Part of
Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics
Edited by Joanna Kopaczyk and Jukka Tyrkkö
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 82] 2018
► pp. 5780
Adolphs, Svenja
2006Introducing Electronic Text Analysis. A Practical Guide for Language and Literary Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Appel, Randy & Trofimovich, Pavel
2015Transitional probability predicts native and non-native use of formulaic sequences. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. Advance online publication: 29 Jan 2015 doi: DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Babbie, Earl
2013The Basics of Social Research. Belmont MA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika
2014’Who are you and why are you following us?’ Wh- questions and communicative context in television dialogue. In Discourse in Context: Contemporary Applied Linguistics, Vol. 3, John Flowerdew (ed.), 49–70. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Bernardini, Silvia, Ferraresi, Adriano & Gaspari, Federico
2010Institutional academic English in the European context: A web-as-corpus approach to comparing native and non-native language. In Professional English in the European context: The EHEA challenge, Angeles Linde Lopez & Rosalia Crespo Jimenez (eds), 27–53. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
2006University Language. A Corpus-based Study of Spoken and Written Registers [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: multi-word patterns in speech and writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(3): 275–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Federica Barbieri
2007Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes 26: 263-286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan & Cortes, Viviana
2004 If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25(3): 371–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bogusławski, Andrzej
1976O zasadach rejestracji jednostek języka. Poradnik Językowy 8: 356–364.Google Scholar
1989Uwagi o pracy nad frazeologią. In Studia z polskiej leksykografii współczesnej, Vol. 3, Zygmunt Saloni (ed.), 13–29. Białystok: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku.Google Scholar
Breeze, Ruth
2013Lexical bundles across four legal genres. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(2): 229–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Canning, John
2013An Introduction to Statistics for Students in the Humanities. [URL]> (16 December 2014).
Chen, Yu.-Hua & Baker, Paul
2010Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language Learning and Technology 14(2): 30–49. [URL]> (10 December 2014).
Cortes, Viviana
2013 The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12(1): 33–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Situating lexical bundles in the formulaic language spectrum. In Corpus-based Research in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honor of Doug Biber [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 66], Viviana Cortes & Eniko Csomay (eds), 197–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
DrugDDI Corpus
. [URL]> (5 December 2014).
Dunning, Ted
1993Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics 19(1): 61–74.Google Scholar
Fletcher, William
2002–2007KfNgram. Annapolis MD: USNA. [URL]> (20 November 2011).
Forsyth, Richard
2015aFormulib: Formulaic Language Software Library. [URL]> (30 November 2015)
2015bFormulib: Formulaic Language Software Library. User notes. [URL]> (2 November 2015)
Gallicano, Keith & Drusano, George
2005Introduction to drug interactions. In Drug Interactions in Infectious Diseases, Stephen Piscitelli & Keith Rodvold (eds), 1–11. Totowa: Humana Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gaspari, Federico
2013A phraseological comparison of international news agency reports published online: Lexical bundles in the English-language output of ANSA, Adnkronos, Reuters and UPI. Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English, Vol. 13. [URL]> (14 April 2016)
Gledhill, Christopher
2000Collocations in Science Writing. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław
2011Patterns of Linguistic Variation in American Legal English. A Corpus-Based Study. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grabowski, Łukasz
2014On lexical bundles in Polish patient information leaflets: A corpus-driven study. Studies in Polish Linguistics 9(1): 21–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Keywords and lexical bundles within English pharmaceutical discourse: A corpus-driven description. English for Specific Purposes 38: 23–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grabowski, Łukasz & Jukneviciene, Rita
2016Towards a refined inventory of lexical bundles: an experiment in the Formulex method. Kalbu Studijos/Studies About Languages 29: 58–73.Google Scholar
Granger, Sylviane
2014A lexical bundle approach to comparing languages. Stems in English and French. In Genre- and Register-related Discourse Features in Contrast, Marie-Aude Lefer & Svetlana Vogeleer (eds). Special issue of Languages in Contrast 14(1): 58–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grochowski, Maciej
1981O wyróżnianiu jednostek opisu semantyki leksykalnej. Studia Minora Facultatis Philosophicae Universitatis Brunensis, 29: 31–37. [URL]> (8 December 2015).
Huang, Shiew-Mei, Lesko, Lawrence & Temple, Robert
2008An integrated approach to assessing drug-drug interactions: A regulatory perspective. In Drug-Drug Interactions, 2nd edn, A. David Rodrigues (ed.), 665–685. New York NY: Informa Healthcare.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2008As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 27: 4–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ionescu, Corina & Caira, Mino
2005Drug Metabolism: Current Concepts. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jukneviciene, Rita
2009Lexical bundles in learner language: Lithuanian learners vs. native speakers. Kalbotyra 61(3): 61–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koester, Almut
2010Building small specialized corpora. In The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, Michael McCarthy & Anne O’Keeffe (eds), 66–79. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopaczyk, Joanna
2012Long lexical bundles and standardisation in historical legal texts. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia: International Review of English Studies 47(2–3): 3–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013The Legal Language of Scottish Burghs (1380–1560). Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, Dilin
2012The most frequently-used multi-word constructions in academic written English: A multi-corpus study. English for Specific Purposes 31: 25–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McEnery, Tony, Xiao, Richard & Tono, Yukio
2006Corpus-Based Language Studies. An Advanced Resource Book. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moon, Rosamund
2007Corpus linguistic aspects of phraseology. In Phraseologie: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenoessischer Forschung Vol. 2, Harald Burger (ed.), 1045–1059. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Myles, Florence & Cordier, Caroline
2017Formulaic sequence(fs) cannot be an umbrella term in SLA: Focusing on psycholinguistic FSs and their identification. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 39(1): 3–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oakes, Michael
1998Statistics for Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Matthew Brook
2011The adjusted frequency list: A method to produce cluster-sensitive frequency lists. ICAME Journal 35: 135–169 [URL]> (9 December 2015).
Rayson, Paul & Garside, Roger
2000Comparing corpora using frequency profiling. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Comparing Corpora, Vol. 9 (WCC ’00), 1–6. Stroudsburg PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. [URL]> (10 December 2015)
Rieger, Burghard
2001Computing granular word meanings. In Computing with Words, Paul Wang (ed.), 147–208. New York NY: Wiley. (cited in Stubbs & Barth 2003: 81).Google Scholar
Rowland, Malcolm
2008Introducing pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic concepts. In Drug-Drug Interactions, 2nd edn, A. David Rodrigues (ed.), 1–29. New York NY: Informa Healthcare.Google Scholar
Rowntree, Derek
2000Statistics Without Tears. An Introduction for Non-Mathematicians. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Salazar, Danica
2011Lexical Bundles in Scientific English: A Corpus-Based Study of Native and Non-native Writing. PhD dissertation. University of Barcelona. [URL]> (10 March 2013).
2014Lexical Bundles in Native and Non-native Scientific Writing [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 65]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Norbert., Grandage, Sarah & Adolphs, Svenja
2004Are corpus-derived recurrent clusters psycholinguistically valid? In Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing, and Use [Language Learning & Language Teaching 9], Norbert Schmitt (ed.), 127–151. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, Mike
2008WordSmith Tools 5.0. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Segura-Bedmar, Isabel, Martinez, Paloma, & de Pablo-Sanchez, Cesar
2010Extracting drug-drug interactions from biomedical texts. BMC Bioinformatics 11(Suppl 5): P9. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simpson-Vlach, Rita & Ellis, Nick
2010An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology research. Applied Linguistics 31(4): 487–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, Michael & Barth, Isabel
The British National Corpus, version 3 (BNC XML Edition)
2007Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. [URL]> (10 January 2015)
Tognini-Bonelli, Elena
2001Corpus Linguistics at Work [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wood, David. & Appel, Randy
2014Multi-word constructions in first year business and engineering university textbooks and EAP textbooks. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 15: 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wood, David
2015Fundamentals of Formulaic Language: An Introduction. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Wray, Alison & Perkins, Michael
2000The functions of formulaic language: An integrated model. Language and Communication 20: 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Zumrík, Miroslav
2021. Lexical Bundles in the Corpus of Slovak Judicial Decisions. Journal of Linguistics/Jazykovedný casopis 72:2  pp. 705 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.