Article published in:
Spanish in Context
Vol. 11:3 (2014) ► pp. 425–453

Peruvian Amazonian Spanish

Uncovering variation and deconstructing stereotypes

Some linguistic structures found in Amazonian Spanish tend to be associated by and large with a rural variety spoken by people frequently depicted as indigenous. However, direct observations indicate that most of these features are pervasive among speakers across the social spectrum. What, then, are the parameters of linguistic variation in Peruvian Amazonian Spanish? Is there any social and/or linguistic meaning associated with the attested variation? This paper looks at data from ten monolingual speakers, five born and raised in Iquitos, and five born and raised in Kokama indigenous villages. The linguistic variables examined are: (i) permutation j/f, (ii) possessor/noun number agreement, (iii) double possession, and (iv) genitive fronting. This study concentrates on one social variable, place, which is found to significantly impact language use. City-speakers emphasize or downplay their category membership through the quantitative manipulation of markers; village-speakers show less variability in their language use. In addition, certain possessive constructions seem to be undertaking specialized functions.
Keywords: Amazonian Spanish, variation, Peruvian Spanish
Published online: 08 December 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/sic.11.3.06val
References
Allin, Trevor
1976 Grammar of Resígaro. Summer Institute of Linguistics, Perú.Google Scholar
Barker, Chris
2011 Possessives and Relational Nouns [Chapter 45]. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, ed. by K. von Heusinger, C. Maienborn, and P. Portner, 1009–1130. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Barraza de la Cruz, Yris
1998 “Apuntes sobre gramática del castellano de Iquitos.” MA thesis, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima.
Bickel, Balthasar, and Johanna Nichols
2011 “Obligatory Possessive Inflection.” In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, ed. by Matthew S. Dryer, and Martin Haspelmath. Max Planck Digital Library. Accessed >March 3, 2013. http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/58.Google Scholar
Calvo Peréz, Julio
2008 “Peru.” In El Español En América: Contactos Lingüísticos En Hispanoamérica, ed. by Azucena Palacios, 189–212. Barcelona: Editorial Ariel.Google Scholar
Caravedo, Rocío
1995 “Variación funcional en el español amazónico del Perú: las palatales sonoras.” Anuario de Lingüística Hispánica XI1: 119–136.Google Scholar
1997 “Los pronombres objeto en un corpus del español amazónico peruano.” Anuario de Letras XXXV1: 131–155.Google Scholar
1999 Lingüística del Corpus. Cuestiones teórico-metodológicas aplicadas al español. Universidad Salamanca, Spain.Google Scholar
Cerrón Palomino, Rodolfo
1981 “Aprender castellano en un contexto plurilingüe.” Lexis V1: 39–52.Google Scholar
Cerulo, Karen
1997 “Identity construction: new issues, new directions.” Annual Review of Sociology 231: 385–409. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M.W., and Alexandra Aikhenvald
(ed.) 1999 The Amazonian Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope
2000 Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Oxford, U.K.: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2008 “Variation and the indexical field.” Journal of sociolinguistics 121: 453–476. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Escobar, Alberto
1978 Variaciones sociolingüísticas del castellano en el Perú. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
1981 “Refonologización o velocidad de ciertos cambios en el español amazónico.” In Logos semantikós. Studia linguistica in honorem Eugenio Coseriu, ed. by Geckeler et al., 425–433. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar
1992 “Post-data: Amazonean Spanish.” Plurilingua XIII1: 89–97.Google Scholar
Escobar, Anna María
1992 “El español andino y el español bilingüe: semejanzas y diferencias en el uso del posesivo.” Lexis 161: 189–222.Google Scholar
1997 “Contrastive and innovative uses of the present perfect and the preterite in Spanish in contact with Quechua.” Hispania 801: 859–870. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 “From Subordinate Marker to Discourse Marker: que in Andean Spanish.” Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 4(1): 93–113. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 “Chapter 16 - Spanish in contact with Quechua”. In The Handbook of Spanish Sociolinguistics, ed. by Manuel Díaz-Campos, 323–352. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
García, Miguel
2011 The intonational patterns of the Peruvian Amazonian Spanish (PAS). New York: State University of New York at Stony Brook.Google Scholar
Gibbon, Dafydd, Roger K. Moore, and Richard Winski
1997 Handbook of Standards and Resources for Spoken Language Systems. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Granda, Germán de
1999 Español y lenguas indoamericanas en hispanoamérica: estructuras, situaciones y transferencias. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid.Google Scholar
Hopper, P.J., and S.A. Thompson
1980 “Transitivity in grammar and discourse.” Language 251–299. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática – INEI
2007 Accessed January 20, 2012. http://​www​.inei​.gob​.pe/.
Jara Yupanqui, Margarita
2012 “Peruvian Amazonian Spanish: Linguistic Variation, Language Ideologies and Identities.” Sociolinguistic Studies 6 (3): 445–69.Google Scholar
Jara Yupanqui, Margarita, and Pilar Valenzuela
2013 “El uso del perfecto en secuencias narrativas en el español peruano amazónico: el caso de Jeberos.” Lexis 37(1): 33–70.Google Scholar
Kerswill, Paul, and Ann Williams
2002 “‘Salience’ as an explanatory factor in language change: evidence from dialect leveling in urban England.” In Contact- induced Language Change: An Examination of Internal, External and Non-linguistic factors, ed. by Mari Jones, and Edith Esch, 81–110. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Klee, Carol A., and Alicia Ocampo
1995 “The Expression of Past Reference in Spanish Narratives of Spanish-Quechua Bilingual Speakers.” In Spanish in Four Continents, Studies in Language Contact and Bilingualism, ed. by Carmen Silva-Corvalán, 52–70. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Klee, Carol A., and Andrew Lynch
2009 El español en contacto con otras lenguas. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Koops, Christian, and Rosa Vallejos
2014 “The prosodic structure of Peruvian Amazonian Spanish: comparing rural and urban varieties.” Conference presented at the 7th International Workshop on Spanish Sociolinguistics. Madison, WI. April 4–6.
Labov, William
1972 Sociolinguistic Patterns. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2001 Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 2: External factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lipski, John
1994 Latin American Spanish. London: Longmans.Google Scholar
Lozano, Anthony G
1975 “Syntactic Borrowing in Spanish from Quechua: The Noun Phrase.” In Lingüística e Indigenismo Moderno de América. Actas y Memorias del XXXIX Congreso Internacional de Americanistas, ed. by Rosalía Avalos, and Rogger Ravines, 397–305. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Mendoza-Dentón, María
2002 “Language and Identity.” In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, ed. by J.K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill, and Natalie Schilling-Estes, 475–499. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Michael, Lev
2014 “On the Pre-Columbian Origin of Proto-Omagua-Kokama.” Journal of Language Contact 7(2): 309–344. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mithun, Mariane
1999 The Languages of Native North America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Montes, Maria Emilia
2004 “Lengua ticuna: resultados de fonología y sintaxis.” Forma y Función 171: 145–178.Google Scholar
Nichols, Johanna, and Balthasar Bickel
2011 “Possessive Classification.” In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, ed. by Matthew S. Dryer, and Martin Haspelmath. Max Planck Digital Library. http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/59.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, Erin
2005 “Intonation and Language Contact: A Case Study of Two Varieties of Peruvian Spanish.” Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Payne, Thomas E., and Doris L. Payne
2012 A Typological Grammar of Panare: A Cariban Language of Venezuela. BRILL. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pozzi-Escot, Inés
1972 “El Castellano en el Perú: Norma culta nacional versus norma culta regional.” In El Reto Del Multilingüismo En El Perú, ed. by Alberto Escobar, 125–142. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Queixalós, Francesc
2009 “Amazonía: Aspectos Generales.” In Atlas sociolingüístico de pueblos indígenas en América Latina, ed. by Inge Sichra, 231–244. Quito: AECID/FUNPROEIB Andes/UNICEF.Google Scholar
Ramírez, Luis Hernán
2003 El español amazónico hablado en el Perú. Lima: Juan Gutemberg Editores.Google Scholar
Rodríguez Garrido, J.A
1982 “Sobre El Uso Del Posesivo Redundante En El Español Del Perú.” Lexis 61: 117–123.Google Scholar
Sánchez, Liliana
2004 “Functional convergence in the tense, evidentiality and aspectual systems of Quechua–Spanish bilinguals.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 71: 147–162. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seifart, Frank
2005 The structure and use of shape-based noun classes in Miraña (North West Amazon). MPI Series in Psycholinguistics 33. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Solís Fonseca, Gustavo
2002 Lenguas en la Amazonía peruana. Lima: Programa FORTE-PE; Ministerio de Educación.Google Scholar
2009 Perú Amazónico. In Atlas sociolingüístico de pueblos indígenas en América Latina, ed. by Inge Sichra, 302–332. Quito: AECID/FUNPROEIB Andes/UNICEF.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
1986 Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Vallejos, Rosa
2010 “A Grammar of Kokama-Kokamilla.” Ph.D. diss., University of Oregon.
2014 “Integrating Language Documentation, Language Preservation, and Linguistic Research: Working with the Kokamas from the Amazon.” Language Documentation & Conservation 81: 38–65.Google Scholar
Zavala, Virginia
2001 “Borrowing evidential functions from Quechua: The role of pues as a discourse marker in Andean Spanish.” Journal of Pragmatics 331: 999–1023. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 12 other publications

Emlen, Nicholas Q.
2017. Multilingualism in the Andes and Amazonia: A View from In‐between. The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology 22:3 ► pp. 556 ff. Crossref logo
Emlen, Nicholas Q.
2020.  In Amazonian Spanish [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 23], ► pp. 260 ff. Crossref logo
Fafulas, Stephen
2020.  In Amazonian Spanish [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 23], ► pp. 2 ff. Crossref logo
Fafulas, Stephen & Ricard Viñas-de-Puig
2020.  In Amazonian Spanish [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 23], ► pp. 156 ff. Crossref logo
Garcia, Miguel
2016.  In Inquiries in Hispanic Linguistics [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 12], ► pp. 191 ff. Crossref logo
Henriksen, Nicholas & Stephen Fafulas
2017. Prosodic timing and language contact: Spanish and Yagua in Amazonian Peru . Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 10:2 ► pp. 225 ff. Crossref logo
Henriksen, Nicholas, Stephen Fafulas & Erin O'Rourke
2020.  In Spanish Phonetics and Phonology in Contact [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 28], ► pp. 141 ff. Crossref logo
Lamanna, Scott
2020.  In Amazonian Spanish [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 23], ► pp. 106 ff. Crossref logo
Rodríguez-Mondonedo, Miguel & Stephen Fafulas
2020.  In Amazonian Spanish [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 23], ► pp. 288 ff. Crossref logo
Sánchez, Liliana, José Camacho, Elisabeth Mayer & Carolina Rodríguez Alzza
2022. Gender Agreement in a Language Contact Situation. Languages 7:2 ► pp. 81 ff. Crossref logo
Vallejos, Rosa
2019. Llegaron en sus canoa: innovación gramatical en el español de la Amazonía peruana. Letras (Lima) 90:131 ► pp. 77 ff. Crossref logo
Vallejos, Rosa, Evelyn Fernández-Lizárraga & Haley Patterson
2020. The role of information structure in the instantiation of objects: Evidence from Amazonian Spanish . Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 219 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.