References

References

Aijmer, Karin
2002English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bar-Asher Siegal, Elitzur A. & Nora Boneh
2015Reconsidering the emergence of non-core dative constructions in Modern Hebrew. Journal of Jewish Languages VOL 3, issue 1–2. 309–323. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bardenstein, Ruti
2020Persistent argumentative discourse markers. The case of Hebrew rectification marker be-ʕecem (‘actually’). Journal of Pragmatics, 172: 254–269.Google Scholar
Bardenstein, Ruti & Mira Ariel
In preparation. Mamash: Chizuk tiuni matmid [(‘Real(ly)’: Persistent argument strengthening]. Tel Aviv university.
Bat-Zeev Shyldkrot, Hava
1995Subordonnées circonstancielles et dépendance sémantique. Comparaison, concession et condition: Grammaticalisation et sens des connecteurs. Faits de langues 5. 145–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Beltrama, Andrea
2018Intensification, gradability and social perception: The case of totally . In Elena Castroviejo, Louise McNally & Galit Weidman Sassoon (eds.), The semantics of gradability, vagueness and scale structure, 169–197. Berlin: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ben Yehuda, Eliezer
1940Complete Dictionary of Ancient and Modern Hebrew. New York: T. Yoseloff.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey N. Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan
1999Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow, Essex: Longman.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight L.
1972Degree words (Janua Linguarum, Series Maior 53). The Hague: Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Breban, Tine & Kristin Davidse
2016The history of very: The directionality of functional shift and (inter)subjectification. English Language and Linguistics 20. 221–249. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brugman, Claudia
1984The very idea: A case study in polysemy and cross-lexical generalizations. CLS XX: Papers from the parasession on lexical semantics, 21–38.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, Nancy Bermudez, Lisa Edwards, Victor Fung & Rosalva Vargas
2007Hella nor cal or totally so cal. Journal of English Linguistics 35. 325–352. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan. & Pagliuca, William
1985Crosslinguistic comparison and the development of grammatical meaning. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical semantics: Historical word-formation, 59–83. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Carston, Robyn
2002Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Even Shushan
1981Hamilon Haxadash (The new dictionary). Jerusalem: Qiryat-Sefer.Google Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke
2014The directionality of (inter)subjectification in the English noun phrase: Pathways of change. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Intensification and focusing: The case of purel(y) and mere(ly). In Maria Napoli & Miriam Ravetto (eds.), Exploring intensification: Synchronic, diachronic and cross-linguistic perspectives, 33–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke & Kristin Davidse
2011The development of intensification scales in noun-intensifying uses of adjectives: Sources, paths and mechanisms of change. English Language and Linguistics 15. 251–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1989Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2002World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herrero-Ruiz
2002Sequencing and integration in metaphor-metonymy interaction. RESLA 15. 73–91Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1991On some principles of grammaticization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. 1: Focus on theoretical and methodological issues (Typological Studies in Language 19:1), 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Geoffrey K. Pullum
(eds.) 2002The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ito, Rika & Sally Tagliamonte
2003Well, weird, right, dodgy, very strange, really cool: layering and recycling in English intensifiers. Language in Society 32. 257–279. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kadari Menahem Zvi
1990Trends in the Study of Responsa Hebrew, Lĕšonénu: A Journal for the Study of the Hebrew Language and Cognate Subjects, Academy of the Hebrew language 54. 231–245.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher & Louise McNally
2005Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language 81. 345–381. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W.
1987Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lasersohn, Peter
1999Pragmatic halos. Language 75. 522–551. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maschler, Yael & Roi Estlein
2008Stance-taking in Hebrew causal conversation via be’emet (‘really, actually, indeed’, lit. ‘in truth’). Discourse Studies 10. 283–316. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Méndez Naya, Belén
2006Adjunct, modifier, discourse marker: On the various functions of right in the history of English. Folia Linguistica Historica 27. 141–169. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 He nas nat right fat: On the origin and development of the intensifier right. In Gabriella Mazzon (ed.), Studies in Middle English forms and meanings, 191–207. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2008aOn the history of downright. English Language and Linguistics 12. 267–287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008bIntroduction. English Language and Linguistics 12. 213–219.Google Scholar
2019Of right heirs, right idiots and bad data. The diachrony of the intensifying adjective right. Studia Neophilologica 91. 273–295. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Montserrat, González
2015From truth-attesting to intensification: The grammaticalization of Spanish la verdad and Catalan la veritat . Discourse Processes 17. 162–181.Google Scholar
Mustanoja, Tauno F.
1960A Middle English syntax. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar
Núñez-Pertejo, Paloma & Ignacio Palacios-Martínez
2018Intensifiers in MLE: New trends and developments. Nordic Journal of English Studies 17. 116–155. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, Carita
1997Degree modifiers of adjectives in spoken British English (Lund Studies in English 92). Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar
2000Reinforcing adjectives: a cognitive semantic perspective on grammaticalization. In Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero, Richard M. Hogg & C. B. McCully (eds.), Generative theory and corpus studies, 233–258. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2001Adjectives and boundedness. Cognitive Linguistics 12. 47–65. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Between epistemic modality and degree: the case of really. Topics in English Linguistics 44. 191–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, Carita & Nina Bergmark
2003‘Am I really really mature or something’: Really in teental. In Karin Aijmer & Britta Olinder (eds.), Proceedings from the 8th conference on English studies, 71–86. Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey N. Leech & Jan Svartvik
1985A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Shaviv, Tamar
2018/19Legamrei – gilgulo shel maacim (legamrei ‘completely’ – the evolution of an intensifier). Chelkat Lashon [in Hebrew] 51. 152–174.Google Scholar
Stratton, James M.
2020 ‘That’s proper cool’. English Today First View. 1–8. Available at: https://​www​.cambridge​.org​/core​/journals​/english​-today​/firstview (last access 15 March 2020), Crossref
Tagliamonte, Sally
2008So different and pretty cool! Recycling intensifiers in Canadian English. English Language and Linguistics 12. 361–394. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1988Is internal semantic-pragmatic reconstruction possible? In Caoline Duncan-Rose & Theo Vennemann (eds.), On language. Rhetorica. Phonologica. Syntactica, 339–341. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2007The concepts of constructional mismatch and type-shifting from the perspective of grammaticalization. Cognitive Linguistics 18. 523–557. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher
2002Regularity in semantic change (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 97). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vandewinkel, Sigi
2010Strengthening uses of pure/puur in English and Dutch. English Text Construction 3. 44–73. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vandewinkel, Sigi & Kristin Davidse
2008The interlocking paths of development to emphasizer adjective pure. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 9. 255–287. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ziv, Yael
1982Getting more mileage out of existentials in English. Linguistics 20. 747–762.Google Scholar
2013 ‘Staam’: Shmirat ikviyut basiach [‘Staam’: maintaining consistency in discourse]. In Moshe Florentin (ed.), Studies in Modern Hebrew and its sources (in memory of Shaul Aloni), 251–159. Jerusalem: The Hebrew Academy of language.Google Scholar