Cover not available
Introduction published In:
Source-Goal (a)symmetries across languages
Edited by Anetta Kopecka and Marine Vuillermet
[Studies in Language 45:1] 2021
► pp. 2–35
Introduction

Source-Goal (a)symmetries across languages

| Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage & Université de Lyon
| University of Zürich
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Path and Ground in motion events
  • 3.Source-Goal asymmetry
    • 3.1Semantic asymmetry
    • 3.2Morphosyntactic asymmetry
    • 3.3Syntactic asymmetry
    • 3.4Discourse frequency of the source and the Goal
    • 3.5Language production in children and in adults
    • 3.6Summary
  • 4.Data collection for Path of motion and Source/Goal expressions
    • 4.1Developing an elicitation tool for data collection
    • 4.2Developing a questionnaire for data exploration
  • 5.Overview of the thematic issue
  • 6.Discussion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 9 February 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.00018.kop
References (104)
References
Ameka, Felix K. & Stephan C. Levinson. 2007. Introduction – The typology and semantics of locative predicates: Posturals, positionals and other beasts. Linguistics 45(5). 847–872.Google Scholar
Aske, Jon. 1989. Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1–14.Google Scholar
Aurnague, Michel. 2015. Motion verbs and spatial PPs in French: from spatio-temporal structure to asymmetry and goal bias. Carnet de Grammaire, noº23. Rapports internes de CLLE-ERSS.Google Scholar
. 2019. About asymmetry of motion in French: Some properties and a principle. In Michael Aurnague & Dejan Stosic (eds.), The semantics of dynamic space in French: Descriptive, experimental and formal studies on motion expression, 31–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Backhouse, Anthony E. 1981. Japanese verbs for dress. Journal of Linguistics 171. 17–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blake, Barry J. 1977. Case marking in Australian languages. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen, Nicholas J. Enfield, James Essegbey, Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano, Sotaro Kita, Friederike Lüpke & Felix Ameka. 2007. Principles of event segmentation in language: The case of motion events. Language 83(3). 495–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borillo, Andrée. 1998. L’espace et son expression en français. Paris: Ophrys.Google Scholar
Bourdin, Philippe. 1997. On Goal-bias across languages: Modal, configurational and orientation parameters. In Bohumil Palek, Osamu Fujimura & Jiří Václav Neustupný (eds.), Proceedings of LP’96. Typology, item orderings and universals. (Proceedings of the Conference held in Prague, August 20–22, 1996), 185–218. Prague: Karolinum.
Bowerman, Melissa, Marianne Gullberg, Asifa Majid & Bhuvana Narasimhan. 2004. Put project: The cross-linguistic encoding of placement events. In Asifa Majid (ed.), Field manual, Vol. 91, 10–24. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burrow, Trigant & Sudhibhushan Bhattacharya. 1970. The Pengo language: Grammar, texts, and vocabulary. Oxford: The Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clancy, Patricia M. 1985. The acquisition of Japanese. In Dan I. Slobin (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 1. The data; Vol. 2. Theoretical issues, 373–524. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Language universals and linguistic typology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis. 2006. Encoding the distinction between location, source and destination: a typological study. In Maya Hickmann & Stéphane Robert (eds.), Space in languages: Linguistic systems and cognitive categories, 19–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, David. 2008. A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics. 6th edn. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, John. 1981. Kobon. Lingua Descriptive Studies 31. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1981. An interpretation of split ergativity and related patterns. Language 57(3). 626–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. Grammaticalization and the gradience of categories: Relator nouns and postpositions in Tibetan and Burmese. In Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays on language function and language type, 59–69. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dirven, René & Marjolijn Verspoor (eds.). 1999. Cognitive exploration of language and linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dromi, Esther. 1979. More on the acquisition of locative prepositions: An analysis of Hebrew data. Journal of Child Language 61. 547–562. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fagard, Benjamin. 2006. Evolution sémantique des prépositions dans les langues romanes: Illustration ou contre-exemple de la primauté du spatiale. Paris: Université Paris 7. PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Fähnrich, Heinz. 1993. Kurze Grammatik der Georgian Sprache. 3rd ed. Leipzig: Langenscheidt Verlag Enzyklopedie.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1972. How to know whether you’re coming or going. In Karl Hyldgaard-Jensen (ed.), Linguistik 1971, Referate des 6. Linguistischen Kolloquiums (11–14 August 1971, Kopenhagen), 369–379. Frankfurt: Athenäum.Google Scholar
1975. Santa Cruz lectures on Deixis 1971. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
1977. The case for case reopened. In Peter Cole & Jerrold M. Sadock (eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. 8: Grammatical Relations, 59–81. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fortis, Jean-Michel & Alice Vittrant. 2011. L’organisation syntaxique de l’expression de la trajectoire : Vers une typologie des constructions. Faits de Langues – Les Cahiers 31. 71–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. On the morpho-syntax of path-expressing constructions: Toward a typology. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 69(3). 341–374.Google Scholar
Fortis, Jean-Michel, Colette Grinevald, Anetta Kopecka & Alice Vittrant. 2011. L’expression de la trajectoire: Perspectives typologiques. Faits de Langues – Les Cahiers 3(2). 33–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fowles, John. 1969. The French lieutenant’s woman. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
. 1981. La mujer del teniente francés. Barcelona: Editorial Argos Vergara.Google Scholar
Freeman, Norman H., Sinha, Chris G. & Jacqueline A. Stedmon. 1981. The allative bias in three-year-olds is almost proof against task naturalness. Journal of Child Language 8(2). 283–296. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulos, Thanasis. 2018. A frame-based approach to the source-goal asymmetry: Synchronic and diachronic evidence from Ancient Greek. Constructions and Frames 10(1). 61–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulos, Thanasis & Athina Sioupi. 2015. Framing the difference between Sources and Goals in Change of Possession events: A corpus-based study in German and Modern Greek. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 31. 105–122. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulos, Thanasis & Petros Karatsareas. 2017. A diachronic take on the Source–Goal asymmetry: Evidence from inner Asia Minor Greek. In Sylvia Luraghi, Tatiana Nikitina & Chiara Zanchi (eds.), Space in diachrony, 179–206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulos, Thanasis, Holden Härtl & Athina Sioupi. 2019. Goal realization: An empirically based comparison between English, German, and Greek. Languages in Contrast 19(2). 280–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grinevald, Colette. 2011. On constructing a working typology of the expression of path. Faits de Langues – Les Cahiers 3(2). 43–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gruber, Jeffrey. 1965. Studies in lexical semantics. MIT Working Papers in LinguisticsGoogle Scholar
Iacobini, Claudio, Luisa Corona, Noemi de Pasquale & Alfonsina Buoniconto. 2017. How should a classical Satellite-Framed language behave? Path encoding asymmetries in Ancient Greek and Latin. In Sylvia Luraghi, Tatiana Nikitina & Chiara Zanchi (eds), Space in diachrony, 95–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ikegami, Yoshihiko. 1979. ‘Goal’ over ‘source’: A case of linguistic dissymmetry. Hungarian Studies in English 121. 139–157.Google Scholar
. 1982. Source vs. Goal: A case of linguistic dissymmetry. In Robert N. St. Clair and Walburga von Raffler-Engel (eds.), Language and cognitive styles: Patterns of neurolinguistic and psycholinguistic development, 292–308. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
. 1987. ‘Source’ and ‘Goal’: A case of linguistic dissymmetry. In René Dirven & Günter Radden (eds.), Concept of case, 122–146. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Ishibashi, Miyuki. 2010. The (a)symmetry of Source and Goal in Motion events in Japanese: Evidence from narrative data. In Giovanna Marotta, Alessandro Lenci, Linda Meini & Francesco Rovai (eds), Space in language, Proceedings of the Pisa International Conference, 515–531. Firenze: Edizioni ETS.Google Scholar
. 2012. The expression of ‘putting’ and ‘taking’ events in Japanese: The asymmetry of Source and Goal revisited. In Anetta Kopecka & Bhuvana Narasimhan (eds.), Put and Take events: A crosslinguistic perspective, 253–272. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ishibashi, Miyuki, Anetta Kopecka & Marine Vuillermet. 2006. Trajectoire : matériel visuel pour élicitation des données linguistiques. Laboratoire Dynamique du Langage, CNRS / Université Lyon 2. Projet de Fédération de recherche en Typologie et Universaux Linguistiques. [URL] (last access 11 December 2020).
Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1990. Semantic structures. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johanson, Megan, Selemis Stathis & Anna Papafragou. 2019. The Source-Goal asymmetry in spatial language: Language-general vs. language-specific aspects. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 34 (7). 826–840. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Michael A. 1983. Speculations on the expression of movement in French. Language Center Occasional Papers (University of Essex) 271. 165–194.Google Scholar
Kabata, Kaori. 2013. Goal-source asymmetry and crosslinguistic grammaticalization patterns: A cognitive-typological approach. Language Sciences 361: 78–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koenig, Jean-Pierre, Gail Mauner & Breton Bienvenue. 2003. Arguments for adjuncts. Cognition 89(2). 67–103. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kölver, Ulrike. 1985. Kasusrelationen im Birmanischen. In Frans Plank (ed.). Relational typology, 195–212. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopecka, Anetta. 2017. Source-oriented and Goal-oriented events in Old and Modern French. In Sylvia Luraghi, Tatiana Nikitina & Chiara Zanchi (eds.), Space in diachrony, 305–328. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopecka, Anetta & Miyuki Ishibashi. 2010. Source-Goal (a)symétrie – Guide de travail. Projet Trajectoire, CNRS-TUL (unpublished ms.).Google Scholar
. 2011. L’(a)symétrie dans l’expression de la Source et du But: Perspective translinguistique. Faits de Langues – Les Cahiers 3(2). 131–149. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kopecka, Anetta & Bhuvana Narasimhan (eds.). 2012. Events of Putting and Taking: A crosslinguistic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kutscher, Silvia. 2010. When ‘towards’ means ‘away from’: the case of directional-ablative syncretism in the Ardeşen variety of Laz (South-Caucasian). STUF – Language Typology and Universals 63(3). 252–271.Google Scholar
Lakoff, Georges. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakusta, Laura & Barbara Landau. 2005. Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial language. Cognition 961. 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Language and memory for motion events: Origins of the asymmetry between goal and source path. Cognitive Science 36(3). 517–544. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lakusta, Laura & Susan Carey. 2015. Twelve-month-old infants’ encoding of goal and source paths in agentive and non-agentive motion events. Language Learning and Development 11(2). 152–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1996. Frames of reference and Molyneux’s question: Crosslinguistic evidence. In Paul Bloom, Merrill F. Peterson, Lynn Nadel & Mary A. Peterson (eds.), Language and space, 109–169). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2003. Space in language and cognition. Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen. 1999. Hypotheses concerning basic locative constructions and the verbal elements within them. In David Wilkins (ed.), Manual for the 1999 Field Season, 55–56. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. & Penelope Brown. 2012. Put and Take in Yélî Dnye, the Papuan language of Rossel Island. In Anetta Kopecka & Bhuvana Narasimhan (eds.), Events of putting and taking: A crosslinguistic perspective, 273–296. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. & David. P. Wilkins. 2006. The background to the study of the language of space. In Stephen C. Levinson & David P. Wilkins (eds.), Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity, 1–23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, J. Lachlan. 1978. Ablative–locative transfers and their relevance for the theory of case-grammar. Journal of Linguistics 14(2). 129–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchello-Nizia, Christiane. 2002. Prépositions françaises en diachronie: Une catégorie en question. Lingvisticae Investigationes 25(2). 205–221. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCawley, James D. 1978. Notes on Japanese clothing verbs. In John Hinds & Irwin Howard (eds.), Problems in Japanese syntax and semantics, 68–78. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Miyajima, Tatsuo. 1986. Kaku shihai no ryou-teki sokumen. In Yotaka Miyaji (ed.), Ronshû nihongo kenkyû, Vol. 1: Gendai-hen, 41–58. Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar
Nam, Seungho. 2004. Goal and Source: Asymmetry in their syntax and semantics. Seoul National University. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Nikitina, Tatiana. 2009. Subcategorization pattern and lexical meaning of motion verbs: A study of the Source/Goal ambiguity. Linguistics 47(5). 1113–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noonan, Michael. 2008. Case compounding in the Bodic languages. In Greville G. Corbett & Michael Noonan (eds.), Case and grammatical relations, Studies in honor of Bernard Comrie, 127–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pajusalu, Renate, Neeme Kahusk, Heili Orav, Ann Veismann, Kadri Vider & Haldur Õim. 2013. The encoding of motion event in Estonian. In Mila Vulchanova & Emile van der Zee (eds.), Motion encoding in language and space, 44–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pantcheva, Marina. 2010. The syntactic structure of locations, goals and sources. Linguistics 48(5). 1043–1081. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papafragou, Anna. 2010. Source-Goal asymmetries in motion representation: Implications for language production and comprehension. Cognitive Science 341: 1064–1092. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Papahagi, Cristiana. 2005. Les prépositions de la trajectoire en français et en roumain: Étude synchronique et diachronique. Paris: Université Paris 3. PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Pléh, Csaba. 1998. Early spatial case markers in Hungarian children. In Eve V. Clark (ed.), The Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Child Language Research Forum, 211–219. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pléh, Csaba, Zsuzsanna Vinkler & László Kálmán. 1996. Early morphology of spatial express-ions in Hungarian children: A childes study. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 401. 129–142.Google Scholar
Regier, Terry & Mingyu Zheng. 2007. Attention to endpoints: A cross-linguistic constraint on spatial meaning. Cognitive Science 311. 705–719. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ricca, Davide. 1993. I verbi deittici di movimento in Europa: Una ricerca interlinguistica. Firenze: La Nuova Italia Editrice.Google Scholar
Rice, Sally & Kaori Kabata. 2007. Crosslingusitic grammaticalization patterns of the allative . Linguistic Typology 11(3). 451–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richardson, John F. 1984. On some though Source-Goal asymmetries. Proceedings of the Eastern States Conference in Linguistics 11 (CESCOL Proceedings). 275–287.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward, Morris Swadesh & Alice Morris. 1932. The expression of the ending-point relation in English, French, and German. Language 8(1), Language Monograph 10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sarda, Laure. 2019. French motion verbs: Insights into the status of locative PPs. In Michel Aurnague & Dejan Stosic (eds.), The semantics of dynamic space in French: Descriptive, experimental and formal studies on motion expression, 68–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinha, Chris, Lis A. Thorseng, Mariko Hayashi & Kim Plunkett. 1994. Comparative spatial semantics and language acquisition: Evidence from Danish, English, and Japanese. Journal of Semantics 11(4). 253–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, I. Dan. 1997. Mind, code, and text. In Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Essays in language function and language type, 437–467. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Sven Strömqvist & Ludo Verhoeven (eds.), Relating events in narrative: Topological & contextual perspectives, 219–257. Mahwah, NJ: LEA Publishers.Google Scholar
. 2005. Relating narrative events in translation. In Dorit Diskin Ravid & Havat Bat-Zeev Shyldkrot (eds.), Perspectives on language and language development: Essays in honor of Ruth A. Berman, 115–129. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, Dan I. & Nini Hoiting. 1994. Reference to movement in spoken and signed languages: Typological considerations. Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session Dedicated to the Contributions of Charles J. Fillmore, 487–505. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2018. The goal bias revised: A collostructional approach. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 6(1).143–166. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Ada Rodhe. 2004. The goal bias in the encoding of motion events. In Günter Radden & Klaus-Uwe Panther (eds.), Studies in linguistic motivation, 249–267. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Svorou, Soteria. 1994. The grammar of space. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Len. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical form. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and semantic description, vol.3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 36–149, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. 1991. Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Proceedings of the Seventeenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 480–519. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics, vol. 2. Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Taremaa, Piia. 2013. Fictive and actual motion in Estonian: Encoding space. SKY Journal of Linguistics 261. 151–183.Google Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich & Hans-Jörg Schmid. 1996. An introduction to cognitive linguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Verkerk, Annemarie. 2017. The goal-over-source principle in European languages: Preliminary results from a parallel corpus study. In Sylvia Luraghi, Tatiana Nikitina & Chiara Zanchi (eds.), Space in diachrony, 1–40. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verspoor, Marjolijn, René Dirven & Günter Radden. 1999. Putting concepts together: Syntax. In René Dirven & Marjolijn Verspoor (eds.), Cognitive exploration of language and linguistics, 79–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Vittrant, Alice. 2015. Expressing motion: The contribution of Southeast Asian languages with reference to East Asian Languages. In Nick J. Enfield & Bernard Comrie (eds), Southeast Asia: The state of arts, 586–632. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vuillermet, Marine & Anetta Kopecka. 2019. “Trajectoire”: A methodological tool for eliciting Path of motion. In Aimée Lahaussois & Marine Vuillermet (eds.), Methodological tools for linguistic description and typology, 97–124. Special issue of Language, Documentation and Conservation 161.Google Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard & Fernando Zúñiga. 2009. Source-Goal (in)difference and the typology of motion events in the clause. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 59(3). 284–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, David P. & Deborah Hill. 1995. When go means come: Questioning the basicness of basic motion verbs. Cognitive Linguistics 6(2/3). 209–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zanchi, Chiara. 2017. New evidence for the Source-Goal asymmetry. Ancient Greek preverbs. In Sylvia Luraghi, Tatiana Nikitina & Chiara Zanchi (eds.). Space in diachrony, 147–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (9)

Cited by nine other publications

Logvinova, Natalia
2024. Concord in Russian close appositional constructions: a quantitative study. Russian Linguistics 48:1 DOI logo
Ryzhova, Daria, Ekaterina Rakhilina, Tatiana Reznikova & Yulia Badryzlova
2024. Lexical systems with systematic gaps: verbs of falling. Folia Linguistica 58:1 ► pp. 191 ff. DOI logo
Soroli, Efstathia
2024. How language influences spatial thinking, categorization of motion events, and gaze behavior: a cross-linguistic comparison. Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Taremaa, Piia & Anetta Kopecka
2023. Manner of motion in Estonian. Studies in Language 47:1 ► pp. 32 ff. DOI logo
Taremaa, Piia & Anetta Kopecka
2023. Speed and space: semantic asymmetries in motion descriptions in Estonian. Cognitive Linguistics 34:1 ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Torres Soler, Julio & Renata Enghels
2023. From Motion to Causation: The Diachrony of the Spanish Causative Constructions with traer (‘Bring’) and llevar (‘Take’). Languages 8:2 ► pp. 122 ff. DOI logo
Hellwig, Birgit, Anna Margetts, Sonja Riesberg & Melanie Schippling
2022. Bringing and taking. In Caused Accompanied Motion [Typological Studies in Language, 134], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Margetts, Anna
2022. Directed caused accompanied motion events in Saliba-Logea. In Caused Accompanied Motion [Typological Studies in Language, 134], ► pp. 147 ff. DOI logo
Taremaa, Piia, Johanna Kiik, Leena Karin Toots & Ann Veismann
2022. Speed as a dimension of manner in Estonian frog stories. Nordic Journal of Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.