219-7677
10
7500817
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Marketing Department / Karin Plijnaar, Pieter Lamers
onix@benjamins.nl
201608250352
ONIX title feed
eng
01
EUR
458014923
03
01
01
JB
John Benjamins Publishing Company
01
JB code
SLCS 153 Eb
15
9789027270559
06
10.1075/slcs.153
13
2013048427
DG
002
02
01
SLCS
02
0165-7763
Studies in Language Companion Series
153
01
The Evidential Basis of Linguistic Argumentation
The
Evidential Basis of Linguistic Argumentation
01
slcs.153
01
https://benjamins.com
02
https://benjamins.com/catalog/slcs.153
1
B01
András Kertész
Kertész, András
András
Kertész
University of Debrecen, and MTA-DE Research Group for Theoretical Linguistics
2
B01
Csilla Rákosi
Rákosi, Csilla
Csilla
Rákosi
MTA-DE Research Group for Theoretical Linguistics
01
eng
326
vi
320
LAN009000
v.2006
CF
2
24
JB Subject Scheme
LIN.FUNCT
Functional linguistics
24
JB Subject Scheme
LIN.THEOR
Theoretical linguistics
06
01
Currently, one of the methodological debates in linguistics focuses on the question of what kinds of <i>data</i> are allowed in different linguistic theories and what subtypes of data can work as <i>evidence</i> for or against particular hypotheses. The first part of the volume puts forward a methodological framework called the ‘p-model’ that is expected to account for the data/evidence problem in linguistics. The aim of the case studies in the second part is to show how this framework can be <i>applied</i> to the everyday research practice of the working linguist, and how it can increase the <i>effectiveness</i> of linguistic theorising. Accordingly, the case studies exemplify that the p-model can come to grips with diverse <i>object</i>-scientific quandaries in syntax, semantics and pragmatics. The third part includes case studies that illustrate how it copes with <i>meta</i>scientific issues such as inconsistency in linguistic theories and the relationship between thought experiments and real experiments.
04
09
01
https://benjamins.com/covers/475/slcs.153.png
04
03
01
https://benjamins.com/covers/475_jpg/9789027259189.jpg
04
03
01
https://benjamins.com/covers/475_tif/9789027259189.tif
06
09
01
https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_front/slcs.153.hb.png
07
09
01
https://benjamins.com/covers/125/slcs.153.png
25
09
01
https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_back/slcs.153.hb.png
27
09
01
https://benjamins.com/covers/3d_web/slcs.153.hb.png
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.01ker
1
12
12
Article
1
01
Chapter 1. Introduction
The state of the art and the structure of the book
1
A01
András Kertész
Kertész, András
András
Kertész
2
A01
Csilla Rákosi
Rákosi, Csilla
Csilla
Rákosi
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.s1
Section header
2
01
Part I: The methodological framework
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.02ker
15
48
34
Article
3
01
Chapter 2. The p-model of data and evidence in linguistics
1
A01
András Kertész
Kertész, András
András
Kertész
2
A01
Csilla Rákosi
Rákosi, Csilla
Csilla
Rákosi
01
The p-model is a metatheoretical approach to linguistic theorising that has been designed to capture the nature of linguistic data and evidence in an unorthodox and novel, but well-motivated and effective way. Its starting point is the insight that the latest literature on linguistic data and evidence acknowledged the <i>uncertainty</i> of the latter as their key feature. Since the main characteristic of <i>plausible inferences</i> is that they facilitate drawing conclusions from uncertain premises, and since chains of plausible inferences constitute the main body of the process of <i>plausible argumentation</i>, the basic idea of the p-model is that the structure of linguistic theories is based on various techniques of plausible argumentation. This chapter summarises the main hypotheses of the p-model, which the case studies in the volume are expected to apply to various linguistic theories.
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.s2
Section header
4
01
Part II: Object-theoretical applications
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.03bib
51
70
20
Article
5
01
Chapter 3. The plausibility of approaches to syntactic alternation of Hungarian verbs
1
A01
Károly Bibok
Bibok, Károly
Károly
Bibok
01
Several – lexical and constructional – approaches have been proposed in the literature to theoretically treat syntactically alternating verb classes. In this chapter I aim to assess their plausibility on the basis of Kertész and Rákosi’s (this volume, 2012) notion of plausible argumentation and present <i>a lexical-constructional account</i>. I argue that both my proposal in general and my analysis of Hungarian verbs of locative alternation are more plausible than either lexical or constructional accounts are separately. As for the assessment of the plausibility of lexical-constructional theory itself, another current publication of mine (Bibok 2010) should be taken into consideration. The lexical-constructional framework of syntactic alternations is supported by a much wider p-context, namely, <i>by lexical pragmatics</i>, which duly highlights the unavoidable interaction between lexicon and contexts.
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.04nag
71
102
32
Article
6
01
Chapter 4. Methods and argumentation in historical linguistics
A case study
1
A01
Katalin Nagy C.
Nagy C., Katalin
Katalin
Nagy C.
01
The present chapter aims to discuss some properties of historical linguistics argumentation, through the analysis of examples taken from actual research practice. Relying on Kertész and Rákosi’s (2012) <i>p-model</i> of scientific theorizing, it compares three competing accounts of the historical development of the Catalan construction “<i>anar </i>‘go’ + infinitive”, namely, those provided in Colon (1979a, b), in Detges (2004) and in Juge (2006). The simultaneous plausibility of some statements and their negations in the starting p-context formed by these three approaches leads to a p-inconsistency, which is eliminated by the extension of the starting p-context and, then, the coordination of the extended p-context. The analysis of historical research practice from a methodological point of view suggests that the development of the Catalan “<i>anar </i>‘go’ + infinitive” construction finds the most satisfactory explanation under Juge’s (2006) proposal, which uses sources, research methods and argumentation techniques traditionally accepted in historical linguistics.
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.05nem
103
132
30
Article
7
01
Chapter 5. Hungarian verbs of natural phenomena with explicit and implicit subject arguments
Their use and occurrence in the light of data
1
A01
Enikő Németh T.
Németh T., Enikő
Enikő
Németh T.
01
The present chapter has two main aims. First, it attempts to provide a novel account for the occurrence of Hungarian verbs of natural phenomena with subject arguments. The problem which the present chapter wants to resolve is that there is an inconsistency between the previous explanations of the behaviour of verbs of natural phenomena with and without an explicit subject and the data. The previous approaches have considered the Hungarian verbs of natural phenomena subjectless, although data from various direct sources (such as written corpora, intuition, introspection, and spoken discourses) testify to occurrences of verbs of natural phenomena with explicit subjects. To eliminate this inconsistency, the chapter argues for a new, unified approach, according to which Hungarian verbs of natural phenomena have subject arguments in their lexical-semantic representations which can (or even should) be lexically unrealised in some contexts, while in others they can be explicitly expressed and contextual, grammatical as well as lexical-semantic factors together license the implicit or explicit occurrence of subject arguments. Second, applying Kertész & Rákosi’s (this volume, 2012) p-model, the chapter aims to reflect on a metalinguistic level on how the proposed explanation has been reached in the course of the research as well as how the new account can resolve the above mentioned problem.
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.06koc
133
178
46
Article
8
01
Chapter 6. The development of a taxonomy of verbal disagreements in the light of the p-model
1
A01
Helga Vanda Koczogh
Koczogh, Helga Vanda
Helga Vanda
Koczogh
01
The main objective of this chapter is to find a category system that is the most capable of describing Hungarian disagreement based on certain criteria set beforehand. As none of the rival approaches to disagreement to be introduced in this chapter seem to satisfy each criterion, a new taxonomy is proposed. Distinguishing between strategies and pragmatic force modifiers (PFMs), this new category system is more reliable and more capable of capturing the complex nature of (Hungarian) disagreements that the rival models. A detailed description of the metatheoretical research is provided including a step-by-step description of the analytical procedure(s) employed. By describing each step of the research along with the decisions and re-evaluations of the information at hand as well as the p-context, the chapter demonstrates the cyclic, retrospective and prismatic nature of the plausible argumentation process.
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.07rak
179
198
20
Article
9
01
Chapter 7. A case of disagreement
On plural reduplicating particles in Hungarian
1
A01
György Rákosi
Rákosi, György
György
Rákosi
01
The chapter discusses the so-called Hungarian <i>reduplicating particle verb construction</i> that has generated some interest in the pertinent generative literature on Hungarian. This literature is divided over whether reduplicating particles can bear plural morphology in the presence of a third person plural oblique associate or not: some accept and some reject the resulting <i>agreeing reduplicating particle verb construction</i>, thus creating a par excellence context of data inconsistency. The chapter offers a detailed and critical overview of the literature, and presents some novel arguments in an effort to find a paraconsistent solution to this problem within the framework of the p-model of Kertész and Rákosi (2012). This solution rests and on the claim that the plural and the non-plural reduplicating particle verb constructions are radically different in their grammar, since the particle only acts as a pronominal in the case of the former construction type. The pronominal use of the particle is a marked option, rendering the agreeing reduplicating particle verb construction a marked phenomenon of Hungarian grammar.
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.08vec
199
218
20
Article
10
01
Chapter 8. A plausibility-based model of shifted indexicals
1
A01
Zoltán Vecsey
Vecsey, Zoltán
Zoltán
Vecsey
01
In his groundbreaking formal work on context-dependent expressions, Kaplan (1989a) argued that the conventional meaning of natural language indexicals cannot be modified by sentential operators. Kaplan’s original theory, however, has been recently challenged by empirical studies. It turned out that in certain languages, for example in Amharic and Zazaki, attitude operators are able to modify the meaning of indexicals. Some of these empirical findings appear to be clearly inconsistent with the Kaplanian account. From a metatheoretical point of view, the current debate about the operator-sensitivity of indexicals can also be interpreted as a debate about the role of linguistic data. In following the p-model and considering linguistic data as statements with plausibility values, one can make some progress in this field of research.
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.s3
Section header
11
01
Part III: Metatheoretical applications
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.09ker
221
270
50
Article
12
01
Chapter 9. Thought experiments and real experiments as converging data sources in pragmatics
1
A01
András Kertész
Kertész, András
András
Kertész
2
A01
Csilla Rákosi
Rákosi, Csilla
Csilla
Rákosi
01
The aim of the present chapter is to reconstruct the relationship between thought experiments and real experiments in pragmatics. In the first part, Searle’s (1969) thought experiment on <i>Kennst du das Land, wo die Zitronen blühn?</i> is analysed with the help of the p-model. The second part reconstructs the argumentation structure of the real experiments reported on in Holtgraves & Ashley (2001), and shows that the latter and Searle’s thought experiment closely interact. Basically, their relationship is characterised by the dynamic process of the cyclic, prismatic and retrospective re-evalutation of information in the sense of the p-model. However, they have different strengths and weaknesses. Accordingly, the generalised finding is that the conscious integration of real and thought experiments as data sources within some research may considerably enhance the reliability of pragmatic hypotheses.
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.10rak
271
308
38
Article
13
01
Chapter 10. Data and the resolution of inconsistency in Optimality Theory
1
A01
Csilla Rákosi
Rákosi, Csilla
Csilla
Rákosi
01
This chapter provides a survey about the most frequent methods of inconsistency resolution in Optimality Theory. With the help of the p-model, inconsistencies in OT are divided into two main groups. The first group includes conflicts that are deemed to be fatal and are solved usually by the modification of the theory: namely, clashes between “linguistic data” (acceptability judgements) and applications of the model (results of the evaluation procedure). The second group consists of conflicts that are, in contrast, tolerable in the view of OT theorists: inconsistencies between constraints and the best output candidates. The author’s analyses result in the conclusion that there is no radical break between OT and “standard” Generative Grammars with respect to the treatment of inconsistencies.
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.11and
309
314
6
Article
14
01
Chapter 11. Conclusions
1
A01
András Kertész
Kertész, András
András
Kertész
2
A01
Csilla Rákosi
Rákosi, Csilla
Csilla
Rákosi
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.12aut
315
316
2
Miscellaneous
15
01
Author index
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.13sub
317
320
4
Miscellaneous
16
01
Subject index
02
JBENJAMINS
John Benjamins Publishing Company
01
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Amsterdam/Philadelphia
NL
04
20140423
2014
John Benjamins B.V.
02
WORLD
13
15
9789027259189
01
JB
3
John Benjamins e-Platform
03
jbe-platform.com
09
WORLD
21
01
00
105.00
EUR
R
01
00
88.00
GBP
Z
01
gen
00
158.00
USD
S
410014922
03
01
01
JB
John Benjamins Publishing Company
01
JB code
SLCS 153 Hb
15
9789027259189
13
2013048427
BB
01
SLCS
02
0165-7763
Studies in Language Companion Series
153
01
The Evidential Basis of Linguistic Argumentation
The
Evidential Basis of Linguistic Argumentation
01
slcs.153
01
https://benjamins.com
02
https://benjamins.com/catalog/slcs.153
1
B01
András Kertész
Kertész, András
András
Kertész
University of Debrecen, and MTA-DE Research Group for Theoretical Linguistics
2
B01
Csilla Rákosi
Rákosi, Csilla
Csilla
Rákosi
MTA-DE Research Group for Theoretical Linguistics
01
eng
326
vi
320
LAN009000
v.2006
CF
2
24
JB Subject Scheme
LIN.FUNCT
Functional linguistics
24
JB Subject Scheme
LIN.THEOR
Theoretical linguistics
06
01
Currently, one of the methodological debates in linguistics focuses on the question of what kinds of <i>data</i> are allowed in different linguistic theories and what subtypes of data can work as <i>evidence</i> for or against particular hypotheses. The first part of the volume puts forward a methodological framework called the ‘p-model’ that is expected to account for the data/evidence problem in linguistics. The aim of the case studies in the second part is to show how this framework can be <i>applied</i> to the everyday research practice of the working linguist, and how it can increase the <i>effectiveness</i> of linguistic theorising. Accordingly, the case studies exemplify that the p-model can come to grips with diverse <i>object</i>-scientific quandaries in syntax, semantics and pragmatics. The third part includes case studies that illustrate how it copes with <i>meta</i>scientific issues such as inconsistency in linguistic theories and the relationship between thought experiments and real experiments.
04
09
01
https://benjamins.com/covers/475/slcs.153.png
04
03
01
https://benjamins.com/covers/475_jpg/9789027259189.jpg
04
03
01
https://benjamins.com/covers/475_tif/9789027259189.tif
06
09
01
https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_front/slcs.153.hb.png
07
09
01
https://benjamins.com/covers/125/slcs.153.png
25
09
01
https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_back/slcs.153.hb.png
27
09
01
https://benjamins.com/covers/3d_web/slcs.153.hb.png
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.01ker
1
12
12
Article
1
01
Chapter 1. Introduction
The state of the art and the structure of the book
1
A01
András Kertész
Kertész, András
András
Kertész
2
A01
Csilla Rákosi
Rákosi, Csilla
Csilla
Rákosi
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.s1
Section header
2
01
Part I: The methodological framework
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.02ker
15
48
34
Article
3
01
Chapter 2. The p-model of data and evidence in linguistics
1
A01
András Kertész
Kertész, András
András
Kertész
2
A01
Csilla Rákosi
Rákosi, Csilla
Csilla
Rákosi
01
The p-model is a metatheoretical approach to linguistic theorising that has been designed to capture the nature of linguistic data and evidence in an unorthodox and novel, but well-motivated and effective way. Its starting point is the insight that the latest literature on linguistic data and evidence acknowledged the <i>uncertainty</i> of the latter as their key feature. Since the main characteristic of <i>plausible inferences</i> is that they facilitate drawing conclusions from uncertain premises, and since chains of plausible inferences constitute the main body of the process of <i>plausible argumentation</i>, the basic idea of the p-model is that the structure of linguistic theories is based on various techniques of plausible argumentation. This chapter summarises the main hypotheses of the p-model, which the case studies in the volume are expected to apply to various linguistic theories.
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.s2
Section header
4
01
Part II: Object-theoretical applications
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.03bib
51
70
20
Article
5
01
Chapter 3. The plausibility of approaches to syntactic alternation of Hungarian verbs
1
A01
Károly Bibok
Bibok, Károly
Károly
Bibok
01
Several – lexical and constructional – approaches have been proposed in the literature to theoretically treat syntactically alternating verb classes. In this chapter I aim to assess their plausibility on the basis of Kertész and Rákosi’s (this volume, 2012) notion of plausible argumentation and present <i>a lexical-constructional account</i>. I argue that both my proposal in general and my analysis of Hungarian verbs of locative alternation are more plausible than either lexical or constructional accounts are separately. As for the assessment of the plausibility of lexical-constructional theory itself, another current publication of mine (Bibok 2010) should be taken into consideration. The lexical-constructional framework of syntactic alternations is supported by a much wider p-context, namely, <i>by lexical pragmatics</i>, which duly highlights the unavoidable interaction between lexicon and contexts.
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.04nag
71
102
32
Article
6
01
Chapter 4. Methods and argumentation in historical linguistics
A case study
1
A01
Katalin Nagy C.
Nagy C., Katalin
Katalin
Nagy C.
01
The present chapter aims to discuss some properties of historical linguistics argumentation, through the analysis of examples taken from actual research practice. Relying on Kertész and Rákosi’s (2012) <i>p-model</i> of scientific theorizing, it compares three competing accounts of the historical development of the Catalan construction “<i>anar </i>‘go’ + infinitive”, namely, those provided in Colon (1979a, b), in Detges (2004) and in Juge (2006). The simultaneous plausibility of some statements and their negations in the starting p-context formed by these three approaches leads to a p-inconsistency, which is eliminated by the extension of the starting p-context and, then, the coordination of the extended p-context. The analysis of historical research practice from a methodological point of view suggests that the development of the Catalan “<i>anar </i>‘go’ + infinitive” construction finds the most satisfactory explanation under Juge’s (2006) proposal, which uses sources, research methods and argumentation techniques traditionally accepted in historical linguistics.
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.05nem
103
132
30
Article
7
01
Chapter 5. Hungarian verbs of natural phenomena with explicit and implicit subject arguments
Their use and occurrence in the light of data
1
A01
Enikő Németh T.
Németh T., Enikő
Enikő
Németh T.
01
The present chapter has two main aims. First, it attempts to provide a novel account for the occurrence of Hungarian verbs of natural phenomena with subject arguments. The problem which the present chapter wants to resolve is that there is an inconsistency between the previous explanations of the behaviour of verbs of natural phenomena with and without an explicit subject and the data. The previous approaches have considered the Hungarian verbs of natural phenomena subjectless, although data from various direct sources (such as written corpora, intuition, introspection, and spoken discourses) testify to occurrences of verbs of natural phenomena with explicit subjects. To eliminate this inconsistency, the chapter argues for a new, unified approach, according to which Hungarian verbs of natural phenomena have subject arguments in their lexical-semantic representations which can (or even should) be lexically unrealised in some contexts, while in others they can be explicitly expressed and contextual, grammatical as well as lexical-semantic factors together license the implicit or explicit occurrence of subject arguments. Second, applying Kertész & Rákosi’s (this volume, 2012) p-model, the chapter aims to reflect on a metalinguistic level on how the proposed explanation has been reached in the course of the research as well as how the new account can resolve the above mentioned problem.
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.06koc
133
178
46
Article
8
01
Chapter 6. The development of a taxonomy of verbal disagreements in the light of the p-model
1
A01
Helga Vanda Koczogh
Koczogh, Helga Vanda
Helga Vanda
Koczogh
01
The main objective of this chapter is to find a category system that is the most capable of describing Hungarian disagreement based on certain criteria set beforehand. As none of the rival approaches to disagreement to be introduced in this chapter seem to satisfy each criterion, a new taxonomy is proposed. Distinguishing between strategies and pragmatic force modifiers (PFMs), this new category system is more reliable and more capable of capturing the complex nature of (Hungarian) disagreements that the rival models. A detailed description of the metatheoretical research is provided including a step-by-step description of the analytical procedure(s) employed. By describing each step of the research along with the decisions and re-evaluations of the information at hand as well as the p-context, the chapter demonstrates the cyclic, retrospective and prismatic nature of the plausible argumentation process.
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.07rak
179
198
20
Article
9
01
Chapter 7. A case of disagreement
On plural reduplicating particles in Hungarian
1
A01
György Rákosi
Rákosi, György
György
Rákosi
01
The chapter discusses the so-called Hungarian <i>reduplicating particle verb construction</i> that has generated some interest in the pertinent generative literature on Hungarian. This literature is divided over whether reduplicating particles can bear plural morphology in the presence of a third person plural oblique associate or not: some accept and some reject the resulting <i>agreeing reduplicating particle verb construction</i>, thus creating a par excellence context of data inconsistency. The chapter offers a detailed and critical overview of the literature, and presents some novel arguments in an effort to find a paraconsistent solution to this problem within the framework of the p-model of Kertész and Rákosi (2012). This solution rests and on the claim that the plural and the non-plural reduplicating particle verb constructions are radically different in their grammar, since the particle only acts as a pronominal in the case of the former construction type. The pronominal use of the particle is a marked option, rendering the agreeing reduplicating particle verb construction a marked phenomenon of Hungarian grammar.
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.08vec
199
218
20
Article
10
01
Chapter 8. A plausibility-based model of shifted indexicals
1
A01
Zoltán Vecsey
Vecsey, Zoltán
Zoltán
Vecsey
01
In his groundbreaking formal work on context-dependent expressions, Kaplan (1989a) argued that the conventional meaning of natural language indexicals cannot be modified by sentential operators. Kaplan’s original theory, however, has been recently challenged by empirical studies. It turned out that in certain languages, for example in Amharic and Zazaki, attitude operators are able to modify the meaning of indexicals. Some of these empirical findings appear to be clearly inconsistent with the Kaplanian account. From a metatheoretical point of view, the current debate about the operator-sensitivity of indexicals can also be interpreted as a debate about the role of linguistic data. In following the p-model and considering linguistic data as statements with plausibility values, one can make some progress in this field of research.
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.s3
Section header
11
01
Part III: Metatheoretical applications
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.09ker
221
270
50
Article
12
01
Chapter 9. Thought experiments and real experiments as converging data sources in pragmatics
1
A01
András Kertész
Kertész, András
András
Kertész
2
A01
Csilla Rákosi
Rákosi, Csilla
Csilla
Rákosi
01
The aim of the present chapter is to reconstruct the relationship between thought experiments and real experiments in pragmatics. In the first part, Searle’s (1969) thought experiment on <i>Kennst du das Land, wo die Zitronen blühn?</i> is analysed with the help of the p-model. The second part reconstructs the argumentation structure of the real experiments reported on in Holtgraves & Ashley (2001), and shows that the latter and Searle’s thought experiment closely interact. Basically, their relationship is characterised by the dynamic process of the cyclic, prismatic and retrospective re-evalutation of information in the sense of the p-model. However, they have different strengths and weaknesses. Accordingly, the generalised finding is that the conscious integration of real and thought experiments as data sources within some research may considerably enhance the reliability of pragmatic hypotheses.
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.10rak
271
308
38
Article
13
01
Chapter 10. Data and the resolution of inconsistency in Optimality Theory
1
A01
Csilla Rákosi
Rákosi, Csilla
Csilla
Rákosi
01
This chapter provides a survey about the most frequent methods of inconsistency resolution in Optimality Theory. With the help of the p-model, inconsistencies in OT are divided into two main groups. The first group includes conflicts that are deemed to be fatal and are solved usually by the modification of the theory: namely, clashes between “linguistic data” (acceptability judgements) and applications of the model (results of the evaluation procedure). The second group consists of conflicts that are, in contrast, tolerable in the view of OT theorists: inconsistencies between constraints and the best output candidates. The author’s analyses result in the conclusion that there is no radical break between OT and “standard” Generative Grammars with respect to the treatment of inconsistencies.
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.11and
309
314
6
Article
14
01
Chapter 11. Conclusions
1
A01
András Kertész
Kertész, András
András
Kertész
2
A01
Csilla Rákosi
Rákosi, Csilla
Csilla
Rákosi
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.12aut
315
316
2
Miscellaneous
15
01
Author index
10
01
JB code
slcs.153.13sub
317
320
4
Miscellaneous
16
01
Subject index
02
JBENJAMINS
John Benjamins Publishing Company
01
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Amsterdam/Philadelphia
NL
04
20140423
2014
John Benjamins B.V.
02
WORLD
08
740
gr
01
JB
1
John Benjamins Publishing Company
+31 20 6304747
+31 20 6739773
bookorder@benjamins.nl
01
https://benjamins.com
01
WORLD
US CA MX
21
9
14
01
02
JB
1
00
105.00
EUR
R
02
02
JB
1
00
111.30
EUR
R
01
JB
10
bebc
+44 1202 712 934
+44 1202 712 913
sales@bebc.co.uk
03
GB
21
14
02
02
JB
1
00
88.00
GBP
Z
01
JB
2
John Benjamins North America
+1 800 562-5666
+1 703 661-1501
benjamins@presswarehouse.com
01
https://benjamins.com
01
US CA MX
21
14
01
gen
02
JB
1
00
158.00
USD