Chapter published in:
Voices Past and Present - Studies of Involved, Speech-related and Spoken Texts: In honor of Merja Kytö
Edited by Ewa Jonsson and Tove Larsson
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 97] 2020
► pp. 283300
References
Aijmer, K.
2003Engelska – ett språk utan gränser. In Gränser: Humanistdag-boken 16, E. Ahlstedt, M.-L. Follér, A. Lundqvist, M. Nyman, T. Magnusson, T. Olsson & B. Ryder Liljegren (eds), 13–20. Gothenburg: Faculty of the Humanities, Gothenburg University.Google Scholar
Barth-Weingarten, D. & Couper-Kuhlen, E.
2002On the development of final though: A case of grammaticalization? In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], I. Wischer & G. Diewald (eds), 345–361. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D.
1988Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. & Gray, B.
2011Grammatical change in the noun phrase: The influence of written language use. English Language and Linguistics 15(2): 223–250. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E.
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Collins = Collins COBUILD English Grammar, 4th edn 2017 Glasgow: Collins.Google Scholar
The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English
, 9th edn 1995 Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Connors, R. J. & Lunsford, A. A.
1988Frequency of formal errors in current college writing, or Ma and Pa Kettle do research. College Composition and Communication 39(4): 395–409.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D.
2003English as a Global Language, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Curzan, A.
2014Fixing English: Prescriptivism and Language History. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
D’Arcy, A.
2006Lexical replacement and the like(s). American Speech 81(4): 339–357. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M.
2008The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 million words, 1990–present. https://​www​.english​-corpora​.org​/coca/ (10 July 2019).
Denison, D.
1998Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. IV: 1776–1997, S. Romaine (ed.), 92–329. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Estling Vannestål, M.
2015A University Grammar of English: With a Swedish Perspective, 2nd edn. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Gabrielatos, C.
2005Corpora and language teaching: Just a fling or wedding bells? Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language 8(4): n.p.Google Scholar
Hancock, C. R.
1993 If he would have and if he didn’t . American Speech 68(3): 241–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G. K.
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hundt, M. & Mair, C.
1999‘Agile’ and ‘uptight’ genres: The corpus-based approach to language change in progress. The International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 4(2): 221–242. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. & Jiang, F. (K.)
2017Is academic writing becoming more informal? English for Specific Purposes 45(1): 40–51. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ishihara, N.
2003 “I wish I would have known!”: The usage of would have in past counterfactual if- and wish-clauses. Issues in Applied Linguistics 14(1): 21–48.Google Scholar
Larsson, T. & Kaatari, H.
2019Extraposition in learner and expert writing: Exploring (in)formality and the impact of register. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 5(1): 33–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English
, 5th edn 2009 Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Mair, C.
1997Parallel corpora: A real-time approach to the study of language change in progress. In Corpus-based Studies in English, M. Ljung (ed.), 195–209. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
2006Twentieth-century English: History, Variation and Standardization. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Molencki, R.
2000Parallelism vs. asymmetry: The case of English counterfactual conditionals. In Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53], O. Fischer, A. Rosenbach & D. Stein (eds), 311–328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
OED Oxford English Dictionary Online. OUP. http://​www​.oed​.com (15 May 2020).
Perales-Escudero, M. D.
2011To split or not to split: The split infinitive past and present. Journal of English Linguistics 39(4): 313–334. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J.
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Römer, U.
2007Learner language and the norms in native corpora and EFL teaching materials: A case study of English conditionals. In Anglistentag 2006 Halle: Proceedings, S. Volk-Birke & J. Lippert (eds), 355–363. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.Google Scholar
Rubio, F. D. & Martínez Lirola, M.
2010English as a foreign language in the EU: Preliminary analysis of the difference in proficiency levels among the member states. European Journal of Language Policy 2(1): 23–40.. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, P.
2009Chapter 11. Linking adverbials in student and professional writing in literary studies: What makes writing mature. In Academic Writing: At the Interface of Corpus and Discourse, M. Charles, D. Pecorari & S. Hunston (eds), 215–235. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Siemund, R.
1995‘For who the bell tolls’: Or why corpus linguistics should carry the bell in the study of language change in present-day English. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 20: 351–376.Google Scholar
Svartvik, J. & Sager, O.
1996Engelsk universitetsgrammatik, 2nd edn. Stockholm: Liber.Google Scholar
Swales, J. M.
2001EAP-related linguistic research: An intellectual history. In Research Perspectives on English for Academic Purposes, J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (eds), 42–54. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar