Chapter published in:
Changing Structures: Studies in constructions and complementation
Edited by Mark Kaunisto, Mikko Höglund and Paul Rickman
[Studies in Language Companion Series 195] 2018
► pp. 109128
Bach, Emmon
1979Control in Montague grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 515–531.Google Scholar
1980In defense of passive. Linguistics and Philosophy 3: 297–341. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Davies, William D. & Dubinsky, Stanley
2004The Grammar of Raising and Control: A Course in Syntactic Argumentation. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duffley, Patrick J.
2000Gerund versus infinitive as complement of transitive verbs in English: The problems of “tense” and “control”. Journal of English Linguistics 28(3): 221–248. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fanego, Teresa
2007Drift and the development of sentential complements in British and American English from 1700 to the present day. In ‘Of Varying Language and Opposing Creed’: New Insights into Late Modern English [Linguistic Insights Series 28], Javier Pérez-Guerra, Dolores González-Álvarez, Jorge L. Bueno-Alonso & Esperanza Rama-Martínez (eds), 161–235. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1991Introduction to Government and Binding Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey K.
2002The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary Online
. September 2013 Oxford: OUP. http://​www​.oed​.comGoogle Scholar
Poutsma, H. MS.
Dictionary of Constructions of Verbs, Adjectives and Nouns.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik
, Jan 1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1986Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 501–557.Google Scholar
Rohdenburg, Günter
2006The role of functional constraints in the evolution of the English complementation system. In Syntax, style and grammatical norms, Christiane Dalton-Puffer, Dieter Kastovsky, Nikolaus Ritt & Herbert Schendl (eds), 143–166. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Rudanko, Juhani
1989Complementation and Case Grammar: A Syntactic and Semantic Study of Selected Patterns of Complementation in Present-Day English. Albany NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
2012Exploring aspects of the Great Complement Shift, with evidence from the TIME Corpus and COCA. In The Oxford Handbook of the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds), 222–232. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Saarimäki, Veera
2014The Complementation of the Verb Propose in Recent British English. MA thesis. https://​tampub​.uta​.fi​/handle​/10024​/96656
Somers, Harold L.
1984The validity of the complement-adjunct distinction in valency grammar. Linguistics 22: 507–530. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Visser, F. Th.
1973An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Part Three, Second Half: Syntactical Units with Two and with More Verbs. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
Vosberg, Uwe
2003The role of extractions and horror aequi in the evolution of ‑ing complements in Modern English. In Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English [Topics in English Linguistics 43], Günter Rohdenburg & Britta Mondorf (eds), 305–327. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009Non-finite complements. In , One Language Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds), 212–227. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar