Article published In:
Studies in LanguageVol. 31:3 (2007) ► pp.569–606
Complement-taking predicates
Usage and linguistic structure
In recent years, there has been considerable discussion about the nature of clausal subordination (cf., for instance, Schilperoord & Verhagen 1998, Verhagen 2001, Verhagen to appear, Diessel & Tomasello 2001, Thompson 2002). One of the foci has been the status of complement clauses of complement-taking predicates like think. Roughly speaking, the two poles of the issue are the ‘traditional’ assumption according to which the ‘main clause’ is central, and a new ‘usage-based’ picture according to which the ‘complement clause’ is central and the ‘main clause’ is more or less an appendix. From the point of view of an approach that sees structure as having a central role in an overall cognitive-functional picture, this potential polarization is at risk of separating issues that should be kept together. The aim of this paper is to show how a picture that is fully committed to maintaining the role of structural (including structural-semantic) subordination can simultaneously remain fully faithful to principles of usage-based linguistics. Ontogeny and phylogeny (acquisition and diachrony) are central elements in the picture.
Cited by
Cited by 87 other publications
Ariel, Mira
2009. Discourse, grammar, discourse. Discourse Studies 11:1 ► pp. 5 ff. 
Beijering, Karin
2015. The lexicalization-grammaticalization-pragmaticalization interface. In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research [Studies in Language Companion Series, 166], ► pp. 67 ff.
Beijering, Karin
2018. Nicholas Evans Honoré Watanabe: Insubordination. Cognitive Linguistics 29:2 ► pp. 349 ff.
Boye, Kasper
2010. Reference and clausal perception-verb complements. Linguistics 48:2
Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder
Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder
2014. (Inter)subjectification in a functional theory of grammaticalization. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 46:1 ► pp. 7 ff.
Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder
2021. Complement-taking predicates, parentheticals and grammaticalization. Language Sciences 88 ► pp. 101416 ff.
Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder
2022. Grammaticalization and pragmatics. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 696 ff.
Brandt, Silke, Arie Verhagen, Elena Lieven & Michael Tomasello
2011. German children's productivity with simple transitive and complement-clause constructions: Testing the effects of frequency and variability. cogl 22:2 ► pp. 325 ff.
Brinton, Laurel J.
2020. The development and pragmatic function of a non-inference marker. In Corpora and the Changing Society [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 96], ► pp. 251 ff.
Butler, Christopher S.
2009. Criteria of adequacy in functional linguistics. FLIN 43:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
BYBEE, JOAN
2023. What Is Usage‐Based Linguistics?. In The Handbook of Usage‐Based Linguistics, ► pp. 7 ff.
Christensen, Marie Herget, Tanya Karoli Christensen & Torben Juel Jensen
2020. Foregrounding of subordinate clauses by word order: Psycholinguistic evidence of the function of V>Adv (V2) word order in Danish. Linguistics 58:1 ► pp. 245 ff.
Christensen, Tanya Karoli & Torben Juel Jensen
2015. Word order variation and foregrounding of complement clauses. In Language Variation - European Perspectives V [Studies in Language Variation, 17], ► pp. 69 ff.
Christensen, Tanya Karoli & Torben Juel Jensen
2022. When Variants Lack Semantic Equivalence: Adverbial Subclause Word Order. In Explanations in Sociosyntactic Variation, ► pp. 171 ff.
Cornillie, Bert & Paola Pietrandrea
2012. Modality at work. Cognitive, interactional and textual functions of modal markers. Journal of Pragmatics 44:15 ► pp. 2109 ff.
Davidse, Kristin, Simon De Wolf & An Van linden
2015. The development of the modal and discourse marker uses of (there/it is/I have)no doubt. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16:1 ► pp. 25 ff.
Davidse, Kristin, An Van linden & Lieselotte Brems
2022. A semiotic approach to grammaticalization: modelling representational and interpersonal modality expressed by verbonominal patterns. Language Sciences 91 ► pp. 101473 ff.
Egan, Thomas
2015. Complementation. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff.
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth
Gentens, Caroline
Gentens, Caroline, Ditte Kimps, Kristin Davidse, Gilles Jacobs, An Van linden & Lieselotte Brems
2016. Mirativity and rhetorical structure. In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178], ► pp. 125 ff.
Gonzálvez-García, Francisco
2014. Chapter 6. Bringing together fragments and constructions. In Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 15], ► pp. 181 ff.
Heine, Bernd & Gunther Kaltenböck
2021. From clause to discourse marker: on the development of comment clauses. Language Sciences 87 ► pp. 101400 ff.
Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck, Tania Kuteva & Haiping Long
2021. Chapter 1. On the rise of discourse markers. In Studies at the Grammar-Discourse Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series, 219], ► pp. 24 ff.
Heltoft, Lars
2014. Constructional change, paradigmatic structure and the orientation of usage processes. In Usage-Based Approaches to Language Change [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 69], ► pp. 203 ff.
Ishkhanyan, Byurakn, Halima Sahraoui, Peter Harder, Jesper Mogensen & Kasper Boye
2017. Grammatical and lexical pronoun dissociation in French speakers with agrammatic aphasia: A usage-based account and REF-based hypothesis. Journal of Neurolinguistics 44 ► pp. 1 ff.
Iwasaki, Shoichi
2015. A multiple-grammar model of speakers’ linguistic knowledge. Cognitive Linguistics 26:2 ► pp. 161 ff.
Janssens, Karolien & Jan Nuyts
2014. How did we think?. In The Functional Perspective on Language and Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 247], ► pp. 149 ff.
Jensen, Torben Juel & Tanya Karoli Christensen
2013. Promoting the demoted: The distribution and semantics of “main clause word order” in spoken Danish complement clauses. Lingua 137 ► pp. 38 ff.
Jeppesen Kragh, Kirsten & Lene Schøsler
2014. Reanalysis and gramma(ticaliza)tion of constructions. In Usage-Based Approaches to Language Change [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 69], ► pp. 169 ff.
Kaatari, Henrik
2018. On the syntactic status of I 'm sure. Corpora 13:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Kaatari, Henrik & Tove Larsson
2019. Using the BNC and the Spoken BNC2014 to Study the Syntactic Development ofI ThinkandI’m Sure. English Studies 100:6 ► pp. 710 ff.
Kahane, Sylvain & Paola Pietrandrea
2009. Les parenthétiques comme « Unités Illocutoires Associées ». Linx :61 ► pp. 49 ff.
Kaltenböck, Gunther
2014. Processibility. In Corpus Pragmatics, ► pp. 117 ff.
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Evelien Keizer & Arne Lohmann
2016. Extra-clausal constituents. In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178], ► pp. 1 ff.
Keizer, Evelien
2009. The interpersonal level in English: Reported speech. Linguistics 47:4
Keizer, Evelien
2016. The (the) fact is (that) construction in English and Dutch. In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178], ► pp. 59 ff.
Killie, Kristin
2015. Secondary grammaticalization and the English adverbial -ly suffix. Language Sciences 47 ► pp. 199 ff.
Kruger, Haidee & Gert De Sutter
2018. Alternations in contact and non-contact varieties. Translation, Cognition & Behavior 1:2 ► pp. 251 ff.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2014. Subordination in a dynamic account of grammar. In Contexts of Subordination [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 249], ► pp. 17 ff.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2016. Toward an integrated view of structure, processing, and discourse. In Studies in Lexicogrammar [Human Cognitive Processing, 54], ► pp. 23 ff.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2017. Evidentiality in Cognitive Grammar. In Evidentiality Revisited [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 271], ► pp. 13 ff.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2019. Levels of Reality. Languages 4:2 ► pp. 22 ff.
Long, Haiping, Bernd Heine & Francesco-Alessio Ursini
2020. Prosody and formation of Modern Chinese parenthetical CTMP ni xiang ‘you think’: A conjoining pathway account. Australian Journal of Linguistics 40:3 ► pp. 369 ff.
Long, Haiping, Fang Wu, Francesco Ursini & Zhijun Qin
2021. On the formation of a conjecturing clause-taking predicate in Modern Chinese. Functions of Language 28:2 ► pp. 183 ff.
López-Couso, María José
2016. Continuing the dialogue between corpus linguistics and grammaticalization theory: Three case studies. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 12:1
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya
2014. On the origin of clausal parenthetical constructions: Epistemic/evidential parentheticals withseem
and impersonalthink. In Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 243], ► pp. 189 ff.
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya
2015. Epistemic/evidential markers of the type verb + complementizer. In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research [Studies in Language Companion Series, 166], ► pp. 93 ff.
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya
2016. From clause to adverb. In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178], ► pp. 157 ff.
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya
2021. From complementizing to modifying status: On the grammaticalization of the complement-taking-predicate-clauses chances are and odds are. Language Sciences 88 ► pp. 101422 ff.
Maekelberghe, Charlotte
2021. Assessing the impact of syntactic complement type on the modifying status of complement-taking predicates: the case of imagine. Language Sciences 86 ► pp. 101390 ff.
Matić, Dejan, Rik van Gijn & Robert D. van Valin Jr.
2014. Information structure and reference tracking in complex sentences: An overview. In Information Structure and Reference Tracking in Complex Sentences [Typological Studies in Language, 105], ► pp. 1 ff.
Mortensen, Sune Sønderberg
2011. A distributional approach to functional Danish subclause classification. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 43:2 ► pp. 127 ff.
Nielsen, Peter Juul
Nuyts, Jan & Karolien Janssens
2019. Parentheticals revisited: The case of Dutchdenken. Folia Linguistica 53:s40-s2 ► pp. 475 ff.
O’Grady, Gerard
2023. Theme in spoken language: when a tone group is not a clause. Journal of World Languages 0:0
Põldvere, Nele, Matteo Fuoli & Carita Paradis
2016. A study of dialogic expansion and contraction in spoken discourse using corpus and experimental techniques. Corpora 11:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
Ranger, Graham
2018. I think: Further Variations in Subjective Endorsement. In Discourse Markers, ► pp. 275 ff.
Rodríguez Louro, Celeste
2015. The evolution of epistemic marking in West Australian English. In Grammatical Change in English World-Wide [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 67], ► pp. 205 ff.
RODRÍGUEZ LOURO, CELESTE & THOMAS HARRIS
2013. Evolution with an attitude: the grammaticalisation of epistemic/evidential verbs in Australian English. English Language and Linguistics 17:3 ► pp. 415 ff.
Sato, Shie
2017. On establishing I think as a final particle in interactions: Some comparisons with sentence-final particles in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 110 ► pp. 83 ff.
Serrano-Losada, Mario
2017. On Englishturn outand Spanishresultarmirative constructions. Journal of Historical Linguistics 7:1-2 ► pp. 160 ff.
Serrano-Losada, Mario
Shank, Christopher, Julie Van Bogaert & Koen Plevoets
2016. The diachronic development of zero complementation: A multifactorial analysis of the that/zero alternation with think, suppose, and believe. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 12:1
Shank, Christopher, Koen Plevoets & Julie Van Bogaert
2016. A multifactorial analysis of that/zero alternation. In Corpus-based Approaches to Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 19], ► pp. 201 ff.
Taverniers, Miriam
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2020. Expressions of stance-to-text: discourse management markers as stance markers. Language Sciences 82 ► pp. 101329 ff.
Usonienė, Aurelija
2013. On the morphosyntactic status of complement-taking predicate clauses in Lithuanian. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 45:1 ► pp. 73 ff.
Van Bogaer, Julie
2011. I think and other complement-taking mental predicates: A case of and for constructional grammaticalization. Linguistics 49:2
VAN BOGAERT, JULIE
2010. A constructional taxonomy ofI thinkand related expressions: accounting for the variability of complement-taking mental predicates. English Language and Linguistics 14:3 ► pp. 399 ff.
van Duijn, Max & Arie Verhagen
2019. Recursive embedding of viewpoints, irregularity, and the role for a flexible framework. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 198 ff.
Van linden, An
2020. The diachrony of stance constructions with ‘no’ chance and ‘no’ wonder. Language Sciences 82 ► pp. 101288 ff.
Van linden, An & Lieselotte Brems
2020. Chapter 8. Present-day English constructions with chance(s) in Talmy’s greater modal system and beyond. In Re-Assessing Modalising Expressions [Studies in Language Companion Series, 216], ► pp. 195 ff.
Van linden, An & Lieselotte Brems
2022. ‘Wonder’ Nouns and the Development of a Mirative Constructional Network: An Exercise in Semiotic Diachronic Construction Grammar. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 70:3 ► pp. 263 ff.
Van linden, An & Freek Van de Velde
2014. (Semi-)autonomous subordination in Dutch: Structures and semantic–pragmatic values. Journal of Pragmatics 60 ► pp. 226 ff.
Van linden, An, Lieven Vandelanotte & Lieselotte Brems
2023. Revisiting complement and parenthetical constructions: theory and description. Language Sciences 98 ► pp. 101545 ff.
Van Rompaey, Tinne, Kristin Davidse & Peter Petré
van Rooy, Bertus
2021. A Diasystematic Construction Grammar analysis of language change in the Afrikaans and English finite verb complement clause construction. In Constructions in Contact 2 [Constructional Approaches to Language, 30], ► pp. 110 ff.
Vandelanotte, Lieven
2023. Constructions of speech and thought representation. WIREs Cognitive Science 14:2
Visconti, Jacqueline
2013. Facets of subjectification. Language Sciences 36 ► pp. 7 ff.
Wiemer, Björn
2023. Between analytical mood and clause-initial particles – on the diagnostics of subordination for (emergent) complementizers. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 68:2 ► pp. 187 ff.
Willems, Dominique & Claire Blanche-Benveniste
2014. Chapter 4. A constructional corpus-based approach to ‘weak’ verbs in French. In Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 15], ► pp. 113 ff.
Zhang, Niina Ning
2019. Appearance and Existence in Mandarin Chinese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 40:2 ► pp. 101 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.