Cover not available
Part of
Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: New perspectives
Edited by Chiara Fedriani and Andrea Sansó
[Studies in Language Companion Series 186] 2017
► pp. 305–333

Chapter 11
Grammaticalization of PMs/DMs/MMs in Japanese

| Georgia Institute of Technology
This paper discusses the source lexemes and the grammaticalization pathways leading to such end products as Discourse Markers (DMs), Modal Markers (MMs), and Pragmatic Markers (PMs) in relation to the layered structures of Japanese syntax, as well as issues of left/right peripheries (LP/RP). It points out that DMs and MMs are categorically parallel, but PMs are not. Further, source lexemes for DMs and MMs show the preferred directionality of positional shifts based on their semantic characters. PMs source items remain within the Core. The function-periphery mappings in Japanese support Beeching & Detges’ (2014) function-periphery asymmetry hypothesis as general tendencies, but also deviate from it as LP and RP are both subjective and intersubjective, reflecting the symmetrical layered structure.
Keywords: Japanese, core, periphery, layered structures, (inter)subjectivity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Source items and their developmental paths: DMs and MMs
    • 2.1Connectives of cause/concession vs. connectives of enumeration
      • 2.1.1Connectives of cause/concession
      • 2.1.2Connectives of enumeration
      • 2.1.3Connectives in functional contrast: Two different pathways
    • 2.2Sino-Japanese nouns vs. formal nouns
      • 2.2.1Sino-Japanese nouns
      • 2.2.2Formal nouns
      • 2.2.3Nouns in functional contrast: Two different pathways
    • 2.3Quotatives/Quotative conditionals
      • 2.3.1Quotatives
      • 2.3.2Quotative conditionals
  • 3.Source Items and their developmental paths: PM
  • 4.Function-Periphery Mapping
  • 5.Implications on Beeching & Detges’ Hypothesis
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 13 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.186.12shi
References (57)
References
Beeching, Kate & Detges, Ulrich (eds). 2014. Discourse Functions at the Left and Right Periphery: Crosslinguistic Investigations of Language Use and Language Change. Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 2010. Discourse markers. In Historical Pragmatics, Andreas H. Jucker & Irma Taavitsinen (eds), 285–314. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Carlier, Anne & De Mulder, Walter. 2010. The emergence of the definite article: ille in competition with ipse in Late Latin. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 241–275. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth. 2014 'So very fast very fast then'. Discourse markers at left and right periphery in spoken French. In Beeching & Detges (eds), 151–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doi, Takeo. 1971. Amae no Koozoo (The anatomy of dependence). Tokyo: Kobundo.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2007. Insubordination and its uses. In Finiteness, Irina Nikolaeva (ed.), 366–431. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fujii, Seiko. 2000. Incipient decategorization of MONO and grammaticalization of speaker attitude in Japanese discourse. In Pragmatic Markers and Propositional Attitude, Gisle Andersen & Thorstein Fretheim (eds), 85–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1999 What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 31(7): 931–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ghezzi, Chiara & Molinelli, Piera. 2014. Italian guarda, prego, dai . Pragmatic markers and the left and right periphery. In Beeching & Detges (eds), 117–150.Google Scholar
Haiman, John. 1978. Conditionals are topics. Language 54: 564–589. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hengeveld, Kees. 2005[1989]. Layers and operators in Functional Grammar. In Crucial Readings in Functional Grammar, Matthew P. Anstey & J. Lachlan Mackenzie (eds), 1–40. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Higashiizumi, Yuko. 2011. Are kara ‘because’-clause causal subordinate clauses in present-day Japanese? In Subordination in Conversation: A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Studies in Language and Social Interaction 24], Ritva Laury & Ryoko Suzuki (eds), 191–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Development of discourse-pragmatic markers in Modern Japanese: A corpus-based study of daro(o) and desho(o) . A paper presented at Discourse-Pragmatic Variation & Change 2, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, April 7–9.
Higashiizumi, Yuko & Onodera, Noriko O. 2013. Cross-linguistic approach to form-function-periphery (LP and RP) mapping: With a special focus on ‘exchange structure’ and ‘action structure’. A paper presented at 13th International Pragmatic Conference, New Delhi, September 8–13.
Higashiizumi, Yuko & Takahashi, Keiko. 2013. “Result, we can say something like that” Usage of sentential-adverb-like nouns in some corpora. The 3rd Corpus Nihongo-gaku Workshop Yokooshuu, 91–96.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 17–36. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ide, Sachiko. 1992. On the notion of wakimae: Toward an integrated framework of Linguistic politeness. Mosaic of Language: Essays in Honour of Professor Natsuko Okuda. Mejiro Linguistic Society (MLS): 298–305.Google Scholar
Izutsu, Katsunobu & Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita. 2013. From discourse markers to modal/final particles: What the position reveals about the continuum. In Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: Categorization and Description [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 234], Liesbeth Degand, Bert Cornillie, & Paola Pietrandrea (eds), 217–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kindaichi, Haruhiko. 1978[1953]. Fuhenka jodooshi no honshitsu: Kyakkanteki hyoogen to shukanteki no betsu ni tsuite’ (The essential nature of the conjugationless auxiliaries: On the distinction between objective and subjective expressions). In Iwanami Kooza Nihongo 3 (Bunpoo I), Shiro Hattori et al. (eds), 207–49. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
Kitano, Hiroaki. 2001. Quotation in Japanese conversational interaction and its implications for the dialogic nature of language. In Cognitive-functional Linguistics in an East Asian Context, Kaoru Horie & Shigeru Sato (eds), 259–178. Tokyo: Kuroshio.Google Scholar
Martin, Samuel. 1975. A Reference Grammar of Japanese. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Matsumura, Akira. 1971. Nihon Bunpoo Daijiten (A comprehensive dictionary of Japanese grammar). Tokyo: Meiji Shoin.Google Scholar
Maynard, Senko K. 2002. Linguistic Emotivity: Centrality of Place, the Topic-Comment Dynamic, and an Ideology of Pathos in Japanese Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 97]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McGloin, Naomi H. & Konishi, Yumiko. 2010. From connective particle to sentence-final particle: A usage-based analysis of shi ‘and’ in Japanese. Language Sciences 32(5): 563–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Minami, Fujio. 1974. Gendai Nihongo no Koozoo (The structure of Modern Japanese). Tokyo: Taishukan Shoten.Google Scholar
Mori, Junko. 1996. Historical change of the Japanese connective datte: Its form and functions. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 5: 201–18.Google Scholar
Moriyama, Takuro. 1997. Udon ni mayoneezu kaketari shite: Heiretu no imi (Like putting mayonnaise on Japanese noodles: The meanings of enumeration). Gengo 26(2): 56–61.Google Scholar
Noda, Harumi. 1997. No (da) no Kinoo (Functions of no (da)). Tokyo: Kurosio Shuppan.Google Scholar
Norrick, Neal R. 2009. Conjunctions in final positions in everyday talk. In Language in Life, and a Life in Language: Jacob Mey – A Festschrift, Bruce Fraser & Ken Turner (eds), 319–328. Bingley: Emerald. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohori, Toshio. 1995. Remarks on suspended clauses: A contribution to Japanese phraseology. In Essays in Semantics and Pragmatics [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 32], Masayoshi Shibatani & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 201–218. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Onodera, Noriko O. 2004. Japanese Discourse Markers: Synchronic and Diachronic Discourse Analysis [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 132]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011. The grammaticalization of discourse markers. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 614–624. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2014. Setting up a mental space: A function of discourse markers at the left periphery (LP) and some observations about LP and RP in Japanese. In Beeching & Detges (eds), 92–116.Google Scholar
Rijkhoff, Jan. 2005. Layers, levels and contexts in Functional Discourse Grammar. In The Noun Phrases in Functional Discourse Grammar, Daniel García Velasco & Jan Rijkhoff (eds), 63–115. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Saegusa, Reiko. 2013. Meishi kara fukushi, setsuzokushi e [From nouns to adverbs, conjunctions]. Hitotsubashi Daigaku Kokusai Kyooiku Sentaa Kiyoo 4: 49–61.Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shinzato, Rumiko. 2006. Subjectivity, intersubjectivity, and grammaticalization. In Emotive Communication in Japanese [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 151], Satoko Suzuki (ed.), 15–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. (Inter)subjectification, Japanese syntax and syntactic scope increase. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8(2): 171–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. From a manner adverb to a discourse particle: The case of yahari, yappari and yappa . Journal of Japanese Linguistics 27: 17–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. From degree/manner adverbs to pragmatic particles in Japanese: A corpus-based approach to the diachronic parallel developments of amari, bakari, and yahari . In Diachronic Corpus Pragmatics, Irma Taavitsainen, Andreas H. Jucker & Jukka Tuominen (eds), 77–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Two types of conditionals and two different grammaticalization paths. In Final Particles, Sylvie Hancil, Alexander Haselow & Margje Post (eds), 157–180. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Shinzato, Rumiko & Suzuki, Satoko. 2007. From quotative conditionals to emotive topic markers: A case of tteba and ttara in Japanese. Japanese/Korean Linguistics 15: 173–183.Google Scholar
Suzuki, Ryoko, 1998. From a lexical noun to an utterance-final pragmatic particle: wake . In Studies in Japanese Grammaticalization, Toshio Ohori (ed.), 67–92. Tokyo: Kurosio.Google Scholar
. 2006. How does ‘reason’ become less and less reasonable? In Emotive Communication in Japanese [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 151], Satoko Suzuki (ed.), 35–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. (Inter)subjectification in the quotative tte in Japanese conversation. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 8(2): 207–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, Satoko. 1998. Pejorative connotation: A case of Japanese. In Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 57], Andreas H. Jucker & Yael Ziv (eds), 265–276. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Surprise and animosity: The use of the copula da in quotative sentences in Japanese. In Pragmatic Markers and Propositional Attitude [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 79], Gisle Andersen & Thorstein Fretheim (eds), 239–253. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Expressivity of vagueness: Alienation in the verb-tari suru construction. Japanese Language and Literature 42(1): 157–169.Google Scholar
Takubo, Yukinori. 1987. Toogo koozoo to bunmyaku joohoo. Nihongogaku 6(5): 37–48.Google Scholar
. 2011. Japanese expression of temporal identity: Aspectual and counterfactual interpretation of tokoro-da . Japanese/Korean Linguistics 18: 392–409.Google Scholar
Tamura, Hiroshi & Kitazawa, Takashi. 2011. Teinei hyoogen ‘~masu desu’ no hensen ni tsuite: Kokkai kaigiroku 63 nenkan no kiroku kara (History of Japanese polite expression “masu-desu” of 63 year session records in the Diet). Tokyo Gakugei Daigaku Kiyoo 62: 1–12.Google Scholar
Tanabe, Kazuko. 2008. ‘toiuka’ no bunpooka ni tomonau oninteki henka no ichi koosatsu: Shukuyakukei ‘teka’ ‘tsuka’ o megutte (An analysis of phonological changes accompanying the grammaticalization of ‘teiuka’: A case of contracted forms, ‘teka’ and ‘tsuka’). Meikai Nihongo 13: 55–63.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. From subjectification to intersubjectification. In Motives for Language Change, Raymond Hickey (ed.), 124–139. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 29–71. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. On the function of the epistemic adverbs surely and no doubt at the left and right peripheries of the clause. In Beeching & Detges (eds), 72–91.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Wälchli, Bernhard. 2005. Co-Compounds and Natural Coordination. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar