Article published in:
Spanish Learner Corpus Research: Current trends and future perspectives
Edited by Margarita Alonso-Ramos
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 78] 2016
► pp. 33–52

What is missing in learner corpus design?

| Tokyo University of Foreign Studies
This chapter discusses what is missing in learner corpus design. Learner corpus researchers are sometimes not fully aware of the basic principles of corpus design and collection that most corpus linguists should know. I will first discuss theoretical and methodological issues related to learner corpus design and collection, focusing on sampling, representativeness, and corpus size. Then, I will review three relevant studies (Biber 1993; Tomasello & Stahl 2004; Mukherjee & Rohrbach 2006) in order to better understand corpus design issues such as parameters of corpus sampling, effects of sample size, and variations in learner corpus design. Finally, the chapter concludes by discussing critical assessment and future directions in terms of issues of design as well as data collection in learner corpus research.
Keywords: corpus design criteria, sample size, representativeness, data collection
Published online: 16 December 2016
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.78.02ton
References

References

Atkins, B.T.S., Clear, J. & Ostler, N.
1991 Corpus design criteria. Literary and Linguistic Computing 7 (1): 1–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D.
1993 Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing 8 (4): 243–257. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. & Reppen, R.
1998 Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R.
1983 The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: The case of systematicity. Language Learning 33 (1): 1–17. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. & Hopper, P.
(eds) 2001 Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure [Typological Studies in Language 45]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chaudron, C.
2008 Data collection in SLA research. In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, C.J. Doughty & M.H. Long, 762–828. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
1994 The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Granger, S.
1994 The learner corpus: A revolution in applied linguistics. English Today 39 3 (3): 25–29. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996 Learner English around the world. In Comparing English World-Wide, S. Greenbaum (ed.), 13–24. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
1998 The computerized learner corpus: a versatile new source of data for SLA research. In Learner English on Computer, S. Granger (ed.), 13–18. London: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
2003 The International Corpus of Learner English: A new resource for foreign language learning and teaching and second language acquisition research. TESOL Quarterly 37 (3): 538–546. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, S., Leech, G. & Goodluck, H.
1978 The Lancaster-Oslo/Bergen Corpus of British English, for Use with Digital Computers. Olso: Department of English, University of Oslo. (Abbreviated as LOB.).Google Scholar
McEnery, T. & Wilson, A.
2001 Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
McEnery, T., Xiao, R. & Tono, Y.
2006 Corpus-based Language Studies: An Advanced Resource Book. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, J. & Rohrbach, J.-M.
2006 Rethinking applied corpus linguistics from a language-pedagogical perspective: New departures in learner corpus research. In Planning, Gluing and Painting Corpora: Inside the Applied Corpus Linguist’s Workshop, B. Kettemann & G. Marko (eds), 205–232. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J.
2005 Corpus and text – Basic principles. In Developing Linguistic Corpora: a Guide to Good Practice, M. Wynn (ed.), 1–16. Oxford: Oxbow Books. http://​www​.ahds​.ac​.uk​/creating​/guides​/linguistic​-corpora​/chapter1​.htm (25 May 2013).
2008 Borrowed ideas. In Language, People, Numbers: Corpus Linguistics and Society, A. Gerbig and O. Mason (eds.), pp.21–41. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Crossref
Seidlhofer, B.
2002 Pedagogy and local learner corpora: working with learning driven data. In Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching, S. Granger, J. Hung and S. Petch-Tyson (eds.), pp.213–234. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref
Tomasello, M. & Stahl, D.
2004 Sampling children’s spontaneous speech: How much is enough? Journal of Child Language 31: 101–121. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tono, Y.
2012 International Corpus of Crosslinguistic Interlanguage: Project overview and a case study on the acquisition of new verb co-occurrence patterns. In Developmental and Crosslinguistic Perspectives in Learner Corpus Research [Tokyo University of Foreign Studies 4], Y. Tono, Y. Kawaguchi & M. Minegishi (eds), 27–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Widdowson, H.
1998 Context, community and authentic language. TESOL Quarterly 32 (4): 705–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 On the limitations of linguistics applied. Applied Linguistics 21: 3–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar