Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 44:1 (2020) ► pp. 95131
References

References

Anttila, Raimo
1972An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Alsina, Alex, Joan Bresnan & Peter Sells
(eds.) 1997Complex Predicates. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Awodey, Steve
2006Category Theory. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark
1988Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Baus, Christina, Manual Carreiras & Karen Emmorey
2013When does Iconicity in Sign Language Matter? Language and cognitive processes 28(3). 261–271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bidaud, Samuel
2016Le niveau phonosymbolique des morphèmes grammaticaux. Quaderni disemantica, 2 (nuova serie), 61-90.Google Scholar
2017La Motivation Du Verbe Tchèque. Studies about languages, 31. 23–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Sarah
1983Advancements and ascensions in Cebuano. In David Perlmutter (ed.) Studies in Relational Grammar 1, 143–218. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bever, Thomas
1970The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In Robert Hayes (ed.) Cognition and Language Development, 279–362. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Blasi, Damian, Søren Wichmann, Harald Hammarström, Peter F. Stadler, & Morten H. Christiansen
2016Sound-meaning association biases evidenced across thousands of languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113(39). 10818–10823. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bravo, Ana, Luis García Fernández, & Diego G. Krivochen
2015On Auxiliary Chains: Auxiliaries at the Syntax-Semantics Interface. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 4(2). 71–101. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1957Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1965Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
1970Remarks on nominalization. In R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum (eds.) Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham: Ginn. 184–221.Google Scholar
1981Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
[ p. 128 ]
1995The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2013Problems of Projection. Lingua 130. 33–49. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Chris
2017Merge(X, Y) = {X, Y}. In Leah Bauke & Andreas Blühmel (eds.) Labels and Roots. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. 47–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1985Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, John M. and Douglas S. Hutchinson
1997Plato. Complete Works. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Culicover, Peter & Ray Jackendoff
2005Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dalrymple, Mary
2001Lexical Functional Grammar (Syntax and Semantics 34). New York: Academic Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diatka, Vojtěch. & Jiří Milička
2017The effect of iconicity flash blindness. In Angelika Zirker, Mathhias Bauer, Olga Fischer & Christina Ljunberg (eds.), Dimensions of Iconicity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dirven, René, Günter Radden
2006La base cognitive du langage: langue et pensée. In Nicole Delbecque (ed.) Linguistique cognitive. Comprendre comment fonctionne le langage, 17–47. Bruxelles: De Boeck Université – Duculot.Google Scholar
Elleström, Lars
2016Visual Iconicity in Poetry: Replacing the Notion of “Visual Poetry”. Orbis Litterarum 71(6). 437–472. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Filip, Hana
2014Biaspectual Verbs: A Marginal Category? (with Yulia Zinova). Proceedings of the Tenth Tbilisi Symposium on Language, Logic and Computation, Gudauri, Georgia.Google Scholar
Foley, William A., & Robert D. Van Valin, Jr.
1984Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry
1983The modularity of mind: an essay on faculty psychology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008LOT 2: The Language of Thought Revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy
1985Iconicity, isomorphism, and non-arbitrary coding in syntax. In John Haiman (ed.) Iconicity in Syntax, 187–220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Glynn, D.
2007: Iconicity in the grammar–lexis interface in Iconicity. In FISCHER, O.LJUNGBERG, C. (eds.), Language and Literature, Amsterdam: John Benjamins p. 269-289Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele
2006Constructions at Work: the nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1975Logic and Conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press. 41–58.Google Scholar
Grimm, Reinhold
2008Concerning the range of iconic poetry: With examples from the works of G. Kunert and H. Teschke. Orbis Litterarum 63. 441–463. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gvoždiak, Vit
2014Jakobsonova sémiotické teorie. Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci.Google Scholar
Haiman, John
1980The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation. Language 56. 515–540. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1983Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59. 781–819. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
[ p. 129 ]
1985Natural syntax: Iconicity and erosion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hale, Kenneth & Samuel J. Keyser
1997The basic elements of argument structure. MIT working Papers in Linguistics 32. 1–47. Available online at http://​lingphil​.mit​.edu​/papers​/hale​/papers​/hale012​.pdf
Hauser, Marc; Noam Chomsky & William Tecumseh Fitch
2002The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298(5598). 1569–1579. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, Leanne, Johanna Nichols & John J. Ohala
1994Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis
1935La catégorie des cas: étude de grammaire générale, Acta Jutlandica, díl 1, Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
1961Prolegomena to a theory of language. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Itkonen, Esa
1994Iconicity, analogy, and universal grammar. Journal of Pragmatics 22. 37–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1971Selected Writings II. Hague-Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1983Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R - Waugh, R. L.
1979: The Sound Shape of Language. Brighton: The Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1987Consciousness and the Computational Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2002Foundations of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1994The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kopečný, František
1962Slovesný vid v češtině. Nakl. Československé Akademie Věd.Google Scholar
Krivochen, Diego G.
2016Divide and…conquer? On the limits of algorithmic approaches to syntactic structure. Czech and Slovak Linguistic Review 1. 15–38.Google Scholar
2018Aspects of Emergent Cyclicity in Language and Computation. Reading: University of Reading dissertation.Google Scholar
Lacková, Ludmila
2018A Linguistic Approach to Protein Folding: Towards a Semiotic Description of Living Systems. Olomouc: Palacky University dissertation.Google Scholar
Ladusaw, William A.
1980Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations. Bloomington, IN: University of Iowa, Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Langendonck, Willy van
2010Iconicity. In Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lecercle, J.J.
2001Of Markov chains and upholstery buttons: “Moi. madame. votre chien ... ”. In Fischer, O.Ljungberg, C. (eds.), Language and Literature. The Motivated sign : iconicity in language and literature 2, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, p. 289-305. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
May, Robert
1985Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D.
1968Concerning the base component of a transformational grammar. Foundations of Language 4. 243-269.Google Scholar
1998The Syntactic Phenomena of English. [2nd Edition] Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Monneret, Philippe
2003Le sens du signifiant. Implications linguistiques et cognitives de la motivation. Paris: Honore Champion.Google Scholar
[ p. 130 ]
Newmeyer, Frederick
1992Iconicity and Generative Grammar. Language 68(4). 756–796. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nübler, Norbert
2017ITERATIVNOST. In Petr Karlík, Marek Nekula & Jana Pleskalová (eds.), CzechEncy – Nový encyklopedický slovník češtiny. URL: https://​www​.czechency​.org​/slovnik​/ITERATIVNOST
Nuckolls, Janis B.
1999The Case for Sound Symbolism. Annual Review of Anthropology. 28: 225–252. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, Timothy
2005Beyond the Constituent: A Dependency Grammar Analysis of Chains. Folia Linguistica XXXIX/3–4. 251–297.Google Scholar
Poldauf, Ivan
1964Souhrnný pohled na vid v nové češtině. Slovo a slovesnost 25. 46–56.Google Scholar
Post, Emil
1943Formal Reductions of the General Combinatorial Decision Problem. American Journal of Mathematics 65(2). 197–215. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Postal, Paul M.
2010Edge-Based Clausal Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pršir, Tea. & Anne-Catherine Simon
2013Iconic interpretation of rhythm in speech. In Sylvie Hancil & Daniel Hirst (eds.) Prosody and Iconicity, 161–180. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Radeva-Bork, Theodora
2012Single and Double Clitics in Adult and Child Grammar. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Reinhart, Tanya
1976The Syntactic Domain of Anaphora. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Saddy, Douglas
2018Syntax and Uncertainty. In Angel Gallego & Roger Martin (eds.) Language, Syntax, and the Natural Sciences, 316–332. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Saddy, Douglas & Diego G. Krivochen
2016 ‘Emergent Oscillations and Cyclicity: Physical Aspects of Frustrated Cognitive Systems’. Paper presented at First International Symposium on the Physics of Language, Tokyo: Sophia University, 4–5 March, 2006.
Sadowski, P.
2001: The sound as an echo to the sense: The iconicity of English gl- words. In Fischer, O.Ljungberg, C. (eds.), Language and Literature. The Motivated sign : iconicity in language and literature 2, Amsterdam: John Benjamins 69-89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, Edward
1933Language. In Edwin R. A. Selgiman & Alvin Johnson, Encyclopædia of the Social Sciences, vol. 9, 155–169. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de
1916Cours de linguistique générale, Payot,. Paris.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. D.
(1959) Course in general linguistics. New York Philosophical LibraryGoogle Scholar
Schachter, Paul
1983Explaining auxiliary order. In Heny, F., Richards, B. (eds.), Linguistic categories: auxiliaries and related puzzles Vol 2, 145–204. Dordrecht: Reidel. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmerling, Susan F.
1975Asymmetric Conjunction and rules of Conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: Speech Acts, 211–231. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2018Sound and Grammar: Towards a Neo-Sapirian Theory of Language. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret
1990Phrase Structure in Natural Language. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tesnière, Lucien
1959Éléments de syntaxe structural. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Tollis, Francis
2005Le grammème comme signe chez Gustave Guillaume: une biunivocité idéale souvent prise en défaut (sémiologie / systématique linguistiques et analogie). Cahiers de linguistique analogique 5–40.Google Scholar
[ p. 131 ]
Townsend, David J., & Thomas G. Bever
2001Sentence Comprehension: The Integration of Habits and Rules. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Turing, Alan
1936On Computable Numbers, with an Application to the Entscheidungsproblem, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 42(2). 230–265.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan
2008Syntactic Anchors: On Semantic restructuring. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Spell Out and the Minimalist Program. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2014Regarding the Third Factor: Arguments for a CLASH model. In Peter Kosta, Steven L. Franks, Teodora Radeva-Bork & Lilia Schürcks (eds.), Minimalism and Beyond: Radicalizing the interfaces, 363–391. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Vachek, Josef
1976Selected Writings in English and General Linguistics. Prague: Academia. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Langendonck, Willy
2010Iconicity. In Dirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuyckens (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, pp. 394-419. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Waugh, Linda R.
1994Degrees of iconicity in the Lexicon. Journal of Pragmatics 22. 55–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wundt, Wilhelm
1900 to 1920Völkerpsychologie (Cultural Psychology), 10 Volumes, Vol. . Die Sprache (Language); Vol. 3. Die Kunst (Art); Vol 4, 5, 6. Mythos und Religion (Myth and Religion); Vol 7, 8. Die Gesellschaft (Society); Vol 9. Das Recht (Right); Vol 10. Kultur und Geschichte (Culture and History). Leipzig: Engelmann.Google Scholar
Zeeman, Christopher
1977Catastrophe theory: selected papers 1972–1977. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar