Chapter published in:
Applications of Pattern-driven Methods in Corpus Linguistics
Edited by Joanna Kopaczyk and Jukka Tyrkkö
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 82] 2018
► pp. 5780


Adolphs, Svenja
2006Introducing Electronic Text Analysis. A Practical Guide for Language and Literary Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Appel, Randy & Trofimovich, Pavel
2015Transitional probability predicts native and non-native use of formulaic sequences. International Journal of Applied Linguistics. Advance online publication: 29 Jan 2015 doi: CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Babbie, Earl
2013The Basics of Social Research. Belmont MA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
Bednarek, Monika
2014’Who are you and why are you following us?’ Wh- questions and communicative context in television dialogue. In Discourse in Context: Contemporary Applied Linguistics, Vol. 3, John Flowerdew (ed.), 49–70. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Bernardini, Silvia, Ferraresi, Adriano & Gaspari, Federico
2010Institutional academic English in the European context: A web-as-corpus approach to comparing native and non-native language. In Professional English in the European context: The EHEA challenge, Angeles Linde Lopez & Rosalia Crespo Jimenez (eds), 27–53. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas
2006University Language. A Corpus-based Study of Spoken and Written Registers [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: multi-word patterns in speech and writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 14(3): 275–311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Federica Barbieri
2007Lexical bundles in university spoken and written registers. English for Specific Purposes 26: 263-286. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999The Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Conrad, Susan & Cortes, Viviana
2004 If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25(3): 371–405. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bogusławski, Andrzej
1976O zasadach rejestracji jednostek języka. Poradnik Językowy 8: 356–364.Google Scholar
1989Uwagi o pracy nad frazeologią. In Studia z polskiej leksykografii współczesnej, Vol. 3, Zygmunt Saloni (ed.), 13–29. Białystok: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu w Białymstoku.Google Scholar
Breeze, Ruth
2013Lexical bundles across four legal genres. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(2): 229–253. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Canning, John 2013An Introduction to Statistics for Students in the Humanities. http://​statisticsforhumanities​.net/> (16 December 2014).
Chen, Yu.-Hua & Baker, Paul
2010Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language Learning and Technology 14(2): 30–49. http://​llt​.msu​.edu​/vol14num2​/chenbaker​.pdf> (10 December 2014).
Cortes, Viviana
2013 The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 12(1): 33–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Situating lexical bundles in the formulaic language spectrum. In Corpus-based Research in Applied Linguistics: Studies in Honor of Doug Biber [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 66], Viviana Cortes & Eniko Csomay (eds), 197–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dunning, Ted
1993Accurate methods for the statistics of surprise and coincidence. Computational Linguistics 19(1): 61–74.Google Scholar
Fletcher, William
2002–2007KfNgram. Annapolis MD: USNA. http://​www​.kwicfinder​.com​/kfNgram​/kfNgramHelp​.html> (20 November 2011).
Forsyth, Richard
2015aFormulib: Formulaic Language Software Library. http://​www​.richardsandesforsyth​.net​/zips​/formulib​.zip> (30 November 2015)
2015bFormulib: Formulaic Language Software Library. User notes. http://​www​.richardsandesforsyth​.net​/docs​/formulib​.pdf> (2 November 2015)
Gallicano, Keith & Drusano, George
2005Introduction to drug interactions. In Drug Interactions in Infectious Diseases, Stephen Piscitelli & Keith Rodvold (eds), 1–11. Totowa: Humana Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gaspari, Federico
2013A phraseological comparison of international news agency reports published online: Lexical bundles in the English-language output of ANSA, Adnkronos, Reuters and UPI. Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English, Vol. 13. http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/journal​/volumes​/13​/gaspari/> (14 April 2016)
Gledhill, Christopher
2000Collocations in Science Writing. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław
2011Patterns of Linguistic Variation in American Legal English. A Corpus-Based Study. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grabowski, Łukasz
2014On lexical bundles in Polish patient information leaflets: A corpus-driven study. Studies in Polish Linguistics 9(1): 21–43. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Keywords and lexical bundles within English pharmaceutical discourse: A corpus-driven description. English for Specific Purposes 38: 23–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grabowski, Łukasz & Jukneviciene, Rita
2016Towards a refined inventory of lexical bundles: an experiment in the Formulex method. Kalbu Studijos/Studies About Languages 29: 58–73.Google Scholar
Granger, Sylviane
2014A lexical bundle approach to comparing languages. Stems in English and French. In Genre- and Register-related Discourse Features in Contrast, Marie-Aude Lefer & Svetlana Vogeleer (eds). Special issue of Languages in Contrast 14(1): 58–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grochowski, Maciej
1981O wyróżnianiu jednostek opisu semantyki leksykalnej. Studia Minora Facultatis Philosophicae Universitatis Brunensis, 29: 31–37. https://​digilib​.phil​.muni​.cz​/bitstream​/handle​/11222​.digilib​/100402​/A​_Linguistica​_29​-1981​-1​_4​.pdf​?sequence​=1> (8 December 2015).
Huang, Shiew-Mei, Lesko, Lawrence & Temple, Robert 2008An integrated approach to assessing drug-drug interactions: A regulatory perspective. In Drug-Drug Interactions, 2nd edn, A. David Rodrigues (ed.), 665–685. New York NY: Informa Healthcare.Google Scholar
Hyland, Ken
2008As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation. English for Specific Purposes 27: 4–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ionescu, Corina & Caira, Mino
2005Drug Metabolism: Current Concepts. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jukneviciene, Rita
2009Lexical bundles in learner language: Lithuanian learners vs. native speakers. Kalbotyra 61(3): 61–71. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koester, Almut
2010Building small specialized corpora. In The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, Michael McCarthy & Anne O’Keeffe (eds), 66–79. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kopaczyk, Joanna
2012Long lexical bundles and standardisation in historical legal texts. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia: International Review of English Studies 47(2–3): 3–25. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013The Legal Language of Scottish Burghs (1380–1560). Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Dilin
2012The most frequently-used multi-word constructions in academic written English: A multi-corpus study. English for Specific Purposes 31: 25–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McEnery, Tony, Xiao, Richard & Tono, Yukio
2006Corpus-Based Language Studies. An Advanced Resource Book. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moon, Rosamund
2007Corpus linguistic aspects of phraseology. In Phraseologie: Ein internationales Handbuch zeitgenoessischer Forschung Vol. 2, Harald Burger (ed.), 1045–1059. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Myles, Florence & Cordier, Caroline
2017Formulaic sequence(fs) cannot be an umbrella term in SLA: Focusing on psycholinguistic FSs and their identification. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 39(1): 3–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oakes, Michael
1998Statistics for Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Matthew Brook
2011The adjusted frequency list: A method to produce cluster-sensitive frequency lists. ICAME Journal 35: 135–169 http://​clu​.uni​.no​/icame​/ij35/> (9 December 2015).
Rayson, Paul & Garside, Roger
2000Comparing corpora using frequency profiling. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Comparing Corpora, Vol. 9 (WCC ’00), 1–6. Stroudsburg PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. http://​ucrel​.lancs​.ac​.uk​/people​/paul​/publications​/rg​_acl2000​.pdf> (10 December 2015)
Rieger, Burghard
2001Computing granular word meanings. In Computing with Words, Paul Wang (ed.), 147–208. New York NY: Wiley. (cited in Stubbs & Barth 2003: 81).Google Scholar
Rowland, Malcolm
2008Introducing pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic concepts. In Drug-Drug Interactions, 2nd edn, A. David Rodrigues (ed.), 1–29. New York NY: Informa Healthcare.Google Scholar
Rowntree, Derek
2000Statistics Without Tears. An Introduction for Non-Mathematicians. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Salazar, Danica
2011Lexical Bundles in Scientific English: A Corpus-Based Study of Native and Non-native Writing. PhD dissertation. University of Barcelona. http://​www​.tdx​.cat​/bitstream​/handle​/10803​/52083​/DJLS​_DISSERTATION​.pdf> (10 March 2013).
Salazar, Danica 2014Lexical Bundles in Native and Non-native Scientific Writing [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 65]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, Norbert., Grandage, Sarah & Adolphs, Svenja
2004Are corpus-derived recurrent clusters psycholinguistically valid? In Formulaic Sequences: Acquisition, Processing, and Use [Language Learning & Language Teaching 9], Norbert Schmitt (ed.), 127–151. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scott, Mike
2008WordSmith Tools 5.0. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Segura-Bedmar, Isabel, Martinez, Paloma, & de Pablo-Sanchez, Cesar
2010Extracting drug-drug interactions from biomedical texts. BMC Bioinformatics 11(Suppl 5): P9. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Simpson-Vlach, Rita & Ellis, Nick
2010An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology research. Applied Linguistics 31(4): 487–512. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stubbs, Michael & Barth, Isabel
2003Using recurrent phrases as text-type discriminators: A quantitative method and some findings. Functions of Language 10(1): 65–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
The British National Corpus, version 3 (BNC XML Edition)
2007Distributed by Oxford University Computing Services on behalf of the BNC Consortium. http://​www​.natcorp​.ox​.ac​.uk/> (10 January 2015)
Tognini-Bonelli, Elena
2001Corpus Linguistics at Work [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wood, David. & Appel, Randy
2014Multi-word constructions in first year business and engineering university textbooks and EAP textbooks. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 15: 1–13. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wood, David
2015Fundamentals of Formulaic Language: An Introduction. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Wray, Alison & Perkins, Michael
2000The functions of formulaic language: An integrated model. Language and Communication 20: 1–28. CrossrefGoogle Scholar