References

References

Aldenderfer, Mark & Zhang Yinong
2004The prehistory of the Tibetan Plateau to the seventh century A.D.: perspectives and research from China and the West since 1950. Journal of World Prehistory 18(1). 1–55. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Stephen R.
2005Aspects of the theory of clitics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Behr, Wolfgang
2004‘To translate’ is ‘to exchange’ 譯者易也 – linguistic diversity and the terms for translation in Ancient China. In N. Vittinghoff & M. Lackner (eds.), Mapping meanings: the field of new learning in late Qing China (Sinica Leidensia 64), 173–209. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
2010Role of language in early Chinese constructions of ethnic identity, Journal of Chinese Philosophy 37(4). 567–587. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bentz, Christian & Bodo Winter
2013Languages with more second language learners tend to lose nominal case. Language Dynamics and Change 3. 1–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Fernando Zúñiga
2017The ‘word’ in polysynthetic languages: phonological and syntactic challenges. In Michael Fortescue, Marianne Mithun & Nicholas Evans (eds.), The Oxford handbook of polysynthesis, 158–185. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Johanna Nichols
2005Inflectional synthesis of the verb. In Martin Haspelmath, Matthew S. Dryer, David Gil, & Bernard Comrie (eds.), The world atlas of language structures, 94–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2007Inflectional morphology. In: Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, 2nd edn., 169–240. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, Goma Banjade, Martin Gaenszle, Elena Lieven, Netra Prasad Paudyal, Ichchha Purna Rai, Manoj Rai, Novel Kishore Rai, Sabine Stoll
2007Free prefix ordering in Chintang. Language 83. 43–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar, Johanna Nichols, Taras Zakharko, Alena Witzlack-Makarevich, Kristine Hildebrandt, Michael Rießler, Lennart Bierkandt, Fernando Zúñiga & John B. Lowe
2020The AUTOTYP typological databases, Version 0.1.1. https://​github​.com​/autotyp​/autotyp​-data (last access 15 September 2020).
Bickel, Balthasar, Kristine A. Hildebrandt & René Schiering
2009The distribution of phonological word domains: A probabilistic typology. In Janet Grijzenhout & Baris Kabak (eds.), Phonological domains: universals and deviations, 47–75. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
2003Prosodic tautomorphemicity in Sino-Tibetan. In David Bradley, Randy J. LaPolla, Boyd Michailovsky & Graham Thurgood (eds.), Variation in Sino-Tibetan and South East Asian languages, 89–99. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert
2010Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, David
1997Tibeto-Burman languages and classification. In David Bradley (ed.), Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayas, 1–71. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin
2018The Lexicalist Hypothesis: both wrong and superfluous. Language 94, 1–42. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Matthew Y.
2000Tone sandhi: patterns across Chinese dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dai, John Xiang-Ling
1998Syntactic, phonological, and morphological words in Chinese. In Jerome L. Packard (ed.), New approaches to Chinese word formation: morphology, phonology and the lexicon in Modern and Ancient Chinese, 104–134. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, Scott
1996The Bipartite Stem Belt: disentangling areal and genetic correspondences. In David Librik & Roxane Beeler (eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society February 16–19 1996, 37–54. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
2013Creolization in the divergence of the Tibeto-Burman languages. In Thomas Owen-Smith & Nathan Hill (eds.), Trans-Himalayan linguistics: Historical and descriptive linguistics of the Himalayan area, 41–70. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015The historical dynamics of morphological complexity in Trans-Himalayan. Linguistic Discovery 13. 60–79. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. & Alexandra A. Aikhenvald
2002Word: A typological framework. In Robert M. W. Dixon & Alexandra A. Aikhenvald (eds.), Word: A cross-linguistic typology, 1–41. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W.
1977A grammar of Yidiny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duanmu, San
2000The phonology of Standard Chinese, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, T. Alan & Ursula Kleinhenz
(eds.) 1999Studies on the phonological word. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hall, T. Alan, Kristine A. Hildebrandt & Balthasar Bickel
2008Introduction: theory and typology of the word. Linguistics 46. 183–192. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2011The indeterminacy of word segmentation and the nature of morphology and syntax. Folia Linguistica 45. 31–80. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hildebrandt, Kristine
2005The Himalayan enclave hypothesis and bipartite stems. Linguistic Society of America Annual Meeting 6–9 January 2005 [https://​www​.siue​.edu​/~khildeb​/bipartite​.pdf].Google Scholar
Hildebrandt, Kristine A.
2007Prosodic and grammatical domains in Limbu. Himalayan Linguistics 8. 1–34.Google Scholar
2014The prosodic word. In John R. Taylor (ed.), The Oxford handbook of the word, 221–245. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M.
2008Directional asymmetries in the morphology and phonology of words, with special reference to Bantu. Linguistics 46. 309–350. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, William H. Jr.
1980Washo bipartite verb stems. In Kathryn Klar, Margaret Langdon & Shirley Silver (eds.), American Indian and Indoeuropean Studies: Papers in Honor of Madison S. Beeler, 85–99. Berlin.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume
2018Bipartite verbs in Japhug and other Trans-Himalayan languages. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 41. 75–191. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jenny, Mathias & San San Hnin Tun
2016Burmese: A comprehensive grammar. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Levshina, Natalia
2015How to do Linguistics with R. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M. Paul
(ed.) 2009Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 16th edn. Dallas: SIL International.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson
1981Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lupyan, Gary & Rick Dale
2010Language structure is partly determined by social structure. PLoS ONE 5(1), e8559. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, John, Sabine Stoll & Balthasar Bickel
2020Category clustering: a probabilistic bias in the morphology of argument marking. Language 96. 255–293. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matisoff, James A.
1989The bulging monosyllable or the mora the merrier: echo-vowel adverbialization in Lahu. In Jeremy H. C. S. Davidson (ed.), Southeast Asian linguistics: Essays in honour of Eugénie J.A. Henderson, 163–197. London: SOAS.Google Scholar
McWhorter, John
2007Language interrupted: Signs of non-native acquisition in standard language grammars. New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Irene Vogel
2007Prosodic Phonology. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paudyal, Netra P.
2015Aspects of Chintang Syntax: University of Zürich PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Post, Mark W.
2009The phonology and grammar of Galo “words”: A case study in benign disunity. Studies in Language 33. 934–974. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sagart, Laurent, Guillaume Jacques, Yunfan Lai, Robin J. Ryder, Valentin Thouzeau, Simon J. Greenhill & Johann-Mattis List
2019Dated language phylogenies shed light on the ancestry of Sino-Tibetan. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116. 10317–10322. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schiering, René, Balthasar Bickel & Kristine A. Hildebrandt
2010The prosodic word is not universal, but emergent. Journal of Linguistics 46. 657–709. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, Devidatta
1989Tribal languages of Himachal Pradesh, part I. Delhi: Mittal.Google Scholar
Thurgood, Graham
2017Sino-Tibetan: genetic and areal subgroups. In Graham Thurgood & Randy J. LaPolla (eds.), The Sino-Tibetan languages, 3–39. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter
2001Contact and simplification: Historical baggage and directionality in linguistic change. Linguistic Typology 5. 371–374.Google Scholar
2011Sociolinguistic typology: Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
van Driem, George
2001aLanguages of the Himalayas: An ethnolinguistic handbook of the greater Himalayan region. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
2001bZhangzhung and its next of kin in the Himalayas. In Yasuhiko Nagano & Randy LaPolla (eds.), New research on Zhangzhung and related Himalayan languages, 31–44. Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar
Widmer, Manuel
2017A grammar of Bunan. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Wiedenhof, Jeroen
2015A grammar of Mandarin. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Winter, Bodo
2020Statistics for Linguists. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wray, Alison & George W. Grace
2007The consequences of talking to strangers: Evolutionary corollaries of socio-cultural influences on linguistic form. Lingua 117. 543–578. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Menghan, Shi Yan, Wuyun Pan & Li Jin
2019Phylogenetic evidence for Sino-Tibetan origin in northern China in the Late Neolithic. Nature 569. 112–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar