References

References

Amberber, Mengistu, Baker, Brett & Harvey, Mark
(eds) 2010aComplex Predicates. Cross-linguistic Perspectives on Event Structure. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010bIntroduction: Complex predicates. In Amberber et al. (eds), 1–12. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biskup, Petr, Putnam, Michael & Smith, Laura Catharine
2010German particle and prefix verbs at the syntax-phonology interface. In Leuvense Bijdragen. Leuven Contributions in Linguistics and Philology 97: 106–135.Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam
2010The light verb jungle: Still hacking away. In Amberber et al. (eds), 48–78. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dehé, Nicole
2015Particle verbs in Germanic. In Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds), 611–626. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dewell, Robert B.
2011The Meaning of Particle / Prefix Constructions in German [Human Cognitive Processing 34]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diedrichsen, Elke
2008Where is the PreCore slot? Mapping the layered structure of the clause and German sentence topology. In Investigations of the Syntax-Semantics-Pragmatics Interface [Studies in Language Companion Series 105], Robert D. Van Valin Jr. (ed.), 203–224. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011The theoretical importance of constructional schemas in RRG. In Proceedings of the RRG 2009 Conference, Wataru Nakamura (ed.), 168–198. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
2012What you give is what you GET? On reanalysis, semantic extension and functional motivation with the German bekommen-passive construction. In The Art of Getting: GET Verbs in European Languages from a Synchronic and Diachronic Point of View, Alexandra N. Lenz & Gudrun Rawoens (eds). Special Issue of Linguistics 50(6): 1163–1204.Google Scholar
2013aConstructions as memes. Interactional function as cultural convention beyond the words. In Beyond Words, Frank Liedtke & Cornelia Schulze (eds), 283–305. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013bFrom idioms to sentence structures and beyond: The theoretical scope of the concept “Construction”. In Linking Constructions into Functional Linguistics. The Role of Constructions in Grammars [Studies in Language Companion Series 145], Brian Nolan & Elke Diedrichsen (eds), 295–330. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Diedrichsen Elke
2014A Role and Reference Grammar parser for German. In Language Processing and Grammars: The Role of Functionally Oriented Computational Models [Studies in Language Companion Series 150], Brian Nolan & Carlos Periñán-Pascual (eds), 105–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Drach, Erich
1937[41963] Grundgedanken der deutschen Satzlehre. Frankfurt: Diesterweg.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Peter
2006Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik: Der Satz. Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
Hinterhölzl, Roland
2010aThe role of information structure in word order variation and word order change. In Information Structure and Language Change. New Approaches to Word Order Variation in Germanic, Roland Hinterhölzl & Svetlana Petrova (eds), 45–66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2010bDie Herausbildung der Satzklammer im Deutschen. Ein Plädoyer für eine informationsstrukturelle Analyse. In Historische Textgrammatik und historische Syntax des Deutschen: Traditionen, Innovationen, Perspektiven, Arne Ziegler (ed.), 121–138. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lüdeling, Anke
2001On Particle Verbs and Similar Constructions in German [Dissertations in Linguistics]. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
McIntyre, Andrew
2001German Particle Verbs as Preverbs. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
2002Idiosyncrasy in particle verbs. In Verb-particle Explorations, Nicole Dehé, Ray Jackendoff, Andrew McIntyre & Silke Urban (eds), 97–118. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Particle verb formation. In Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds), 434–449. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Müller, Stefan
2002Complex Predicates. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2003Solving the bracketing paradox: An analysis of the morphology of German particle verbs. Journal of Linguistics 39: 275–325.Google Scholar
Negele, Michaela
2012Varianten der Pronominaladverbien im Neuhochdeutschen. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, Brian
2012The Structure of Modern Irish. A Functional Account. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
2013Constructions as grammatical objects: A case study of the prepositional ditransitive construction in Modern Irish. In Linking Constructions into Functional Linguistics. The Role of Constructions in Grammars [Studies in Language Companion Series 145], Brian Nolan & Elke Diedrichsen (eds), 143–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nübling, Damaris
2008Historische Sprachwissenschaft des Deutschen, 2nd edn. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Okamoto, Junji
2001Particle-bound directions in German particle-verb constructions. Paper presented at International Workshop on Germanic Languages and Comparative Grammar, University of Tsukuba (July 2001), and Germanistentagung, University of Shinshu, Japan, October. http://​www​-cc​.gakushuin​.ac​.jp​/~20050003​/pdfs​/pbound​.pdf> (7 April 2016).
Olsen, Susan
1996aPleonastische Direktionale. In Wenn die Semantik arbeitet, Manfred Bierwisch & Gisela Harras (eds), 303–329. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996bPartikelverben im deutsch-englischen Vergleich. In Deutsch – typologisch. Institut für deutsche Sprache, Jahrbuch 1995, Ewald Lang & Gisela Zifonun (eds), 261–288. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1998Semantische und konzeptuelle Aspekte der Partikelverbbildung mit ein-. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
1999aDurch den Park durch, zum Bahnhof hin: Komplexe Präpositionalphrasen mit einfachem direktionalem Kopf. In Deutsch kontrastiv, Heide Wegener (ed.), 111–134. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
1999bVerbpartikel oder Adverb. In Grammatik und mentale Prozesse, Angelika Redder & Jochen Rehbein (eds), 223–239. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
1999cKomplexe Präpositionalphrasen mit postponiertem direktionalem Kopf. Linguistische Berichte 180: 389–408.Google Scholar
Rehbein, Ines & von Genabith, Josef
2006German particle verbs and pleonastic prepositions. In Proceedings of the Third ACL-SIGSEM Workshop on Prepositions, 57–64. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ronneberger-Sibold, Elke
1991Funktionale Betrachtungen zu Diskontinuität und Klammerbildung im Deutschen. In Beiträge zum 8. Bochum-Essener Kolloquium über „Sprachwandel und seine Prinzipien“, Norbert Boretzky, Werner Enninger, Benedikt Jeßing, Thomas Stolz (eds), 206–236. Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
2010Die deutsche Nominalklammer: Geschichte, Funktion, typologische Bewertung. In Historische Textgrammatik und historische Syntax des Deutschen: Traditionen, Innovationen, Perspektiven, Band 1: Diachronie, Althochdeutsch, Mittelhochdeutsch, Arne Ziegler (ed.), 85–120. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stiebels, Barbara
1996Lexikalische Argumente und Adjunkte. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stiebels, Barbara & Wunderlich, Dieter
1994Morphology feeds syntax: The case of particle verbs. Linguistics 32: 913–968. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
1985Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Timothy Shopen (ed.), 57–149. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2000Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. 1: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich & Hans-Jörg Schmid
1996An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Van Valin Jr., Robert D.
2005Exploring the Syntax-semantics Interface. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weinrich, Harald
2005Textgrammatik der deutschen Sprache. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Zeller, Jochen
2001Particle Verbs and Local Domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zifonun, Gisela
1999Wenn mit alleine im Mittelfeld erscheint: Verbpartikeln und ihre Doppelgänger im Deutschen und Englischen. In Deutsch kontrastiv, Heide Wegener (ed.), 211–235. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Zifonun, Gisela, Hoffmann, Ludger & Strecker, Bruno
1997Grammatik der deutschen Sprache [Schriften des Instituts für deutsche Sprache 7]. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar