Article published in:
Grammatical Change in English World-Wide
Edited by Peter Collins
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 67] 2015
► pp. 179–204

Dual adverbs in Australian English

| Macquarie University
Dual or dual-form adverbs are those found with and without the -ly suffix in modern English (e.g. deep/deeply), providing alternative forms for adverbial constituents or modifiers within the clause. But research on British English has shown decreasing numbers of fully interchangeable pairs. This paper investigates five dual adverbs in 19th and 20th century Australian English, examining their syntactic behaviour in writing as well as transcribed speech and scripted dialogue. Parallel data from the Australian and British ICE corpora, as well as custom-built mini-corpora of 19th century Australian and British English (news and narrative texts) are compared, showing far more zero forms in 19th century Australian data than a century later, and lower levels of use altogether in the British data. Keywords: dual adverbs; zero adverb; -ly adverb; Australian English; British English
Published online: 24 February 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.67.08pet
References
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Boyd, Alexander Jenyns
1882[1974] Old Colonials, facs. edn. Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, Deborah
1995 Verbal Hygiene. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Denison, David
2010 Category change in English with and without structural change. In Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 90], Elizabeth Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds), 105–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Donner, Morton
1991 Adverb form in Middle English. English Studies 72: 1–11. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fritz, Clemens
2007 From English in Australia to Australian English. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Görlach, Manfred
1987 Colonial lag? The alleged conservative character of American English and other ‘colonial’ varieties. English World-Wide 8(1): 41–60. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Greenough, James & Kittredge, George
1901 Words and Their Ways in English Speech. New York NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey
2002 Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1949 A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd & Lunkenheimer, Kerstin
2012 World Atlas of Variation in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, Henry
1896/1928 While the Billy Boils. Sydney: Cornstalk Publishing.Google Scholar
Leonard, Sterling
1962 The Doctrine of Correctness in English Usage 1700-1800. New York NY: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar
Lowth, Robert
1762[2010] A Short Introduction to English Grammar. London, printed for A. Miller and R. & J. Dodsley. Reprinted Gale Ecco, Print Editions.Google Scholar
Marckwardt, Albert & Walcott, Fred
1938 Facts about Current Usage. New York NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Mencken, Henry
1919[1945/1961] The American Language. New York NY: Alfred Knopf.Google Scholar
Mittins, William, Salu, Mary, Edminson, Mary & Coyne, Sheila
1970 Attitudes to English Usage. London: OUP.Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu
1994 Diachronic issues in English adverb derivation. In Creating and Using English Language Corpora, Udo Fries, Gunnel Tottie & Peter Schneider (eds), 139–147. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
1997 The processes of adverb derivation in Late Middle and Early Modern English. In Grammaticalization at Work, Matti Rissanen, Merja Kytö & Kirsi Heikkonen (eds), 145–189. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Opdahl, Lisa
1991 - ly as adverbial suffix: Corpus and elicitation material compared. ICAME Journal 15: 19–35.Google Scholar
2000 LY or zero suffix? A Study in Variation of Dual-form Adverbs in Present-day English, Vols. 1 & 2. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Oxford Dictionary of English Grammar
1994 Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Partridge, Eric
1947[1965/1994] Usage and Abusage. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Peters, Pam
1999  Paradigm split . In Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, Christian Mair & Marianne Hundt (eds), 301–312. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2009 Australian English as regional epicentre. In World Englishes – Problems, Properties and Prospects [Varieties of English around the World G40], Thomas Hoffmann & Lucia Siebers (eds), 107–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 Australian narrative voices and the colloquial element in nineteenth century written registers. Australian Journal of Linguistics 34(1): 100–117. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Peters, Pam & Collins, Peter
2012 Colloquial Australian English. In World Atlas of Varieties of English, Bernd Kortmann & Kerstin Lunkenheimer (eds), 585–595. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Poutsma, Hendrik
1926 A Grammar of Late Modern English. Groningen: Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan
1985 Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schibsbye, Knut
1965 A Modern English Grammar. Oxford: OUIP.Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar
2007 Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali & Ito, Rika
2002 Thinking really different: Continuity and specialization in English dual form adverbs. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6(2): 236–266. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Webster’s Dictionary of English Usage
1987 Springfield MA: Merriam-Webster.Google Scholar
Yallop, Colin
2003 A. G. Mitchell and the development of Australian pronunciation. Australian Journal of Linguistics 23(2): 129–143. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zandvoort, Reinard
1953 A Handbook of English Grammar. Groningen: JB Wolters.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Collins, Peter & Xinyue Yao
2019. AusBrown: A new diachronic corpus of Australian English. ICAME Journal 43:1 ► pp. 5 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 may 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.