87019020 03 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 JB code SiBil 62 Eb 15 9789027260130 06 10.1075/sibil.62 13 2020051889 00 EA E107 10 01 JB code SiBil 02 0928-1533 02 62.00 01 02 Studies in Bilingualism Studies in Bilingualism 11 01 JB code jbe-all 01 02 Full EBA collection (ca. 4,200 titles) 11 01 JB code jbe-eba-2023 01 02 Compact EBA Collection 2023 (ca. 700 titles, starting 2018) 11 01 JB code jbe-2021 01 02 2021 collection (118 titles) 11 01 JB code jbe.2021.all 01 01 Research on Second Language Processing and Processing Instruction Studies in honor of Bill VanPatten Research on Second Language Processing and Processing Instruction: Studies in honor of Bill VanPatten 1 B01 01 JB code 71339395 Michael J. Leeser Leeser, Michael J. Michael J. Leeser Florida State University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/71339395 2 B01 01 JB code 704339396 Gregory D. Keating Keating, Gregory D. Gregory D. Keating San Diego State University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/704339396 3 B01 01 JB code 89339397 Wynne Wong Wong, Wynne Wynne Wong The Ohio State University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/89339397 01 eng 11 367 03 03 viii 03 00 359 03 01 23 401/.93 03 2021 P118.2 04 Second language acquisition. 04 Psycholinguistics. 04 Language and languages--Study and teaching--Foreign speakers. 10 LAN009040 12 CFDM 24 JB code LIN.APPL Applied linguistics 24 JB code LIN.COGN Cognition and language 24 JB code LIN.LA Language acquisition 24 JB code LIN.EDUC Language teaching 24 JB code LIN.BIL Multilingualism 24 JB code LIN.PSYLIN Psycholinguistics 01 06 02 00 This volume consists of a well-integrated collection of original research articles and theoretical/overview papers on second language (L2) input processing. 03 00 This volume consists of a well-integrated collection of original research articles and theoretical/overview papers on second language (L2) input processing. The primary contributors are former students of Bill VanPatten from the past three decades, and the collection of articles is intended as a tribute to his career and contribution of bringing processing issues to the center stage of research in second language acquisition (SLA) and instructed SLA. The research and theorizing presented in this volume are the most recent in the field and represent innovations in approaches to L2 processing research, including the use of online methodologies (self-paced reading and eye tracking) in the experimental papers. In addition, the editors are recognized authors and researchers who have published on sentence processing, input processing, and processing instruction, and all three editors are either on editorial boards or are associate editors of major L2 journals. 01 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/475/sibil.62.png 01 01 D502 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_jpg/9789027208446.jpg 01 01 D504 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_tif/9789027208446.tif 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_front/sibil.62.hb.png 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/125/sibil.62.png 02 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_back/sibil.62.hb.png 03 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/3d_web/sibil.62.hb.png 01 01 JB code sibil.62.pre 06 10.1075/sibil.62.pre vii viii 2 Miscellaneous 1 01 04 Preface and acknowledgements Preface and acknowledgements 01 eng 01 01 JB code sibil.62.int 06 10.1075/sibil.62.int 4 24 21 Section header 2 01 04 Introduction Introduction 01 eng 01 01 JB code sibil.62.01lee 06 10.1075/sibil.62.01lee 3 24 22 Chapter 3 01 04 Chapter 1. Input processing in second language acquisition Chapter 1. Input processing in second language acquisition 01 04 The pioneering work of Bill VanPatten The pioneering work of Bill VanPatten 1 A01 01 JB code 262423841 Michael J. Leeser Leeser, Michael J. Michael J. Leeser Florida State University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/262423841 2 A01 01 JB code 663423842 Gregory D. Keating Keating, Gregory D. Gregory D. Keating San Diego State University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/663423842 3 A01 01 JB code 53423843 Wynne Wong Wong, Wynne Wynne Wong The Ohio State University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/53423843 01 eng 03 00

In this chapter, we highlight Bill VanPatten’s numerous contributions to the fields of second language acquisition (SLA) and instructed second language acquisition (ISLA), and to the language teaching profession. We begin with an overview of his major professional achievements, followed by an exploration of his early work and the origins of his model of input processing. We underscore the significant contribution that his model of input processing makes to theory building in SLA and subsequently discuss his pioneering instructional innovation, processing instruction, along with the prolific body of research it has inspired. After briefly noting the importance of his work on acquisition and processing more broadly, we conclude with an overview of the individual chapters included in the volume.

01 01 JB code sibil.62.p1 06 10.1075/sibil.62.p1 28 150 123 Section header 4 01 04 Part I. Research on sentence processing Part I. Research on sentence processing 01 eng 01 01 JB code sibil.62.02jeg 06 10.1075/sibil.62.02jeg 27 52 26 Chapter 5 01 04 Chapter 2. The processing of case in intermediate L2 Spanish Chapter 2. The processing of case in intermediate L2 Spanish 1 A01 01 JB code 227423844 Jill Jegerski Jegerski, Jill Jill Jegerski University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/227423844 01 eng 03 00

This self-paced reading study investigated the processing of case marking with the particle a in non-native Spanish. Experiment 1 tested online sensitivity to case marking on direct and indirect objects. Unlike native speakers, intermediate L2 learners showed effects only with indirect objects. For Experiment 2, direct objects were doubled with a preverbal clitic, to see if the addition was associated with more native-like processing, as has been shown in previous research with very advanced L2 learners (Jegerski, 2015). Again, online sensitivity to case marking was only observed with the ditransitive stimuli. Thus, clitic doubling only seems to make a difference at sufficiently high levels of proficiency, perhaps because of increasingly robust representations of grammatical forms in the developing L2 system.

01 01 JB code sibil.62.03joh 06 10.1075/sibil.62.03joh 53 124 72 Chapter 6 01 04 Chapter 3. The processing of subject shifts in L2 Spanish Chapter 3. The processing of subject shifts in L2 Spanish 01 04 An examination of L2 learners' use of inflectional morphology and reliance on overt subject pronouns An examination of L2 learners’ use of inflectional morphology and reliance on overt subject pronouns 1 A01 01 JB code 323423845 Suzanne Johnston Johnston, Suzanne Suzanne Johnston University of Central Arkansas 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/323423845 01 eng 03 00

A vital part of understanding language is linking referring expressions to the appropriate antecedents. In null subject languages like Spanish, person-number inflections on verbs are essential to ensuring the appropriate connections are made. However, second language (L2) learners have limited processing capabilities (VanPatten, 1996, 2015), and may rely on strategies that steer them away from inflections. The current study examines whether first language English/L2 Spanish learners process verb inflections that signal subject shifts or if they prefer to process lexical items (i.e., overt subjects) as predicted by VanPatten’s lexical preference principle. The results of this study indicate that non-natives do not rely on inflections to link antecedents and referring expressions, and that L2 processing is facilitated by overt subject pronouns.

01 01 JB code sibil.62.04sag 06 10.1075/sibil.62.04sag 125 150 26 Chapter 7 01 04 Chapter 4. When more is better Chapter 4. When more is better 01 04 Higher L1/L2 similarity, L2 proficiency, and working memory facilitate L2 morphosyntactic processing Higher L1/L2 similarity, L2 proficiency, and working memory facilitate L2 morphosyntactic processing 1 A01 01 JB code 259423846 Nuria Sagarra Sagarra, Nuria Nuria Sagarra Rutgers University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/259423846 01 eng 03 00

This chapter investigates the role of first language (L1) transfer, second language (L2) proficiency, and working memory (WM) on processing subject-verb number agreement in Spanish. Intermediate and advanced English and Romanian learners of Spanish and Spanish monolinguals completed a WM test and a reading eye-tracking task with sentences with adjacent subject-verb number agreement/disagreement. Results revealed that all groups were sensitive to violations but processed them differently, depending on their L1 (the less morphologically rich, the more reliance on subjects), proficiency (the more advanced, the more reliance on verbs), and WM (the higher the span, the more sensitivity to violations). These findings indicate that higher L1/L2 similarity, L2 proficiency, and WM facilitate L2 verbal morphosyntactic processing.

01 01 JB code sibil.62.p2 06 10.1075/sibil.62.p2 154 231 78 Section header 8 01 04 Part II. Research and perspectives on VanPatten's model of input processing Part II. Research and perspectives on VanPatten’s model of input processing 01 eng 01 01 JB code sibil.62.05san 06 10.1075/sibil.62.05san 153 182 30 Chapter 9 01 04 Chapter 5. VanPatten (1990)'s long and winding story and the nature of replication studies Chapter 5. VanPatten (1990)’s long and winding story and the nature of replication studies 1 A01 01 JB code 242423847 Cristina Sanz Sanz, Cristina Cristina Sanz Georgetown University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/242423847 2 A01 01 JB code 591423848 Timothy J. McCormick McCormick, Timothy J. Timothy J. McCormick Georgetown University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/591423848 01 eng 03 00

VanPatten’s (1990) investigation of attention to form and meaning during input processing remains among the most cited and replicated studies in second language research. Early replications (Barcroft, 2001; Greenslade, Bouden, & Sanz, 1999; Wong, 2001) kept materials intact, changing modality or language, yielding comparable results. Later replications operationalized comprehension differently, changing text and assessment, and concluded even low proficiency learners can consciously process form, regardless of salience or meaning, without detriment to comprehension (Leow, Hsieh, & Moreno, 2008; Morgan-Short, Heil, Botero-Moriarty, & Ebert, 2012; Morgan-Short et al., 2018). This chapter compares these texts and assessments. Results suggest the new assessment obscures differences between proficiencies and modalities, and the new, more complex text hides task effects identified in the original strand.

01 01 JB code sibil.62.06isa 06 10.1075/sibil.62.06isa 183 200 18 Chapter 10 01 04 Chapter 6. Contextual effects in processing OVS constructions in Spanish Chapter 6. Contextual effects in processing OVS constructions in Spanish 01 04 A partial replication of VanPatten and Houston (1998) and Malovrh (2006) A partial replication of VanPatten and Houston (1998) and Malovrh (2006) 1 A01 01 JB code 631423849 Casilde A. Isabelli Isabelli, Casilde A. Casilde A. Isabelli University of Nevada, Reno 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/631423849 01 eng 03 00

This study investigates the contextual constraint principle in input processing, which states that learners may rely less on a first-noun-as-subject/agent strategy if preceding context constrains the interpretation of a clause or sentence. Second language learners of Spanish (N = 39) completed a sentence interpretation task in which they heard OVS sentences in various context conditions: neutral versus constraining context appearing prior to and after OVS clauses. Results revealed greater accuracy on OVS sentence interpretation when constraining context was available, particularly when it appeared prior to the target OVS clause. The results suggest that first noun reliance is significantly weakened when constraining context is available, and that the contextual constraint principle should be expanded to include context in post target-clause position.

01 01 JB code sibil.62.07bar 06 10.1075/sibil.62.07bar 201 232 32 Chapter 11 01 04 Chapter 7. Multilevel input processing Chapter 7. Multilevel input processing 01 04 Emerging developments and future challenges Emerging developments and future challenges 1 A01 01 JB code 653423850 Joe Barcroft Barcroft, Joe Joe Barcroft Washington University in St. Louis 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/653423850 01 eng 03 00

Research on input processing (IP) to date has focused largely on sentences and acquisition of morphosyntax. Other research has addressed IP at the lexical level for different aspects of vocabulary acquisition. This chapter clarifies how understanding multilevel IP can improve our understanding of IP across the board. Section 1 defines multilevel IP and clarifies its overarching role when learners are exposed to input. Section 2 summarizes research on sentence-level IP and identifies areas in which research on lexical IP can be informative. Section 3 summarizes research on lexical IP, noting areas in which research on sentence-level IP can be informative. Finally, Section 4 discusses challenges to be met in new efforts to investigate and advance theory related to multilevel IP.

01 01 JB code sibil.62.p3 06 10.1075/sibil.62.p3 236 323 88 Section header 12 01 04 Part III. Research and perspectives on processing instruction Part III. Research and perspectives on processing instruction 01 eng 01 01 JB code sibil.62.08fer 06 10.1075/sibil.62.08fer 235 260 26 Chapter 13 01 04 Chapter 8. Trials-to-criterion as a methodological option to measure language processing in processing instruction Chapter 8. Trials-to-criterion as a methodological option to measure language processing in processing instruction 1 A01 01 JB code 539423851 Claudia Fernandez Fernandez, Claudia Claudia Fernandez University of Illinois at Chicago 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/539423851 01 eng 03 00

Trials-to-criterion – a method commonly used in applied behavior analysis as an alternative to the pre-/post-test study design – has been used to observe and assess input processing in processing instruction (PI) research. The results from trials-to-criterion studies have made important contributions to our understanding of the effects of PI in input processing, particularly regarding the role of explicit information. In order to promote trials-to-criterion as a method in PI research, this chapter reviews and discusses studies that have used trials-to-criterion data to investigate the effects of PI on second language processing. It also examines crucial design choices in the implementation of trials-to-criterion as a measure of language processing. Finally, it discusses future considerations for trials-to-criterion research.

01 01 JB code sibil.62.09won 06 10.1075/sibil.62.09won 261 294 34 Chapter 14 01 04 Chapter 9. PI and the French causative and passive constructions Chapter 9. PI and the French causative and passive constructions 01 04 Examining transfer-of-training effects using eye tracking Examining transfer-of-training effects using eye tracking 1 A01 01 JB code 737423852 Wynne Wong Wong, Wynne Wynne Wong The Ohio State University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/737423852 2 A01 01 JB code 4423853 Kiwako Ito Ito, Kiwako Kiwako Ito The University of Newcastle 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/4423853 3 A01 01 JB code 404423854 Laurene Glimois Glimois, Laurene Laurene Glimois Auburn University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/404423854 01 eng 03 00

We examined whether French L2 learners trained with processing instruction (PI) or traditional instruction (TI) on the French causative, would transfer training effects to the passive construction. Experiment 2 included explicit information (EI) but not Experiment 1. Accuracy results and eye movement patterns showed PI had a positive impact on participants’ processing of the causative, but neither treatment had any effect on the passive. The null effect could be attributed to the low number of tokens used and to the nature of the passive structure. Furthermore, PI training on the causative might have trained learners to rely on the necessary cues to process causative sentences correctly, but this might not have been sufficient to decrease reliance on the first noun principle.

01 01 JB code sibil.62.10lee 06 10.1075/sibil.62.10lee 295 324 30 Chapter 15 01 04 Chapter 10. Why does processing instruction work? Chapter 10. Why does processing instruction work? 01 04 The role of PI within a framework of language and second language development The role of PI within a framework of language and second language development 1 A01 01 JB code 621423855 Michael J. Leeser Leeser, Michael J. Michael J. Leeser Florida State University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/621423855 01 eng 03 00

Research on processing instruction (PI) has shown that PI is an effective instructional intervention for learners of various languages and contexts. This chapter addresses a basic question: Why does PI work? In the first section, I provide an overview of the language faculty and discuss how PI differs from other research in terms of the nature of language. The second section explores how VanPatten’s model of input processing (VanPatten, 1996, 2004, 2020) can be understood within larger frameworks that integrate language processing and acquisition. The third section discusses the characteristics of PI and the findings of PI research within the wider context of growth within the language faculty. Finally, I conclude with thoughts on future directions of PI research.

01 01 JB code sibil.62.con 06 10.1075/sibil.62.con 328 356 29 Section header 16 01 04 Conclusion Conclusion 01 eng 01 01 JB code sibil.62.11kea 06 10.1075/sibil.62.11kea 327 356 30 Chapter 17 01 04 Chapter 11. Online methods in research on input processing and processing instruction Chapter 11. Online methods in research on input processing and processing instruction 1 A01 01 JB code 413423856 Gregory D. Keating Keating, Gregory D. Gregory D. Keating San Diego State University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/413423856 01 eng 03 00

Evidence for the input processing (IP) model (VanPatten, 1996, 2004, 2007, 2015a, 2020) and the benefits of processing instruction (PI) comes largely from offline tasks, despite the fact that both are concerned with online sentence comprehension. This chapter aims to stimulate more online research in these areas. I first provide a brief summary of techniques that measure real-time sentence comprehension and then offer suggestions for how they can be used in research on the IP model and PI. Lastly, I review recent online studies of the effects of PI on second language (L2) learners’ real-time sentence comprehension. I end by proposing two new hypotheses regarding the potential that PI has to benefit L2 learners’ online processing of input.

01 01 JB code sibil.62.index 06 10.1075/sibil.62.index 357 359 3 Miscellaneous 18 01 04 Index Index 01 eng
01 JB code JBENJAMINS John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 https://benjamins.com 02 https://benjamins.com/catalog/sibil.62 Amsterdam NL 00 John Benjamins Publishing Company Marketing Department / Karin Plijnaar, Pieter Lamers onix@benjamins.nl 04 01 00 20210317 C 2021 John Benjamins D 2021 John Benjamins 02 WORLD 13 15 9789027208446 WORLD 09 01 JB 3 John Benjamins e-Platform 03 https://jbe-platform.com 29 https://jbe-platform.com/content/books/9789027260130 21 01 00 Unqualified price 02 99.00 EUR 01 00 Unqualified price 02 83.00 GBP GB 01 00 Unqualified price 02 149.00 USD
104019019 03 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 JB code SiBil 62 Hb 15 9789027208446 06 10.1075/sibil.62 13 2020051888 00 BB 08 800 gr 10 01 JB code SiBil 02 0928-1533 02 62.00 01 02 Studies in Bilingualism Studies in Bilingualism 01 01 Research on Second Language Processing and Processing Instruction Studies in honor of Bill VanPatten Research on Second Language Processing and Processing Instruction: Studies in honor of Bill VanPatten 1 B01 01 JB code 71339395 Michael J. Leeser Leeser, Michael J. Michael J. Leeser Florida State University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/71339395 2 B01 01 JB code 704339396 Gregory D. Keating Keating, Gregory D. Gregory D. Keating San Diego State University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/704339396 3 B01 01 JB code 89339397 Wynne Wong Wong, Wynne Wynne Wong The Ohio State University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/89339397 01 eng 11 367 03 03 viii 03 00 359 03 01 23 401/.93 03 2021 P118.2 04 Second language acquisition. 04 Psycholinguistics. 04 Language and languages--Study and teaching--Foreign speakers. 10 LAN009040 12 CFDM 24 JB code LIN.APPL Applied linguistics 24 JB code LIN.COGN Cognition and language 24 JB code LIN.LA Language acquisition 24 JB code LIN.EDUC Language teaching 24 JB code LIN.BIL Multilingualism 24 JB code LIN.PSYLIN Psycholinguistics 01 06 02 00 This volume consists of a well-integrated collection of original research articles and theoretical/overview papers on second language (L2) input processing. 03 00 This volume consists of a well-integrated collection of original research articles and theoretical/overview papers on second language (L2) input processing. The primary contributors are former students of Bill VanPatten from the past three decades, and the collection of articles is intended as a tribute to his career and contribution of bringing processing issues to the center stage of research in second language acquisition (SLA) and instructed SLA. The research and theorizing presented in this volume are the most recent in the field and represent innovations in approaches to L2 processing research, including the use of online methodologies (self-paced reading and eye tracking) in the experimental papers. In addition, the editors are recognized authors and researchers who have published on sentence processing, input processing, and processing instruction, and all three editors are either on editorial boards or are associate editors of major L2 journals. 01 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/475/sibil.62.png 01 01 D502 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_jpg/9789027208446.jpg 01 01 D504 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_tif/9789027208446.tif 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_front/sibil.62.hb.png 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/125/sibil.62.png 02 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_back/sibil.62.hb.png 03 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/3d_web/sibil.62.hb.png 01 01 JB code sibil.62.pre 06 10.1075/sibil.62.pre vii viii 2 Miscellaneous 1 01 04 Preface and acknowledgements Preface and acknowledgements 01 eng 01 01 JB code sibil.62.int 06 10.1075/sibil.62.int 4 24 21 Section header 2 01 04 Introduction Introduction 01 eng 01 01 JB code sibil.62.01lee 06 10.1075/sibil.62.01lee 3 24 22 Chapter 3 01 04 Chapter 1. Input processing in second language acquisition Chapter 1. Input processing in second language acquisition 01 04 The pioneering work of Bill VanPatten The pioneering work of Bill VanPatten 1 A01 01 JB code 262423841 Michael J. Leeser Leeser, Michael J. Michael J. Leeser Florida State University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/262423841 2 A01 01 JB code 663423842 Gregory D. Keating Keating, Gregory D. Gregory D. Keating San Diego State University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/663423842 3 A01 01 JB code 53423843 Wynne Wong Wong, Wynne Wynne Wong The Ohio State University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/53423843 01 eng 03 00

In this chapter, we highlight Bill VanPatten’s numerous contributions to the fields of second language acquisition (SLA) and instructed second language acquisition (ISLA), and to the language teaching profession. We begin with an overview of his major professional achievements, followed by an exploration of his early work and the origins of his model of input processing. We underscore the significant contribution that his model of input processing makes to theory building in SLA and subsequently discuss his pioneering instructional innovation, processing instruction, along with the prolific body of research it has inspired. After briefly noting the importance of his work on acquisition and processing more broadly, we conclude with an overview of the individual chapters included in the volume.

01 01 JB code sibil.62.p1 06 10.1075/sibil.62.p1 28 150 123 Section header 4 01 04 Part I. Research on sentence processing Part I. Research on sentence processing 01 eng 01 01 JB code sibil.62.02jeg 06 10.1075/sibil.62.02jeg 27 52 26 Chapter 5 01 04 Chapter 2. The processing of case in intermediate L2 Spanish Chapter 2. The processing of case in intermediate L2 Spanish 1 A01 01 JB code 227423844 Jill Jegerski Jegerski, Jill Jill Jegerski University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/227423844 01 eng 03 00

This self-paced reading study investigated the processing of case marking with the particle a in non-native Spanish. Experiment 1 tested online sensitivity to case marking on direct and indirect objects. Unlike native speakers, intermediate L2 learners showed effects only with indirect objects. For Experiment 2, direct objects were doubled with a preverbal clitic, to see if the addition was associated with more native-like processing, as has been shown in previous research with very advanced L2 learners (Jegerski, 2015). Again, online sensitivity to case marking was only observed with the ditransitive stimuli. Thus, clitic doubling only seems to make a difference at sufficiently high levels of proficiency, perhaps because of increasingly robust representations of grammatical forms in the developing L2 system.

01 01 JB code sibil.62.03joh 06 10.1075/sibil.62.03joh 53 124 72 Chapter 6 01 04 Chapter 3. The processing of subject shifts in L2 Spanish Chapter 3. The processing of subject shifts in L2 Spanish 01 04 An examination of L2 learners' use of inflectional morphology and reliance on overt subject pronouns An examination of L2 learners’ use of inflectional morphology and reliance on overt subject pronouns 1 A01 01 JB code 323423845 Suzanne Johnston Johnston, Suzanne Suzanne Johnston University of Central Arkansas 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/323423845 01 eng 03 00

A vital part of understanding language is linking referring expressions to the appropriate antecedents. In null subject languages like Spanish, person-number inflections on verbs are essential to ensuring the appropriate connections are made. However, second language (L2) learners have limited processing capabilities (VanPatten, 1996, 2015), and may rely on strategies that steer them away from inflections. The current study examines whether first language English/L2 Spanish learners process verb inflections that signal subject shifts or if they prefer to process lexical items (i.e., overt subjects) as predicted by VanPatten’s lexical preference principle. The results of this study indicate that non-natives do not rely on inflections to link antecedents and referring expressions, and that L2 processing is facilitated by overt subject pronouns.

01 01 JB code sibil.62.04sag 06 10.1075/sibil.62.04sag 125 150 26 Chapter 7 01 04 Chapter 4. When more is better Chapter 4. When more is better 01 04 Higher L1/L2 similarity, L2 proficiency, and working memory facilitate L2 morphosyntactic processing Higher L1/L2 similarity, L2 proficiency, and working memory facilitate L2 morphosyntactic processing 1 A01 01 JB code 259423846 Nuria Sagarra Sagarra, Nuria Nuria Sagarra Rutgers University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/259423846 01 eng 03 00

This chapter investigates the role of first language (L1) transfer, second language (L2) proficiency, and working memory (WM) on processing subject-verb number agreement in Spanish. Intermediate and advanced English and Romanian learners of Spanish and Spanish monolinguals completed a WM test and a reading eye-tracking task with sentences with adjacent subject-verb number agreement/disagreement. Results revealed that all groups were sensitive to violations but processed them differently, depending on their L1 (the less morphologically rich, the more reliance on subjects), proficiency (the more advanced, the more reliance on verbs), and WM (the higher the span, the more sensitivity to violations). These findings indicate that higher L1/L2 similarity, L2 proficiency, and WM facilitate L2 verbal morphosyntactic processing.

01 01 JB code sibil.62.p2 06 10.1075/sibil.62.p2 154 231 78 Section header 8 01 04 Part II. Research and perspectives on VanPatten's model of input processing Part II. Research and perspectives on VanPatten’s model of input processing 01 eng 01 01 JB code sibil.62.05san 06 10.1075/sibil.62.05san 153 182 30 Chapter 9 01 04 Chapter 5. VanPatten (1990)'s long and winding story and the nature of replication studies Chapter 5. VanPatten (1990)’s long and winding story and the nature of replication studies 1 A01 01 JB code 242423847 Cristina Sanz Sanz, Cristina Cristina Sanz Georgetown University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/242423847 2 A01 01 JB code 591423848 Timothy J. McCormick McCormick, Timothy J. Timothy J. McCormick Georgetown University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/591423848 01 eng 03 00

VanPatten’s (1990) investigation of attention to form and meaning during input processing remains among the most cited and replicated studies in second language research. Early replications (Barcroft, 2001; Greenslade, Bouden, & Sanz, 1999; Wong, 2001) kept materials intact, changing modality or language, yielding comparable results. Later replications operationalized comprehension differently, changing text and assessment, and concluded even low proficiency learners can consciously process form, regardless of salience or meaning, without detriment to comprehension (Leow, Hsieh, & Moreno, 2008; Morgan-Short, Heil, Botero-Moriarty, & Ebert, 2012; Morgan-Short et al., 2018). This chapter compares these texts and assessments. Results suggest the new assessment obscures differences between proficiencies and modalities, and the new, more complex text hides task effects identified in the original strand.

01 01 JB code sibil.62.06isa 06 10.1075/sibil.62.06isa 183 200 18 Chapter 10 01 04 Chapter 6. Contextual effects in processing OVS constructions in Spanish Chapter 6. Contextual effects in processing OVS constructions in Spanish 01 04 A partial replication of VanPatten and Houston (1998) and Malovrh (2006) A partial replication of VanPatten and Houston (1998) and Malovrh (2006) 1 A01 01 JB code 631423849 Casilde A. Isabelli Isabelli, Casilde A. Casilde A. Isabelli University of Nevada, Reno 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/631423849 01 eng 03 00

This study investigates the contextual constraint principle in input processing, which states that learners may rely less on a first-noun-as-subject/agent strategy if preceding context constrains the interpretation of a clause or sentence. Second language learners of Spanish (N = 39) completed a sentence interpretation task in which they heard OVS sentences in various context conditions: neutral versus constraining context appearing prior to and after OVS clauses. Results revealed greater accuracy on OVS sentence interpretation when constraining context was available, particularly when it appeared prior to the target OVS clause. The results suggest that first noun reliance is significantly weakened when constraining context is available, and that the contextual constraint principle should be expanded to include context in post target-clause position.

01 01 JB code sibil.62.07bar 06 10.1075/sibil.62.07bar 201 232 32 Chapter 11 01 04 Chapter 7. Multilevel input processing Chapter 7. Multilevel input processing 01 04 Emerging developments and future challenges Emerging developments and future challenges 1 A01 01 JB code 653423850 Joe Barcroft Barcroft, Joe Joe Barcroft Washington University in St. Louis 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/653423850 01 eng 03 00

Research on input processing (IP) to date has focused largely on sentences and acquisition of morphosyntax. Other research has addressed IP at the lexical level for different aspects of vocabulary acquisition. This chapter clarifies how understanding multilevel IP can improve our understanding of IP across the board. Section 1 defines multilevel IP and clarifies its overarching role when learners are exposed to input. Section 2 summarizes research on sentence-level IP and identifies areas in which research on lexical IP can be informative. Section 3 summarizes research on lexical IP, noting areas in which research on sentence-level IP can be informative. Finally, Section 4 discusses challenges to be met in new efforts to investigate and advance theory related to multilevel IP.

01 01 JB code sibil.62.p3 06 10.1075/sibil.62.p3 236 323 88 Section header 12 01 04 Part III. Research and perspectives on processing instruction Part III. Research and perspectives on processing instruction 01 eng 01 01 JB code sibil.62.08fer 06 10.1075/sibil.62.08fer 235 260 26 Chapter 13 01 04 Chapter 8. Trials-to-criterion as a methodological option to measure language processing in processing instruction Chapter 8. Trials-to-criterion as a methodological option to measure language processing in processing instruction 1 A01 01 JB code 539423851 Claudia Fernandez Fernandez, Claudia Claudia Fernandez University of Illinois at Chicago 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/539423851 01 eng 03 00

Trials-to-criterion – a method commonly used in applied behavior analysis as an alternative to the pre-/post-test study design – has been used to observe and assess input processing in processing instruction (PI) research. The results from trials-to-criterion studies have made important contributions to our understanding of the effects of PI in input processing, particularly regarding the role of explicit information. In order to promote trials-to-criterion as a method in PI research, this chapter reviews and discusses studies that have used trials-to-criterion data to investigate the effects of PI on second language processing. It also examines crucial design choices in the implementation of trials-to-criterion as a measure of language processing. Finally, it discusses future considerations for trials-to-criterion research.

01 01 JB code sibil.62.09won 06 10.1075/sibil.62.09won 261 294 34 Chapter 14 01 04 Chapter 9. PI and the French causative and passive constructions Chapter 9. PI and the French causative and passive constructions 01 04 Examining transfer-of-training effects using eye tracking Examining transfer-of-training effects using eye tracking 1 A01 01 JB code 737423852 Wynne Wong Wong, Wynne Wynne Wong The Ohio State University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/737423852 2 A01 01 JB code 4423853 Kiwako Ito Ito, Kiwako Kiwako Ito The University of Newcastle 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/4423853 3 A01 01 JB code 404423854 Laurene Glimois Glimois, Laurene Laurene Glimois Auburn University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/404423854 01 eng 03 00

We examined whether French L2 learners trained with processing instruction (PI) or traditional instruction (TI) on the French causative, would transfer training effects to the passive construction. Experiment 2 included explicit information (EI) but not Experiment 1. Accuracy results and eye movement patterns showed PI had a positive impact on participants’ processing of the causative, but neither treatment had any effect on the passive. The null effect could be attributed to the low number of tokens used and to the nature of the passive structure. Furthermore, PI training on the causative might have trained learners to rely on the necessary cues to process causative sentences correctly, but this might not have been sufficient to decrease reliance on the first noun principle.

01 01 JB code sibil.62.10lee 06 10.1075/sibil.62.10lee 295 324 30 Chapter 15 01 04 Chapter 10. Why does processing instruction work? Chapter 10. Why does processing instruction work? 01 04 The role of PI within a framework of language and second language development The role of PI within a framework of language and second language development 1 A01 01 JB code 621423855 Michael J. Leeser Leeser, Michael J. Michael J. Leeser Florida State University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/621423855 01 eng 03 00

Research on processing instruction (PI) has shown that PI is an effective instructional intervention for learners of various languages and contexts. This chapter addresses a basic question: Why does PI work? In the first section, I provide an overview of the language faculty and discuss how PI differs from other research in terms of the nature of language. The second section explores how VanPatten’s model of input processing (VanPatten, 1996, 2004, 2020) can be understood within larger frameworks that integrate language processing and acquisition. The third section discusses the characteristics of PI and the findings of PI research within the wider context of growth within the language faculty. Finally, I conclude with thoughts on future directions of PI research.

01 01 JB code sibil.62.con 06 10.1075/sibil.62.con 328 356 29 Section header 16 01 04 Conclusion Conclusion 01 eng 01 01 JB code sibil.62.11kea 06 10.1075/sibil.62.11kea 327 356 30 Chapter 17 01 04 Chapter 11. Online methods in research on input processing and processing instruction Chapter 11. Online methods in research on input processing and processing instruction 1 A01 01 JB code 413423856 Gregory D. Keating Keating, Gregory D. Gregory D. Keating San Diego State University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/413423856 01 eng 03 00

Evidence for the input processing (IP) model (VanPatten, 1996, 2004, 2007, 2015a, 2020) and the benefits of processing instruction (PI) comes largely from offline tasks, despite the fact that both are concerned with online sentence comprehension. This chapter aims to stimulate more online research in these areas. I first provide a brief summary of techniques that measure real-time sentence comprehension and then offer suggestions for how they can be used in research on the IP model and PI. Lastly, I review recent online studies of the effects of PI on second language (L2) learners’ real-time sentence comprehension. I end by proposing two new hypotheses regarding the potential that PI has to benefit L2 learners’ online processing of input.

01 01 JB code sibil.62.index 06 10.1075/sibil.62.index 357 359 3 Miscellaneous 18 01 04 Index Index 01 eng
01 JB code JBENJAMINS John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 https://benjamins.com 02 https://benjamins.com/catalog/sibil.62 Amsterdam NL 00 John Benjamins Publishing Company Marketing Department / Karin Plijnaar, Pieter Lamers onix@benjamins.nl 04 01 00 20210317 C 2021 John Benjamins D 2021 John Benjamins 02 WORLD WORLD US CA MX 09 01 JB 1 John Benjamins Publishing Company +31 20 6304747 +31 20 6739773 bookorder@benjamins.nl 01 https://benjamins.com 21 82 18 01 00 Unqualified price 02 JB 1 02 99.00 EUR 02 00 Unqualified price 02 83.00 01 Z 0 GBP GB US CA MX 01 01 JB 2 John Benjamins Publishing Company +1 800 562-5666 +1 703 661-1501 benjamins@presswarehouse.com 01 https://benjamins.com 21 82 18 01 00 Unqualified price 02 JB 1 02 149.00 USD
714027486 03 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 JB code SiBil 62 GE 15 9789027260130 06 10.1075/sibil.62 13 2020051889 00 EA E133 10 01 JB code SiBil 02 JB code 0928-1533 02 62.00 01 02 Studies in Bilingualism Studies in Bilingualism 01 01 Research on Second Language Processing and Processing Instruction Research on Second Language Processing and Processing Instruction 1 B01 01 JB code 71339395 Michael J. Leeser Leeser, Michael J. Michael J. Leeser Florida State University 2 B01 01 JB code 704339396 Gregory D. Keating Keating, Gregory D. Gregory D. Keating San Diego State University 3 B01 01 JB code 89339397 Wynne Wong Wong, Wynne Wynne Wong The Ohio State University 01 eng 11 367 03 03 viii 03 00 359 03 24 JB code LIN.APPL Applied linguistics 24 JB code LIN.COGN Cognition and language 24 JB code LIN.LA Language acquisition 24 JB code LIN.EDUC Language teaching 24 JB code LIN.BIL Multilingualism 24 JB code LIN.PSYLIN Psycholinguistics 10 LAN009040 12 CFDM 01 06 02 00 This volume consists of a well-integrated collection of original research articles and theoretical/overview papers on second language (L2) input processing. 03 00 This volume consists of a well-integrated collection of original research articles and theoretical/overview papers on second language (L2) input processing. The primary contributors are former students of Bill VanPatten from the past three decades, and the collection of articles is intended as a tribute to his career and contribution of bringing processing issues to the center stage of research in second language acquisition (SLA) and instructed SLA. The research and theorizing presented in this volume are the most recent in the field and represent innovations in approaches to L2 processing research, including the use of online methodologies (self-paced reading and eye tracking) in the experimental papers. In addition, the editors are recognized authors and researchers who have published on sentence processing, input processing, and processing instruction, and all three editors are either on editorial boards or are associate editors of major L2 journals. 01 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/475/sibil.62.png 01 01 D502 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_jpg/9789027208446.jpg 01 01 D504 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_tif/9789027208446.tif 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_front/sibil.62.hb.png 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/125/sibil.62.png 02 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_back/sibil.62.hb.png 03 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/3d_web/sibil.62.hb.png 01 01 JB code sibil.62.pre 06 10.1075/sibil.62.pre viii viii 1 Miscellaneous 1 01 04 Preface and acknowledgements Preface and acknowledgements 01 01 JB code sibil.62.int 06 10.1075/sibil.62.int 4 24 21 Section header 2 01 04 Introduction Introduction 01 01 JB code sibil.62.01lee 06 10.1075/sibil.62.01lee 4 24 21 Chapter 3 01 04 Chapter 1. Input processing in second language acquisition Chapter 1. Input processing in second language acquisition 01 04 The pioneering work of Bill VanPatten The pioneering work of Bill VanPatten 1 A01 01 JB code 262423841 Michael J. Leeser Leeser, Michael J. Michael J. Leeser Florida State University 2 A01 01 JB code 663423842 Gregory D. Keating Keating, Gregory D. Gregory D. Keating San Diego State University 3 A01 01 JB code 53423843 Wynne Wong Wong, Wynne Wynne Wong The Ohio State University 01 01 JB code sibil.62.p1 06 10.1075/sibil.62.p1 28 150 123 Section header 4 01 04 Part I. Research on sentence processing Part I. Research on sentence processing 01 01 JB code sibil.62.02jeg 06 10.1075/sibil.62.02jeg 28 51 24 Chapter 5 01 04 Chapter 2. The processing of case in intermediate L2 Spanish Chapter 2. The processing of case in intermediate L2 Spanish 1 A01 01 JB code 227423844 Jill Jegerski Jegerski, Jill Jill Jegerski University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 01 01 JB code sibil.62.03joh 06 10.1075/sibil.62.03joh 54 124 71 Chapter 6 01 04 Chapter 3. The processing of subject shifts in L2 Spanish Chapter 3. The processing of subject shifts in L2 Spanish 01 04 An examination of L2 learners' use of inflectional morphology and reliance on overt subject pronouns An examination of L2 learners’ use of inflectional morphology and reliance on overt subject pronouns 1 A01 01 JB code 323423845 Suzanne Johnston Johnston, Suzanne Suzanne Johnston University of Central Arkansas 01 01 JB code sibil.62.04sag 06 10.1075/sibil.62.04sag 126 150 25 Chapter 7 01 04 Chapter 4. When more is better Chapter 4. When more is better 01 04 Higher L1/L2 similarity, L2 proficiency, and working memory facilitate L2 morphosyntactic processing Higher L1/L2 similarity, L2 proficiency, and working memory facilitate L2 morphosyntactic processing 1 A01 01 JB code 259423846 Nuria Sagarra Sagarra, Nuria Nuria Sagarra Rutgers University 01 01 JB code sibil.62.p2 06 10.1075/sibil.62.p2 154 231 78 Section header 8 01 04 Part II. Research and perspectives on VanPatten's model of input processing Part II. Research and perspectives on VanPatten’s model of input processing 01 01 JB code sibil.62.05san 06 10.1075/sibil.62.05san 154 181 28 Chapter 9 01 04 Chapter 5. VanPatten (1990)'s long and winding story and the nature of replication studies Chapter 5. VanPatten (1990)’s long and winding story and the nature of replication studies 1 A01 01 JB code 242423847 Cristina Sanz Sanz, Cristina Cristina Sanz Georgetown University 2 A01 01 JB code 591423848 Timothy J. McCormick McCormick, Timothy J. Timothy J. McCormick Georgetown University 01 01 JB code sibil.62.06isa 06 10.1075/sibil.62.06isa 184 199 16 Chapter 10 01 04 Chapter 6. Contextual effects in processing OVS constructions in Spanish Chapter 6. Contextual effects in processing OVS constructions in Spanish 01 04 A partial replication of VanPatten and Houston (1998) and Malovrh (2006) A partial replication of VanPatten and Houston (1998) and Malovrh (2006) 1 A01 01 JB code 631423849 Casilde A. Isabelli Isabelli, Casilde A. Casilde A. Isabelli University of Nevada, Reno 01 01 JB code sibil.62.07bar 06 10.1075/sibil.62.07bar 202 231 30 Chapter 11 01 04 Chapter 7. Multilevel input processing Chapter 7. Multilevel input processing 01 04 Emerging developments and future challenges Emerging developments and future challenges 1 A01 01 JB code 653423850 Joe Barcroft Barcroft, Joe Joe Barcroft Washington University in St. Louis 01 01 JB code sibil.62.p3 06 10.1075/sibil.62.p3 236 323 88 Section header 12 01 04 Part III. Research and perspectives on processing instruction Part III. Research and perspectives on processing instruction 01 01 JB code sibil.62.08fer 06 10.1075/sibil.62.08fer 236 259 24 Chapter 13 01 04 Chapter 8. Trials-to-criterion as a methodological option to measure language processing in processing instruction Chapter 8. Trials-to-criterion as a methodological option to measure language processing in processing instruction 1 A01 01 JB code 539423851 Claudia Fernandez Fernandez, Claudia Claudia Fernandez University of Illinois at Chicago 01 01 JB code sibil.62.09won 06 10.1075/sibil.62.09won 262 293 32 Chapter 14 01 04 Chapter 9. PI and the French causative and passive constructions Chapter 9. PI and the French causative and passive constructions 01 04 Examining transfer-of-training effects using eye tracking Examining transfer-of-training effects using eye tracking 1 A01 01 JB code 737423852 Wynne Wong Wong, Wynne Wynne Wong The Ohio State University 2 A01 01 JB code 4423853 Kiwako Ito Ito, Kiwako Kiwako Ito The University of Newcastle 3 A01 01 JB code 404423854 Laurene Glimois Glimois, Laurene Laurene Glimois Auburn University 01 01 JB code sibil.62.10lee 06 10.1075/sibil.62.10lee 296 323 28 Chapter 15 01 04 Chapter 10. Why does processing instruction work? Chapter 10. Why does processing instruction work? 01 04 The role of PI within a framework of language and second language development The role of PI within a framework of language and second language development 1 A01 01 JB code 621423855 Michael J. Leeser Leeser, Michael J. Michael J. Leeser Florida State University 01 01 JB code sibil.62.con 06 10.1075/sibil.62.con 328 356 29 Section header 16 01 04 Conclusion Conclusion 01 01 JB code sibil.62.11kea 06 10.1075/sibil.62.11kea 328 356 29 Chapter 17 01 04 Chapter 11. Online methods in research on input processing and processing instruction Chapter 11. Online methods in research on input processing and processing instruction 1 A01 01 JB code 413423856 Gregory D. Keating Keating, Gregory D. Gregory D. Keating San Diego State University 01 01 JB code sibil.62.index 06 10.1075/sibil.62.index 357 357 1 Miscellaneous 18 01 04 Index Index 01 JB code JBENJAMINS John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 https://benjamins.com Amsterdam NL 00 John Benjamins Publishing Company Marketing Department / Karin Plijnaar, Pieter Lamers onix@benjamins.nl 04 01 00 20210317 C 2021 John Benjamins D 2021 John Benjamins 02 WORLD 13 15 9789027208446 WORLD 03 01 JB 17 Google 03 https://play.google.com/store/books 21 01 00 Unqualified price 00 99.00 EUR 01 00 Unqualified price 00 83.00 GBP 01 00 Unqualified price 00 149.00 USD