Chapter published in:
Non-Canonically Case-Marked Subjects: The Reykjavík-Eyjafjallajökull papers
Edited by Jóhanna Barðdal, Na'ama Pat-El and Stephen Mark Carey
[Studies in Language Companion Series 200] 2018
► pp. 257274
References

References

Allen, Cynthia L.
1986Reconsidering the history of like. Journal of Linguistics 22: 375–409.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1995Case Marking and Reanalysis: Grammatical Relations from Old to Early Modern English. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Andrews, Avery
1976The VP complement analysis in Modern Icelandic. North Eastern Linguistic Society 6: 1–21.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna
2000The subject is nominative! On obsolete axioms and their deep-rootedness. In 17th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Carl-Erik Lindberg & Steffen Nordahl Lund (eds), 93–117. Odense: Institute of Language and Communication.Google Scholar
2001The perplexity of Dat-Nom verbs in Icelandic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 24: 47–70.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Construction-specific properties of syntactic subjects in Icelandic and German. Cognitive Linguistics 17(1): 39–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Eythórsson, Thórhallur
2003The change that never happened: The story of oblique subjects. Journal of Linguistics 39(3): 439–472.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Control infinitives and case in Germanic: ‘Performance error’ or marginally acceptable constructions. In Case, Valency and Transitivity [Studies in Language Companion Series 77], Leonid Kulikov, Andrej L. Malchukov & Peter de Swart (eds), 147–177. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009The origin of the oblique subject construction: An Indo-European comparison. In Grammatical Change in Indo-European Languages [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 305], Vit Bubenik, John Hewson & Sarah Rose (eds), 179–193. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012‘Hungering and lusting for women and fleshly delicacies’: Reconstructing grammatical relations for Proto-Germanic. Transactions of the Philological Society 110(3): 363–393.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Eythórsson, Thórhallur & Dewey, Tonya Kim
2014Alternating predicates in Icelandic and German: A sign-based construction grammar account. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 93: 50–101.Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna & Smitherman, Thomas
2013The quest for cognates: A reconstruction of oblique subject constructions in Proto-Indo-European. Language Dynamics and Change 3(1): 28–67.Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef
2004Non-nominative subjects in comparison. In Non-nominative Subjects, Vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 19], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 31–58. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benedetti, Marina
2013aNon-canonical subjects in clauses with noun predicates. In Argument Structure in Flux: The Naples–Capri Papers [Studies in Language Companion Series 131], Elly van Gelderen, Michela Cennamo & Jóhanna Barðdal (eds), 15–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013bExperiencers and psychological noun predicates: From Latin to Italian. In The Diachronic Typology of Non-canonical Subjects [Studies in Language Companion Series 140], Ilja A. Seržant & Leonid Kulikov (eds), 121–138. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar
2004The syntax of experiencers in the Himalayas. In Non-nominative Subjects, Vol. I [Typologial Studies in Language 60], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 77–111. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bjarnadóttir, Valgerður
2014Dialectal and diachronic distribution of case variation in Lithuanian pain-verb constructions. Baltic Linguistics 5: 9–57.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter, Harbert, Wayne, Hermon, Gabriella & Sridhar, S. N.
1980The acquisition of subjecthood. Language 56: 719–743.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1973The ergative: Variations on a theme. Lingua 32: 239–253.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Conti, Luz
2008Synchronie und Diachronie des altgriechischen Genitivs als Semisubjekt. Historische Sprachforschung 121: 94–113.Google Scholar
2009Weiteres zum Genitiv als Semisubjekt im Altgriechischen: Analyse des Kasus bei impersonalen Konstruktionen. Historische Sprachforschung 122: 182–207.Google Scholar
Conti, Luz & Luraghi, Silvia
2014The Ancient Greek partitive genitive in typological perspective. In Partitive Cases and Related Categories, Silvia Luraghi & Tuomas Huumo (eds), 443–476. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Croft, William
1998Event structure in argument linking. In The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds), 1–43. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2012Verbs: Aspect and Clausal Structure. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Eystein
2014On the semantics and syntax of the Latin ‘double dative’ construction. In Das Nomen im Indogermanischen: Morphologie, Substantiv versus Adjektiv, Kollektivum, Norbert Oettinger & Thomas Steer (eds), 32–50. Wiesbaden: Reichert.Google Scholar
Eythórsson, Thórhallur & Barðdal, Jóhanna
2005Oblique subjects: A common Germanic inheritance. Language 81(4): 824–881.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje
1990Syntactic Change: Toward a Theory of Historical Syntax. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1992The subject as a thematic category in the history of Scandinavian. Folia Linguistica 26: 151–170.Google Scholar
2001The notion of oblique subject and its status in the history of Icelandic. In Grammatical Relations in Change [Studies in Language Companion Series 56], Jan Terje Faarlund (ed.), 99–135. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert
2002Quirky subjects and other specifiers. In More than Words: A Festschrift for Dieter Wunderlich, Ingrid Kaufmann & Barbara Stiebels (eds), 227–250. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Farrell, Patrick
2005Grammatical Relations. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fedriani, Chiara
2009The “behavior-before-coding-principle”: Further evidence from Latin. Archivio Glottologico Italiano XCIV: 156–184.Google Scholar
Fischer, Susann
2010Word-Order Change as a Source of Grammaticalisation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 157]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grillborzer, Christine
2014Sintaksis konstrukcij s pervym datel’nym aktantom – Sinchronnyj i diachronnyj analiz. PhD dissertation, Regensburg University.Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert
2005How to turn German into Icelandic – and derive the OV–VO contrast. Journal of Comparative Germanic Syntax 8: 1–53.Google Scholar
2010The Syntax of German. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
2001Non-canonical marking of core arguments in European Languages. In Non-Canonical Marking of Subjects and Objects [Typological Studies in Language 46], Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, Robert M. W. Dixon & Masayoki Onishi (eds), 53–83. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin & Caruana, Sandro
2000Subject diffuseness in Maltese: On some subject properties of experiential verbs. Folia Linguistica 24(3–4): 245–265.Google Scholar
Hermon, Gabriella
1985Syntactic Modularity. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans H.
1990Oblique subjects in Sanskrit? In Verma & Mohanan (eds). 119–139.Google Scholar
Hock, Hans Henrich & Bashir, Elena
2016The Languages and Linguistics of South Asia: A Comprehensive Guide. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Holvoet, Axel
2013Obliqueness, quasi-subjects and transitivity in Baltic and Slavonic. In The Diachronic Typology of Non-Canonical Subjects [Studies in Language Companion Series 140], Ilja A. Seržant & Leonid Kulikov (eds), 257–282. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Argument marking in Baltic and Slavonic pain-verb constructions. Argument Realization in Baltic [Valency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 3], Axel Holvoet & Nicole Nau (eds), 83–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, Otto
1927A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Vol. 3. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli
1996Clausal Architecture and Case in Icelandic. PhD disseration, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L.
1976Towards a universal definition of subject. In Li (ed.), 303–333.Google Scholar
Klaiman, Miriam H.
1980Bengali dative subjects. Lingua 51(4): 275–295.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kristoffersen, Kristian E.
1991Kasus, semantiske roller og grammatiske funksjonar i norrønt (Case, semantic roles and grammatical functions in Old Norse). MA thesis, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
1994Passiv i norrønt og nyislansk – ei samanlikning (The passive in Old Norse-Icelandic and Modern Icelandic – A comparison). Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 12: 43–69.Google Scholar
1996Infinitival Phrases in Old Norse: Aspects of their Syntax and Semantics. PhD dissertation, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan
2009The Locative Syntax of Experiencers. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N.
(ed.) 1976Subject and Topic. New York NY: Academic press.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David W.
1979Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Masica, Colin P.
1976Defining a Linguistic Area: South Asia. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mathieu, Eric
2006Quirky subjects in Old French. Studia Linguistica 60(3): 282–312.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moore, John & Perlmutter, David M.
2000What does it take to be a dative subject? Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18: 373–416.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mørck, Endre
1992Subjektets kasus i norrønt og mellomnorsk (The case of the subject in Old Norse-Icelandic and Middle Norwegian). Arkiv för Nordisk Filologi 107: 53–99.Google Scholar
1994The distribution of subject properties and the acquisition of subjecthood in the West Scandinavian languages. In Language Change and Language Structure: Older Germanic Languages in a Comparative Perspective, Toril Swan, Endre Mørck & Olaf J. Westwik (eds), 159–194. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rákosi, György
2006Dative Experiencer Predicates in Hungarian. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Reis, Marga
1982Zum Subjektbegriff im Deutschen. In Satzglieder im Deutschen. Vorschläge zur syntaktischen, semantischen und pragmatischen Fundierung, Werner Abraham (ed.), 171–211. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Rivero, Maria-Luisa
2004Quirky subjects, person restrictions, and the Person-Case Constraint. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 494–502.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Eiríkur
1991Quirky subjects in Old Icelandic. In Papers from the Twelfth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson (ed.), 369–387. Reykjavík: Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland.Google Scholar
1995Old Icelandic: A non-configurational language? NOWELE: North-Western European Language Evolution 26: 3–29.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1996Frumlag og fall að fornu (Subject and case in Old Icelandic). Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði 18: 37–69.Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen
1978Subjekt und Ergativ: Zur pragmatischen Grundlage primärer grammatischer Relationen. Folia Linguistica 12: 219–252.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seržant, Ilja
2013The diachronic typology of non-canonical subjects. In The Diachronic Typology of Non-Canonical Subjects [Studies in Language Companion Series 140], Ilja A. Seržant & Leonid Kulikov (eds), 313–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi
1999Dative subject constructions twenty-two years later. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 29(2): 45–76.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann
1989Verbal Syntax and Case in Icelandic. PhD dissertation, Lund University.Google Scholar
1990–91Beygingarsamræmi (Agreement). Íslenskt mál og almenn málfræði 12–13: 31–77.Google Scholar
2004Icelandic non-nominative subjects: Facts and implications. In Non-nominative Subjects, Vol. 2 [Typological Studies in Language 61], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 137–159. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Steever, Sanford B.
(ed.) 1998The Dravidian Languages. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tournadre, Nicolas
1996L’ergativité en tibétain moderne: Approche morphosyntaxique de la langue parlée. Paris-Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur
1979On Complementation in Icelandic. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Verma, Mahendra K. & Mohanan, Karravanur Puthanvettil
(eds) 1990Experiencer Subjects in South Asian Languages. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter
2008The force of lexical case: German and Icelandic compared. In The Nature of the Word: Essays in Honor of Paul Kiparsky, Kristin Hanson & Sharon Inkelas (eds), 587–620. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yoon, James H.
2004Non-nominative (major) subjects and case stacking in Korean. In Non-Nominative Subjects, Vol. 2 [Typological Studies in Language 19], Peri Bhaskararao & Karumuri Venkata Subbarao (eds), 265–314. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zaenen, Annie, Maling, Joan & Thráinsson, Höskuldur
1985Case and grammatical functions: The Icelandic passive. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3: 441–483.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Barðdal, Jóhanna, Thórhallur Eythórsson & Tonya Kim Dewey
2019. The alternating predicate puzzle. Constructions and Frames 11:1  pp. 107 ff. Crossref logo
Barđdal, Jóhanna, Leonid Kulikov, Roland Pooth & Peter Alexander Kerkhof
2020. Oblique anticausatives: A morphosyntactic isogloss in Indo-European. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 56:3  pp. 413 ff. Crossref logo
Benedetti, Marina & Chiara Gianollo
2020.  In Historical Linguistics 2017 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 350],  pp. 30 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.