Article published in:
Implicit and Explicit Learning of Languages
Edited by Patrick Rebuschat
[Studies in Bilingualism 48] 2015
► pp. 443482
Cited by

Cited by 47 other publications

Adrada-Rafael, Sergio
2019. Explicitness of deductive instruction and L2 development. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 170:1  pp. 111 ff. Crossref logo
Alonso-Aparicio, Irene
2018.  In Usage-inspired L2 Instruction [Language Learning & Language Teaching, 49],  pp. 143 ff. Crossref logo
Andringa, Sible
2020. The emergence of awareness in uninstructed L2 learning: A visual world eye tracking study. Second Language Research 36:3  pp. 335 ff. Crossref logo
Arroyo, Diana C. & Yucel Yilmaz
2017.  In Expanding Individual Difference Research in the Interaction Approach [AILA Applied Linguistics Series, 16],  pp. 72 ff. Crossref logo
Bateman, Blair, Michael W. Child & Eliane (Lily) Berlendis Bueno
2020. A focus on language in the immersion language arts curriculum. Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language Education  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Cerezo, Luis, Allison Caras & Ronald P. Leow
2016. THE EFFECTIVENESS OF GUIDED INDUCTION VERSUS DEDUCTIVE INSTRUCTION ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMPLEX SPANISHGUSTARSTRUCTURES. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 38:2  pp. 265 ff. Crossref logo
Cintrón-Valentín, Myrna C. & Nick C. Ellis
2016. Salience in Second Language Acquisition: Physical Form, Learner Attention, and Instructional Focus. Frontiers in Psychology 7 Crossref logo
Ellis, Nick C. & Stefanie Wulff
2019.  In The Cambridge Handbook of Language Learning,  pp. 41 ff. Crossref logo
Godfroid, Aline
2016. THE EFFECTS OF IMPLICIT INSTRUCTION ON IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 38:2  pp. 177 ff. Crossref logo
Goo, Jaemyung
2016.  In Cognitive Individual Differences in Second Language Processing and Acquisition [Bilingual Processing and Acquisition, 3],  pp. 279 ff. Crossref logo
Gisela Granena, Long, Michael H. & Yucel Yilmaz
2016. Major Research Issues in SLA. Brill Research Perspectives in Multilingualism and Second Language Acquisition 1:1  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Granena, Gisela & Yucel Yilmaz
2019. Corrective Feedback and the Role of Implicit Sequence-Learning Ability in L2 Online Performance. Language Learning 69  pp. 127 ff. Crossref logo
GRAUS, JOHAN & PETER-ARNO COPPEN
2018. Influencing Student Teacher Grammar Cognitions: The Case of the Incongruous Curriculum. The Modern Language Journal 102:4  pp. 693 ff. Crossref logo
Gómez-Garzarán, Eduardo & Raquel Fernández-Fuertes
2020. Is explicit instruction effective? The learning of English noun-noun and adjective-noun structures by L1 Spanish school children (¿Es efectiva la instrucción explícita? El aprendizaje de las estructuras nombre-nombre y adjetivo-nombre del inglés por escolares de L1 español). Culture and Education 32:2  pp. 299 ff. Crossref logo
Indrarathne, Bimali & Judit Kormos
2017. ATTENTIONAL PROCESSING OF INPUT IN EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT CONDITIONS. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 39:3  pp. 401 ff. Crossref logo
Ishikawa, Keiichi
2019. Incidental and explicit learning of L2 derivational morphology and the nature of acquired knowledge. Applied Psycholinguistics 40:6  pp. 1377 ff. Crossref logo
Jordan, Geoffrey
2019. A response to Hughes. ELT Journal Crossref logo
Kachinske, Ilina & Robert DeKeyser
2019. The interaction between timing of explicit grammar explanation and individual differences in second language acquisition. Journal of Second Language Studies 2:2  pp. 197 ff. Crossref logo
Kang, Eun Young, Sarah Sok & ZhaoHong Han
2019. Thirty-five years of ISLA on form-focused instruction: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research 23:4  pp. 428 ff. Crossref logo
Leow, Ronald P.
2019. ISLA: How implicit or how explicit should it be? Theoretical, empirical, and pedagogical/curricular issues. Language Teaching Research 23:4  pp. 476 ff. Crossref logo
Lin, Huifen, Tsuiping Chen & Hsien-Chin Liou
2018. Transparency of reporting in CALL meta-analyses between 2003 and 2015. ReCALL 30:3  pp. 253 ff. Crossref logo
Loewen, Shawn & Masatoshi Sato
2019.  In Second Handbook of English Language Teaching [Springer International Handbooks of Education, ],  pp. 1131 ff. Crossref logo
Loewen, Shawn & Masatoshi Sato
2019.  In Second Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education [Springer International Handbooks of Education, ],  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Long, Michael H.
2016. In Defense of Tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and Real Issues. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 36  pp. 5 ff. Crossref logo
Long, Michael H.
2020. Optimal input for language learning: Genuine, simplified, elaborated, or modified elaborated?. Language Teaching 53:2  pp. 169 ff. Crossref logo
Long, Michael M.
2017. Instructed second language acquisition (ISLA). Instructed Second Language Acquisition 1:1  pp. 7 ff. Crossref logo
Mahmoudi‐Gahrouei, Vahid, Manijeh Youhanaee & Dariush Nejadanasari
2020. Targeting accuracy in foreign language teaching: The role of practice type in learning unsalient grammatical aspects. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:3  pp. 390 ff. Crossref logo
Maie, Ryo & Robert M. DeKeyser
2020. CONFLICTING EVIDENCE OF EXPLICIT AND IMPLICIT KNOWLEDGE FROM OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE MEASURES. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 42:2  pp. 359 ff. Crossref logo
Martin, Ines A. & Carrie N. Jackson
2016. Pronunciation Training Facilitates the Learning and Retention of L2 Grammatical Structures. Foreign Language Annals 49:4  pp. 658 ff. Crossref logo
Monaghan, Padraic, Simón Ruiz & Patrick Rebuschat
2020. The role of feedback and instruction on the cross-situational learning of vocabulary and morphosyntax: Mixed effects models reveal local and global effects on acquisition. Second Language Research  pp. 026765832092774 ff. Crossref logo
Monaghan, Padraic, Christine Schoetensack & Patrick Rebuschat
2019. A Single Paradigm for Implicit and Statistical Learning. Topics in Cognitive Science 11:3  pp. 536 ff. Crossref logo
Morgan-Short, Kara
2020. Insights into the neural mechanisms of becoming bilingual: A brief synthesis of second language research with artificial linguistic systems. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23:1  pp. 87 ff. Crossref logo
Patsala, Paschalia & Maria Michali
2020.  In Handbook of Research on Cultivating Literacy in Diverse and Multilingual Classrooms [Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design, ],  pp. 234 ff. Crossref logo
Pawlak, Mirosław
2019.  In Contacts and Contrasts in Educational Contexts and Translation [Second Language Learning and Teaching, ],  pp. 45 ff. Crossref logo
Pennington, Martha C. & Pamela Rogerson-Revell
2019.  In English Pronunciation Teaching and Research,  pp. 173 ff. Crossref logo
Pennington, Martha C. & Pamela Rogerson-Revell
2019.  In English Pronunciation Teaching and Research,  pp. 401 ff. Crossref logo
Rastelli, Stefano
2018. Neurolinguistics and second language teaching: A view from the crossroads. Second Language Research 34:1  pp. 103 ff. Crossref logo
Roehr-Brackin, Karen
2020. Investigating explicit and implicit L2 knowledge and learning: Replications of Erlam (2005) and Roehr-Brackin and Tellier (2019). Language Teaching  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Ruiz, Simón, Patrick Rebuschat & Detmar Meurers
2019. The effects of working memory and declarative memory on instructed second language vocabulary learning: Insights from intelligent CALL. Language Teaching Research  pp. 136216881987285 ff. Crossref logo
Ruiz, Simón, Kaitlyn M. Tagarelli & Patrick Rebuschat
2018. Simultaneous Acquisition of Words and Syntax: Effects of Exposure Condition and Declarative Memory. Frontiers in Psychology 9 Crossref logo
Saito, Kazuya & Luke Plonsky
2019. Effects of Second Language Pronunciation Teaching Revisited: A Proposed Measurement Framework and Meta‐Analysis. Language Learning 69:3  pp. 652 ff. Crossref logo
Spada, Nina
2018.  In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,  pp. 1 ff. Crossref logo
Toda-Cosi, Mireia
2020. Susan M. Gass, Patti Spinner, and Jennifer Behney: Salience in Second Language Acquisition. Applied Linguistics Crossref logo
VanPatten, Bill
2017. Situating instructed language acquisition. Instructed Second Language Acquisition 1:1  pp. 45 ff. Crossref logo
Wulff, Stefanie & Nick C. Ellis
2018.  In Bilingual Cognition and Language [Studies in Bilingualism, 54],  pp. 37 ff. Crossref logo
YILMAZ, YUCEL & GISELA GRANENA
2019. Cognitive Individual Differences as Predictors of Improvement and Awareness Under Implicit and Explicit Feedback Conditions. The Modern Language Journal Crossref logo
Yilmaz, Yucel & Ayşenur Sağdıç
2019. The interaction between inhibitory control and corrective feedback timing. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics 170:2  pp. 204 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References* An asterisk indicates that the study was included in the present meta-analysis

References* An asterisk indicates that the study was included in the present meta-analysis

Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K.
(2009) Age of acquisition and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59, 249–306. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Adams, R., Nuevo, A., & Egi, T.
(2011) Explicit and implicit feedback, modified output, and SLA: Does explicit and implicit feedback promote learning and learner-learner interactions? The Modern Language Journal, 95, 42–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*
Alanen, R. (1995) Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language learning(pp. 259–302). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
*
Alcon, E.S. (2005) Does instruction work for learning pragmatics in the EFL context? System, 33, 417–435. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ammar, A.
(2008) Prompts and recasts: Differential effects on second language morphosyntax. Language Teaching Research, 12, 183–210. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ammar, A., & Spada, N.
(2006) One size fits all? Recasts, prompts and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543–574. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*
Andringa, S.J., de Glopper, C.M., & Hacquebord, H.I. (2011) The effect of explicit and implicit instruction on free written response task performance. Language Learning, 61, 868–903. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*
Ayoun, D. (2001) The role of negative and positive feedback in the second language acquisition of passé composé and imparfait. The Modern Language Journal, 85, 226–243. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*
Benati, A. (2004) The effects of structured input activities and explicit information on the acquisition of the Italian future tense. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research and commentary (pp. 187–206). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U.
(2009) The relative effectiveness of different types of direct written corrective feedback. System, 37, 322–329. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L.V., Higgins, J.P.T., & Rothstein, H.R.
(2005) Comprehensive meta-analysis version 2. Englewood, NJ: Biostat.Google Scholar
(2009) Introduction to meta- analysis. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*
Carroll, S., & Swain, M. (1993) Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 357–386. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, H., Hedges, L.V., & Valentine, J.C.
(2009) The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Cornell Statistical Consulting Unit
(October 2008) StatNews # 73: Overlapping confidence intervals and statistical significance. Retrieved from http://​www​.cscu​.cornell​.edu​/news​/statnews​/stnews73​.pdf
*
de Graaff, R. (1997) The eXperanto experiment: Effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 249–297. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Graaff, R., & Housen, A.
(2009) Investigating the effects and effectiveness of L2 instruction. In M.H. Long & C.J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 726–755). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R.M.
(1995) Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17, 379–410. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1997) Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 195–221. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2000) The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499–533.Google Scholar
(2003) Implicit and explicit learning. In C.J. Doughty & M.H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313–349). Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R.M., Alfi-Shabtay, I., & Ravid, D.
(2010) Cross-linguistic evidence for the nature of age effects in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 413–438. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*
de la Fuente, M.J. (2006) Classroom L2 vocabulary acquisition: Investigating the role of pedagogical tasks and form-focused instruction. Language Teaching Research, 10, 263–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z.
(2005) The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
*
Doughty, C.J. (1991) Second language instruction does make a difference: Evidence from an empirical study of second language relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 431–469. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Instructed SLA: Constraints, compensation, and enhancement. In C.J. Doughty & M.H. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 206–257). New York, NJ: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doughty, C.J., & Williams, J.
(1998) Pedagogical choices in focus on form acquisition. In C.J. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 197–262). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
*
Ellis, R. (2007) The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 339–360). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
*
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006) Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fotos, S., & Ellis, R.
(1991) Communicating about grammar: A task-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 605–628. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*
Fukuya, Y., & Martínez-Flor, A. (2008) The interactive effects of pragmatic-eliciting tasks and pragmatic instruction. Foreign Language Annals, 41, 478–500. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*
Gass, S., Svetics, I., & Lemelin, S. (2003) Differential effects of attention. Language Learning, 53, 497–545. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*
Ghobadi, A., & Fahim, M. (2009) The effect of explicit teaching of English 'thanking formulas' on Iranian EFL intermediate level students at English language institutes. System, 37, 526–537. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harley, B.
(1989) Functional grammar in French immersion: A classroom experiment. Applied Linguistics, 10, 331–359. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hedges, L.
(1981) Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 107–128. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hernández, T.A.
(2008) The effect of explicit instruction and input flood on students’ use of discourse markers on a simulated oral proficiency interview. Hispania, 91, 665–675.Google Scholar
(2011) Re-examining the role of explicit instruction and input flood on the acquisition of Spanish discourse markers. Language Teaching Research, 15, 159–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J.S., & Newport, E.L.
(1989) Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Julious, S.A.
(2004) Using confidence intervals around individual means to assess statistical significance between two means. Pharmaceutical Statistics, 3, 217–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*
Kang, H. (2010) Negative evidence and its explicitness and positioning in the learning of Korean as a heritage language. The Modern Language Journal, 94, 582–599. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Keck, C., Iberri-Shea, G., Tracy-Ventura, N., & Wa-Mbaleka, S.
(2006) Investigating the empirical link between task-based interaction and acquisition. In J. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 91–131). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*
Koike, D., & Pearson, L. (2005) The effect of instruction and feedback in the development of pragmatic competence. System, 33, 481–501. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*
Kubota, M. (1994) The role of negative feedback on the acquisition of the English dative alternation by Japanese college students of EFL. Institute for Research in Language Teaching Bulletin, 8, 1–36.Google Scholar
*
Kubota, M. (1996) The effects of instruction plus feedback on Japanese university students of EFL: A pilot study. Bulletin of Chofu Gakuen Women’s Junior College, 18, 59–95.Google Scholar
*
Laufer, B., & Girsai, N. (2008) Form-focused instruction in second language vocabulary learning: a case for contrastive analysis and translation. Applied Linguistics, 29, 694–716. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.K.
(2007) Effects of textual enhancement and topic familiarity on Korean EFL students’ reading comprehension and learning of passive form. Language Learning, 57, 87–118. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.K., & Huang, H.T.
(2008) Visual input enhancement and grammar learning: A meta-analytic review. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 307–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*
Leow, R. (1998) The effects of amount and type of exposure on adult learners’ L2 development in SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 49–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Li, S.
(2009) The differential effects of implicit and explicit feedback on L2 learners of different proficiency levels. Applied Language Learning, 19, 53–79.Google Scholar
(2010) The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309–365. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*
Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006) Corrective feedback in the chatroom: An experimental study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19, 1–14 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*
Loewen, S., & Nabei, T. (2007) Measuring the effects of oral corrective feedback on L2 knowledge. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 361–377). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Long, M.H.
(2007) Problems in SLA. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Long, M.H., Inagaki, S., & Ortega, L.
(1998) The role of implicit negative feedback in SLA: Models and recasts in Japanese and Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 357–371. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Loschky, L.
(1994) Comprehensible input and second language acquisition: What is the relationship? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 303–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R.
(1994) The effect of functional-analytic teaching on aspects of French immersion students’ sociolinguistic competence. Applied Linguistics, 15, 263–287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399–432. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2004) Research on form-focused instruction in immersion classrooms: Implications for theory and practice. Journal of French Language Studies, 14, 321–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R., & Mori, H.
(2006) Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 269–300. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyster, R., & Saito, K.
(2010) Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265–302. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., & Goo, J.
(2007) Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 407–452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mackey, A., & Philp, J.
(1998) Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal, 82, 338–356. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*
Martínez-Flor, A., & Fukuya, Y.J. (2005) The effects of instruction on learners’ production of appropriate and accurate suggestions. System, 33, 463–480. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Master, P.
(1994) The effect of systematic instruction on learning the English article system. In T. Odlin (Ed.), Perspectives on pedagogical grammar (pp. 229–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K.
(2007) Interactional feedback and the emergence of simple past activity verbs in L2 English. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 323–338). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mueller, C.
(2010) Effects of explicit instruction on incidental noticing of metaphorical word sequences during a subsequent reading task. International Journal of English Studies, 10, 81–101.Google Scholar
*
Muranoi, H. (2000) Focus on form through interaction enhancement: Integrating formal instruction into a communicative task in EFL classrooms. Language Learning, 50, 617–673. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J., & Ortega, L.
(2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417–528. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2006) The value and practice of research synthesis for language learning and teaching. In J. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 3–50). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radwan, A.
(2005) The effectiveness of explicit attention to form in language learning. System, 33, 69–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reinders, H., & Ellis, R.
(2009) The effects of two types of positive enhanced input on intake and L2 acquisition. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching (pp. 281–302). Clevendon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
*
Robinson, P. (1996) Learning simple and complex second language rules under implicit, incidental, rule-search and instructed conditions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 27–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*
Rosa, E.M., & Leow, R.P. (2004) Awareness, different learning conditions, and second language development. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 269–292. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*
Rosa, E.M., & O’Neill, M.D. (1999) Explicitness, intake, and the issue of awareness: Another piece to the puzzle. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 511–556. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, R.
(1979) The ‘file drawer problem’ and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638–641. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(1991) Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Russell, J., & Spada, N.
(2006) The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar. In J. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133–164). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*
Sanz, C., & Morgan-Short, K. (2004) Positive evidence vs. explicit rule presentation and explicit negative feedback: A computer-assisted study. Language Learning, 54, 35–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*
Sauro, S. (2009) Computer-mediated corrective feedback and the development of L2 grammar. Language Learning & Technology, 13, 96–120.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R.
(1995) Attention and awareness in foreign language learning>. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai‘i Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
Schulz, R.
(2001) Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction. The Modern Language Journal, 85, 244–258. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*
Scott, V.M. (1989) An empirical study of explicit and implicit teaching strategies in French. The Modern Language Journal, 73, 14–22. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*
Sheen, Y. (2007) The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 301–322). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sheen, Y., Wright, D., & Moldawa, A.
(2009) Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners. System, 37, 556–569. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spada, N.
(1997) Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 30, 73–87. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
(2011) Beyond form-focused instruction: Reflections on past, present and future research. Language Teaching, 44, 225–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y.
(2010) Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 263–308. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trahey, M., & White, L.
(1993) Positive evidence and preemption in the second language classroom. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 181–204. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*
Tode, T. (2007) Durability problems with explicit instruction in an EFL context: the learning of the English copula be before and after the instruction of the auxiliary be. Language Teaching Research, 11, 11–30. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B.
(2004) Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Cadierno, T.
(1993) Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225–241. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
*
VanPatten, B., & Oikkenon, S. (1996) Explanation versus structured input in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 495–510. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
VanPatten, B., & Sanz, C.
(1995) From input to output: Processing instruction and communicative tasks. In F. Eckman, D. Highland, P. Lee, J. Mileham, & R. Weber (Eds.), SLA theory and pedagogy (pp. 169–185). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Varnosfadrani, A.D., & Basturkmen, H.
(2009) The effectiveness of implicit and explicit error correction on learners’ performance. System, 37, 82–98. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
White, J.
(1998) Getting the learners’ attention: A typographical input enhancement study. In C.J. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 85–113). New York, NY: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
*
Williams, J., & Evans, J. (1998) What kind of focus and on which forms? In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp.139–155). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
*
Wong, W. (2004) The nature of processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), Processing instruction: Theory, research, and commentary (pp. 33–63). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar