Article published in:
Spanish Learner Corpus Research: Current trends and future perspectives
Edited by Margarita Alonso-Ramos
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 78] 2016
► pp. 199234
References

References

Abad, F.J., Garrido, J., Olea, J. & Ponsoda, V.
2006Introducción a la Psicometría. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma.Google Scholar
Altman, H.B.
1980Foreign language teaching: Focus on the learner. In Foreign Language Teaching: Meeting Individual Needs, H.B. Altman & C.V. James (eds), 1–16. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Best, C.T.
1984Discovering messages in the medium: speech and the prelinguistic infant. In Advances in Pediatric Psychology, Vol. 2, H.E. Fitzgerald, B. Lester & M. Yogman (eds), 97–145. New York NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
1994The emergence of native-language phonological influences in infants: a perceptual assimilation model. In The Development of Speech Perception: The Transition from Speech Sounds to Spoken Words, Nusbaum, H.C. (ed.), 167–224. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1995A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Cross-Language Speech Research, Strange, W. (ed.), 171–203. Timonium MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Blanco Canales, A.
2012Corpus oral para el estudio de la adquisición y aprendizaje del componente fónico del español como lengua extranjera. Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada 50 (2): 3–37.Google Scholar
2014Adquisición y aprendizaje del componente fónico del español como lengua extranjera. In Fonética experimental, Educación Superior e Investigación, Y. Congosto Martín, M.L. Montero Curiel & A. Salvador Plans (eds), 179–198. Madrid: Arco-Libros.Google Scholar
Blumstein, S.E.
1986On acoustic invariance in speech. In Invariance and Variability in Speech Processes, J.S. Perkell & D.H. Klatt (eds), 178–193. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Bohn, O.-S.
1995Cross-language speech perception in adults: First language transfer doesn’t tell it all. In Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues, Strange, W. (ed.), 273–304. Timonium MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Bohn, O.-S. & Flege, J.E.
1990Interlingual identification and the role of foreign language experience in L2 vowel perception. Applied Psycholinguistics 11:303–328. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, C.
2000The interrelation between speech perception and phonological acquisition from infant to adult. In Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory, Archibald, J. (ed.), 4–63. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cano García, F.
2000Diferencias de género en estrategias y estilos de aprendizaje. Psicothema 12(3): 360–367.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Miller, G.A.
1963Introduction to formal analysis of natural languages. In Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 2, Luce, R.D., R. Bush & E. Galanter (eds), 269–321. New York NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Cortés, M.
2001Percepción y adquisición de la entonación española en enunciados de habla espontánea: el caso de los estudiantes taiwaneses. Estudios de Fonética Experimental XI: 89–119.Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Sebastian-Galles, N., Navarete, E. & Peperkamp, S.
2008Persistent stress ‘deafness’: The case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition 106(2): 682–706. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Eckman, F.R. & Iverson, G.K.
2013The role of native language phonology in the production of L2 contrasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(1): 67–92 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Escudero, P.R.
2005Linguistic Perception and Second Language Acquisition. Explaining the Attainment of Optimal Phonological Categorization. Utrecht: LOT Publications.Google Scholar
Espinoza-Varas, B.
1987Involvement of the critical band in the identification, perceived distance and discrimination of vowels. In The Psychophysics of Speech Perception, Schouten, M.E.H. (ed.), 306–313. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fant, G.
1962Descriptive analysis of the acoustic aspects of speech. Logos 5:3–17.Google Scholar
Flege, J.E., Munro, M. & MacKay, I.R.A.
1995Factors affecting the strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97: 3125–3134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J.E.
1980Phonetic a pproximation in second language acquisition. Language Learning 27(1): 117–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992Speech learning in a second language. In Phonological Development: Models, Research, and Application, Ferguson, C.A., L. Menn & C. Stoel-Gammon (eds), 565–603. Timonium MD: York Press.Google Scholar
2003Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception. In Phonetics and Phonology in Language Comprehension and Production, A. Meyer & N.O. Schiller (eds), 319–355. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, C.A.
1986An even approach to the study of speech perception from a direct-realist perspective. Journal of Phonetics 14:1–38.Google Scholar
García Moutón, P.
2000Cómo hablan las mujeres. Madrid: Arco-Libros.Google Scholar
Howard, P.J.
1999The Owner’s Manual for the Brain: Everyday Applications from Mind-Brain Research. Atlanta: Bard Press.Google Scholar
Iverson, P. & Kuhl, P.K.
1995Mapping the perceptual magnet effect for speech using signal detection theory and multidimensional scaling. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97: 553–562. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996Influences of phonetic identification and category goodness on American listeners perception of /r/ and /l/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99: 1130–1140. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
James, A.
1996Second language phonology. In Investigating Second Language Acquisition, Peter Jordaens & Josine Lalleman (eds), 293–320. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kuhl, P.K.
1991Human adults and human infants show a ‘perceptual magnetic effect’ for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception & Psychophysics 50: 93–107. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000A new view of language acquisition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 97: 11850–11857. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W.
1996Principios del cambio lingüístico. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Liberman, A.M.
1982On finding that speech is special. American Psychologist 37:148–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, A.M., Delattre, P.C. & Cooper, F.S.
1958Some cues for the distinction between voiced and voiceless stops in initial position. Language and Speech 1: 153–167.Google Scholar
Liberman, A.M. & Mattingly, I.G.
1985The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 21(1): 1–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, B.
1986On the origin and purpose of discreteness and invariance in sound patterns. In Invariance and Variability in Speech Processes, J.S. Perkell & D.H. Klatt (ed.), 493–510. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
1992Phonological units as adaptive emergents of lexical development. In Phonological Development: Models, Research, Implications, Ferguson, C.A., L. Menn & C. Stoel-Gammon (eds), 131–163. Parkton MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Llisterri, J.
1995Relationships between speech production and speech perception in a second language. In Proceedings of the XIII International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Vol. 4, K. Elenius & P. Branderud (eds), 92–99. Stockholm: KTH – Stockholm University.Google Scholar
López Bascuas, L.E.
1996Las teorías de la percepción del habla: Un análisis crítico. Estudios de Psicología 56:45–58. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
MacNeilage, P.F.
1972Parametric study of single motor unit waveforms in upper articulatory musculature. Journal of The Acoustical Society of America 52(1A): 124.Google Scholar
Major, R.C.
1987Phonological similarity, markedness and rate of L2 acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 9: 63–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marrero, V.
2008La fonética perceptiva: Trascendencia lingüística de mecanismos neuropsicofisiológicos. Estudios de Fonética Experimental XVII: 207–245.Google Scholar
McClelland, J.L. & Elman, J.L.
1986The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology 18:1–86. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Miller, J.L. & Jusczyk, P. W.
1989Seeking the neurobiological basis of speech perception. Cognition 33:117–137. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mora, E., Courtois, F. & Cavé, C.
1997Étude comparative de la perception par des sujets francophones et hispanophones de l’accent lexical en espagnol. Revue Parole 1: 75–86.Google Scholar
Moreno, F.
1990Metodología sociolingüística. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
Muñoz, M., Panissal, N., Billières, M. & Baqué, L.
2009¿La metáfora de la criba fonológica se puede aplicar a la percepción del acento léxico español? Estudio experimental con estudiantes francófonos. In La lingüística aplicada actual: Comprendiendo el lenguaje y la mente, C.M. Bretones Callejas, S. Salaberri Ramiro, E. García Sánchez, E. Cortés de los Ríos, S. Cruz Martínez, J.F. Fernández Sánchez & J.R. Ibañez Sánchez (eds), 489–99. Almería: Universidad de Almería – AESLA.Google Scholar
Repp, B.H.
1982Phonetic trading relations and context effects: new experimental evidence for a phonetic mode of perception. Psychological Bulletin 92: 81–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, K.N. & Blumstein, S.E.
1981The search for invaríant ácoustic correlates of phonetic features. In Perspectives on the Study of Speech, P.D. Eimas & J.L. Miller (eds), 1–39. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Wode, H.
1996Speech perception and L2 phonologycal acquisition. In Investigating Second Language AcquisitionP. Jordaens & J. Lalleman (eds), 321–353. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar