The relationship between demonstratives and interrogatives
Holger Diessel | Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology
This paper examines two types of expressions that seem to exist in all languages, demonstratives and interrogatives. Based on a representative sample of 100 languages it is shown that demonstratives and interrogatives have some striking features in common. They cross-cut the boundaries of several word classes and encode the same semantic features: person, thing, place, direction, manner, time, and amount. It is the central hypothesis of this study that the crosslinguistic parallelism between demonstratives and interrogatives is motivated by their pragmatic functions: both initiate a search for information that is guided by their semantic and syntactic features. Further, it is argued that demonstratives and interrogatives have a special status in language. Although both types of expressions are commonly considered grammatical markers, they do not serve an ordinary grammatical function. Grammatical markers organize the information flow in the ongoing discourse, whereas basic demonstratives and interrogatives are immediately concerned with the speaker-hearer interaction.
Published online: 27 November 2003
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.27.3.06die
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.27.3.06die
Cited by
Cited by 21 other publications
No author info given
2019.
In Diachrony of Personal Pronouns in Japanese [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 344],
No author info given
2021.
In The Mysterious Address Term anata 'you' in Japanese [Topics in Address Research, 4],
Auderset, Sandra
2020. Interrogatives as relativization markers in Indo-European.
Diachronica 37:4 ► pp. 474 ff.
Baunaz, Lena & Eric Lander
2018. Deconstructing categories syncretic with the nominal complementizer.
Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 3:1
Catasso, Nicholas
2011. The Grammaticalization of Demonstratives: A Comparative Analysis.
Journal of Universal Language 12:1 ► pp. 7 ff.
Cysouw, Michael
2007. Content Interrogatives in Pichis Ashéninca: Corpus Study and Typological Comparison.
International Journal of American Linguistics 73:2 ► pp. 133 ff.
Diessel, H.
2006.
In Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics,
► pp. 430 ff.
Diessel, Holger
2006. Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar.
Cognitive Linguistics 17:4
Diessel, Holger
2013. Where does language come from? Some reflections on the role of deictic gesture and demonstratives in the evolution of language.
Language and Cognition 5:2-3 ► pp. 239 ff.
Diessel, Holger
2014. Demonstratives, Frames of Reference, and Semantic Universals of Space.
Language and Linguistics Compass 8:3 ► pp. 116 ff.
EVANS, NICHOLAS, HENRIK BERGQVIST & LILA SAN ROQUE
2018. The grammar of engagement I: framework and initial exemplification.
Language and Cognition 10:1 ► pp. 110 ff.
Gärdenfors, Peter & Maja Brala-Vukanović
2018. Semantic domains of demonstratives and articles: A view of deictic referentiality explored on the paradigm of Croatian demonstratives.
Lingua 201 ► pp. 102 ff.
Heine, Bernd, Tania Kuteva, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Fang Wu
2020. Where do demonstratives come from?.
STUF - Language Typology and Universals 73:3 ► pp. 403 ff.
Kummerow, David
2012. The Person That Isn't: On Defining the Third-Person, Negatively and Positively So.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 32:2 ► pp. 259 ff.
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019.
In World Lexicon of Grammaticalization,
Meeuwis, Michael & Koen Stroeken
2012. Non-situational functions of demonstrative noun phrases in Lingala (Bantu).
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 22:1 ► pp. 147 ff.
Mwinlaaru, Isaac N. & Foong Ha Yap
2021. Syntactic position, qualitative features and extended demonstrative functions: Dagaare distal demonstratives nὲ and lὲ in interactional discourse.
Journal of Pragmatics 182 ► pp. 265 ff.
Rubio-Fernandez, Paula
2021. Pragmatic markers: the missing link between language and Theory of Mind.
Synthese 199:1-2 ► pp. 1125 ff.
Sheng, Yimin
2015. The Location morpheme-demonstrative cycle in Wu dialects.
International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 2:1 ► pp. 121 ff.
Suárez-Gómez, Cristina
2008. Strategies in Competition: Demonstratives and Interrogatives as Relativizers in the History of English.
English Studies 89:3 ► pp. 339 ff.
Walkowski, Swen, Ralf Dörner, Mirja Lievonen & Duska Rosenberg
2011. Using a game controller for relaying deictic gestures in computer-mediated communication.
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 69:6 ► pp. 362 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.