Chapter published in:
Space in Diachrony
Edited by Silvia Luraghi, Tatiana Nikitina and Chiara Zanchi
[Studies in Language Companion Series 188] 2017
► pp. 119146
References

References

Aristar, Anthony Rodriguez
1997Marking and hierarchy: Types and grammaticalization of case markers. Studies in Language 21(2): 313–368.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bossong, Georg
1985Differentielle Objektmarkierung in den Neuiranischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Chantraine, Pierre
1953Grammaire homérique, Tome 2: Syntaxe. Paris: Klinksiek.Google Scholar
2013Grammaire homérique, Tome 1: Phonologie et Morphologie. Paris: Klinksiek.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1986Markedness, grammar, people, and the world. In Markedness, Edith A. Moravcsik & Jessica Wirth (eds), 85–106. New York NY: Plenum Press.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cuyckens, Hubert
1993Spatial prepositions in French revisited. Cognitive Linguistics 4(3): 291–310.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hackstein, Olav
2010The Greek of Epic. In A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language, Egbert J. Bakker (ed), 401–423. Chichester: Wiley.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2001Non-canonical marking of core arguments in European languages. In Non-canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language 46], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Robert M. W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds), 53–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hoop de, Helen & de Swart, Peter
(eds) 2008Differential Subject Marking. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Iemmolo, Giorgio
2010Topicality and differential object marking: Evidence from Romance and beyond. Studies in Language 34(2): 239–272.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iemmolo, Giorgio & Klumpp, Gerson
2014Introduction to the special issue differential object marking: Theoretical and empirical issues. Linguistics 52(2): 271–279.Google Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo
2008Animacy effects on differential goal marking. Linguistic Typology 12(2): 245–268.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014The markedness of direction: The (allative and illative) case(s) of Finnish. In Perspectives on Semantic Roles [Typological Studies in Language 106], Silvia Luraghi & Heiko Narrog (eds), 151–179. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kittilä, Seppo & Ylikoski, Jussi
2011Remarks on the coding of direction, recipient and vicinal direction in European Uralic. In Case, Animacy and Semantic Roles [Typological Studies in Language 99], Seppo Kittilä, Katja Västi & Jussi Ylikoski (eds), 29–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kopecka, Anetta & Narasimhan, Bhuvana
2012Events of Putting and Taking. A Crosslinguistic Perspective [Typological Studies in Language 100]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kornfilt, Jaklin
1997Turkish. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Liddell & Scott
2009 = The Online Liddell-Scott-Jones Greek-English Lexicon. 〈http://​stephanus​.tlg​.uci​.edu​/lsj/Google Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia
1986On the distribution of instrumental and agent markers for human and non-human agents of passive verbs in some Indo-European languages. Indogermanische Forschungen 91: 48–66.Google Scholar
1989Cause and Instrument expressions in Classical Greek. Mnemosyne 43: 294–308.Google Scholar
1997Hittite. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
2003On the Meaning of Prepositions and Cases. The Expression of Semantic Roles in Ancient Greek [Studies in Language Companion Series 67]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010Where do beneficiaries come from and how do they come about? In Historical Cognitive Linguistics, Margaret E. Winters, Heli Tissari, & Kathryn Allan (eds), 93–131. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Human landmarks in spatial expressions: From Latin to Romance. In Case, Animacy and Semantic Roles [Typological Studies in Language 99], Seppo Kittilä, Katja Västi & Jussi Ylikoski (eds), 209–234. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Luraghi, Silvia & Huumo, Tuomas.
2014Introduction. In Partitive Cases and Related Categories, Silvia Luraghi & Huumo Tuomas (eds), 1–13. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Malchukov, Andrej
2008Animacy and asymmetries in differential case marking. Lingua 118: 203–221.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nikitina, Tatiana & Maslov, Boris
2013Redefining constructio praegnans: On the variation between allative and locative expressions in Ancient Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics 13: 105–142.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sands, Kristina & Campbell, Lyle
2001Non-canonical subjects and objects in finnish. In Non-canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language 46], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Robert M. W. Dixon & Masayuki Onishi (eds), 251–305. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stolz, Thomas, Lestrade, Sander & Stolz, Christel
2014The Crosslinguistics of Zero-Marking of Spatial Relations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard
2000Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Tribulato, Olga
2010Literary dialects. In A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language, Egbert J. Bakker (ed), 388–400. Chichester: Wiley.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Haspelmath, Martin
2019. Differential place marking and differential object marking . STUF - Language Typology and Universals 72:3  pp. 313 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.