Part of
Learner Corpora in Language Testing and Assessment
Edited by Marcus Callies and Sandra Götz
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 70] 2015
► pp. 110
Barker, F.
2010How can corpora be used in language testing? In The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (eds), 633–645. New York NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Corpus-based testing. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, C.A. Chapelle (ed.), 1360–1366. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Biber, D.
1988Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Callies, M.
2013aAgentivity as a determinant of lexico-syntactic variation in L2 academic writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(3): 357–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013bAdvancing the research agenda of Interlanguage Pragmatics: The role of learner corpora. In Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2013: New Domains and Methodologies, J. Romero-Trillo (ed.), 9–36. New York, NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
To appear. Using learner corpora in language testing and assessment: Current practice and future challenges. In Studies in Learner Corpus Linguistics: Research and Applications for Foreign Language Teaching and Assessment, E. Castello, K. Ackerley & F. Coccetta (eds) Frankfurt Peter Lang
Callies, M., Díez-Bedmar, M.B. & Zaytseva, E.
2014Using learner corpora for testing and assessing L2 proficiency. In Measuring L2 Proficiency: Perspectives from SLA, P. Leclercq, H. Hilton & A. Edmonds (eds), 71–90. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Chapelle, C.A. & Plakans, L.
2013Assessment and testing: Overview. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, C.A. Chapelle (ed.), 241–244. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Carlsen, C.
2012Proficiency level – A fuzzy variable in computer learner corpora. Applied Linguistics 33(2): 161–183. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe
2001The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
De Cock, S.
2004Preferred sequences of words in NS and NNS speech. Belgian Journal of English Language and Literatures, New Series 2: 225–246.Google Scholar
Gilquin, G., DeCock, S. & Granger, S.
2010The Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage. Handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Granger, S., Dagneaux, E., Meunier, F. & Paquot, M.
2009The International Corpus of Learner English. Version 2. Handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Gries, S. Th
2006Exploring variability within and between corpora: Some methodological considerations. Corpora 1(2): 109–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkey, R. & Barker, F.
2004Developing a common scale for the assessment of writing. Assessing Writing 9: 122–159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J.A. & Buttery, P.
2010Criterial features in learner corpora: Theory and illustrations. English Profile Journal 1(1): 1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J. & Filipović, L.
2012Criterial Features in L2 English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Leclercq, P., Hilton, H. & Edmonds, A.
(eds). 2014Measuring L2 proficiency: Perspectives from SLA. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
McCarthy, M.
2013Putting the CEFR to good use: Designing grammars based on learner-corpus evidence. Language Teaching. FirstView , DOI logo (12 July 2014). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, J.
2009The grammar of conversation in advanced spoken learner English: Learner corpus data and language-pedagogical implications. In Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 33], K. Aijmer (ed.), 203–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L. & Byrnes, H.
2008The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities: An introduction. In The Longitudinal Study of Advanced L2 Capacities, L. Ortega & H. Byrnes (eds), 3–20. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thomas, M.
1994Assessment of L2 proficiency in second language acquisition research. Language Learning 44(2): 307–336. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Research synthesis and historiography: The case of assessment of second language proficiency. In Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching [Language Learning & Language Teaching 13], J.M. Norris & L. Ortega (eds), 279–298. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tono, Y., Kawaguchi, Y. & Minegishi, M.
(eds) 2012Developmental and Crosslinguistic Perspectives in Learner Corpus Research [Tokyo University of Foreign Studies 4]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Diao, Wenhao & Chen Chen
2022. L2 use of pragmatic markers in peer talk: Mandarin utterance-final particles. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:4  pp. 1293 ff. DOI logo
Kisselev, Olesya, Aleksandr Klimov & Mihail Kopotev
2022. Syntactic complexity measures as linguistic correlates of proficiency level in learner Russian. In Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in Learner Corpus Research [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 104],  pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
Wisniewski, Katrin
2017. Empirical Learner Language and the Levels of the Common European Framework of Reference. Language Learning 67:S1  pp. 232 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.