Chapter published in:
Imperatives and Directive Strategies
Edited by Daniël Van Olmen and Simone Heinold
[Studies in Language Companion Series 184] 2017

“You’re just workin’ for yourself”

Directive strategies in yoga instructional discourse

| Louisiana State University
In this paper, I examine directives uttered by yoga teachers to their students during classes, with special attention to their frequency of use and their degree of modification. Yoga instructional discourse is shown to be characterized by a wide range of directives, from bald imperatives to modified forms, including indirect directives. I demonstrate that these different types of directive have a characteristic pattern of distribution within the yoga instructional practice context. Indirect directives include present and future descriptions of actions rather than instructions to perform them and various kinds of modifications, including phrases that echo yoga ideology.
Published online: 11 April 2017
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.184.05bro
References

References

Aarts, Flor
1989 Imperatives in English: Semantics and pragmatics. Studia Linguistica 43(2): 119–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, Michael
1981 The Dialogic Imagination. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre
1977 Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brody, Jill
1991 Indirection in the negotiation of self in everyday Tojolab’al women’s conversation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 1(1):78–96. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen
1987 Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Clemen, Gudrun
1997 The concept of hedging: Origins, approaches and definitions. In Hedging and Discourse. Approaches to the Analysis of a Pragmatic Phenomenon, Raija Markkanen & Hartmut Schröder (eds), 235–248. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cooren, François
2010 Action and Agency in Dialogue [Dialogue Studies 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Csordas, Thomas J.
1993 Somatic modes of attention. Cultural Anthropology 8(2): 135–156. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Delin, Judy
1998 Facework and instructor goals in the step aerobics workout. In Language at Work, Susan Hunston (ed.), 52–71. Clevedon: British Association for Applied Linguistics in association with Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
2001 Keeping in step: Task structure, discourse structure and utterance interpretation in the step aerobics workout. Discourse Processes 31(1): 61–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dufour, Nicole M.
2003 Dialogic Dogs and Phatic Felines: Speaking to and through Our Pets. MA dissertation, Louisiana State University.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan
1976 Is Sybil there? The structure of some American English directives. Language in Society 5(1): 25–66. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Falgout, Suzanne & Levin, Paula
1992 Transforming knowledge: Western schooling in the Pacific. Anthropology and Education Quarterly 23(1): 3–9. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Feuerstein, Georg & Payne, Larry
1999 Yoga for Dummies. New York NY: IDG Books Worldwide.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving
1974 Frame Analysis. An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York NY: Harper Colophon Books.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie Harness
1990 He-Said-She-Said: Talk as Social Organization among Black Children. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hamblin, Charles L.
1987 Imperatives. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet
1984 Modifying illocutionary force. Journal of Pragmatics 8(3): 345–365. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith
1979 Formality and informality in communicative events. American Anthropologist 81(4): 733–790. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1960 Closing statements: Linguistics and poetics. In Style in Language, Thomas Sebeok (ed.), 350–377. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kiesling, Scott F.
2001 “Now I gotta watch what I say”: Shifting constructions of masculinity in discourse. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 11(2): 250–273. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kissine, Mikhail
2013 From Utterances to Speech Acts. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, Tamara
2001 Don’t talk–blend: Ideas about body and communication in aikido practice. In An Anthropology of Indirect Communication, Joy Dendry & Conrad W. Watson (eds), 163–176. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lave, Jean & Wegner, Etienne
1991 Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mauss, Marcel
1950 Sociologie et Anthropologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Richardson-Klavehn, Alan & Bjork, Robert A.
1988 Measures of memory. Annual Review of Psychology 39: 475–543. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Alf
1968 Directives and Norms. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Searle, John
1975 A taxonomy of illocutionary acts, In Language, Mind, and Knowledge, Keith Gunderson (ed.), 344–369. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael
2001 The limits of awareness. In Linguistic Anthropology. A Reader, Alessandro Duranti (ed.), 382–401. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Strauss, Sarah
2005 Positioning Yoga. Balancing Acts across Cultures. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Tannen, Debora
2003 Power maneuvers or connection maneuvers? Ventriloquizing in family interaction. In Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics. Linguistics, Language and the Real World. Discourse and Beyond, Deborah Tannen & James E. Alatis (eds), 50–62. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
2004 Talking the dog: Framing pets as interactional resources in family discourse. Research on Language and Social Interaction 37(4): 399–420. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yoga Journal’s Practice for Strength with Rodney Yee
1996 Living Arts, Healing Arts Publishing.Google Scholar