Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 43:3 (2019) ► pp. 585–627

Syntactic and semantic agreement in Eegimaa (Banjal)

An account of lexical hybrids in an African noun class system

| University of York
Typological research on agreement systems recognises syntactic and semantic agreement as the two main types of agreement, with the former considered to be more canonical. An examination of different manifestations of semantic agreement found in the Gújjolaay Eegimaa noun class (non sex based gender) system is proposed in this paper from the perspective of Canonical Typology, and the findings are related to the Agreement Hierarchy predictions. The results show that Eegimaa has hybrid nouns and constructional mismatches which trigger semantically based agreement mismatches, both in gender and number between controller nouns and certain targets. This paper shows that Eegimaa has two main subtypes of semantic agreement: human semantic agreement and locative semantic agreement. The data and the analysis proposed here reveal novel results according to which these two types of semantic agreement behave differently in relation to the Agreement Hierarchy.
Keywords: agreement mismatches, noun class, canonical typology, Jóola, Atlantic, Niger-Congo
Published online: 18 November 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.14023.sag
References

[ p. 625 ]References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y.
2000 Classifiers : A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark
1994 Morphology by itself: stems and inflectional classes. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bassène, Alain-Christian
2015 Accords de classe et référence générique dans les parlers joola. In Denis Creissels & Konstantin Podzniakov (eds.), Typologie des systèmes de classes nominales dans les langues Atlantiques. Cologne: RüdigerKöppeVerlag.Google Scholar
Bassène, Alain Chistian
2012 Concurrence entre critères morphologiques et critères sémantiques dans les accords de classe: le cas du jóola banjal. Africana Linguistica 18. 261–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Johanna Nichols
2007 Inflectional morphology. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 2nd ed., 169–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cobbinah, Alexander Yao
2013 Nominal classification and verbal nouns in Baïnounk Gubëeher. London: SOAS, University of London, Department of Linguistics PhD Dissertation.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.
1979 The agreement hierarchy. Journal of Linguistics 15(2). Cambridge University Press. 203–224.Google Scholar
1983 Hierarchies, Targets and Controllers: Agreement Patterns in Slavic. Croom Helm.Google Scholar
1991 Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000 Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2007 Gender and noun classes. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Linguistic typology and syntactic description. Vol III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 2nd ed., 241–279. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010a Canonical derivational morphology. Word Structure 3(2). 141–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010b Features: essential notions. In A. Kibort & Greville G. Corbett (eds.), Features: perspectives on a key notion in linguistics, 141–155. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 Sex-based and Non-sex-based Gender Systems. In Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds.), The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library, chapter 31. http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/31. Accessed on 2013-06-05.
2015 Hybrid nouns and their complexity. In Jürg Fleischer, Elisabeth Rieken & Paul Widmer (eds.), Agreement from a diachronic perspective, 191–214. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Creissels, Denis
1999 “Genres” indo-européens et “classes nominales” Niger-Congo. Faits de Langues 14. Paris: OPHRYS. 177–184.Google Scholar
[ p. 626 ]
2013 Atlantic noun-class systems: a typological approach. Language Documentation & Linguistic Theory 4. London.Google Scholar
Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse
2004 Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Garbo, Francesca Di
2014 Gender and its interaction with number and evaluative morphology: An intra- and intergenealogical survey of Africa. Stockholm: University of Stockholm Department of Linguistics PhD Dissertation.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H.
1978 How do languages acquire gender markers? In Joseph H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson & A. Moravcsik Edith (eds.), Universals of human language, vol. 3, 47–82. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2013 Argument indexing: a conceptual framework for the syntactic status of bound person forms. In Martin Haspelmath & Dik Bakker (eds.), Languages across boundaries, 197–226. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1982 African noun class systems. In Hansjakob Seiler & Christian Lehmann (eds.), Apprehension: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Gegenstanden, vol. 1. Tubingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Hundt, M.
2006 The committee has/have decided…: on concord patterns with collective nouns in inner- and outer-circle varieties of English. Journal of English Linguistics 34(3). 206–232. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Magnus
2001 Agreement with collective nouns in English (Lund Studies in English). Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
2006 Collective nouns and language change. English Language and Linguistics 10(2). 321–343. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, John
1977 Semantics I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres.Google Scholar
Pozdniakov, Konstantin
2010 La classification nominale : A la croisée des paradigmes. In Franck Floricic (ed.), Essais de typologie et de linguistique générale: mélanges offerts à Denis Creissels, 87–105. ENS Éditions.Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleonor
1978 Principles of categorization. In Eleonor Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and Categorization, 27–48. Hillsdate, Mich: Laurence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sagna, Serge
2008 Formal and semantic properties of the Gújjolaay Eegimaa (A.k.a Banjal) nominal classification system. London: SOAS, University of London Department of Linguistics PhD Dissertation.Google Scholar
2010 Issues in noun classification and noun class assignment in Gújjolaay Eegimaa (Banjal) and other Jóola languages. Studies in African Linguistics 39(1). 1–33.Google Scholar
2011 Semantic categorisations in the Gújjolaay Eegimaa collectives and distributives. In Peter K. Austin, Oliver Richards-Bond, David Nathan & Lutz Marten (eds.), Proceedings of Conference on Language Documentation and Linguistic Theory 3, 1–10. London: Department of Linguistics, SOAS.Google Scholar
2012 Physical properties and culture-specific factors as principles of semantic categorisation in the Gújjolaay Eegimaa noun class system. Cognitive Linguistics 23 (1). 129–163. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schadeberg, Thilo
2001 Number in Swahili grammar. Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere 68(Swahili forum VIII). 7–16.Google Scholar
Seifart, Frank
2010 Nominal Classification. Language and Linguistics Compass 4(8). 719–736. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 627 ]
Steele, Susan
1978 Word order variation: a typological study. In J. H. Greenberg, Charles A. Ferguson & Edith A. Moravcsik (eds.), Universals of Human Language IV: Syntax, 585–623. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, John R.
2003 Linguistic categorization. Oxford textbooks in linguistics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, Rachel
2015 Kujireray: morphosyntax, noun classification and verbal nouns. London: SOAS, University of London Department of Linguistics PhD Dissertation.Google Scholar
Welmers, W E.
1973 African language structures. Berkeley (USA); London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Paul Polydoor de
1971 The noun class system of Proto-Benue-Congo. The Hague & Paris: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar