Part of
Focus and Background in Romance LanguagesEdited by Andreas Dufter and Daniel Jacob
[Studies in Language Companion Series 112] 2009
► pp. 83–121
Edited by Andreas Dufter and Daniel Jacob
[Studies in Language Companion Series 112] 2009
► pp. 83–121
Clefting and discourse organization: Comparing Germanic and Romance
Cited by
Cited by 32 other publications
Bourgoin, Charlotte
2024. Towards a new typology of the referential information structure of specificational it-clefts. Text & Talk 44:1 ► pp. 1 ff. 
Brunetti, Lisa, Kordula De Kuthy & Arndt Riester
2021. The Information-Structural Status of Adjuncts: A Question-under-Discussion-Based Approach. Discours :28
Carlier, Anne & Karen Lahousse
2023. Chapter 5. Presentational clefts, existentials and information structure. In Existential Constructions across Languages [Human Cognitive Processing, 76], ► pp. 139 ff.
Colonna, Saveria, Sarah Schimke & Barbara Hemforth
2015. Different effects of focus in intra- and inter-sentential pronoun resolution in German. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 30:10 ► pp. 1306 ff.
Cruschina, Silvio
De Cesare, Anna-Maria & Davide Garassino
2015. On the status of exhaustiveness in cleft sentences: An empirical and cross-linguistic study of English also-/only-clefts and Italian anche-/solo-clefts. Folia Linguistica 49:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
De Cesare, Anna-Maria & Davide Garassino
2018. Chapter 9. Adverbial cleft sentences in Italian, French and English. In Focus Realization in Romance and Beyond [Studies in Language Companion Series, 201], ► pp. 255 ff.
De Paolis, Bianca Maria, Cecilia Andorno, F. Neveu, S. Prévost, A. Steuckardt, G. Bergounioux & B. Hamma
2022. Constructions clivées en Français L1 et L2 (Italien L1). Premiers résultats d’une étude expérimentale. SHS Web of Conferences 138 ► pp. 09001 ff.
del Mar Vanrell, Maria & Olga Fernández-Soriano
2018. Chapter 2. Language variation at the prosody-syntax interface. In Focus Realization in Romance and Beyond [Studies in Language Companion Series, 201], ► pp. 33 ff.
Estigarribia, Bruno
2017. Chapter 8. Automatic detection of syntactic patterns from texts with application to Spanish clitic doubling. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 11 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 11], ► pp. 169 ff.
Frascarelli, Mara & Francesca Ramaglia
2014. The interpretation of clefting (a)symmetries between Italian and German. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2012 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 6], ► pp. 65 ff.
Garassino, Davide
2022. Translation as a source of pragmatic interference?. In When Data Challenges Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 273], ► pp. 272 ff.
Garassino, Davide & Daniel Jacob
2022. Introduction. When data challenges theory. In When Data Challenges Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 273], ► pp. 2 ff.
Greif, Markus & Stavros Skopeteas
2021. Correction by Focus: Cleft Constructions and the Cross-Linguistic Variation in Phonological Form. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Grubic, Mira, Agata Renans & Reginald Akuoko Duah
2019. Focus, exhaustivity and existence in Akan, Ga and Ngamo. Linguistics 57:1 ► pp. 221 ff.
Jourdain, Morgane
2022. The emergence of Information Structure in child speech: the acquisition ofc’est-clefts in French. Cognitive Linguistics 33:1 ► pp. 121 ff.
KARSSENBERG, LENA
2017. Frenchil y aclefts, existential sentences and the Focus-Marking Hypothesis. Journal of French Language Studies 27:3 ► pp. 405 ff.
Karssenberg, Lena, Karen Lahousse, Béatrice Lamiroy, Stefania Marzo & Ana Drobnjakovic
Karssenberg, Lena, Karen Lahousse & Stefania Marzo
Karssenberg, Lena, F. Neveu, G. Bergounioux, M.-H. Côté, J.-M. Fournier, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
2016. ‘Il n’y a que Superman qui porte le slip par-dessus le pantalon’ – les clivées enil n’y a que x qui. SHS Web of Conferences 27 ► pp. 02009 ff.
Lahousse, Karen
2022. Is focus a root phenomenon?. In When Data Challenges Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 273], ► pp. 148 ff.
Larrivée, Pierre
2022. The curious case of the rare focus movement in French. In When Data Challenges Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 273], ► pp. 184 ff.
Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo
2022. Distinguishing psychological Given/New from linguistic Topic/Focus makes things clearer. In When Data Challenges Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 273], ► pp. 40 ff.
Mai, Ziyin & Boping Yuan
2016. Uneven reassembly of tense, telicity and discourse features in L2 acquisition of the Chinese shì … de cleft construction by adult English speakers. Second Language Research 32:2 ► pp. 247 ff.
MATIĆ, DEJAN & DANIEL WEDGWOOD
2013. The meanings of focus: The significance of an interpretation-based category in cross-linguistic analysis. Journal of Linguistics 49:1 ► pp. 127 ff.
Meier, Franz
2023. Les phrases pseudo-clivées inversées dans la traduction scientifique dans l’Italie de la fin du 18e siècle. In Expert Cultures and Standardization / Expertenkulturen und Standardisierung [Studienreihe Romania, 40], ► pp. 223 ff.
Nicklaus, Martina & Goranka Rocco
2018. Fingierte Mündlichkeit und Übersetzen. Lebende Sprachen 63:2 ► pp. 393 ff.
Patterson, Clare, Yulia Esaulova & Claudia Felser
2017. The impact of focus on pronoun resolution in native and non-native sentence comprehension. Second Language Research 33:4 ► pp. 403 ff.
Rosemeyer, Malte
2021. Two Types of Constructionalization Processes in Spanish and Portuguese Cleftedwh-interrogatives. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 117 ff.
VAN TIEL, BOB & MIKHAIL KISSINE
2018. Quantity-based reasoning in the broader autism phenotype: A web-based study. Applied Psycholinguistics 39:6 ► pp. 1373 ff.
van Tiel, Bob & Walter Schaeken
2017. Processing Conversational Implicatures: Alternatives and Counterfactual Reasoning. Cognitive Science 41:S5 ► pp. 1119 ff.
Waltereit, Richard
2020. Chapter 7. Is the information-structural contribution of modal particles in the syntax, in discourse structure, or in both?. In Information-Structural Perspectives on Discourse Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 213], ► pp. 178 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.