Complement-taking predicates
Usage and linguistic structure
Kasper Boye | University of Copenhagen
In recent years, there has been considerable discussion about the nature of clausal subordination (cf., for instance, Schilperoord & Verhagen 1998, Verhagen 2001, Verhagen to appear, Diessel & Tomasello 2001, Thompson 2002). One of the foci has been the status of complement clauses of complement-taking predicates like think. Roughly speaking, the two poles of the issue are the ‘traditional’ assumption according to which the ‘main clause’ is central, and a new ‘usage-based’ picture according to which the ‘complement clause’ is central and the ‘main clause’ is more or less an appendix. From the point of view of an approach that sees structure as having a central role in an overall cognitive-functional picture, this potential polarization is at risk of separating issues that should be kept together. The aim of this paper is to show how a picture that is fully committed to maintaining the role of structural (including structural-semantic) subordination can simultaneously remain fully faithful to principles of usage-based linguistics. Ontogeny and phylogeny (acquisition and diachrony) are central elements in the picture.
Published online: 19 June 2007
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.31.3.03boy
https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.31.3.03boy
Cited by
Cited by 70 other publications
No author info given
2017.
In How Grammar Links Concepts [Human Cognitive Processing, 57],
No author info given
2021.
In Constructions in Contact 2 [Constructional Approaches to Language, 30],
No author info given
2021.
In Studies at the Grammar-Discourse Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series, 219],
Ariel, Mira
2009. Discourse, grammar, discourse.
Discourse Studies 11:1 ► pp. 5 ff.
Beijering, Karin
2015.
In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research [Studies in Language Companion Series, 166],
► pp. 67 ff.
Boye, Kasper
2010. Reference and clausal perception-verb complements.
Linguistics 48:2
Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder
2013.
In Handbook of Pragmatics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Boye, Kasper & Peter Harder
2014. (Inter)subjectification in a functional theory of grammaticalization.
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 46:1 ► pp. 7 ff.
Brandt, Silke, Arie Verhagen, Elena Lieven & Michael Tomasello
2011. German children's productivity with simple transitive and complement-clause constructions: Testing the effects of frequency and variability.
Cognitive Linguistics 22:2
Brinton, Laurel J.
2020.
In Corpora and the Changing Society [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 96],
► pp. 251 ff.
Butler, Christopher S.
2009. Criteria of adequacy in functional linguistics.
FLIN 43:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Christensen, Marie Herget, Tanya Karoli Christensen & Torben Juel Jensen
2020. Foregrounding of subordinate clauses by word order: Psycholinguistic evidence of the function of V>Adv (V2) word order in Danish.
Linguistics 58:1 ► pp. 245 ff.
Christensen, Tanya Karoli & Torben Juel Jensen
2015.
In Language Variation - European Perspectives V [Studies in Language Variation, 17],
► pp. 69 ff.
Cornillie, Bert & Paola Pietrandrea
2012. Modality at work. Cognitive, interactional and textual functions of modal markers.
Journal of Pragmatics 44:15 ► pp. 2109 ff.
Davidse, Kristin, Simon De Wolf & An Van linden
2015. The development of the modal and discourse marker uses of (there/it is/I have) no doubt
.
Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16:1 ► pp. 25 ff.
Egan, Thomas
2015.
In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics,
► pp. 1 ff.
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth
2020. Markers of epistemic modality and their origins.
Studies in Language ► pp. 1 ff.
Gentens, Caroline
2015. “Factive” parenthetical clauses?.
Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16:2 ► pp. 218 ff.
Gentens, Caroline, Ditte Kimps, Kristin Davidse, Gilles Jacobs, An Van linden & Lieselotte Brems
2016.
In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178],
► pp. 125 ff.
Gonzálvez-García, Francisco
2014.
In Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 15],
► pp. 181 ff.
Heltoft, Lars
2014.
In Usage-Based Approaches to Language Change [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 69],
► pp. 203 ff.
Ishkhanyan, Byurakn, Halima Sahraoui, Peter Harder, Jesper Mogensen & Kasper Boye
2017. Grammatical and lexical pronoun dissociation in French speakers with agrammatic aphasia: A usage-based account and REF-based hypothesis.
Journal of Neurolinguistics 44 ► pp. 1 ff.
Iwasaki, Shoichi
2015. A multiple-grammar model of speakers’ linguistic knowledge.
Cognitive Linguistics 26:2 ► pp. 161 ff.
Janssens, Karolien & Jan Nuyts
2014.
In The Functional Perspective on Language and Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 247],
► pp. 149 ff.
Jensen, Torben Juel & Tanya Karoli Christensen
2013. Promoting the demoted: The distribution and semantics of “main clause word order” in spoken Danish complement clauses.
Lingua 137 ► pp. 38 ff.
Jeppesen Kragh, Kirsten & Lene Schøsler
2014.
In Usage-Based Approaches to Language Change [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics, 69],
► pp. 169 ff.
Kaatari, Henrik
2018. On the syntactic status of I 'm sure.
Corpora 13:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Kaatari, Henrik & Tove Larsson
2019. Using the BNC and the Spoken BNC2014 to Study the Syntactic Development of I Think and I’m Sure.
English Studies 100:6 ► pp. 710 ff.
Kahane, Sylvain & Paola Pietrandrea
2009. Les parenthétiques comme « Unités Illocutoires Associées ».
Linx :61 ► pp. 49 ff.
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Evelien Keizer & Arne Lohmann
2016.
In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178],
► pp. 1 ff.
Keizer, Evelien
2009. The interpersonal level in English: Reported speech.
Linguistics 47:4
Keizer, Evelien
2016.
In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178],
► pp. 59 ff.
Killie, Kristin
2015. Secondary grammaticalization and the English adverbial -ly suffix.
Language Sciences 47 ► pp. 199 ff.
Kruger, Haidee & Gert De Sutter
2018. Alternations in contact and non-contact varieties.
Translation, Cognition & Behavior 1:2 ► pp. 251 ff.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2014.
In Contexts of Subordination [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 249],
► pp. 17 ff.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2016.
In Studies in Lexicogrammar [Human Cognitive Processing, 54],
► pp. 23 ff.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2017.
In Evidentiality Revisited [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 271],
► pp. 13 ff.
Langacker, Ronald W.
2019. Levels of Reality.
Languages 4:2 ► pp. 22 ff.
Long, Haiping, Bernd Heine & Francesco-Alessio Ursini
2020. Prosody and formation of Modern Chinese parenthetical CTMP ni xiang ‘you think’: A conjoining pathway account.
Australian Journal of Linguistics 40:3 ► pp. 369 ff.
Long, Haiping, Fang Wu, Francesco Ursini & Zhijun Qin
2020. On the formation of a conjecturing clause-taking predicate in Modern Chinese.
Functions of Language
López-Couso, María José
2016. Continuing the dialogue between corpus linguistics and grammaticalization theory: Three case studies.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 12:1
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya
2014.
In Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 243],
► pp. 189 ff.
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya
2014. From clause to pragmatic marker.
Journal of Historical Pragmatics 15:1 ► pp. 36 ff.
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya
2015.
In New Directions in Grammaticalization Research [Studies in Language Companion Series, 166],
► pp. 93 ff.
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya
2016.
In Outside the Clause [Studies in Language Companion Series, 178],
► pp. 157 ff.
Matić, Dejan, Rik van Gijn & Robert D. van Valin Jr.
2014.
In Information Structure and Reference Tracking in Complex Sentences [Typological Studies in Language, 105],
► pp. 1 ff.
Mortensen, Sune Sønderberg
2011. A distributional approach to functional Danish subclause classification.
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 43:2 ► pp. 127 ff.
Nuyts, Jan & Karolien Janssens
2019. Parentheticals revisited: The case of Dutch denken.
Folia Linguistica 40:2 ► pp. 475 ff.
Põldvere, Nele, Matteo Fuoli & Carita Paradis
2016. A study of dialogic expansion and contraction in spoken discourse using corpus and experimental techniques.
Corpora 11:2 ► pp. 191 ff.
Ranger, Graham
2018.
In Discourse Markers,
► pp. 275 ff.
Rodríguez Louro, Celeste
2015.
In Grammatical Change in English World-Wide [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 67],
► pp. 205 ff.
RODRÍGUEZ LOURO, CELESTE & THOMAS HARRIS
2013. Evolution with an attitude: the grammaticalisation of epistemic/evidential verbs in Australian English.
English Language and Linguistics 17:3 ► pp. 415 ff.
Sato, Shie
2017. On establishing I think as a final particle in interactions: Some comparisons with sentence-final particles in Japanese.
Journal of Pragmatics 110 ► pp. 83 ff.
Serrano-Losada, Mario
2017. On English turn out and Spanish resultar mirative constructions.
Journal of Historical Linguistics 7:1-2 ► pp. 160 ff.
Serrano-Losada, Mario
2017. Raising turn out in Late Modern English.
Review of Cognitive Linguistics 15:2 ► pp. 411 ff.
Shank, Christopher, Julie Van Bogaert & Koen Plevoets
2016. The diachronic development of zero complementation: A multifactorial analysis of the that/zero alternation with think, suppose, and believe.
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 12:1
Shank, Christopher, Koen Plevoets & Julie Van Bogaert
2016.
In Corpus-based Approaches to Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 19],
► pp. 201 ff.
Taverniers, Miriam
2018. Grammatical metaphor and grammaticalization.
Functions of Language 25:1 ► pp. 164 ff.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
2020. Expressions of stance-to-text: discourse management markers as stance markers.
Language Sciences 82 ► pp. 101329 ff.
Usonienė, Aurelija
2013. On the morphosyntactic status of complement-taking predicate clauses in Lithuanian.
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 45:1 ► pp. 73 ff.
Van Bogaer, Julie
2011. I think and other complement-taking mental predicates: A case of and for constructional grammaticalization.
Linguistics 49:2
VAN BOGAERT, JULIE
2010. A constructional taxonomy of I think and related expressions: accounting for the variability of complement-taking mental predicates.
English Language and Linguistics 14:3 ► pp. 399 ff.
van Duijn, Max & Arie Verhagen
2019. Recursive embedding of viewpoints, irregularity, and the role for a flexible framework.
Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 29:2 ► pp. 198 ff.
Van linden, An
2020. The diachrony of stance constructions with ‘no’ chance and ‘no’ wonder.
Language Sciences 82 ► pp. 101288 ff.
Van linden, An & Lieselotte Brems
2020.
In Re-Assessing Modalising Expressions [Studies in Language Companion Series, 216],
► pp. 195 ff.
Van linden, An & Freek Van de Velde
2014. (Semi-)autonomous subordination in Dutch: Structures and semantic–pragmatic values.
Journal of Pragmatics 60 ► pp. 226 ff.
Van Rompaey, Tinne, Kristin Davidse & Peter Petré
2015. Lexicalization and grammaticalization.
Functions of Language 22:2 ► pp. 232 ff.
Visconti, Jacqueline
2013. Facets of subjectification.
Language Sciences 36 ► pp. 7 ff.
Willems, Dominique & Claire Blanche-Benveniste
2014.
In Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 15],
► pp. 113 ff.
Zhang, Niina Ning
2019. Appearance and Existence in Mandarin Chinese.
Studies in Chinese Linguistics 40:2 ► pp. 101 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.