Lexical meaning as a testable hypothesis
The case of English look, see, seem and appear
Author
This book offers an original treatment of the lexical form look. The work is innovative in that it establishes that the Columbia School conception of an invariant meaning – hitherto found primarily in grammar – is equally operative in core vocabulary items like look and see. The upshot is that grammar and lexicon are both amenable to synchronic monosemic analysis. The invariant meaning proposed for look explains the full range of its distribution, without the need to posit as linguistic units ‘look-noun’ and ‘look-verb’, ‘look-visual’ and ‘look-intellectual’, or constructions such as have-a-look, look-like, etc. The analysis places look in opposition with see, seem and appear for which tentative meanings are posited as well. The hypotheses are supported through qualitative analyses of attested examples and quantitative predictions tested in a massive corpus. These predictions offer new knowledge about the distribution of look, see and other forms that may provide useful for other scholars.
[Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 75] 2018. xv, 144 pp.
Publishing status: Available
© John Benjamins
Table of Contents
-
Acknowledgements | pp. ix–9
-
List of tables | pp. xi–xiii
-
List of figures | pp. xv–15
-
Chapter 1. The problem, methodology and theoretical background | pp. 1–24
-
Chapter 2. attention, visual as the explanation for the choice of look | pp. 25–46
-
Chapter 3. Using big data to support the hypothesized meaning attention, visual | pp. 47–76
-
Chapter 4. attention, visual in competition with the meanings of see, seem, and appear | pp. 77–110
-
Chapter 5. Competing analyses of the meaning of look | pp. 111–123
-
Chapter 6. Theoretical excursus: A critique of William Diver’s approach to the grammar-lexicon divide and a recapitulation of analytical assumptions and findings | pp. 125–137
-
References | pp. 139–141
-
Index
“A model of lexical analysis, demonstrating in a masterful manner that meaning is the central driver of usage, and that specific, explicit, well-articulated hypotheses about what a word means can be justified theoretically and lead to testable quantitative scientific predictions. A linguistic tour de force.”
Ricardo Otheguy, Research Institute for the Study of Language in Urban Society
“This book presents a radical turn in the field of lexical semantics, using qualitative and quantitative research to argue convincingly for a single meaning of the English word look that explains a range of newly discovered distributional generalizations. Within the Columbia School framework, it is a model of rigor, clarity, and responsible engagement with the wider linguistic community.”
Juliette Blevins, The City University of New York, Graduate Center
Cited by
Cited by 11 other publications
Blevins, Juliette
2019. Evolutionary phonology as human behavior. In Columbia School Linguistics in the 21st Century [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 77], ► pp. 281 ff.
de Jonge, Bob
2019. The relevance of relevance in linguistic analysis. In Columbia School Linguistics in the 21st Century [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 77], ► pp. 122 ff.
Hesseltine, Kelli & Joseph Davis
Otheguy, Ricardo & Naomi L. Shin
Reid, Wallis
2019. The object of explanation for linguistics. In Columbia School Linguistics in the 21st Century [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 77], ► pp. 103 ff.
Sabar, Nadav
2019. Using big data to support meaning hypotheses for some and any. In Columbia School Linguistics in the 21st Century [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 77], ► pp. 33 ff.
Stern, Nancy
2019. Introduction. In Columbia School Linguistics in the 21st Century [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 77], ► pp. 1 ff.
Whitty, Lauren
Xiang, Xuehua
2019. A comparative study of the restrictive markings of mandarin Jiù, Cái, and Zhǐ. In Columbia School Linguistics in the 21st Century [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 77], ► pp. 259 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
Subjects
Main BIC Subject
CFG: Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
Main BISAC Subject
LAN016000: LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Semantics