Article published in:
Multiple Affordances of Language Corpora for Data-driven Learning
Edited by Agnieszka Leńko-Szymańska and Alex Boulton
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 69] 2015
► pp. 177198
References

References

Allen, D.
2009A study of the role of relative clauses in the simplification of news texts for learners of English. System 37: 585–599. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bhatia, V.K.
1993Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, D.
2003Compressed noun-phrase structures in newspaper discourse. In New Media Language, J. Aitchison & D.M. Lewis (eds), 169–182. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E.
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Boulton, A.
2010aData-driven learning: Taking the computer out of the equation. Language Learning 60(3): 534–572. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010bLearning outcomes from corpus consultation. In Exploring New Paths in Language Pedagogy: Lexis and Corpus-based Language Teaching, M. Moreno Jaén, F. Serrano Valverde, & M. Calzada Pérez (eds), 129–144. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
2012Beyond concordancing: Multiple affordances of corpora in university language degrees. Elsevier Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences 34: 33–38. http://​www​.sciencedirect​.com​/science​/journal​/18770428​/34 (13 February 2014). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, H.
1995Why are newspaper law reports so hard to understand? English for Specific Purposes 14(3): 201–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brill, E.
2011POS-Tagger. Center for Sprogteknologi. http://​cst​.dk​/download​/uk​/index​.html#tagger (20 August 2013)Google Scholar
Burnard, L. & McEnery, T.
1999The BNC Sampler. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cantos Gómez, P.
2013Statistical Methods in Language and Linguistic Research. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
Chambers, A.
2005Integrating corpus consultation in language studies. Language Learning & Technology 9(2): 111–125.Google Scholar
Charles, M.
2011Using hands-on concordancing to teach rhetorical functions: Evaluation and implications for EAP writing classes. In New Trends in Corpora and Language Learning, A. Frankenberg-Garcia, L. Flowerdew & G. Aston (eds), 26–43. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Cheng, W.
2009Income/interest/net: Using internal criteria to determine the aboutness of a text. In Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 33], K. Aijmer (ed.), 157–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, W., Warren, M. & Xun-feng, X.
2003The language learner as language researcher: Putting corpus linguistics on the timetable. System 31(2): 173–186. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe
2003Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Cambridge: CUP. http://​www​.uk​.cambridge​.org​/elt (15 February 2014).Google Scholar
Curado Fuentes, A.
2002Exploitation and assessment of a business English corpus through language learning tasks. ICAME Journal 26: 5–32.Google Scholar
2004The use of corpora and IT in evaluating oral task competence for tourism English. CALICO Journal 22(1): 5–22.Google Scholar
2007A corpus-based assessment of reading comprehension in English. In Corpora in the Foreign Language Classroom, E. Hidalgo, L. Quereda & J. Santana (eds), 309–326. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
De Beaugrande, R.
2000User-friendly communication skills in teaching and learning of business English. English for Specific Purposes 19(4): 331–349. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuertes-Olivera, P.A. & Piqué-Noguera, C.
2010The literal translation hypothesis in ESP teaching/learning environments. ScriptaManent 8(1): 15–30.Google Scholar
Gavioli, L.
2006Exploring Corpora for ESP Learning [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 21]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Corpus analysis and the achievement of learner autonomy in interaction. In Using Corpora to Learn about Language and Discourse, L. Lombardo (ed.), 39–72. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hunston, S.
2001Colligation, lexis, pattern and text. In Patterns of Text: In honour of Michael Hoey, M. Scott & G. Thompson (eds), 13–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyon, S.
2001Long-term effects of genre-based instruction: A follow-up study of an EAP reading course. English for Specific Purposes 20(1): 417–438. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ilangakoon, S.R.
2012Identifying threshold vocabulary for academic study. Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences 8: 141–159.Google Scholar
Johns, T.
1976The communicative approach to language teaching in the framework of a programme of English for academic purposes. In L’Enseignement de la Compétence de Communication en Langues Secondes, E. Roulet & H. Holec (eds), 94–112. Neuchâtel: Institut de Linguistique de l’Université de Neuchâtel.Google Scholar
1988Whence and whither classroom concordancing? In Computer Applications in Language Learning, P. Bongaerts, P. de Haan, S. Lobbe & H. Wekker (eds), 9–27. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
2002Data-driven learning: The perpetual challenge. In Teaching and Learning by Doing Corpus Analysis, B. Kettemann & G. Marko (eds), 107–118. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Kang, N. & Yu, Q.
2011Corpus-based stylistic analysis of tourism English. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 2(1): 129–136. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kreyer, R.
2008Corpora in the classroom and beyond. In Handbook of Research on Computer-enhanced Language Acquisition and Learning, F. Zhang & B. Barber (eds), 422–437. Hershey: Information Science Reference. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lombardo, L.
2009Introduction: Establishing guidelines for the use of corpora as resources for learners. In Using Corpora to Learn about Language and Discourse, L. Lombardo (ed.), 7–38. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Morrow, P.R.
1989Conjunct use in business news stories and academic journal articles: A comparative study. English for Specific Purposes 8(3): 239–254. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Murison-Bowie, S.
1993MicroConcord Handbook and MicroConcord Corpus A and B. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Nassaji, H.
2004The relationship between depth of vocabulary knowledge and L2 learners’ lexical inferencing strategy use and success. Canadian Modern Language Review 61: 107–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, M.
2006Semantic associations in business English: A corpus-based analysis. English for Specific Purposes 25: 217–234. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Basanta, C.
1996La integración de los contenidos léxicos en los métodos comunicativos: Una cuestión pendiente. In Segundas Jornadas sobre Estudio y Enseñanza del Léxico, L. Durán & P. Beltrán (eds), 229–310. Granada: Método.Google Scholar
2005Assessing the receptive vocabulary of Spanish students of English philology: An empirical investigation. In Towards an Understanding of the English Language, Past, Present and Future: Studies in Honour of Fernando Serrano, E. Martínez-Dueñas (ed.), 545–564. Granada: Universidad de Granada.Google Scholar
Pérez-Paredes, P.
2003Small corpora as assisting tools in the teaching of English news language: A preliminary tokens-based examination of Michael Swan’s ‘Practical English Usage’ news language wordlist. ESP World Journal 2(3). http://​www​.esp​-world​.info​/articles​_6​/issue​_6​.htm (20 November 2013).Google Scholar
Sanderson, P.
1999Using Newspapers in the Classroom. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Scott. M.
1997PC analysis of key words and key key words. System 25: 233–245. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott, M.
2000aFocusing on the text and its key words. In Rethinking Language Pedagogy from a Corpus Perspective, L. Burnard & T. McEnery (eds), 103–122. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2000bReverberations of an echo. In PALC’99: Practical Applications in Language Corpora, B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk & P.J. Melia (eds), 49–68. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2000cWordSmith Tools 3.0. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2001Mapping keywords to problem and solution . In Patterns of Text: In Honour of Michael Hoey, M. Scott & G. Thompson (eds), 109–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002Picturing the key words of a very large corpus and their lexical upshots, or getting the Guardian’s view of the world. In Teaching and Learning by Doing Corpus Analysis, B. Kettemann & G. Marko (eds), 43–50. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2010Problems in investigating keyness, or clearing the undergrowth and marking out trails. In Keyness in Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 41], M. Bondi & M. Scott (eds), 43–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott, M. & Tribble, C.
2006Textual Patterns: Key Words and Corpus Analysis in Language Education [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 22]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smart, J.
2014The role of guided induction in paper-based data-driven learning. ReCALL 26(2): 184–201. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, M.
2010Three concepts of keywords. In Keyness in Texts [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 41], M. Bondi & M. Scott (eds), 21–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verifica Report
2008Informe Verifica del Grado de Administración y Empresa. Extremadura: Universidad de Extremadura. ANECA. http://​www​.unex​.es​/conoce​-la​-uex​/centros​/feet​/archivos​/planes​_estudio​/extensos​/1407​.pdf (8 June 2014).Google Scholar
Widdowson, H.G.
2003Defining Issues in English Language Teaching. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

LEE, HANSOL, MARK WARSCHAUER & JANG HO LEE
2020. Toward the Establishment of a Data‐Driven Learning Model: Role of Learner Factors in Corpus‐Based Second Language Vocabulary Learning. The Modern Language Journal 104:2  pp. 345 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 february 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.