Article published in:
Usage-based and Typological Approaches to Linguistic Units
Edited by Tsuyoshi Ono, Ritva Laury and Ryoko Suzuki
[Studies in Language 43:2] 2019
► pp. 301328
Aho, Eija
2010: Spontaanin puheen prosodinen jaksottelu. Helsinki: University of Helsinki Doctoral dissertation. http://​urn​.fi​/URN:ISBN:978​-952​-10​-6405​-0 [retrieved December 28, 2015].
Antaki, Charles
2012Affiliative and disaffiliative candidate understandings. Discourse Studies 14(5). 531–547. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Arkisyn = Arkisyn
A morphosyntactically coded database of conversational Finnish. Data-base compiled at the University of Turku, with material from the Conversation Analysis Archive at the University of Helsinki and the Syntax Archives at the University of Turku. Department of Finnish and Finno-Ugric Languages, University of Turku.
Auer, Peter
2005Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text 25(1). 7–36. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, Betsy K.
1985The pragmatics of left detachment in spoken standard French (Pragmatics and Beyond VI, 3). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David
(2019) Praat: doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.1, retrieved 13 July 2019 http://​www​.praat​.org
Bruce, Gösta
2005Intonational prominence in varieties of Swedish revisited. In Sun-Ah Jun (ed.), Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing, 410–429. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace
1987Cognitive constraints on information flow. In Russell Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and grouding in discourse, 21–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1988Linking Intonation Units in Spoken English. In John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, 10–27. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994Discourse, consciousness, and time. The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth
2014What does grammar tell us about action? Pragmatics 24(3). 623–647. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cruttenden, Alan
1986Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Danae Paolino & Susanna Cummings
1992Discourse transcription. Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics, vol. 41. Department of Linguistics, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
Erman, Britt & Beatrice Warren
2000The idiom principle and open choice principle. Text 20(1). 29–62. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox & Sandra A. Thompson
2002Constituency and the Grammar of Turn Increments. In Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), The Language of Turn and Sequence, 14–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
1991Syntaktiset rakenteet kertomuksen jäsentiminä. Virittäjä 951. 33–47.Google Scholar
1997Functions of case-marking vs. non-marking in conversational Finnish. In Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen, Kristin Davidse & Dirk Noël (eds.), Reconnecting Language: Morphology and Syntax in Functional Perspectives. CILT. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001Syntax in the Making. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa & Nobufumi, Inaba
2013Functions of free NPs in Old Finnish texts. Paper presented at the Grammar and Context Conference, June 2013. University of Tartu.
Heritage, John
1984A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement. In J. M. Atkinson & John Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2012The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1). 30–52. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul
1987Emergent grammar. In John Aske, Natasha Beery, Laura Michaelis & Hana Filip (eds.), Proceedings of the thirteenth annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 139–157. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Huumo, Tuomas
2013On the many faces of incompleteness: Hide-and-seek with the Finnish partitive object. Folia Linguistica 47(1). 1–23. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huumo, Tuomas & Marja-Liisa Helasvuo
2015On the subject of subject in Finnish. In Marja-Liisa Helasvuo & Tuomas Huumo (eds.), Subjects in constructions: Canonical and non-canonical, 13–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Laakso, Minna & Marja-Leena Sorjonen
2010Cut-off or particle: Devices for initiating self-repair in conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 421. 1151–1172. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lagae, Véronique
2007Left-detachment and topic-marking in French: The case of quant à and en fait de . Folia Linguistica 41(3). 327–355.Google Scholar
Laury, Ritva, Marja Etelämäki & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
(eds.) 2015Approaches to grammar for interactional linguistics. Special Issue. Pragmatics 24(3).Google Scholar
Laury, Ritva & Marja-Liisa Helasvuo
2016Detached NPs with relative clauses in Finnish conversations. In M. M. Jocelyne Fernandez-Vest & Robert D. Van Valin, Jr. (eds.), Information structuring of spoken language from a cross-linguistic perspective, 149–165. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ono, Tsuyoshi & Sandra A. Thompson
1994Unattached NPs in English Conversation. Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session Dedicated to the Contributions of Charles J. Fillmore. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, Simona
2011Emergent grammar for all practical purposes: the online formatting of left- and right dislocations in French conversation. In Peter Auer & Stefan Pfänder (eds.), Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, 45–87. Berlin: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, Elwys de Stefani & Anne-Sofie Horlacher
2015Time and emergence in grammar. Dislocation, topicalization and hanging topic in French talk-in-interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selting, Margret & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen
(eds.) 2001Studies in interactional linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seppänen, Eeva-Leena
1997Vuorovaikutus paperilla. In Liisa Tainio (ed.), Keskustelunanalyysin perusteet, 18–31. Tampere: Vastapaino.Google Scholar
Siro, Paavo
1964Suomen kielen lauseoppi. Helsinki: Tietosanakirja.Google Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena
2001Responding in Conversation: A Study of Response Particles in Finnish. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorjonen, Marja-Leena & Liisa, Raevaara
2014On the grammatical form of making requests at the convenience store: Requesting as embodied action. In Paul Drew & Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen (eds.), Requesting in Social Interaction, 243–268. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Tao, Hongyin
1996Units in Mandarin Conversation: Prosody, Discourse, and Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Terasaki, A. K.
2004Pre-announcement sequences in conversation. In Gene Lerner (ed.), Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, 171–223. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Voronov, Mikhail
forthcoming). Kielellinen muutos ja sen ymmärtäminen. Tapaustutkimuksena totaaliobjektin merkinnän tasoittuminen Pohjois-Norjan kainun murteissa. Turku: University of Turku doctoral dissertation.
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Helasvuo, Marja-Liisa
2020.  In The ‘Noun Phrase’ across Languages [Typological Studies in Language, 128],  pp. 72 ff. Crossref logo
Stoenica, Ioana-Maria, Simona Pekarek Doehler & Anne-Sylvie Horlacher
2020.  In The ‘Noun Phrase’ across Languages [Typological Studies in Language, 128],  pp. 44 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.