Cover not available
Part of
Non-Canonically Case-Marked Subjects: The Reykjavík-Eyjafjallajökull papers
Edited by Jóhanna Barðdal, Na'ama Pat-El and Stephen Mark Carey
[Studies in Language Companion Series 200] 2018
► pp. 257–274

Chapter 11
What is a subject

The nature and validity of subject tests

| Ghent University
| University of Iceland
Published online: 2 November 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.200.11bar
References (77)
References
Allen, Cynthia L. 1986. Reconsidering the history of like. Journal of Linguistics 22: 375–409.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1995. Case Marking and Reanalysis: Grammatical Relations from Old to Early Modern English. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Andrews, Avery. 1976. The VP complement analysis in Modern Icelandic. North Eastern Linguistic Society 6: 1–21.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2000. The subject is nominative! On obsolete axioms and their deep-rootedness. In 17th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Carl-Erik Lindberg & Steffen Nordahl Lund (eds), 93–117. Odense: Institute of Language and Communication.Google Scholar
. 2001. The perplexity of Dat-Nom verbs in Icelandic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 24: 47–70.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Construction-specific properties of syntactic subjects in Icelandic and German. Cognitive Linguistics 17(1): 39–106.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Eythórsson, Thórhallur. 2003. The change that never happened: The story of oblique subjects. Journal of Linguistics 39(3): 439–472.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Control infinitives and case in Germanic: ‘Performance error’ or marginally acceptable constructions. In Case, Valency and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 77], Leonid Kulikov, Andrej L. Malchukov & Peter de Swart (eds), 147–177. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. The origin of the oblique subject construction: An Indo-European comparison. In Grammatical Change in Indo-European Languages [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 305], Vit Bubenik, John Hewson & Sarah Rose (eds), 179–193. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. ‘Hungering and lusting for women and fleshly delicacies’: Reconstructing grammatical relations for Proto-Germanic. Transactions of the Philological Society 110(3): 363–393.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Eythórsson, Thórhallur & Dewey, Tonya Kim. 2014. Alternating predicates in Icelandic and German: A sign-based construction grammar account. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 93: 50–101.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Smitherman, Thomas. 2013. The quest for cognates: A reconstruction of oblique subject constructions in Proto-Indo-European. Language Dynamics and Change 3(1): 28–67.Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef. 2004. Non-nominative subjects in comparison. In Non-nominative Subjects, Vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 19], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 31–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Benedetti, Marina. 2013a. Non-canonical subjects in clauses with noun predicates. In Argument Structure in Flux: The Naples–Capri Papers [Studies in Language Companion Series 131], Elly van Gelderen, Michela Cennamo & Jóhanna Barðdal (eds), 15–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013b. Experiencers and psychological noun predicates: From Latin to Italian. In The Diachronic Typology of Non-canonical Subjects [Studies in Language Companion Series 140], Ilja A. Seržant & Leonid Kulikov (eds), 121–138. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 2004. The syntax of experiencers in the Himalayas. In Non-nominative Subjects, Vol. I [Typologial Studies in Language 60], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 77–111. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bjarnadóttir, Valgerður. 2014. Dialectal and diachronic distribution of case variation in Lithuanian pain-verb constructions. Baltic Linguistics 5: 9–57.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter, Harbert, Wayne, Hermon, Gabriella & Sridhar, S. N. 1980. The acquisition of subjecthood. Language 56: 719–743.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1973. The ergative: Variations on a theme. Lingua 32: 239–253.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conti, Luz. 2008. Synchronie und Diachronie des altgriechischen Genitivs als Semisubjekt. Historische Sprachforschung 121: 94–113.Google Scholar
. 2009. Weiteres zum Genitiv als Semisubjekt im Altgriechischen: Analyse des Kasus bei impersonalen Konstruktionen. Historische Sprachforschung 122: 182–207.Google Scholar
Conti, Luz & Luraghi, Silvia. 2014. The Ancient Greek partitive genitive in typological perspective. In Partitive Cases and Related Categories, Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds), 443–476. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 1998. Event structure in argument linking. In The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds), 1–43. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
. 2012. Verbs: Aspect and Clausal Structure. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Eystein. 2014. On the semantics and syntax of the Latin ‘double dative’ construction. In Das Nomen im Indogermanischen: Morphologie, Substantiv versus Adjektiv, Kollektivum, Norbert Oettinger & Thomas Steer (eds), 32–50. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur & Barðdal, Jóhanna. 2005. Oblique subjects: A common Germanic inheritance. Language 81(4): 824–881.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje. 1990. Syntactic Change: Toward a Theory of Historical Syntax. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1992. The subject as a thematic category in the history of Scandinavian. Folia Linguistica 26: 151–170.Google Scholar
. 2001. The notion of oblique subject and its status in the history of Icelandic. In Grammatical Relations in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 56], Jan Terje Faarlund (ed.), 99–135. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert. 2002. Quirky subjects and other specifiers. In More than Words: A Festschrift for Dieter Wunderlich, Ingrid Kaufmann & Barbara Stiebels (eds), 227–250. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Farrell, Patrick. 2005. Grammatical Relations. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara. 2009. The “behavior-before-coding-principle”: Further evidence from Latin. Archivio Glottologico Italiano XCIV: 156–184.Google Scholar
Fischer, Susann. 2010. Word-Order Change as a Source of Grammaticalisation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 157]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grillborzer, Christine. 2014. Sintaksis konstrukcij s pervym datel’nym aktantom – Sinchronnyj i diachronnyj analiz. PhD dissertation, Regensburg University.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert. 2005. How to turn German into Icelandic – and derive the OV–VO contrast. Journal of Comparative Germanic Syntax 8: 1–53.Google Scholar
. 2010. The Syntax of German. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2001. Non-canonical marking of core arguments in European Languages. In Non-Canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language 46], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Robert M. W. Dixon & Masayoki Onishi (eds), 53–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Caruana, Sandro. 2000. Subject diffuseness in Maltese: On some subject properties of experiential verbs. Folia Linguistica 24(3–4): 245–265.Google Scholar
Hermon, Gabriella. 1985. Syntactic Modularity. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans H. 1990. Oblique subjects in Sanskrit? In Verma & Mohanan (eds). 119–139.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich & Bashir, Elena. 2016. The Languages and Linguistics of South Asia: A Comprehensive Guide. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Holvoet, Axel. 2013. Obliqueness, quasi-subjects and transitivity in Baltic and Slavonic. In The Diachronic Typology of Non-Canonical Subjects [Studies in Language Companion Series 140], Ilja A. Seržant & Leonid Kulikov (eds), 257–282. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Argument marking in Baltic and Slavonic pain-verb constructions. Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 3], Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau (eds), 83–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1927. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Vol. 3. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 1996. Clausal Architecture and Case in Icelandic. PhD disseration, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. 1976. Towards a universal definition of subject. In Li (ed.), 303–333.Google Scholar
Klaiman, Miriam H. 1980. Bengali dative subjects. Lingua 51(4): 275–295.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kristoffersen, Kristian E. 1991. Kasus, semantiske roller og grammatiske funksjonar i norrønt (Case, semantic roles and grammatical functions in Old Norse). MA thesis, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
1994. Passiv i norrønt og nyislansk – ei samanlikning (The passive in Old Norse-Icelandic and Modern Icelandic – A comparison). Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 12: 43–69.Google Scholar
1996. Infinitival Phrases in Old Norse: Aspects of their Syntax and Semantics. PhD dissertation, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2009. The Locative Syntax of Experiencers. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. (ed.). 1976. Subject and Topic. New York NY: Academic press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David W. 1979. Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Masica, Colin P. 1976. Defining a Linguistic Area: South Asia. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mathieu, Eric. 2006. Quirky subjects in Old French. Studia Linguistica 60(3): 282–312.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, John & Perlmutter, David M. 2000. What does it take to be a dative subject? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 373–416.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mørck, Endre. 1992. Subjektets kasus i norrønt og mellomnorsk (The case of the subject in Old Norse-Icelandic and Middle Norwegian). Arkiv för Nordisk Filologi 107: 53–99.Google Scholar
. 1994. The distribution of subject properties and the acquisition of subjecthood in the West Scandinavian languages. In Language Change and Language Structure: Older Germanic Languages in a Comparative Perspective, Toril Swan, Endre Mørck & Olaf J. Westwik (eds), 159–194. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rákosi, György. 2006. Dative Experiencer Predicates in Hungarian. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Reis, Marga. 1982. Zum Subjektbegriff im Deutschen. In Satzglieder im Deutschen. Vorschläge zur syntaktischen, semantischen und pragmatischen Fundierung, Werner Abraham (ed.), 171–211. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Rivero, Maria-Luisa. 2004. Quirky subjects, person restrictions, and the Person-Case Constraint. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 494–502.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur. 1991. Quirky subjects in Old Icelandic. In Papers from the Twelfth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson (ed.), 369–387. Reykjavík: Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland.Google Scholar
. 1995. Old Icelandic: A non-configurational language? NOWELE: North-Western European Language Evolution 26: 3–29.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Frumlag og fall að fornu (Subject and case in Old Icelandic). Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði 18: 37–69.Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 1978. Subjekt und Ergativ: Zur pragmatischen Grundlage primärer grammatischer Relationen. Folia Linguistica 12: 219–252.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Seržant, Ilja. 2013. The diachronic typology of non-canonical subjects. In The Diachronic Typology of Non-Canonical Subjects [Studies in Language Companion Series 140], Ilja A. Seržant & Leonid Kulikov (eds), 313–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1999. Dative subject constructions twenty-two years later. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 29(2): 45–76.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann. 1989. Verbal Syntax and Case in Icelandic. PhD dissertation, Lund University.Google Scholar
. 1990–91. Beygingarsamræmi (Agreement). Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði 12–13: 31–77.Google Scholar
. 2004. Icelandic non-nominative subjects: Facts and implications. In Non-nominative Subjects, Vol. 2 [Typological Studies in Language 61], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 137–159. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Steever, Sanford B. (ed.) 1998. The Dravidian Languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas. 1996. L’ergativité en tibétain moderne: Approche morphosyntaxique de la langue parlée. Paris-Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1979. On Complementation in Icelandic. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Verma, Mahendra K. & Mohanan, Karravanur Puthanvettil (eds). 1990. Experiencer Subjects in South Asian Languages. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter. 2008. The force of lexical case: German and Icelandic compared. In The Nature of the Word: Essays in Honor of Paul Kiparsky, Kristin Hanson & Sharon Inkelas (eds), 587–620. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoon, James H. 2004. Non-nominative (major) subjects and case stacking in Korean. In Non-Nominative Subjects, Vol. 2 [Typological Studies in Language 19], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 265–314. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zaenen, Annie, Maling, Joan & Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1985. Case and grammatical functions: The Icelandic passive. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 441–483.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (10)

Cited by ten other publications

Rezac, Milan
2024. The rise and fall of a person-case constraint in Breton. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 42:3 ► pp. 1233 ff. DOI logo
Rodríguez Guerra, Alexandre
2023. Prototipicidade, marcaxe prepositiva e suxeito no galego medieval. Revista Galega de Filoloxía 24 DOI logo
Halevy, Rivka
2022. What makes the dative-experiencer construction in Modern Hebrew different from its counterparts in European languages?. STUF - Language Typology and Universals 75:3 ► pp. 379 ff. DOI logo
Martín, Juan
2022. Spanish preverbal subjects and the cartography of the Spanish left periphery. Lingua 270 ► pp. 103197 ff. DOI logo
Heltoft, Lars
2021. From indexical to symbolic case in Danish – a content analysis. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 53:2 ► pp. 160 ff. DOI logo
Heltoft, Lars
2021. The typology of Old Norse revisited. NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution 74:2 ► pp. 242 ff. DOI logo
Ilioaia, Mihaela & Marleen Van Peteghem
2021. Dative experiencers with nominal predicates in Romanian: a synchronic and diachronic study. Folia Linguistica 55:s42-s2 ► pp. 255 ff. DOI logo
Barđdal, Jóhanna, Leonid Kulikov, Roland Pooth & Peter Alexander Kerkhof
2020. Oblique anticausatives: A morphosyntactic isogloss in Indo-European. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 56:3 ► pp. 413 ff. DOI logo
Benedetti, Marina & Chiara Gianollo
2020. Criteria for subjecthood and non-canonical subjects in Classical Greek. In Historical Linguistics 2017 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 350], ► pp. 30 ff. DOI logo
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Thórhallur Eythórsson & Tonya Kim Dewey
2019. The alternating predicate puzzle. Constructions and Frames 11:1 ► pp. 107 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 26 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.