, Shen, Yuan Kui, Presser Aiden, Aviva, Veres, Adrian, Gray, Matthew K., Pickett, Joseph P., Hoiberg, Dale, Clancy, Dan, Norvig, Peter, Orwant, Jon, Pinker, Steven, Nowak, Martin A. & Lieberman Aiden, Erez
2011Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science 331(6014): 176–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Muralidharan, Aditi & Hearst, Marti A.
2013Supporting exploratory text analysis in literature study. Literary and Linguistic Computing 28(2): 283–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Closs Traugott, Elizabeth
2012The Oxford Handbook of the History of English. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rubino, Raphael, Degaetano-Ortlieb, Stefania, Teich, Elke & van Genabith, Josef
2016Modeling diachronic change in scientific writing with information density. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING), 750–761, Osaka, Japan, December.Google Scholar
Schulz, Erika, Oh, Yoon Mi, Malisz, Zofia, Andreeva, Bistra & Möbius, Bernd
2016Impact of prosodic structure and information density on vowel space size. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody, 350–354, Boston, MA, USA, May. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sikos, Les, Greenberg, Clayton, Drenhaus, Heiner & Crocker, Matthew
2017Information density of encodings: The role of syntactic variation in comprehension. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 3168–3173, London, UK, July.Google Scholar
Teich, Elke, Degaetano-Ortlieb, Stefania, Fankhauser, Peter, Kermes, Hannah & Lapshinova-Koltunski, Ekaterina
2016The linguistic construal of disciplinarity: A data mining approach using register features. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology (JASIST) 67(7): 1668–1678. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhai, Chengxiang & Lafferty, John
2004A study of smoothing methods for language models applied to information retrieval. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 22(2): 179–214. CrossrefGoogle Scholar