Article published In:
Studies in LanguageVol. 27:1 (2003) ► pp.61–112
Demonstratives
A cross-linguistic typology
A typology is presented of parameters of variation associated with three main types of demonstratives: nominal (corresponding to demonstrative pronouns and demonstrative adjectives in traditional terminology), local adverbial and verbal. The paper surveys their basis characteristics; forms (including relationship to articles and interrogatives); deictic, syntactic, anaphoric and other functions; and types of reference — spatial, height and stance, visibility, etc. There is a case study of demonstratives in Dyirbal, and an array of questions which can usefully be pursued when investigating demonstratives in a given language.
Cited by
Cited by 85 other publications
Aikhenvald, A.Y.
2006. Dixon, Robert M. W. (b. 1939). In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 737 ff. 
Amha, Azeb
2017. The Omotic Language Family. In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Typology, ► pp. 815 ff.
Asiimwe, Allen
2016. Investigating the connection between the demonstrative and the definite morpheme -ain Runyankore-Rukiga. South African Journal of African Languages 36:1 ► pp. 65 ff.
Breunesse, Merlijn & Holger Diessel
2023. Chapter 7. Iconicity in spatial deixis. In Reconnecting Form and Meaning [Studies in Language Companion Series, 230], ► pp. 185 ff.
Burenhult, Niclas
2008. Spatial coordinate systems in demonstrative meaning. Linguistic Typology 12:1
Burenhult, Niclas
2022. Attention, accessibility, and the addressee. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 363 ff.
CAMBRAIA, César Nardelli, Teresa Cristina Alves de MELO, Cynthia Elias de Leles VILAÇA & Thiago César Viana Lopes SALTARELLI
2016. Demonstrativos na România medieval: uma análise comparativa em uma perspectiva funcional. Alfa : Revista de Linguística (São José do Rio Preto) 60:1 ► pp. 29 ff.
Chelliah, Shobhana L. & Willem J. de Reuse
2010. What to Expect in Morphosyntactic Typology and Terminology. In Handbook of Descriptive Linguistic Fieldwork, ► pp. 279 ff.
Cooperrider, Kensy
2016. The Co-Organization of Demonstratives and Pointing Gestures. Discourse Processes 53:8 ► pp. 632 ff.
Cooperrider, Kensy
Cooperrider, Kensy, James Slotta & Rafael Núñez
2018. The Preference for Pointing With the Hand Is Not Universal. Cognitive Science 42:4 ► pp. 1375 ff.
Coventry, Kenny R., Harmen B. Gudde, Holger Diessel, Jacqueline Collier, Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes, Mila Vulchanova, Valentin Vulchanov, Emanuela Todisco, Maria Reile, Merlijn Breunesse, Helen Plado, Juergen Bohnemeyer, Raed Bsili, Michela Caldano, Rositsa Dekova, Katharine Donelson, Diana Forker, Yesol Park, Lekhnath Sharma Pathak, David Peeters, Gabriella Pizzuto, Baris Serhan, Linda Apse, Florian Hesse, Linh Hoang, Phuong Hoang, Yoko Igari, Keerthana Kapiley, Tamar Haupt-Khutsishvili, Sara Kolding, Katri Priiki, Ieva Mačiukaitytė, Vaisnavi Mohite, Tiina Nahkola, Sum Yi Tsoi, Stefan Williams, Shunei Yasuda, Angelo Cangelosi, Jon Andoni Duñabeitia, Ramesh Kumar Mishra, Roberta Rocca, Jurģis Šķilters, Mikkel Wallentin, Eglė Žilinskaitė-Šinkūnienė & Ozlem Durmaz Incel
2023. Spatial communication systems across languages reflect universal action constraints. Nature Human Behaviour 7:12 ► pp. 2099 ff.
da Milano, Federica
2007. Demonstratives in parallel texts: a case study. Language Typology and Universals 60:2 ► pp. 135 ff.
De Cia, Simone & Mariangela Cerullo
2024. Towards a Typology of Zero Aboutness: Expletive A in Fornese and Chiru in Cilentano. Languages 9:2 ► pp. 60 ff.
De Mulder, Walter
2021. Le déterminant démonstratif ce : d’un marqueur token -réflexif à une instruction contribuant à la construction de référents. Langue française N° 210:2 ► pp. 41 ff.
Diessel, H.
2006. Demonstratives. In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, ► pp. 430 ff.
Diessel, Holger
2006. Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 17:4
Diessel, Holger
2013. Where does language come from? Some reflections on the role of deictic gesture and demonstratives in the evolution of language. Language and Cognition 5:2-3 ► pp. 239 ff.
Diessel, Holger
2014. Demonstratives, Frames of Reference, and Semantic Universals of Space. Language and Linguistics Compass 8:3 ► pp. 116 ff.
Diessel, Holger & Kenny R. Coventry
2020. Demonstratives in Spatial Language and Social Interaction: An Interdisciplinary Review. Frontiers in Psychology 11
DIESSEL, Holger & Sergei MONAKHOV
2023. Acquisition of demonstratives in cross-linguistic perspective. Journal of Child Language 50:4 ► pp. 922 ff.
Dudschig, Carolin, Claudia Maienborn & Barbara Kaup
2016. These lemons are sour: Investigating the influence of demonstrative determiners on the N400 complex. Neuroscience Letters 630 ► pp. 141 ff.
Enfield, N. J.
2023. Scale in Language. Cognitive Science 47:10
Evans, Jonathan P.
2022. Classifiers in Dimasa and (in-)definite marking. Asian Languages and Linguistics 3:2 ► pp. 181 ff.
EVANS, NICHOLAS, HENRIK BERGQVIST & LILA SAN ROQUE
2018. The grammar of engagement I: framework and initial exemplification. Language and Cognition 10:1 ► pp. 110 ff.
Fleck, David W.
2008. Coreferential Fourth‐Person Pronouns in Matses. International Journal of American Linguistics 74:3 ► pp. 279 ff.
Forker, Diana
2019. Elevation as a category of grammar: Sanzhi Dargwa and beyond. Linguistic Typology 23:1 ► pp. 59 ff.
Forker, Diana
2020. Elevation as a Grammatical and Semantic Category of Demonstratives. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Garoma, Eba Teresa
2024. Demonstratives in Afaan Oromoo. Cogent Arts & Humanities 11:1
Gerner, Matthias
2009. Deictic Features of Demonstratives: A Typological Survey with Special Reference to the Miao Group. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 54:1 ► pp. 43 ff.
Gipper, Sonja
2017. Pre-semantic pragmatics encoded: A non-spatial account of Yurakaré demonstratives. Journal of Pragmatics 120 ► pp. 122 ff.
González Pérez, Manuel David
2023. Spheres of interest: Space and social cognition in Phola deixis. Open Linguistics 9:1
Grelyn Takau, Lana
2023. A Grammar of Nese,
Guillot, Céline
2006. Le démonstratif en français – présentation. Langue française n° 152:4 ► pp. 3 ff.
Guérin, Valérie
2015. Demonstrative verbs: A typology of verbal manner deixis. Linguistic Typology 19:2
Gärdenfors, Peter & Maja Brala-Vukanović
2018. Semantic domains of demonstratives and articles: A view of deictic referentiality explored on the paradigm of Croatian demonstratives. Lingua 201 ► pp. 102 ff.
Han, Zhao & Tom Williams
2022. 2022 17th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), ► pp. 783 ff.
Hazem, Ali Hussein & Waleed Younus Meteab
2020. Demonstratives in English with Reference to Arabic : A Syntactico-Pragmatic Study. SSRN Electronic Journal
Heine, Bernd, Tania Kuteva, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Fang Wu
2020. Where do demonstratives come from?. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 73:3 ► pp. 403 ff.
Hoffmann, Dorothea, Bill Palmer & Alice Gaby
2022. Geocentric directional systems in Australia: a typology. Linguistics Vanguard 8:s1 ► pp. 67 ff.
Issah, Samuel Alhassan
2013. The structure of the Dagbani simple noun phrase. South African Journal of African Languages 33:2 ► pp. 203 ff.
Jarbou, Samer Omar
2018. Time frame as a determinant of accessibility of anaphoric demonstratives in Classical Arabic. Topics in Linguistics 19:2 ► pp. 57 ff.
Jarbou, Samir O. & Fathi Migdadi
2012. Testing the Limits of Anaphoric Distance in Classical Arabic: A Corpus-Based Study. Research in Language 10:4 ► pp. 423 ff.
Jarbou, Samir Omar
2010. Accessibility vs. physical proximity: An analysis of exophoric demonstrative practice in Spoken Jordanian Arabic. Journal of Pragmatics 42:11 ► pp. 3078 ff.
Jarbou, Samir Omar
2022. Medial deictic demonstratives in Arabic. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 103 ff.
Killian, Don
2022. Towards a typology of predicative demonstratives. Linguistic Typology 26:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
König, Ekkehard
2015. Manner deixis as source of grammatical markers in Indo-European languages. In Perspectives on Historical Syntax [Studies in Language Companion Series, 169], ► pp. 33 ff.
König, Ekkehard
2017. Chapter 5. The deictic identification of similarity. In Similative and Equative Constructions [Typological Studies in Language, 117], ► pp. 143 ff.
König, Ekkehard & Letizia Vezzosi
2022. Chapter 13. On the development of OE swā to ModE so and related changes in an atypical group of demonstratives. In English Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 358], ► pp. 310 ff.
L, Adel Abdulrahman & Utpal Lahiri
2022. Demonstratives in Arabic: Evidence from Taizi Yemeni Arabic and Hodeidi Yemeni Arabic. Indian Journal of Language and Linguistics 3:4 ► pp. 9 ff.
Mauri, Simone
2020. Time and shared knowledge in the demonstrative system of Ayt Atta Tamazight (Berber). Lingua 247 ► pp. 102812 ff.
Mesh, Kate, Emiliana Cruz, Joost van de Weijer, Niclas Burenhult & Marianne Gullberg
2021. Effects of Scale on Multimodal Deixis: Evidence From Quiahije Chatino. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Mihas, Elena
2012. Spatial deixis in Ashéninka Perené (Arawak). LIAMES: Línguas Indígenas Americanas 12:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
Moyse-Faurie, Claire
2019. Similarity, comparison of equality and verbal manner demonstratives in Polynesian languages. Faits de Langues 50:1 ► pp. 135 ff.
Mwinlaaru, Isaac N. & Foong Ha Yap
2021. Syntactic position, qualitative features and extended demonstrative functions: Dagaare distal demonstratives nὲ and lὲ in interactional discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 182 ► pp. 265 ff.
Loretta O'Connor & Pieter Muysken
1920. The Native Languages of South America,
Pavesi, Maria
2014. This and That in the Language of Film Dubbing: A Corpus-Based Analysis. Meta 58:1 ► pp. 103 ff.
Peeters, David, Emiel Krahmer & Alfons Maes
2021. A conceptual framework for the study of demonstrative reference. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 28:2 ► pp. 409 ff.
Perekhvalskaya, Elena
2013. L’espace déictique dans la langue mwan. Mandenkan :50 ► pp. 103 ff.
Post, Mark W.
2019. Topographical Deixis in Trans‐Himalayan (Sino‐Tibetan) Languages. Transactions of the Philological Society 117:2 ► pp. 234 ff.
Reile, Maria, Kristiina Averin & Nele Põldver
2020. Interpreting Estonian Demonstratives: The Effects of Referent’s Distance and Visual Salience. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Reile, Maria, Helen Plado, Harmen B. Gudde & Kenny R. Coventry
2020. Demonstratives as spatial deictics or something more? Evidence from Common Estonian and Võro. Folia Linguistica 54:1 ► pp. 167 ff.
Sagna, Serge, Virve‑Anneli Vihman, Marilyn Vihman & Dunstan Brown
2022. The acquisition of demonstratives in a complex noun class system. Word Structure 15:3 ► pp. 226 ff.
Saha, Baidya Nath, Apurbalal Senapati & Utpal Garain
2022. A Deep Learning Framework for Anaphora Resolution from Social Media Text. In Advanced Machine Intelligence and Signal Processing [Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 858], ► pp. 687 ff.
Sutarman, Sutarman & Nurachman Hanafi
2020. The Syntactic-Semantic Analyses of Sasak Demonstratives in Lombok. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature 7:2 ► pp. 200 ff.
Todisco, Emanuela, Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes & Kenny R. Coventry
2021. Analogical Levelling in the Majorcan Catalan Demonstrative System. Probus 33:1 ► pp. 33 ff.
Todisco, Emanuela, Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes & Kenny R. Coventry
2021. Analogical Levelling in the Majorcan Catalan Demonstrative System. Probus 33:1 ► pp. 33 ff.
Todisco, Emanuela, Roberta Rocca & Mikkel Wallentin
2023. Aqueix Caught in the Middle. A Demonstrative Choice Task Study of Catalan Demonstratives. Probus 35:1 ► pp. 31 ff.
Toro, Francisca, Verónica Orqueda & Demian Inostroza
2022. Reevaluating the etymology of Latin reflexives. Folia Linguistica 56:s43-s1 ► pp. 33 ff.
Urban, Matthias
2020. Mountain linguistics. Language and Linguistics Compass 14:9
Van de Velde, Freek
2009. Do we need the category of postdeterminer in the NP?1. Transactions of the Philological Society 107:3 ► pp. 293 ff.
VAN DE VELDE, FREEK
2011. Left-peripheral expansion of the English NP. English Language and Linguistics 15:2 ► pp. 387 ff.
Van de Velde, Freek
2012. PP extraction and extraposition in Functional Discourse Grammar. Language Sciences 34:4 ► pp. 433 ff.
Vindenes, Urd
Vulchanova, Mila, Jacqueline Collier, Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes & Valentin Vulchanov
2023. Variation in first-generation L1 deictic systems: Language attrition and bilingualism effects. International Journal of Bilingualism 27:1 ► pp. 104 ff.
Vulchanova, Mila, Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes, Jacqueline Collier & Valentin Vulchanov
2020. Shrinking Your Deictic System: How Far Can You Go?. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Williams, Nicholas
2020. Deixis and Indexicals. In The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology, ► pp. 1 ff.
Wittenberg, Eva, Shota Momma & Elsi Kaiser
2021. Demonstratives as bundlers of conceptual structure. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 6:1
Xu, Junyi & Chenliang Zhou
2024. Re-investigating the classification of definite CL-NP constructions in Chinese dialect: An empirical study based on semantic maps. Lingua 303 ► pp. 103713 ff.
Yang, Ying
2023. Turn-initial na in Mandarin Chinese conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 216 ► pp. 144 ff.
Zingler, Tim
2023. A functional approach to the formal mismatches of indexation markers. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 42:2 ► pp. 373 ff.
[no author supplied]
2011. References. In A Grammar of Vaeakau-Taumako, ► pp. 503 ff.
[no author supplied]
2011. References. In A Grammar of Goemai, ► pp. 565 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.