Cover not available
Part of
Current Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse: Global context and diverse perspectives
Edited by Yun Xiao and Linda Tsung
[Studies in Chinese Language and Discourse 10] 2019
► pp. 28–56

Chapter 3
Usage based language change and exemplar representations in Beijing Mandarin Chinese

| Ohio University

This study offers support to usage-based studies to promote the importance of everyday language use in language development and grammaticalization. Specifically, the study presents a new construction in Beijing Mandarin Chinese that currently co-occurs with its original form, both in spoken language and written texts. The change is another instance of phono-syntactic conspiracy (Tao 2002, 2006, 2009). It starts from phonological reduction and ends in a syntactic change of a highly frequently used rhetorical question 不是…吗: ‘Isn’t it the case that….’ However, the process differs from previous findings (Bybee 2010) in that the grammaticalization process involves usage frequency as well as cognitive, cultural and social factors. The findings further support the view that language and grammar are fostered and conditioned through human communication.

Keywords: grammaticalization, frequency, chunking, phonological fusion, Mandarin tones, phono-syntactic conspiracy, discourse-functional linguistics, bu35shi…ma (不是…吗)?
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Mandarin Chinese and the current study
    • 2.1Mandarin Chinese pertaining to the present study
    • 2.2The current study
  • 3.Phono-syntactic conspiracy and grammaticalization
  • 4.Usage-caused grammatical change
    • 4.1The data and the specific construction of this study
    • 4.2Usage frequency, consonant lenition and an optional allophone
    • 4.3Tone sandhi, the rhotic approximant and exemplar representations of /sh/
    • 4.4Language variation, grammaticalization, and language change
      • 4.4.1Misperception and transcription
      • 4.4.2Impact of 普通话 Putonghua ‘common language’
    • 4.5Interim summary
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 15 April 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/scld.10.03tao
References
Anderson, John. R.
1993 Rules of the Mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ashby, Michael, and John Maidment
2005 Introducing Phonetic Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barlow, Michael, and Suzanne Kemmer
2000 (eds). Usage-Based Models of Language. Sanford, CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Boyce, Suzanne E., Sarah M. Hamilton, and Ahmed Rivera-Campos
2016 “Acquiring rhoticity across languages: An ultrasound study of differentiating tongue movements.” Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 30 (3–5): 174–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2000 “The phonology of the lexicon: Evidence from lexical diffusion.” In Usage-Based Models of Language, ed. by Michael Barlow and Suzanne Kemmer, 65–85. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
2003 “Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency.” In The handbook of historical linguistics, ed. by Brian D. Joseph and Richard D. Janda, 602–23. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition.” Language 82 (4): 711–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “Usage-based Theory and Exemplar Representations of Constructions.” In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, ed. by Thomas Hoffmann and Graeme Trousdale, 49–69. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan and Paul Hopper
2001 “Introduction to frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure.” In Frequency effects and the emergence of linguistic structure, ed. by Joan Bybee and Paul Hopper, 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, William Pagliuca, and Revere D. Perkins
1991 “Back to the future.” In Approaches to grammaticalization, ed. by Elizabeth C. Traugott, and Bernd Heine, 19–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Revere D. Perkins, and William Pagliuca
1994 The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, and Joanne Scheibman
1999 “The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: The reduction of don’t in English.” Linguistics 37: 575–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cambridge Dictionary
Accessed December 28, 2017. [URL].
Chafe, Wallace
1994 Discourse, Consciousness and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago of Press.Google Scholar
2002 “Putting Grammaticalization in its place.” In New Reflections of Grammaticalization, ed. by Ilse Wischer, and Gabriele Dieward, 395–412. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren
1968 A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Ping
1999 Modern Chinese: History and Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duanmu, San
2007 The Phonology of Standard Chinese (2nd ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Erbaugh, Mary S.
1986 “The development of Chinese noun classifiers historically and in young children.” In Noun Classes and Categorization, ed. by Colette G. Craig, 399–436. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Carol
1986 “An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct‐realist perspective.” Journal of Phonetics 14: 3–28.Google Scholar
Goldinger, Stephen D.
1998 “Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access.” Psychological Review 105: 251–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 “The cognitive basis of spontaneous imitation: Evidence from the visual world.” Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 19: 1–6. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles
2013 “The co-operative, transformative organization of human action and knowledge.” Journal of Pragmatics 46 (1): 8–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, Charles and Marjorie H. Goodwin
2004 “Participation.” In A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, 222–244. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Guo, Degang 郭德纲 and Qian Yu 于谦
卖吊票 (Mai Diao Piao: Selling Tickets for Hanging Seats. Cross-Talk) [URL] Accessed February 5, 2017.
Haiman, John
1994 “Ritualization and the development of language.” In Perspectives on Grammaticalization, ed. by William Pagliuca. 3–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1993 Auxiliaries: Cognitive forces and grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2002 “On the role of context in grammaticalization.” In New Reflections of Grammaticalization, ed. by Ilse Wischer, and Gabriele Dieward, 83–101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd and Tanya Kuteva
2002 World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1994 “Phonogenesis.” In Perspectives on Grammaticalization, ed. by William Pagliuca, 29–45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul. J.
1998 “The paradigm at the end of the universe.” In The Limits of Grammaticalization, ed. by Anna G. Ramat, and Paul Hopper, 147–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1999 “Conversation and argument structure: The significance of dialogue for grammatical explanation.” Paper presented at the International Symposium New Reflections on Grammaticalization. University of Potsdam, Germany.
Hopper, Paul J. and Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2003 (1993) Grammaticalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ingram, David
1989 First Language Acquisition: Method, description and explanation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter
1964 A Phonetic Study of West African Languages. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail
2004 “Glossary of transcript symbols with an Introduction.” In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the first generation, ed. by Gene H. Lerner, 13–23. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter
2003 Phonetic Data Analysis: An introduction to fieldwork and instrumental techniques. Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
1999 Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lass, Roger
1984 Phonology: An introduction to basic concepts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Standard Spoken and Written Chinese Language
. People’s Republic of China Database of Laws and Regulations. Published October 31 2000 Accessed January 31, 2017. [URL].
Li, Charles and Sandra A. Thompson
1981 Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Yen-Hwei
2007 The Sounds of Chinese. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2011 “Loanword adaptation in Standard Mandarin and phonological theory,” Current Issues in Chinese Linguistics, edited by Yun Xiao, Liang Tao & Hooi Ling Soh, 426–451. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Lindqvist, Cecilia
1991 China: Empire of Living Symbols. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Lü, Shuxiang 吕叔湘
1990 吕叔湘文集(2): 汉语语法论文集 (Lü Shuxiang Wen Ji (2): Hanyu Yufa Lunwen Ji: Collection of Research Articles by Lü Shuxiang (2): Articles on Chinese Grammar). 北京, 商务印书馆 (Beijing: Commercial Press).Google Scholar
Lyovin, Anatole V., Brett Kessler, and William R. Leben
2017 An Introduction to the Languages of the World (2nd edition). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Newell, Allen
1990 Unified Theories of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Norman, Jerry
1988 Chinese (Cambridge Linguistic Surveys). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B.
2001 “Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast.” In Frequency effects and the emergence of linguistic structure, ed. by Joan Bybee and Paul Hopper, 137–158. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reetz, Henning and Allard Jongman
2011 Phonetics: Transcription, Production, Acoustics, and Perception. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Su, Danjie
2016 “Grammar emerges through reuse and modification of prior utterances.” Discourse Studies 18 (3): 330–353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1987 “Repetition in conversation as spontaneous formulaicity.” Text 7 (3): 215–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tao, Hongyin
2015 “Profiling the Mandarin Spoken Vocabulary Based on Corpora.” In The Oxford handbook of Chinese linguistics, ed. by William S-Y. Wang, and Chaofen Sun, 336–347. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tao, Liang
2002 “Phono-syntactic conspiracy and beyond: Grammaticalization in spoken Beijing Mandarin.” In New Reflections of Grammaticalization, ed. by Ilse Wischer, and Gabriele Dieward, 283–299. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 “The Importance of Discourse Analysis for Linguistic Theory: A Mandarin Chinese Illustration.” In Linguistic Diversity and Language Theories, ed. by Zygmunt Frajzyngier, Adam Hodges, and David Rood, 285–317. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 “Classifier Loss and Frozen Tone in Spoken Beijing Mandarin: The yi+ge phono-syntactic Conspiracy.” Linguistics 44: 91–133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009 “Syntactic tone and discourse processing in Beijing Mandarin: A case study.” Journal of Chinese Linguistics 37 (2): 258–296.Google Scholar
2018 “Self-repair in Mandarin Chinese: The multimodality of conversation.” In Multimodality in Chinese Interaction, ed. by Xiaoting Li and Tsuyoshi Ono, 255–298. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Tao, Liang, Barbara Fox, and Jule Gomez de Garcia
1999 “Tone-choice repair in Conversational Mandarin Chinese”. In Cognition and Function in Language, ed. by Barbara Fox, Dan Jurafsky, and Laura Michaelis, 268–281. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A., and Paul Hopper
2001 “Transitivity, clause structure, and argument structure: Evidence from conversation.” In Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, ed. by Joan Bybee, and Paul J. Hopper, 27–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Li
1958 Hayu Shigao (A Draft History of the Chinese Language), Vol. 2. Beijing: Science Press.Google Scholar
Wiedenhof, Jereon
1995 Meaning and Syntax in Spoken Mandarin. Leiden, the Netherlands: Research School CNWS.Google Scholar
Wieger, Léon S. J.
1965 (1927) Chinese Character, their Origin, Etymology, History, Classification and Signification: A Thorough Study from Chinese Documents. 2nd ed., English and revision according to the 4th French ed. New York: Paragon Book Reprint Corp.Google Scholar
Xinhua News Agency
2011 Today in History: On February 6th, the Chinese State Department issued the document ‘Directions on promoting Putonghua’. Central People’s Government of the People’s Republic of China. Accessed on December 12, 2016. [URL]
Zhan, Weidong, Rui Guo, and Yirong Chen
2003 北京大学汉语语言学研究中心语料库 The CCL Corpus of Chinese Texts: 700 million Chinese Characters, the 11th Century B.C. – present, Available online at the website of Center for Chinese Linguistics (CCL) of Peking University. [URL]
Zhang, Qing
2005 “A Chinese yuppie in Beijing: Phonological variation and the construction of a new professional identity.” Language in Society 34 (3): 431–466. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Wei 张巍
陆贞传奇 (Legend of Lu, Zhen). Accessed March 8, 2017. [URL]
Zipf, George Kingsley
1968 [1935] The Psycho-Biology of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Tao, Liang
2020. Usage, media, and grammaticalization. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 11:1 ► pp. 55 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.