Part of
Focus and Background in Romance LanguagesEdited by Andreas Dufter and Daniel Jacob
[Studies in Language Companion Series 112] 2009
► pp. 83–121
Edited by Andreas Dufter and Daniel Jacob
[Studies in Language Companion Series 112] 2009
► pp. 83–121
Clefting and discourse organization: Comparing Germanic and Romance
Cited by
Cited by 32 other publications
Bourgoin, Charlotte
2022. Towards a new typology of the referential information structure of specificational it-clefts. Text & Talk 0:0 
Brunetti, Lisa, Kordula De Kuthy & Arndt Riester
2021. The Information-Structural Status of Adjuncts: A Question-under-Discussion-Based Approach. Discours :28
Carlier, Anne & Karen Lahousse
2023. Chapter 5. Presentational clefts, existentials and information structure. In Existential Constructions across Languages [Human Cognitive Processing, 76], ► pp. 139 ff.
Colonna, Saveria, Sarah Schimke & Barbara Hemforth
2015. Different effects of focus in intra- and inter-sentential pronoun resolution in German. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 30:10 ► pp. 1306 ff.
Cruschina, Silvio
De Cesare, Anna-Maria & Davide Garassino
2015. On the status of exhaustiveness in cleft sentences: An empirical and cross-linguistic study of English also-/only-clefts and Italian anche-/solo-clefts. Folia Linguistica 49:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
De Cesare, Anna-Maria & Davide Garassino
2018. Chapter 9. Adverbial cleft sentences in Italian, French and English. In Focus Realization in Romance and Beyond [Studies in Language Companion Series, 201], ► pp. 255 ff.
De Paolis, Bianca Maria, Cecilia Andorno, F. Neveu, S. Prévost, A. Steuckardt, G. Bergounioux & B. Hamma
2022. Constructions clivées en Français L1 et L2 (Italien L1). Premiers résultats d’une étude expérimentale. SHS Web of Conferences 138 ► pp. 09001 ff.
del Mar Vanrell, Maria & Olga Fernández-Soriano
2018. Chapter 2. Language variation at the prosody-syntax interface. In Focus Realization in Romance and Beyond [Studies in Language Companion Series, 201], ► pp. 33 ff.
Estigarribia, Bruno
2017. Chapter 8. Automatic detection of syntactic patterns from texts with application to Spanish clitic doubling. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 11 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 11], ► pp. 169 ff.
Frascarelli, Mara & Francesca Ramaglia
2014. The interpretation of clefting (a)symmetries between Italian and German. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2012 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 6], ► pp. 65 ff.
Garassino, Davide
2022. Translation as a source of pragmatic interference?. In When Data Challenges Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 273], ► pp. 272 ff.
Garassino, Davide & Daniel Jacob
2022. Introduction. When data challenges theory. In When Data Challenges Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 273], ► pp. 2 ff.
Greif, Markus & Stavros Skopeteas
2021. Correction by Focus: Cleft Constructions and the Cross-Linguistic Variation in Phonological Form. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Grubic, Mira, Agata Renans & Reginald Akuoko Duah
2019. Focus, exhaustivity and existence in Akan, Ga and Ngamo. Linguistics 57:1 ► pp. 221 ff.
Jourdain, Morgane
2022. The emergence of Information Structure in child speech: the acquisition ofc’est-clefts in French. Cognitive Linguistics 33:1 ► pp. 121 ff.
KARSSENBERG, LENA
2017. Frenchil y aclefts, existential sentences and the Focus-Marking Hypothesis. Journal of French Language Studies 27:3 ► pp. 405 ff.
Karssenberg, Lena, Karen Lahousse, Béatrice Lamiroy, Stefania Marzo & Ana Drobnjakovic
Karssenberg, Lena, Karen Lahousse & Stefania Marzo
Karssenberg, Lena, F. Neveu, G. Bergounioux, M.-H. Côté, J.-M. Fournier, L. Hriba & S. Prévost
2016. ‘Il n’y a que Superman qui porte le slip par-dessus le pantalon’ – les clivées enil n’y a que x qui. SHS Web of Conferences 27 ► pp. 02009 ff.
Lahousse, Karen
2022. Is focus a root phenomenon?. In When Data Challenges Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 273], ► pp. 148 ff.
Larrivée, Pierre
2022. The curious case of the rare focus movement in French. In When Data Challenges Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 273], ► pp. 184 ff.
Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo
2022. Distinguishing psychological Given/New from linguistic Topic/Focus makes things clearer. In When Data Challenges Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 273], ► pp. 40 ff.
Mai, Ziyin & Boping Yuan
2016. Uneven reassembly of tense, telicity and discourse features in L2 acquisition of the Chinese shì … de cleft construction by adult English speakers. Second Language Research 32:2 ► pp. 247 ff.
MATIĆ, DEJAN & DANIEL WEDGWOOD
2013. The meanings of focus: The significance of an interpretation-based category in cross-linguistic analysis. Journal of Linguistics 49:1 ► pp. 127 ff.
Meier, Franz
2023. Les phrases pseudo-clivées inversées dans la traduction scientifique dans l’Italie de la fin du 18e siècle. In Expert Cultures and Standardization / Expertenkulturen und Standardisierung [Studienreihe Romania, 40], ► pp. 223 ff.
Nicklaus, Martina & Goranka Rocco
2018. Fingierte Mündlichkeit und Übersetzen. Lebende Sprachen 63:2 ► pp. 393 ff.
Patterson, Clare, Yulia Esaulova & Claudia Felser
2017. The impact of focus on pronoun resolution in native and non-native sentence comprehension. Second Language Research 33:4 ► pp. 403 ff.
Rosemeyer, Malte
2021. Two Types of Constructionalization Processes in Spanish and Portuguese Cleftedwh-interrogatives. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 117 ff.
VAN TIEL, BOB & MIKHAIL KISSINE
2018. Quantity-based reasoning in the broader autism phenotype: A web-based study. Applied Psycholinguistics 39:6 ► pp. 1373 ff.
van Tiel, Bob & Walter Schaeken
2017. Processing Conversational Implicatures: Alternatives and Counterfactual Reasoning. Cognitive Science 41:S5 ► pp. 1119 ff.
Waltereit, Richard
2020. Chapter 7. Is the information-structural contribution of modal particles in the syntax, in discourse structure, or in both?. In Information-Structural Perspectives on Discourse Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series, 213], ► pp. 178 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.