Part of
Variation in Second and Heritage Languages: Crosslinguistic perspectives
Edited by Robert Bayley, Dennis R. Preston and Xiaoshi Li
[Studies in Language Variation 28] 2022
► pp. 97126
References
Bauer, Robert S. & Paul K. Benedict
1997Modern Cantonese phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink
2016Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer Program] (version 6.0.15). [URL].Google Scholar
Census and Statistics Department, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
2016Thematic household survey report No. 59. Hong Kong. [URL].
Chan, Arlene
2011The Chinese in Toronto from 1878: From outside to inside the circle. Toronto: Dundurn Press.Google Scholar
Coetsem, Frans van
1988Loan phonology and the two transfer types in language contact. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2000A general and unified theory of the transmission process in language contact. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Cui, Naomi, Minyi Zhu, Vina Law, Holman Tse & Naomi Nagy
2014Exploring automated formant analysis for comparative variationist study of heritage Cantonese and English. In Presentation at change and variation in Canada/Changement et Variation au Canada (CVC 8). Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada. [URL].Google Scholar
Eberhard, David M., Gary F. Simons & Charles D. Fennig
(eds.) 2020Ethnologue: Languages of the world. 23rd ed. Dallas, Texas: SIL International. [URL].Google Scholar
Gorman, Kyle, Jonathan Howell & Michael Wagner
2011Prosodylab-Aligner: A tool for forced alignment of laboratory speech. Canadian Acoustics 39(3). 192–193.Google Scholar
Guy, Gregory R.
1990The sociolinguistic types of language change. Diachronica 7(1). 47–67. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Michol F. & James A. Walker
2010Ethnolects and the city: Ethnic orientation and linguistic variation in Toronto English. Language Variation and Change 22(1). 37–67. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel Ezra
2009Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1). 359–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keefe, Susan Emley & Amado M. Padilla
1987Chicano ethnicity. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William
1994Principles of linguistic change, Volume 1. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2007Transmission and diffusion. Language 83(2). 344–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Principles of linguistic change, Vol. 3: Cognitive and cultural factors. Malden, Mass.: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Sharon Ash & Charles Boberg
2006The atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology and sound change. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lyskawa, Paulina, Ruth Maddeaux, Emilia Melara & Naomi Nagy
2016Heritage speakers follow all the rules: Language contact and convergence in Polish devoicing. Heritage Language Journal 13(2). 219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Montrul, Silvina
2015The acquisition of heritage languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nagy, Naomi
2011A multilingual corpus to explore variation in language contact situations. Rassegna Italiana Di Linguistica Applicata 43(1/2). 65–84.Google Scholar
Nagy, Naomi, Joanna Chociej & Michol F. Hoffman
2014Analyzing ethnic orientation in the quantitative sociolinguistic paradigm. Language & Communication 35. 9–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nagy, Naomi & Miriam Meyerhoff
2008Introduction: Social lives in language. In Gillian Sankoff, Miriam Meyerhoff & Naomi Nagy (Eds.), Social lives in language–Sociolinguistics and multilingual speech communities: Celebrating the work of Gillian Sankoff, 1–17. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Payne, Arvilla Chapin
1976The acquisition of the phonological system of a second dialect. University of Pennsylvania dissertation. [URL].Google Scholar
Polinsky, Maria
2018Heritage languages and their speakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian
2013Linguistic outcomes of bilingualism. In J. K Chambers & Natalie Schilling (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change, 501–518. Maldon, Mass.: Wiley Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scovel, Thomas
2000A critical review of the critical period research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 20. 213–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smits, Caroline
1998Two models for the study of language contact: A Psycho-linguistic perspective versus a socio-cultural perspective. In Monika S. Schmid, Jennifer R. Austin & Dieter Stein (eds.), Historical linguistics 1997: Selected papers from the 13th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Düsseldorf, 377–390. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Statistics Canada
2017Toronto, C [Census Subdivision], Ontario and Canada [Country] (Table). Census Profile. 2016 Census. Statistics Canada Catalogue No. 98-316-X2016001. Ottawa. [URL].
Thomas, Erik & Tyler Kendall
2007NORM: The vowel normalization and plotting suite. [URL].Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey & Terrence Kaufman
1988Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
2013Sociolinguistic typology social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tsang, Chui-Lim
1984Sociolinguistic considerations in selecting the language of instruction in a bilingual programme. In Beverly Hong (ed.), New papers on Chinese language use, 45–58. Canberra: Contemporary China Centre, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University.Google Scholar
Tse, Holman
2019Vowel shifts in Cantonese? Asia-Pacific Language Variation 5(1). 67–83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Walker, James A.
2015Canadian English: A sociolinguistic perspective. New York: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel
1953Languages in contact, findings and problems. New York: Linguistic Circle of New York.Google Scholar
Winford, Donald
2007Some issues in the study of language contact. Journal of Language Contact 1(1). 22–40. DOI logo.Google Scholar
2013On the unity of contact phenomena: The case for imposition. In Carole de Féral (ed.), In and out of Africa: Languages in question. In honour of Robert Nicolaï, 43–71. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
2017The ecology of language and the New Englishes: Toward an integrative framework. In Markku Filppula, Juhani Klemola, Anna Mauranen & Svetlana Vetchinnikova (eds.), Changing English: Global and local perspectives, 25–55. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Yip, Moira
1996Lexicon optimization in languages without alternations. In J. Durand & B. Laks (Eds.), Current trends in phonology: Models and methods, 354–385. Salford, Manchester: European Studies Research Institute, University of Salford. . DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yue-Hashimoto, Anne Oi-kan
1972Phonology of Cantonese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zee, Eric
1999Change and variation in the syllable-initial and syllable-final consonants in Hong Kong Cantonese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 27(1). 120–67.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Li, Katrina Kechun, Li Nguyen, Christopher Bryant & Kayeon Yoo
2023. Lexical tonal effects in code-switching: A comparative study of Cantonese, Mandarin, and Vietnamese switching with English. International Journal of Bilingualism DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.