Article published in:
Studies in Language
Vol. 40:1 (2016) ► pp. 137175
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Coussé, Evie, Peter Andersson & Joel Olofsson
2018.  In Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21],  pp. 3 ff. Crossref logo
Granvik, Anton
2018.  In Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21],  pp. 205 ff. Crossref logo
Heine, Bernd
2018.  In New Trends in Grammaticalization and Language Change [Studies in Language Companion Series, 202],  pp. 23 ff. Crossref logo
Heine, Bernd, Tania Kuteva, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Fang Wu
2020. Where do demonstratives come from?. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 73:3  pp. 403 ff. Crossref logo
Hilpert, Martin
2018.  In Grammaticalization meets Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language, 21],  pp. 21 ff. Crossref logo
Kuteva, Tania, Bernd Heine, Bo Hong, Haiping Long, Heiko Narrog & Seongha Rhee
2019.  In World Lexicon of Grammaticalization, Crossref logo
Noël, Dirk
2016. For a radically usage-based diachronic construction grammar. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 30  pp. 39 ff. Crossref logo
Zhan, Fangqiong & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2020. A study of the development of the Chinese correlative comparative construction from the perspective of constructionalization. Diachronica 37:1  pp. 83 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Anderson, Steven R.
1992A-morphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Appah, Clement Kwamina Insaidoo
2013Construction Morphology: Issues in Akan Complex Morphology. Lancaster University dissertation.Google Scholar
Appah, Clement Kwamina Insaidoo & N.A.A. Amfo
2011The morphopragmatics of the diminutive morpheme (-ba/-wa) in Akan. Lexis. E-Journal in English Lexicology 6. 85–103.Google Scholar
Bauer, L.
1978The grammar of nominal compounding, with special reference to Danish, English and French. Odense: Odense University Press.Google Scholar
2003Introducing linguistic morphology, 2nd edn. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press and Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Bisang, Walter
2010Grammaticalization in Chinese: A construction-based account. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization, 245–277. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bisetto, A. & Sergio Scalise
2005The classification of compounds. Lingue e Linguaggio 4(2). 319–332.Google Scholar
Blank, Andreas
2001Pathways of lexicalizaion. In Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Language typology and linguistic universals: An international handbook(Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft), 1596–1608. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert
2005Copounding and derivation: Evidence for construction morphology. In Wolfgang U. Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer & Franz Rainer (eds.), Morphology and its demarcations, 109–32. Oxford: Oxford University Press CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Construction morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2015Morphological analysis. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 2nd edn, 449–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Börjars, Kerstin & Nigel Vincent
2011Grammaticalization and directionality. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 162–76. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. & Elizabeth Closs Traugott
2005Lexicalization and language change (Research Surveys in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan
1985Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan L.
2003Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 602–23. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4). 711–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Usage-based theory and grammaticalization. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 225–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan L., Revere D. Perkins & William Pagliuca
1994The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew
1992Current morphology (Linguistic Theory Guides). London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Colette G.
1991Ways to go in Rama: A case study in polygrammaticalization. In Elizabeth C. Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. 2, 455–92. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William
2001Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William & Alan Cruse
2004Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik
2010Grammatical interference: Subject marker for and the phrasal verb particles out and forth . In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization, 75–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dressler, W.U. & L. Merlini Barbaresi
1994Morphopragmatics: Diminutives and intensifiers in Italian, German, and other languages. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duden: Grammatik der deutschen Gegenwartssprache
1998 6., neu bearbeitete Auflage, Vol. 4. Mannheim, Leipzig, Vienna, Zurich: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga
2000Grammaticalisation: Unidirectional, non-reversable? In Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds.), Pathways of change: Grammaticalization in English, 149–69. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Grammaticalization as analogically driven change? In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 31–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2013An inquiry into unidirectionality as a foundational element of grammaticalization: On the role played by analogy and the synchronic grammar system in processes of language change. Studies in Language 37(3). 515–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas
2011Constructions, word grammar, and grammaticalization. Cognitive Linguistics 22(1). 155–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gisborne, Nikolas & Amanda Patten
2011Construction: Grammar and grammaticalization. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine, The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 92–104. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E.
1995Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2006Constructions at work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harder, Peter & Kasper Boye
2011Grammaticalization and functional linguistics. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 56–68. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1992Grammaticalization chains. Studies in Language 16(2). 335–68. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993Auxiliaries: Cognitive forces and grammaticalization. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1997aPossession: Sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997bCognitive foundations of grammar. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2003Grammaticalization. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda(eds.), The Handbook of Historical Linguistics, 575–601. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Friederike Hünnemeyer
1991Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Friederike Hünnemeyer
1988On the fate of Ewe ví ‘child’ – the development of a diminutive marker. AAP (Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere, Cologne) 16. 97–121.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck, Tania Kuteva & Haiping Long
2013An outline of discourse grammar. In Shannon Bischoff & Carmen Jany (eds.), Functional Approaches to Language, 175–233. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Christa König
2005Grammatical hybrids: Between serialization, compounding and derivation in !Xun (North Khoisan). In Wolfgang U. Dressler, Dieter Kastovsky, Oskar E. Pfeiffer & Franz Rainer, Morphology and its demarcations: Selected papers from the 11th Morphology Meeting, Vienna, February 2004, 81–96. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Crossref
Forthcoming. The !Xun language: A dialect grammar of Northern Khoisan (Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung.). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.
Heine, Bernd & Tania Kuteva
2002World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007The genesis of grammar: A reconstruction (Studies in the Evolution of Language 9). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2009The genesis of grammar: On combining nouns. In Rudie Botha & Henriette de Swart (eds.), Language evolution: The view from restricted linguistic systems, 139–77. Utrecht: LOT (Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics).Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Heiko Narrog
2015Grammaticalization and linguistic analysis. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 2nd edn, 407–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin
2008Germanic future constructions: A usage-based approach to language change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Constructional change in English: Developments in allomorphy, word-formation, and syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015From hand-carved to computer-based: Noun-participle compounding and the upward strengthening hypothesis. Cognitive Linguistics 26(1). 113–47. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Himmelmann, Nikolaus P.
2004Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? In Walter Bisang, et al. (eds.), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components, 21–42. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Höhle, Tilman N.
1982Über Komposition und Derivation: zur Konstituentenstruktur von Wortbildungsproduktion im Deutschen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 1. 76–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J.
1991On some principles of grammaticization. In Elizabeth Traugott C. & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, Vol. 1, 17–35. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Elizabeth C. Traugott
2003Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hüning, Matthias & Geert Booij
2014From compounding to derivation: The emergence of derivational affixes through “constructionalization”. Folia Linguistica 48(2). 579–604. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Israel, Michael
1996The way constructions grow. In Adele Goldberg, (ed.), Conceptual structure, discourse and language, 217–30. Stanford: CSLI.Google Scholar
Jurafsky, Daniel
1996Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language 72(3). 533–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Bernd Heine & Tania Kuteva
2011On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35(4). 848–893. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
2012Grammaticalization as optimization. In Dianne Jonas, John Whitman & Andrew Garrett (eds.), Grammatical change: Origins, nature, outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy
1976 [1965]The evolution of grammatical categories. Reprinted in Jerzy Kuryłowicz. 1976. Esquisses linguistiques, Vol. 2, 38–54. Munich: Finck.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1982Thoughts on grammaticalization: A programmatic sketch, Vol.1 ( AKUP 48 – Arbeiten des Kölner Universalien-Projekts). Cologne: Universität zu Köln, Institut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
1985Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20(3). 303–18.Google Scholar
1989Grammatikalisierung und Lexikalisierung. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 42. 11–19.Google Scholar
2004Theory and method in grammaticalization. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik 32. 152–187. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle & Pavol Štekauer
(eds.) 2009The Oxford handbook of compounding. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 34–53.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle & Pavol Šteckauer
(eds.) 2014The Oxford handbook of derivational morphology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lord, Carol Diane
1975Igbo verb compounds and the lexicon. Studies in African Linguistics (Los Angeles) 6(1). 23–48.Google Scholar
Mair, Christian
2004Corpus linguistics and grammaticalization theory: Statistics, frequency, and beyond. In H. Lindquist & C. Mair (eds.), Corpus approaches to grammaticalization in English, 121–50. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mukarovsky, Hans
1976A study of Western Nigritic, Vol. II (Beiträge zur Afrikanistik, Band 2). Vienna: Afro-Pub.Google Scholar
Marchand, Hans
1969The categories and types of Present-Day English word-formation: A synchronic-diachronic approach, 2nd edn. Munich: Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko & Bernd Heine
To appear. Grammaticalisation. In Adam Ledgeway & Ian Roberts (eds.) The Cambridge handbook of historical syntax Cambridge Cambridg University Press
Newmeyer, Frederick J.
1998Language form and language function. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Noël, Dirk
2007Diachronic construction grammar and grammaticalization theory. Functions of Language 14(2). 177–202. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel
2009Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel & Karin Beijering
2014Facing interfaces: A clustering approach to grammaticalization and related changes. Folia Linguistica 48(2). 385–424. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Norde, Muriel & Kristel Van Goethem
2014Bleaching, debonding and productivity of prefixoids: A corpus-based analysis of ‘giant’ in German and Swedish. Lingvisticae Investigationes 37(2). 256–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Patten, Amanda L.
2010Cleft sentences, construction grammar and grammaticalization. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh dissertation.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann
1880Principien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Ralli, A.
2013Compounding in Modern Greek. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ramat, Paolo
2015Grammaticalization. In Neil J. Smelser & Paul B. Baltes (eds.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, 2nd edn, 330–5. Oxford: Elsevier. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Scalise, Sergio & Petra Vogel
(eds.) 2010Cross-disciplinary issues in compounding. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, Klaus
2003Diminutives in English. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schrock, Terrill B.
2014A grammar of Ik (Icé-tód): Northeast Uganda’s last thriving Kuliak language (Leiden University dissertation). Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena & James A. Walker
2011Collocations in grammaticalization and variation. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine, The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, 225–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs
1995Subjectification in grammaticalisation. In Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C.
2003Constructions in grammaticalization. In Brian D. Joseph & Richard D. Janda (eds.), The handbook of historical linguistics, 624–47. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008The grammaticalization of NP of NP patterns. In Alexander Bergs & Gabriele Diewald (eds.), Constructions and language change, 23–46. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Graeme Trousdale
(eds.) 2010Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Constructionalization and constructional changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Contentful constructionalization. Journal of Historical Linguistics 4(2). 254–82. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trips, Carola
2009Lexical semantics and diachronic morphology. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Derivation and historical change. In Rochelle Lieber & Pavel Šteckauer (eds.), The Oxford handbook of derivational morphology, 384–406. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trousdale, Graeme
2008aA constructional approach to lexicalization processes in the history of English: Evidence from possessive constructions. Word Structure 1. 156–77. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008bConstructions in grammaticalization and lexicalization: Evidence from the history of a composite predicate in English. In Graeme Trousdale & Nikolas Gisborne (eds.), Constructional approaches to English grammar, 33–67. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2008cWords and constructions in grammaticalization: The end of the English impersonal construction. In Susan M. Fitzmaurice & Donka Minkova (eds.), Studies in the history of the English language IV: Empirical and analytical advances in the study of English language change, 301–26. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Multiple inheritance and constructional change. Studies in Language 37(3). 491–514. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trousdale Graeme & Muriel Norde
2013Degrammaticalization and constructionalization: Two case studies. Language Sciences 36. 32–46. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Van Bogaert, Julie
2011 I think and other complement-taking mental predicates: A case of constructional grammaticalization. Linguistics 49(2). 295–332.Google Scholar
Wälchli, B.
2005Co-compounds and Natural Coordination (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory). Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiemer, Björn
2014Quo vadis grammaticalization theory? Why complex language change is like words. Folia Linguistica 48. 425–67. CrossrefGoogle Scholar