References
Altenberg, Bengt
1998On the phraseology of spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word combination. In Phraseology, Anthony P. Cowie (ed.), 101–122. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Balash, Sonia
2008Construction of poner(se) ADJ: 17th-19th century. Final project for graduate seminar Frequency of Use and Emergent Grammar, Professor Bybee, UNM, Spring 2008.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna
2008Productivity: Evidence from Case and Argument Structure in Icelandic [Constructional Approaches to Language 8]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Butler, Christopher
1998Collocational frameworks in Spanish. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 3: 1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan
2006From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82: 711–733. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Eddington, David
2006A usage-based approach to Spanish verbs of “becoming.” Language 82: 323–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, Joan & Torres Cacoullos, Rena
2008Phonological and grammatical variation in exemplar models. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 1: 399–413. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009The role of prefabs in grammaticization: How the particular and the general interact in language change. In Formulaic Language, Vol. 1: Distribution and Historical Change [Typological Studies in Language 82], Roberta Corrigan, Edith A. Moravcsik, Hamid Ouali & Kathleen M. Wheatly, 187–217. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coste, Jean & Redondo, Augustín
1965Syntaxe de l’espagnol moderne. Paris: Société d’Edition d’Enseignement Superieur.Google Scholar
Crespo, Luis A.
1949To become. Hispania 32: 210–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davies, Mark
2002Corpus del Español: 100 Million Words, 1200s-1900s. [URL]
Delbecque, Nicole & Van Gorp, Lise
2015The pseudo-copular use of the Spanish verbs hacerse and volverse: Two types of change. CogniTextes 13. [URL]
2012Hacerse y volverse como nexo pseudo-copulativo: Dos maneras de concebir el cambio en español. Bulletin Hispanique 114: 279–307.Google Scholar
Eberenz, Rolf
1985Aproximación estructural a los verbos de cambio en Iberorromance. In Linguistique comparée et typologie des langues romanes, 461–475. Aix en Provence: Université de Provence.Google Scholar
Eddington, David
1999On “becoming” in Spanish: A corpus analysis of verbs expressing a change of state. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18: 23–46.Google Scholar
2002Disambiguating Spanish change of state verbs. Hispania 85: 921–929. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004Spanish Phonology and Morphology: Experimental and Quantitative Perspectives [Studies in Functional and Structural Linguistics 53]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Erman, Britt & Warren, Beatrice
2000The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text 20: 29–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fente, Rafael
1970Sobre los verbos de cambio o “devenir”. Filología Moderna 38:157–172.Google Scholar
Glynn, Dylan
2010Corpus-driven cognitive semantics: Introduction to the field. In Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics Corpus-driven Approaches, Kerstin Fischer & Dylan Glynn (eds), 1–41. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Israel, Michael
1996The way constructions grow. In Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language, Adele Goldberg (ed.), 217–231. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George
1987Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald
1987Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, M. Lynn
2003Semantic Relations and the Lexicon. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Antonyms as lexical constructions: or, why paradigmatic construction is not an oxymoron. Constructions SV1. [URL]
O’Neill, John
1999Electronic Texts and Concordances of the Madison Corpus of Early Spanish Manuscripts and Printings. Madison, WI: Hispanic Seminary of Medieval Studies, Lt.Google Scholar
Renouf, Antoinette & Sinclair, John
1991Collocational frameworks in English. In English Corpus Linguistics: Studies in Honour of Jan Svartvik, Karin Aijmer & Bengt Altenberg (eds), 128–143. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg
2010Does frequency in text instantiate entrenchment in the cognitive system? In Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics Corpus-driven Approaches, Kerstin Fischer & Dylan Glynn (eds), 101–133. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015A blueprint of the Entrenchment-and-Conventionalization Model. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association 3: 3–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sinclair, John
1991Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme
2013Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Gorp, Lise
2012Ponerse como pseudo-cópula: una manera específica de concebir el cambio en español. Actas del XL Simposio Internacional y III Congreso de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística, Feb. 2011, 395–401. Madrid.Google Scholar
2015Pseudo-copular use of the Spanish verbs ponerse and quedarse: two types of change. CogniTextes 13. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Wedel, Andrew B.
2006Exemplar models, evolution and language change. The Linguistic Review 23: 247–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Damián V.
2009From “remaining” to “becoming” in Spanish: The role of prefabs in the development of the construction quedar(se) + ADJECTIVE. In Formulaic Language, Vol. 1: Distribution and Historical Change [Typological Studies in Language 82], Roberta Corrigan, Moravcsik, Edith A., Hamid Ouali & Kathleen M. Wheatly (eds), 273–295. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Damián Vergara
2014Categorization and Constructional Change in Spanish Expressions of “Becoming.” Leiden: Brill. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zeschel, Arne
2010Exemplars and analogy: Semantic extension in constructional networks. In Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics Corpus-driven Approaches, Kerstin Fischer & Dylan Glynn (eds), 201–219. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar