Cover not available
Part of
Spanish Learner Corpus Research: Current trends and future perspectives
Edited by Margarita Alonso-Ramos
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 78] 2016
► pp. 55–87

Chapter 3
Learner Spanish on computer

The CAES ‘Corpus de Aprendices de Español’ project

| Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
| Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

This chapter aims to provide a general description of the ‘Corpus de Aprendices de Español’ (CAES). It starts by discussing the contributions of Corpus Linguistics to the study of language and it next explains the emergence of learner corpora. The next section is concerned with the origin and development of the CAES corpus from the beginning to its current state and explains in detail the general design, compilation method, text encoding and annotation plus the search tool accompanying the corpus. The last part presents the results of a study on false friends based on data extracted from the corpus. Several conclusions and reflections follow together with some suggestions for further research.

Keywords: learner corpus, corpus linguistics, Spanish as a second language, false friends
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.CL, general learner corpora and main Spanish learner corpora
    • 2.1Brief overview of the importance of CL, the emergence of learner corpora and their applications
    • 2.2General review of the existing learner corpora in Spanish
  • 3.The CAES (Corpus de Aprendices de Español) Project
    • 3.1Origin and development of the project up to its current state
    • 3.2General design and compilation
    • 3.3Tasks devised for each of the levels considered and description of the sample collection method
    • 3.4Text encoding and annotation
    • 3.5The search tool
  • 4.Discussion of results obtained from the analysis of data gathered from CAES
    • 4.1False friends
  • 5.Final reflections and questions for further consideration
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 16 December 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.78.03roj
References

References

Adolphs, S.
2008 Corpus and Context. Investigating Pragmatic Functions in Spoken Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 30]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adolphs, S. & Carter, R.A.
2013 Spoken Corpus Linguistics: From Monomodal to Multimodal. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Aijmer, K.
2002 Modality in advanced Swedish learners’ written interlanguage. In Granger et al. (eds), 55–76. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 Corpora and Language Teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S. & Reppen, R.
1998 Corpus Linguistics. Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braun, S., Kohn, K. & Mukherjee, J.
(eds) 2006 Corpus Technology and Language Pedagogy. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Cestero Mancera, A., Penadés Martínez, I., Blanco Canales, A., Camargo Fernández, L. & Simón Granda, J.
2001 Corpus para el análisis de errores de aprendices de E/LE (CORANE). In Actas del XII Congreso de ASELE tecnologías de la información y de las comunicaciones en la enseñanza de la E/LE, A. Gimeno Sanz (ed.), 527–534. Centro Virtual Cervantes.Google Scholar
Chacón Beltrán, R.
2006 Towards a typological classification of false friends (Spanish-English). Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 19: 29–39.Google Scholar
Council of Europe
2001 Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
De Cock, S.
1998 A recurrent word combination approach to the study of formulae in the speech of native and non-native speakers of English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 3 (1): 59–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R.
2004 The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Granger, S.
1998 Learner English in Computer. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2002 A Bird’s-eye view of learner corpus research. In Granger et al. (eds), 3–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Learner corpora. In Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (eds), 259–274. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Granger, S., Hung, J. & Petch-Tyson, S.
(eds) 2002 Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching [Language Learning & Language Teaching 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krashen, S.
1988 Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. New York NY: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Leech, G.
1992 Corpora and theories of linguistic performance. In Directions in Corpus Linguistics. Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 82, Stockholm 4 –8 August 1991, J. Svartvik (ed.), 105–122. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lozano, C.
2009 Selective deficits at the syntax-discourse interface: Evidence from the CEDEL2 corpus. In Representational Deficits in SLA [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 47], N. Snape, Y.-k. I. Leung & M. Sharwood-Smith (eds), 127–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lozano, C. & Mendikoetxea, A.
2013 Learner corpora and second language acquisition. The design and collection of CEDEL2. In Automatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpus Data [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 59], A. Díaz-Negrillo, N. Ballier & P. Thompson (eds), 65–100. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lüdeling, A. & Kytö, M.
(eds) 2008 Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lombardo, L.
2009 Using Corpora to Learn about Language and Discourse. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
McEnery, T. & Hardie, A.
2012 Corpus Linguistics: Methods, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R., Domínguez, L., Arche, M.J., Myles, F. & Marsden, E.
2008 SPLLOC: A new database for Spanish second language acquisition research. EUROSLA 8: 287–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, M
2009 The UAM CorpusTool: Software for corpus annotation and exploration. In Applied Linguistics Now: Understanding Language and Mind/ La lingüística aplicada hoy: Comprendiendo el lenguaje y la mente, C.M. Bretones Callegas, F. Fernández, J. Ibáñez, M.E. Garcia Ramón, M.E. Cortés Salaberri, M.S. Sagrario Cruz, N. Perdú & B. Cantizano (eds), 1433–1447. Almería: Universidad de Almería.Google Scholar
O’Keeffe, A., McCarthy, M. & Carter, R.
2007 From Corpus to Classroom. Language Use and Language Teaching. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortiz de Urbina, C., Trives, J.R. & Heras Díez, F.
1998 Diccionario francés-español de falsos amigos. Alicante: Universidad de Alicante.Google Scholar
Padró, L. & Stanilovsky, E.
2012 FreeLing 3.0: Towards wider multilinguality. In Proceedings of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC 2012) ELRA. Istanbul, May 2012. Paris: ELRA.Google Scholar
Pérez Basanta, C.
1999 La enseñanza del vocabulario desde una perspectiva lingüística y peda-gógica. In Lingüística aplicada a la enseñanza de lenguas extranjeras, S. Salaberri Ramiro (ed.), 262–306. Almería: Universidad de Almería.Google Scholar
Pérez Paredes, P. & Cantos-Gómez, P.
2004 Some lessons students learn: Self-directory and corpora. In Corpora and Language Learners [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 17], G. Aston, S. D. Stewart (eds), 247–257. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Postigo Pinazo, E.
2007 Diccionario de falsos amigos: Inglés-español. Madrid: Verba.Google Scholar
Prado, M.
2001 Diccionario de falsos amigos inglés-español. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Reppen, R.
2010 Using Corpora in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Roca Varela, M.L.
2015 False Friends in Learner Corpora. A Corpus-Based Study of English False Friends in the Written and Spoken Production of Spanish Learners [Linguistic Insights Series]. Bern: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Römer, U.
2011 Corpus research applications in second language teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31: 205–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seidlhofer, B.
2002 Pedagogy and local learner corpora: Working with learning-driven data. In Granger et al. (eds), 213–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tognini-Bonelli, E.
2001 Corpus Linguistics at Work [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tracy-Ventura, N.
2008 Spanish Learner Language Oral Corpus project (SPLLOC1). A new corpus of oral L2 Spanish. [URL]> & [URL]
WOSLAC Research Group
2007 Proyecto CEDEL2. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. [URL]
Cited by

Cited by 7 other publications

Fernández-Mira, Paloma, Emily Morgan, Sam Davidson, Aaron Yamada, Agustina Carando, Kenji Sagae & Claudia H. Sánchez-Gutiérrez
2021. Lexical diversity in an L2 Spanish learner corpus. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 7:2 ► pp. 230 ff. DOI logo
Ferreira Cabrera, Anita Alejandra, Jessica Elejalde Gómez & Lorena Blanco San Martín
2022. Diseño e implementación del Corpus de Aprendientes de Español como Lengua Extranjera (CAELE). Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 90 ► pp. 137 ff. DOI logo
Lozano, Cristóbal
2022. CEDEL2: Design, compilation and web interface of an online corpus for L2 Spanish acquisition research. Second Language Research 38:4 ► pp. 965 ff. DOI logo
Lozano, Cristóbal & Paloma Fernández-Mira
2022. Designing, compiling and interrogating corpora in L2 Spanish acquisition research. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching 9:2 ► pp. 190 ff. DOI logo
Sampedro Mella, María
2024. An Approach to the Lexical Ambiguity Caused by False Cognates in Spanish L2. a Corpus‐Based Exploratory Study. Studia Linguistica 78:1 ► pp. 186 ff. DOI logo
Sánchez-Gutiérrez, Claudia, Barbara De Cock & Nicole Tracy-Ventura
2022. Spanish corpora and their pedagogical uses: challenges and opportunities. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching 9:2 ► pp. 105 ff. DOI logo
Yamada, Aaron, Sam Davidson, Paloma Fernández-Mira, Agustina Carando, Kenji Sagae & Claudia Sánchez-Gutiérrez
2020. COWS-L2H: A corpus of Spanish learner writing. Research in Corpus Linguistics 8 ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.