1016887 03 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 JB code SLCS 206 Eb 15 9789027263001 06 10.1075/slcs.206 13 2019000276 00 EA E107 10 01 JB code SLCS 02 0165-7763 02 206.00 01 02 Studies in Language Companion Series Studies in Language Companion Series 11 01 JB code jbe-all 01 02 Full EBA collection (ca. 4,200 titles) 11 01 JB code jbe-eba-2023 01 02 Compact EBA Collection 2023 (ca. 700 titles, starting 2018) 11 01 JB code jbe-eba-2024 01 02 Compact EBA Collection 2024 (ca. 600 titles, starting 2019) 11 01 JB code jbe-2019 01 02 2019 collection (119 titles) 05 02 2019 collection 01 01 Possession in Languages of Europe and North and Central Asia Possession in Languages of Europe and North and Central Asia 1 B01 01 JB code 44258376 Lars Johanson Johanson, Lars Lars Johanson University of Mainz 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/44258376 2 B01 01 JB code 118258377 Lidia Federica Mazzitelli Mazzitelli, Lidia Federica Lidia Federica Mazzitelli University of Bremen/University of Cologne 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/118258377 3 B01 01 JB code 272258378 Irina Nevskaya Nevskaya, Irina Irina Nevskaya Goethe University, Frankfurt/Institute of Philology, Siberian Division of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk/Tomsk State University, Tomsk 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/272258378 01 eng 11 411 03 03 vi 03 00 405 03 01 23 415 03 2019 P299.P67 04 Grammar, Comparative and general--Possessives. 10 LAN009060 12 CFK 24 JB code LIN.MORPH Morphology 24 JB code LIN.SEMAN Semantics 24 JB code LIN.SYNTAX Syntax 24 JB code LIN.THEOR Theoretical linguistics 01 06 02 00 This volume is a collection of articles dealing with the linguistic category of possession and its expression in languages spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia (Uralic, Turkic, Indo-European and Caucasian), with a few excursions into other parts of the world. 03 00 This volume is a collection of articles dealing with the linguistic category of possession and its expression in languages spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia (Uralic, Turkic, Indo-European and Caucasian), with a few excursions into other parts of the world. Some papers engage in typological comparisons, both within and beyond the borders of individual language families focusing on issues of motivation; meaning and forms used in expressing possession; typology of belong constructions; marking possession in possessor chains; non-canonical possessives and their relation to the category of familiarity; metaphoric shifts of possessive semantics. Others focus on possession in individual languages, offering new precious pieces of information on the linguistic expression of possession in lesser known languages, some of which are endangered and even unwritten. The volume will be of interest to both general linguists and typologists as well as to experts/students of the individual languages or language families analyzed in the papers. 01 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/475/slcs.206.png 01 01 D502 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_jpg/9789027202048.jpg 01 01 D504 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_tif/9789027202048.tif 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_front/slcs.206.hb.png 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/125/slcs.206.png 02 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_back/slcs.206.hb.png 03 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/3d_web/slcs.206.hb.png 01 01 JB code slcs.206.01int 06 10.1075/slcs.206.01int 1 6 6 Chapter 1 01 04 Introduction Introduction 01 01 JB code slcs.206.02aik 06 10.1075/slcs.206.02aik 7 26 20 Chapter 2 01 04 Expressing `possession' Expressing ‘possession’ 01 04 Motivations, meanings, and forms Motivations, meanings, and forms 1 A01 01 JB code 186354867 Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald James Cook University Australia 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/186354867 30 00

Competing motivations are often at work in the choice of form and meaning of possessive and associative noun phrases. The article offers a broad typological review of the ways of expressing possession at the NP-internal level. In particular, it discusses how iconicity and economic motivations interact in determining the shape of NP-internal possessive expressions, also addressing the topics of how socio-cultural factors affect the grammar of possession and how societal changes are reflected in language variation.

01 01 JB code slcs.206.03arb 06 10.1075/slcs.206.03arb 27 50 24 Chapter 3 01 04 Predicative possession in revived Cornish Predicative possession in revived Cornish 1 A01 01 JB code 917354868 Deborah Arbes Arbes, Deborah Deborah Arbes University of Bremen 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/917354868 30 00

This study introduces the possessive schemas of revived Cornish. By means of a survey and interviews with 25 fluent speakers and a corpus study I identified several possessive schemas being employed for different purposes due to semantic and structural reasons. Possession splits, which are also attested for the other Brythonic languages (Stolz et al. 2008), occur for the distinction of temporary possession and the possession of illnesses. Furthermore, the speakers may be developing a new form to express the possession of abstract nouns by employing the short form of bos ‘to be’ and the preposition dhe ‘to’. For the development of this form the history of interrupted language transmission and the use of Cornish by New Speakers are relevant factors.

01 01 JB code slcs.206.05com 06 10.1075/slcs.206.05com 51 84 34 Chapter 4 01 04 Possessive chains and Possessor Camouflage Possessive chains and Possessor Camouflage 1 A01 01 JB code 844348236 Bernard Comrie Comrie, Bernard Bernard Comrie University of California , Santa Barbara 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/844348236 30 00 In most recursive possessive chains like English the color of the covers of the
books and the girl’s father’s house, from knowing the morphosyntax of possessor and possessum in bipartite constructions (the color of the books, the girl’s house), one can predict the morphosyntax of the intermediate possessor (the covers, father): it combines the distinctive properties of possessor and possessum. However, near the eastern and western peripheries of Eurasia, we find two striking instances of “Possessor Camouflage”, whereby intermediate possessors either take on unexpected marking, as in Sakha (Yakut), or lack expected marking, as in the Goidelic languages. Similarities and differences between the Sakha and Goidelic cases are examined against the general background of the typology of possessive constructions.
01 01 JB code slcs.206.06csa 06 10.1075/slcs.206.06csa 85 102 18 Chapter 5 01 04 On Turkish non-canonical possessives On Turkish non-canonical possessives 1 A01 01 JB code 23348237 Éva Ágnes Csató Csató, Éva Ágnes Éva Ágnes Csató Uppsala University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/23348237 30 00

Turkic canonical possessive noun phrases consist of the possessor marked with the genitive, and the possessee with a possessive suffix. This study deals with Turkic non-canonical constructions, where a genitive marker attaches to the possessor, but the possessee remains unmarked. It is argued that in the non-canonical construction, the frame of reference is delimited to the world known/familiar to the interlocutors through shared knowledge of the world or shared discourse. Thus, these constructions express the concept of “familiarity” with possible overtones of empathy or endearment, or with negative connotations. As the speaker and hearer are typical participants in the deictic system, non-canonical possessives are most frequently used with first- and second-person possessors.

01 01 JB code slcs.206.06ina 06 10.1075/slcs.206.06ina 103 123 21 Chapter 6 01 04 Predicative possession in South Saami Predicative possession in South Saami 1 A01 01 JB code 765354871 Nobufumi Inaba Inaba, Nobufumi Nobufumi Inaba University of Turku 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/765354871 2 A01 01 JB code 205354872 Rogier Blokland Blokland, Rogier Rogier Blokland University of Uppsala 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/205354872 30 00

In this paper, we analyse and describe the HAVE-constructions in South Saami (Saamic, Uralic), from a comparative perspective with other Saamic and Uralic languages. The Saamic languages can be divided into three subgroups: in the first, HAVE is expressed with a verb meaning ‘to be’; the second has a HAVE-construction based on a verb ‘to have’ and one on the verb ‘to be’. The third subgroup comprises only of South Saami, which has three HAVE-constructions, one based on the verb ‘to have’ and two on the verb ‘to be’. South Saami is also unique among Saamic languages in that it has a HAVE-construction based on the verb ‘to be’ where the possessor in the genitive.

01 01 JB code slcs.206.07kar 06 10.1075/slcs.206.07kar 125 148 24 Chapter 7 01 04 Predicative possession in Oghuz and Kipchak Turkic languages Predicative possession in Oghuz and Kipchak Turkic languages 1 A01 01 JB code 440354873 Birsel Karakoç Karakoç, Birsel Birsel Karakoç Uppsala University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/440354873 30 00

This article studies syntactic, semantic and discursive properties of non-subordinate (main) clauses conveying possession in Oghuz and Kipchak Turkic languages. In Turkic, the concept of possession is typically encoded by clauses based on existential predicates. The language-specific and crosslinguistic properties of two predicate types, {bar} and {bol}, will be contrastively surveyed. As for the marking of possessor in clauses containing {bar}, three patterns will be described, one of which is a contact-induced structure restricted to Turkic varieties in Iran. As a multifunctional verb, {bol} can convey, among other things, dynamic or static possession. The results indicate that the clauses based on the static possession marker {bol} are more operative in Kipchak languages and in Turkmen (East Oghuz), than in West Oghuz languages. It will further be shown that the structures based on {bar} or the static marker {bol} typically exhibit discourse-related distribution in the respective languages.

01 01 JB code slcs.206.08kri 06 10.1075/slcs.206.08kri 149 168 20 Chapter 8 01 04 Pronominal and adjectival attributive possession in spoken Czech Pronominal and adjectival attributive possession in spoken Czech 01 04 A usage-based perspective A usage-based perspective 1 A01 01 JB code 6354874 Jan Křivan Křivan, Jan Jan Křivan Czech Language Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/6354874 30 00

This article analyses two types of possessive constructions in Czech: pronominal attributive possession and adjectival attributive possession. By means of a usage-based approach to language, the aim of the present corpus investigation is to reveal relevant patterns of grammar and usage in order to explain the evolution of the concerned constructions. The main focus is put on spoken language. I analyse the given data from the Czech corpora of both spoken (ORAL2013) and written language (SYN2010). I test the hypotheses concerning different frequency distributions, and the position of the possessor on the prominence hierarchies. The results support functional explanations of emergence of the pronominal and adjectival constructions, based on the prominent status of the possessor.

01 01 JB code slcs.206.09maz 06 10.1075/slcs.206.09maz 169 186 18 Chapter 9 01 04 Predicative possession in North Saami and Norwegian Predicative possession in North Saami and Norwegian 1 A01 01 JB code 435354875 Lidia Federica Mazzitelli Mazzitelli, Lidia Federica Lidia Federica Mazzitelli University of Cologne 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/435354875 30 00

This paper describes the strategies employed by North Saami (Uralic, Saamic) and Norwegian (Indo-European, North Germanic) to express predicative possession. It shows that both North Saami and Norwegian do not provide evidence of splits in their possession systems; rather, they use the same constructions to express both ownership as well as less prototypical possessive notions, displaying a typical European behaviour. The expression of some notions contiguous to possession, namely experience, location and attribution is also analyzed: these are rarely coded by means of possessive constructions in Norwegian, but more often in North Saami.

01 01 JB code slcs.206.10mem 06 10.1075/slcs.206.10mem 187 204 18 Chapter 10 01 04 Possession and ownership in Modern Uyghur Possession and ownership in Modern Uyghur 1 A01 01 JB code 801354876 Aminem Memtimin Memtimin, Aminem Aminem Memtimin Chinese Academy of Social Sciences 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/801354876 30 00

The article deals with the linguistic expression of possession and ownership in Modern Uyghur, a Turkic language spoken in Northern China. It describes the structure and semantics of Uyghur attributive and predicative possessive constructions and their interaction with the categories of inalienability, tense, aspect and mood. The paper distinguishes canonical and non-canonical possessive constructions, and shows their semantic and structural features. Special attention is paid to the structure of complex constructions with possessors and possessees as subjects of dependent clauses with the predicate in the -(i)p converb form. The relations of inalienability between the subjects of the dependent and main clauses license this use of the -(i)p converb.

01 01 JB code slcs.206.11nev 06 10.1075/slcs.206.11nev 205 238 34 Chapter 11 01 04 Superlative readings of possessive constructions in Turkic Superlative readings of possessive constructions in Turkic 01 04 A comparative perspective A comparative perspective 1 A01 01 JB code 454354877 Irina Nevskaya Nevskaya, Irina Irina Nevskaya Frankfurt University / Institute of Philology, Novosibirsk / Tomsk State University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/454354877 2 A01 01 JB code 680354878 Saule Tazhibayeva Tazhibayeva, Saule Saule Tazhibayeva Eurasian National University, Astana 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/680354878 30 00

The article describes the superlative, hyperlative and elative use of formally possessive constructions in a number of Turkic languages from a comparative perspective, analyzing their structural and semantic types and pragmatic properties. Similar possessive superlative constructions are found all over Eurasia in languages belonging to various language families: they mostly express abstract (absolute) comparison of referred entities where their quantities are compared with a certain norm. One of the most unclear issues of possessive superlative constructions is their origin. They could have emerged as structural copies of corresponding Semitic Biblical expressions or as effect of language internal developments. The material of corresponding English and German non-canonical possessive constructions allows assuming that both factors have contributed to their emergence.

01 01 JB code slcs.206.12rin 06 10.1075/slcs.206.12rin 239 266 28 Chapter 12 01 04 Possession in Khinalug Possession in Khinalug 1 A01 01 JB code 894354879 Monika Rind-Pawlowski Rind-Pawlowski, Monika Monika Rind-Pawlowski Goethe University Frankfurt 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/894354879 30 00

The article describes the functions and the usage of the genitive in Khinalug, a Nakh-Dagestanian language spoken in the North-East of Azerbaijan. Khinalug stands out for its tripartite genitive system with two subsystems: (a) a possessee-based subsystem, which distinguishes alienability versus certain types of inalienability according to the degree of bondedness towards the possessee; only animate possessors can take an inalienably marked possessee. (b) a possessor-based subsystem, which distinguishes alienability versus family-relatedness according to the bondedness among the members of the possessor group towards each other: They have to be in a family relationship to justify the use of this genitive. Moreover, independently from animacy, the alienable and the inalienable genitive are governed by a range of postpositions.

01 01 JB code slcs.206.13sch 06 10.1075/slcs.206.13sch 267 290 24 Chapter 13 01 04 A diachronic perspective on alienability splits in Icelandic attributive possession A diachronic perspective on alienability splits in Icelandic attributive possession 1 A01 01 JB code 935354880 Susanne Schuster Schuster, Susanne Susanne Schuster University of Bremen 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/935354880 30 00

Icelandic makes use of different morphosyntactic patterns for different kinds of possessive relations both in predicative and attributive possession. The fact that this differentiation is at least partly motivated by the semantics of the possessum suggests an alienability split in the Icelandic possession system (Stolz 2008). There are various approaches to explain the formal distinctions in the system, one of them depending on grammaticalization processes. Following this approach, a diachronic perspective needs to be taken in order to understand how splits arise. Accordingly, this paper presents the results of a corpus-linguistic and frequency-based analysis of the attributive pronominal possessive system of Icelandic. The most significant finding to emerge is that splits in the possessive system do not only manifest in a different synchronic behaviour but also in different degrees of susceptibility to language-internal and/or contact-induced changes.

01 01 JB code slcs.206.14ser 06 10.1075/slcs.206.14ser 291 312 22 Chapter 14 01 04 Grammaticalization of possessive markers in the Beserman dialect of Udmurt Grammaticalization of possessive markers in the Beserman dialect of Udmurt 1 A01 01 JB code 248354881 Natalia Serdobolskaya Serdobolskaya, Natalia Natalia Serdobolskaya Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/248354881 2 A01 01 JB code 608354882 Maria Usacheva Usacheva, Maria Maria Usacheva Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/608354882 3 A01 01 JB code 68354883 Timofey Arkhangelskiy Arkhangelskiy, Timofey Timofey Arkhangelskiy Universität Hamburg 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/68354883 30 00

The paper is focused on the functions of possessive suffixes in the Beserman dialect of Udmurt. Considering the data from the Beserman corpus of oral texts we find the parameters influencing the presence/omission of the possessive suffixes in the contexts of possessive (alienable and inalienable) and non-possessive contexts. We review the claim about the grammaticalization of the Beserman possessives into markers of definiteness, and suggest that they are subject to pragmaticization in terms of Fried (2009).

01 01 JB code slcs.206.15sto 06 10.1075/slcs.206.15sto 313 364 52 Chapter 15 01 04 On belonging On belonging 01 04 Preliminary thoughts on the typology of belong-constructions Preliminary thoughts on the typology of belong-constructions 1 A01 01 JB code 26354884 Thomas Stolz Stolz, Thomas Thomas Stolz University of Bremen 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/26354884 2 A01 01 JB code 421354885 Nataliya Levkovych Levkovych, Nataliya Nataliya Levkovych University of Bremen 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/421354885 30 00

This study aims at pinpointing certain properties of belong-constructions which might prove helpful for a future cross-linguistic inquiry into the grammar of those categories which associate with the notion belong in particular and with predicative possession in general. To this end, languages from two different regions – Mexico and Europe – are reviewed as to the evidence they provide of belong-constructions and their relation to other predicative-possessive categories. Cases of areal and genetic micro-variation in the domain of belong are discussed. The methodological issue of collecting data which are usually not featured in the descriptive-linguistic literature is raised as well.

01 01 JB code slcs.206.16val 06 10.1075/slcs.206.16val 365 392 28 Chapter 16 01 04 Competing possessive constructions in Late Latin documents from Italy Competing possessive constructions in Late Latin documents from Italy 1 A01 01 JB code 849354886 Cecilia Valentini Valentini, Cecilia Cecilia Valentini Università degli Studi di Firenze 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/849354886 30 00

This paper illustrates the grammaticalisation of the preposition de as a genitive marker through the analysis of Early Medieval notary deeds written in northern and central Italy (Codice diplomatico longobardo, CDL). In Classical Latin, de is used mainly as a verbal adjunct; its usage at the noun phrase level is sporadic and semantically determined, conveying mainly the meaning of ‘source’. By the time of the CDL documents, de has a more grammaticalised status and a higher frequency, but has not yet affected the expression of kinship and ownership. Semantic factors such as the prototypicality of the possessive relation and the degree of animacy of the modifier can motivate this concurrence between the synthetic and the analytical pattern of adnominal possession.

01 01 JB code slcs.206.ind1 06 10.1075/slcs.206.ind1 393 395 3 Miscellaneous 17 01 04 Languages and language families and areas Languages and language families and areas 01 01 JB code slcs.206.ind2 06 10.1075/slcs.206.ind2 397 400 4 Miscellaneous 18 01 04 Name index Name index 01 01 JB code slcs.206.ind3 06 10.1075/slcs.206.ind3 401 405 5 Miscellaneous 19 01 04 Subject index Subject index
01 JB code JBENJAMINS John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 https://benjamins.com 02 https://benjamins.com/catalog/slcs.206 Amsterdam NL 00 John Benjamins Publishing Company Marketing Department / Karin Plijnaar, Pieter Lamers onix@benjamins.nl 04 01 00 20190305 C 2019 John Benjamins D 2019 John Benjamins 02 WORLD 13 15 9789027202048 WORLD 09 01 JB 3 John Benjamins e-Platform 03 https://jbe-platform.com 29 https://jbe-platform.com/content/books/9789027263001 21 01 00 Unqualified price 02 99.00 EUR 01 00 Unqualified price 02 83.00 GBP GB 01 00 Unqualified price 02 149.00 USD
360016886 03 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 JB code SLCS 206 Hb 15 9789027202048 06 10.1075/slcs.206 13 2018045385 00 BB 08 870 gr 10 01 JB code SLCS 02 0165-7763 02 206.00 01 02 Studies in Language Companion Series Studies in Language Companion Series 01 01 Possession in Languages of Europe and North and Central Asia Possession in Languages of Europe and North and Central Asia 1 B01 01 JB code 44258376 Lars Johanson Johanson, Lars Lars Johanson University of Mainz 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/44258376 2 B01 01 JB code 118258377 Lidia Federica Mazzitelli Mazzitelli, Lidia Federica Lidia Federica Mazzitelli University of Bremen/University of Cologne 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/118258377 3 B01 01 JB code 272258378 Irina Nevskaya Nevskaya, Irina Irina Nevskaya Goethe University, Frankfurt/Institute of Philology, Siberian Division of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk/Tomsk State University, Tomsk 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/272258378 01 eng 11 411 03 03 vi 03 00 405 03 01 23 415 03 2019 P299.P67 04 Grammar, Comparative and general--Possessives. 10 LAN009060 12 CFK 24 JB code LIN.MORPH Morphology 24 JB code LIN.SEMAN Semantics 24 JB code LIN.SYNTAX Syntax 24 JB code LIN.THEOR Theoretical linguistics 01 06 02 00 This volume is a collection of articles dealing with the linguistic category of possession and its expression in languages spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia (Uralic, Turkic, Indo-European and Caucasian), with a few excursions into other parts of the world. 03 00 This volume is a collection of articles dealing with the linguistic category of possession and its expression in languages spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia (Uralic, Turkic, Indo-European and Caucasian), with a few excursions into other parts of the world. Some papers engage in typological comparisons, both within and beyond the borders of individual language families focusing on issues of motivation; meaning and forms used in expressing possession; typology of belong constructions; marking possession in possessor chains; non-canonical possessives and their relation to the category of familiarity; metaphoric shifts of possessive semantics. Others focus on possession in individual languages, offering new precious pieces of information on the linguistic expression of possession in lesser known languages, some of which are endangered and even unwritten. The volume will be of interest to both general linguists and typologists as well as to experts/students of the individual languages or language families analyzed in the papers. 01 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/475/slcs.206.png 01 01 D502 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_jpg/9789027202048.jpg 01 01 D504 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_tif/9789027202048.tif 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_front/slcs.206.hb.png 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/125/slcs.206.png 02 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_back/slcs.206.hb.png 03 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/3d_web/slcs.206.hb.png 01 01 JB code slcs.206.01int 06 10.1075/slcs.206.01int 1 6 6 Chapter 1 01 04 Introduction Introduction 01 01 JB code slcs.206.02aik 06 10.1075/slcs.206.02aik 7 26 20 Chapter 2 01 04 Expressing `possession' Expressing ‘possession’ 01 04 Motivations, meanings, and forms Motivations, meanings, and forms 1 A01 01 JB code 186354867 Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald James Cook University Australia 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/186354867 30 00

Competing motivations are often at work in the choice of form and meaning of possessive and associative noun phrases. The article offers a broad typological review of the ways of expressing possession at the NP-internal level. In particular, it discusses how iconicity and economic motivations interact in determining the shape of NP-internal possessive expressions, also addressing the topics of how socio-cultural factors affect the grammar of possession and how societal changes are reflected in language variation.

01 01 JB code slcs.206.03arb 06 10.1075/slcs.206.03arb 27 50 24 Chapter 3 01 04 Predicative possession in revived Cornish Predicative possession in revived Cornish 1 A01 01 JB code 917354868 Deborah Arbes Arbes, Deborah Deborah Arbes University of Bremen 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/917354868 30 00

This study introduces the possessive schemas of revived Cornish. By means of a survey and interviews with 25 fluent speakers and a corpus study I identified several possessive schemas being employed for different purposes due to semantic and structural reasons. Possession splits, which are also attested for the other Brythonic languages (Stolz et al. 2008), occur for the distinction of temporary possession and the possession of illnesses. Furthermore, the speakers may be developing a new form to express the possession of abstract nouns by employing the short form of bos ‘to be’ and the preposition dhe ‘to’. For the development of this form the history of interrupted language transmission and the use of Cornish by New Speakers are relevant factors.

01 01 JB code slcs.206.05com 06 10.1075/slcs.206.05com 51 84 34 Chapter 4 01 04 Possessive chains and Possessor Camouflage Possessive chains and Possessor Camouflage 1 A01 01 JB code 844348236 Bernard Comrie Comrie, Bernard Bernard Comrie University of California , Santa Barbara 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/844348236 30 00 In most recursive possessive chains like English the color of the covers of the
books and the girl’s father’s house, from knowing the morphosyntax of possessor and possessum in bipartite constructions (the color of the books, the girl’s house), one can predict the morphosyntax of the intermediate possessor (the covers, father): it combines the distinctive properties of possessor and possessum. However, near the eastern and western peripheries of Eurasia, we find two striking instances of “Possessor Camouflage”, whereby intermediate possessors either take on unexpected marking, as in Sakha (Yakut), or lack expected marking, as in the Goidelic languages. Similarities and differences between the Sakha and Goidelic cases are examined against the general background of the typology of possessive constructions.
01 01 JB code slcs.206.06csa 06 10.1075/slcs.206.06csa 85 102 18 Chapter 5 01 04 On Turkish non-canonical possessives On Turkish non-canonical possessives 1 A01 01 JB code 23348237 Éva Ágnes Csató Csató, Éva Ágnes Éva Ágnes Csató Uppsala University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/23348237 30 00

Turkic canonical possessive noun phrases consist of the possessor marked with the genitive, and the possessee with a possessive suffix. This study deals with Turkic non-canonical constructions, where a genitive marker attaches to the possessor, but the possessee remains unmarked. It is argued that in the non-canonical construction, the frame of reference is delimited to the world known/familiar to the interlocutors through shared knowledge of the world or shared discourse. Thus, these constructions express the concept of “familiarity” with possible overtones of empathy or endearment, or with negative connotations. As the speaker and hearer are typical participants in the deictic system, non-canonical possessives are most frequently used with first- and second-person possessors.

01 01 JB code slcs.206.06ina 06 10.1075/slcs.206.06ina 103 123 21 Chapter 6 01 04 Predicative possession in South Saami Predicative possession in South Saami 1 A01 01 JB code 765354871 Nobufumi Inaba Inaba, Nobufumi Nobufumi Inaba University of Turku 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/765354871 2 A01 01 JB code 205354872 Rogier Blokland Blokland, Rogier Rogier Blokland University of Uppsala 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/205354872 30 00

In this paper, we analyse and describe the HAVE-constructions in South Saami (Saamic, Uralic), from a comparative perspective with other Saamic and Uralic languages. The Saamic languages can be divided into three subgroups: in the first, HAVE is expressed with a verb meaning ‘to be’; the second has a HAVE-construction based on a verb ‘to have’ and one on the verb ‘to be’. The third subgroup comprises only of South Saami, which has three HAVE-constructions, one based on the verb ‘to have’ and two on the verb ‘to be’. South Saami is also unique among Saamic languages in that it has a HAVE-construction based on the verb ‘to be’ where the possessor in the genitive.

01 01 JB code slcs.206.07kar 06 10.1075/slcs.206.07kar 125 148 24 Chapter 7 01 04 Predicative possession in Oghuz and Kipchak Turkic languages Predicative possession in Oghuz and Kipchak Turkic languages 1 A01 01 JB code 440354873 Birsel Karakoç Karakoç, Birsel Birsel Karakoç Uppsala University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/440354873 30 00

This article studies syntactic, semantic and discursive properties of non-subordinate (main) clauses conveying possession in Oghuz and Kipchak Turkic languages. In Turkic, the concept of possession is typically encoded by clauses based on existential predicates. The language-specific and crosslinguistic properties of two predicate types, {bar} and {bol}, will be contrastively surveyed. As for the marking of possessor in clauses containing {bar}, three patterns will be described, one of which is a contact-induced structure restricted to Turkic varieties in Iran. As a multifunctional verb, {bol} can convey, among other things, dynamic or static possession. The results indicate that the clauses based on the static possession marker {bol} are more operative in Kipchak languages and in Turkmen (East Oghuz), than in West Oghuz languages. It will further be shown that the structures based on {bar} or the static marker {bol} typically exhibit discourse-related distribution in the respective languages.

01 01 JB code slcs.206.08kri 06 10.1075/slcs.206.08kri 149 168 20 Chapter 8 01 04 Pronominal and adjectival attributive possession in spoken Czech Pronominal and adjectival attributive possession in spoken Czech 01 04 A usage-based perspective A usage-based perspective 1 A01 01 JB code 6354874 Jan Křivan Křivan, Jan Jan Křivan Czech Language Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/6354874 30 00

This article analyses two types of possessive constructions in Czech: pronominal attributive possession and adjectival attributive possession. By means of a usage-based approach to language, the aim of the present corpus investigation is to reveal relevant patterns of grammar and usage in order to explain the evolution of the concerned constructions. The main focus is put on spoken language. I analyse the given data from the Czech corpora of both spoken (ORAL2013) and written language (SYN2010). I test the hypotheses concerning different frequency distributions, and the position of the possessor on the prominence hierarchies. The results support functional explanations of emergence of the pronominal and adjectival constructions, based on the prominent status of the possessor.

01 01 JB code slcs.206.09maz 06 10.1075/slcs.206.09maz 169 186 18 Chapter 9 01 04 Predicative possession in North Saami and Norwegian Predicative possession in North Saami and Norwegian 1 A01 01 JB code 435354875 Lidia Federica Mazzitelli Mazzitelli, Lidia Federica Lidia Federica Mazzitelli University of Cologne 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/435354875 30 00

This paper describes the strategies employed by North Saami (Uralic, Saamic) and Norwegian (Indo-European, North Germanic) to express predicative possession. It shows that both North Saami and Norwegian do not provide evidence of splits in their possession systems; rather, they use the same constructions to express both ownership as well as less prototypical possessive notions, displaying a typical European behaviour. The expression of some notions contiguous to possession, namely experience, location and attribution is also analyzed: these are rarely coded by means of possessive constructions in Norwegian, but more often in North Saami.

01 01 JB code slcs.206.10mem 06 10.1075/slcs.206.10mem 187 204 18 Chapter 10 01 04 Possession and ownership in Modern Uyghur Possession and ownership in Modern Uyghur 1 A01 01 JB code 801354876 Aminem Memtimin Memtimin, Aminem Aminem Memtimin Chinese Academy of Social Sciences 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/801354876 30 00

The article deals with the linguistic expression of possession and ownership in Modern Uyghur, a Turkic language spoken in Northern China. It describes the structure and semantics of Uyghur attributive and predicative possessive constructions and their interaction with the categories of inalienability, tense, aspect and mood. The paper distinguishes canonical and non-canonical possessive constructions, and shows their semantic and structural features. Special attention is paid to the structure of complex constructions with possessors and possessees as subjects of dependent clauses with the predicate in the -(i)p converb form. The relations of inalienability between the subjects of the dependent and main clauses license this use of the -(i)p converb.

01 01 JB code slcs.206.11nev 06 10.1075/slcs.206.11nev 205 238 34 Chapter 11 01 04 Superlative readings of possessive constructions in Turkic Superlative readings of possessive constructions in Turkic 01 04 A comparative perspective A comparative perspective 1 A01 01 JB code 454354877 Irina Nevskaya Nevskaya, Irina Irina Nevskaya Frankfurt University / Institute of Philology, Novosibirsk / Tomsk State University 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/454354877 2 A01 01 JB code 680354878 Saule Tazhibayeva Tazhibayeva, Saule Saule Tazhibayeva Eurasian National University, Astana 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/680354878 30 00

The article describes the superlative, hyperlative and elative use of formally possessive constructions in a number of Turkic languages from a comparative perspective, analyzing their structural and semantic types and pragmatic properties. Similar possessive superlative constructions are found all over Eurasia in languages belonging to various language families: they mostly express abstract (absolute) comparison of referred entities where their quantities are compared with a certain norm. One of the most unclear issues of possessive superlative constructions is their origin. They could have emerged as structural copies of corresponding Semitic Biblical expressions or as effect of language internal developments. The material of corresponding English and German non-canonical possessive constructions allows assuming that both factors have contributed to their emergence.

01 01 JB code slcs.206.12rin 06 10.1075/slcs.206.12rin 239 266 28 Chapter 12 01 04 Possession in Khinalug Possession in Khinalug 1 A01 01 JB code 894354879 Monika Rind-Pawlowski Rind-Pawlowski, Monika Monika Rind-Pawlowski Goethe University Frankfurt 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/894354879 30 00

The article describes the functions and the usage of the genitive in Khinalug, a Nakh-Dagestanian language spoken in the North-East of Azerbaijan. Khinalug stands out for its tripartite genitive system with two subsystems: (a) a possessee-based subsystem, which distinguishes alienability versus certain types of inalienability according to the degree of bondedness towards the possessee; only animate possessors can take an inalienably marked possessee. (b) a possessor-based subsystem, which distinguishes alienability versus family-relatedness according to the bondedness among the members of the possessor group towards each other: They have to be in a family relationship to justify the use of this genitive. Moreover, independently from animacy, the alienable and the inalienable genitive are governed by a range of postpositions.

01 01 JB code slcs.206.13sch 06 10.1075/slcs.206.13sch 267 290 24 Chapter 13 01 04 A diachronic perspective on alienability splits in Icelandic attributive possession A diachronic perspective on alienability splits in Icelandic attributive possession 1 A01 01 JB code 935354880 Susanne Schuster Schuster, Susanne Susanne Schuster University of Bremen 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/935354880 30 00

Icelandic makes use of different morphosyntactic patterns for different kinds of possessive relations both in predicative and attributive possession. The fact that this differentiation is at least partly motivated by the semantics of the possessum suggests an alienability split in the Icelandic possession system (Stolz 2008). There are various approaches to explain the formal distinctions in the system, one of them depending on grammaticalization processes. Following this approach, a diachronic perspective needs to be taken in order to understand how splits arise. Accordingly, this paper presents the results of a corpus-linguistic and frequency-based analysis of the attributive pronominal possessive system of Icelandic. The most significant finding to emerge is that splits in the possessive system do not only manifest in a different synchronic behaviour but also in different degrees of susceptibility to language-internal and/or contact-induced changes.

01 01 JB code slcs.206.14ser 06 10.1075/slcs.206.14ser 291 312 22 Chapter 14 01 04 Grammaticalization of possessive markers in the Beserman dialect of Udmurt Grammaticalization of possessive markers in the Beserman dialect of Udmurt 1 A01 01 JB code 248354881 Natalia Serdobolskaya Serdobolskaya, Natalia Natalia Serdobolskaya Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/248354881 2 A01 01 JB code 608354882 Maria Usacheva Usacheva, Maria Maria Usacheva Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/608354882 3 A01 01 JB code 68354883 Timofey Arkhangelskiy Arkhangelskiy, Timofey Timofey Arkhangelskiy Universität Hamburg 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/68354883 30 00

The paper is focused on the functions of possessive suffixes in the Beserman dialect of Udmurt. Considering the data from the Beserman corpus of oral texts we find the parameters influencing the presence/omission of the possessive suffixes in the contexts of possessive (alienable and inalienable) and non-possessive contexts. We review the claim about the grammaticalization of the Beserman possessives into markers of definiteness, and suggest that they are subject to pragmaticization in terms of Fried (2009).

01 01 JB code slcs.206.15sto 06 10.1075/slcs.206.15sto 313 364 52 Chapter 15 01 04 On belonging On belonging 01 04 Preliminary thoughts on the typology of belong-constructions Preliminary thoughts on the typology of belong-constructions 1 A01 01 JB code 26354884 Thomas Stolz Stolz, Thomas Thomas Stolz University of Bremen 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/26354884 2 A01 01 JB code 421354885 Nataliya Levkovych Levkovych, Nataliya Nataliya Levkovych University of Bremen 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/421354885 30 00

This study aims at pinpointing certain properties of belong-constructions which might prove helpful for a future cross-linguistic inquiry into the grammar of those categories which associate with the notion belong in particular and with predicative possession in general. To this end, languages from two different regions – Mexico and Europe – are reviewed as to the evidence they provide of belong-constructions and their relation to other predicative-possessive categories. Cases of areal and genetic micro-variation in the domain of belong are discussed. The methodological issue of collecting data which are usually not featured in the descriptive-linguistic literature is raised as well.

01 01 JB code slcs.206.16val 06 10.1075/slcs.206.16val 365 392 28 Chapter 16 01 04 Competing possessive constructions in Late Latin documents from Italy Competing possessive constructions in Late Latin documents from Italy 1 A01 01 JB code 849354886 Cecilia Valentini Valentini, Cecilia Cecilia Valentini Università degli Studi di Firenze 07 https://benjamins.com/catalog/persons/849354886 30 00

This paper illustrates the grammaticalisation of the preposition de as a genitive marker through the analysis of Early Medieval notary deeds written in northern and central Italy (Codice diplomatico longobardo, CDL). In Classical Latin, de is used mainly as a verbal adjunct; its usage at the noun phrase level is sporadic and semantically determined, conveying mainly the meaning of ‘source’. By the time of the CDL documents, de has a more grammaticalised status and a higher frequency, but has not yet affected the expression of kinship and ownership. Semantic factors such as the prototypicality of the possessive relation and the degree of animacy of the modifier can motivate this concurrence between the synthetic and the analytical pattern of adnominal possession.

01 01 JB code slcs.206.ind1 06 10.1075/slcs.206.ind1 393 395 3 Miscellaneous 17 01 04 Languages and language families and areas Languages and language families and areas 01 01 JB code slcs.206.ind2 06 10.1075/slcs.206.ind2 397 400 4 Miscellaneous 18 01 04 Name index Name index 01 01 JB code slcs.206.ind3 06 10.1075/slcs.206.ind3 401 405 5 Miscellaneous 19 01 04 Subject index Subject index
01 JB code JBENJAMINS John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 https://benjamins.com 02 https://benjamins.com/catalog/slcs.206 Amsterdam NL 00 John Benjamins Publishing Company Marketing Department / Karin Plijnaar, Pieter Lamers onix@benjamins.nl 04 01 00 20190305 C 2019 John Benjamins D 2019 John Benjamins 02 WORLD WORLD US CA MX 09 01 JB 1 John Benjamins Publishing Company +31 20 6304747 +31 20 6739773 bookorder@benjamins.nl 01 https://benjamins.com 21 75 01 00 Unqualified price 02 JB 1 02 99.00 EUR 02 00 Unqualified price 02 83.00 01 Z 0 GBP GB US CA MX 01 01 JB 2 John Benjamins Publishing Company +1 800 562-5666 +1 703 661-1501 benjamins@presswarehouse.com 01 https://benjamins.com 21 75 01 00 Unqualified price 02 JB 1 02 149.00 USD
775019012 03 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 JB code SLCS 206 GE 15 9789027263001 06 10.1075/slcs.206 13 2019000276 00 EA E133 10 01 JB code SLCS 02 JB code 0165-7763 02 206.00 01 02 Studies in Language Companion Series Studies in Language Companion Series 01 01 Possession in Languages of Europe and North and Central Asia Possession in Languages of Europe and North and Central Asia 1 B01 01 JB code 44258376 Lars Johanson Johanson, Lars Lars Johanson University of Mainz 2 B01 01 JB code 118258377 Lidia Federica Mazzitelli Mazzitelli, Lidia Federica Lidia Federica Mazzitelli University of Bremen/University of Cologne 3 B01 01 JB code 272258378 Irina Nevskaya Nevskaya, Irina Irina Nevskaya Goethe University, Frankfurt/Institute of Philology, Siberian Division of Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk/Tomsk State University, Tomsk 01 eng 11 411 03 03 vi 03 00 405 03 24 JB code LIN.MORPH Morphology 24 JB code LIN.SEMAN Semantics 24 JB code LIN.SYNTAX Syntax 24 JB code LIN.THEOR Theoretical linguistics 10 LAN009060 12 CFK 01 06 02 00 This volume is a collection of articles dealing with the linguistic category of possession and its expression in languages spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia (Uralic, Turkic, Indo-European and Caucasian), with a few excursions into other parts of the world. 03 00 This volume is a collection of articles dealing with the linguistic category of possession and its expression in languages spoken in Europe and North and Central Asia (Uralic, Turkic, Indo-European and Caucasian), with a few excursions into other parts of the world. Some papers engage in typological comparisons, both within and beyond the borders of individual language families focusing on issues of motivation; meaning and forms used in expressing possession; typology of belong constructions; marking possession in possessor chains; non-canonical possessives and their relation to the category of familiarity; metaphoric shifts of possessive semantics. Others focus on possession in individual languages, offering new precious pieces of information on the linguistic expression of possession in lesser known languages, some of which are endangered and even unwritten. The volume will be of interest to both general linguists and typologists as well as to experts/students of the individual languages or language families analyzed in the papers. 01 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/475/slcs.206.png 01 01 D502 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_jpg/9789027202048.jpg 01 01 D504 https://benjamins.com/covers/475_tif/9789027202048.tif 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_front/slcs.206.hb.png 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/125/slcs.206.png 02 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/1200_back/slcs.206.hb.png 03 00 03 01 01 D503 https://benjamins.com/covers/3d_web/slcs.206.hb.png 01 01 JB code slcs.206.01int 06 10.1075/slcs.206.01int 1 6 6 Chapter 1 01 04 Introduction Introduction 01 01 JB code slcs.206.02aik 06 10.1075/slcs.206.02aik 7 25 19 Chapter 2 01 04 Expressing `possession' Expressing ‘possession’ 01 04 Motivations, meanings, and forms Motivations, meanings, and forms 1 A01 01 JB code 186354867 Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald James Cook University Australia 01 01 JB code slcs.206.03arb 06 10.1075/slcs.206.03arb 27 49 23 Chapter 3 01 04 Predicative possession in revived Cornish Predicative possession in revived Cornish 1 A01 01 JB code 917354868 Deborah Arbes Arbes, Deborah Deborah Arbes University of Bremen 01 01 JB code slcs.206.05com 06 10.1075/slcs.206.05com 51 84 34 Chapter 4 01 04 Possessive chains and Possessor Camouflage Possessive chains and Possessor Camouflage 1 A01 01 JB code 844348236 Bernard Comrie Comrie, Bernard Bernard Comrie University of California , Santa Barbara 01 01 JB code slcs.206.06csa 06 10.1075/slcs.206.06csa 85 102 18 Chapter 5 01 04 On Turkish non-canonical possessives On Turkish non-canonical possessives 1 A01 01 JB code 23348237 Éva Ágnes Csató Csató, Éva Ágnes Éva Ágnes Csató Uppsala University 01 01 JB code slcs.206.06ina 06 10.1075/slcs.206.06ina 103 123 21 Chapter 6 01 04 Predicative possession in South Saami Predicative possession in South Saami 1 A01 01 JB code 765354871 Nobufumi Inaba Inaba, Nobufumi Nobufumi Inaba University of Turku 2 A01 01 JB code 205354872 Rogier Blokland Blokland, Rogier Rogier Blokland University of Uppsala 01 01 JB code slcs.206.07kar 06 10.1075/slcs.206.07kar 125 148 24 Chapter 7 01 04 Predicative possession in Oghuz and Kipchak Turkic languages Predicative possession in Oghuz and Kipchak Turkic languages 1 A01 01 JB code 440354873 Birsel Karakoç Karakoç, Birsel Birsel Karakoç Uppsala University 01 01 JB code slcs.206.08kri 06 10.1075/slcs.206.08kri 149 168 20 Chapter 8 01 04 Pronominal and adjectival attributive possession in spoken Czech Pronominal and adjectival attributive possession in spoken Czech 01 04 A usage-based perspective A usage-based perspective 1 A01 01 JB code 6354874 Jan Křivan Křivan, Jan Jan Křivan Czech Language Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences 01 01 JB code slcs.206.09maz 06 10.1075/slcs.206.09maz 169 186 18 Chapter 9 01 04 Predicative possession in North Saami and Norwegian Predicative possession in North Saami and Norwegian 1 A01 01 JB code 435354875 Lidia Federica Mazzitelli Mazzitelli, Lidia Federica Lidia Federica Mazzitelli University of Cologne 01 01 JB code slcs.206.10mem 06 10.1075/slcs.206.10mem 187 204 18 Chapter 10 01 04 Possession and ownership in Modern Uyghur Possession and ownership in Modern Uyghur 1 A01 01 JB code 801354876 Aminem Memtimin Memtimin, Aminem Aminem Memtimin Chinese Academy of Social Sciences 01 01 JB code slcs.206.11nev 06 10.1075/slcs.206.11nev 205 238 34 Chapter 11 01 04 Superlative readings of possessive constructions in Turkic Superlative readings of possessive constructions in Turkic 01 04 A comparative perspective A comparative perspective 1 A01 01 JB code 454354877 Irina Nevskaya Nevskaya, Irina Irina Nevskaya Frankfurt University / Institute of Philology, Novosibirsk / Tomsk State University 2 A01 01 JB code 680354878 Saule Tazhibayeva Tazhibayeva, Saule Saule Tazhibayeva Eurasian National University, Astana 01 01 JB code slcs.206.12rin 06 10.1075/slcs.206.12rin 239 266 28 Chapter 12 01 04 Possession in Khinalug Possession in Khinalug 1 A01 01 JB code 894354879 Monika Rind-Pawlowski Rind-Pawlowski, Monika Monika Rind-Pawlowski Goethe University Frankfurt 01 01 JB code slcs.206.13sch 06 10.1075/slcs.206.13sch 267 289 23 Chapter 13 01 04 A diachronic perspective on alienability splits in Icelandic attributive possession A diachronic perspective on alienability splits in Icelandic attributive possession 1 A01 01 JB code 935354880 Susanne Schuster Schuster, Susanne Susanne Schuster University of Bremen 01 01 JB code slcs.206.14ser 06 10.1075/slcs.206.14ser 291 311 21 Chapter 14 01 04 Grammaticalization of possessive markers in the Beserman dialect of Udmurt Grammaticalization of possessive markers in the Beserman dialect of Udmurt 1 A01 01 JB code 248354881 Natalia Serdobolskaya Serdobolskaya, Natalia Natalia Serdobolskaya Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences 2 A01 01 JB code 608354882 Maria Usacheva Usacheva, Maria Maria Usacheva Institute of Linguistics, Russian Academy of Sciences 3 A01 01 JB code 68354883 Timofey Arkhangelskiy Arkhangelskiy, Timofey Timofey Arkhangelskiy Universität Hamburg 01 01 JB code slcs.206.15sto 06 10.1075/slcs.206.15sto 313 363 51 Chapter 15 01 04 On belonging On belonging 01 04 Preliminary thoughts on the typology of belong-constructions Preliminary thoughts on the typology of belong-constructions 1 A01 01 JB code 26354884 Thomas Stolz Stolz, Thomas Thomas Stolz University of Bremen 2 A01 01 JB code 421354885 Nataliya Levkovych Levkovych, Nataliya Nataliya Levkovych University of Bremen 01 01 JB code slcs.206.16val 06 10.1075/slcs.206.16val 365 392 28 Chapter 16 01 04 Competing possessive constructions in Late Latin documents from Italy Competing possessive constructions in Late Latin documents from Italy 1 A01 01 JB code 849354886 Cecilia Valentini Valentini, Cecilia Cecilia Valentini Università degli Studi di Firenze 01 01 JB code slcs.206.ind1 06 10.1075/slcs.206.ind1 393 395 3 Miscellaneous 17 01 04 Languages and language families and areas Languages and language families and areas 01 01 JB code slcs.206.ind2 06 10.1075/slcs.206.ind2 397 400 4 Miscellaneous 18 01 04 Name index Name index 01 01 JB code slcs.206.ind3 06 10.1075/slcs.206.ind3 401 405 5 Miscellaneous 19 01 04 Subject index Subject index 01 JB code JBENJAMINS John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 01 JB code JB John Benjamins Publishing Company 01 https://benjamins.com Amsterdam NL 00 John Benjamins Publishing Company Marketing Department / Karin Plijnaar, Pieter Lamers onix@benjamins.nl 04 01 00 20190305 C 2019 John Benjamins D 2019 John Benjamins 02 WORLD 13 15 9789027202048 WORLD 03 01 JB 17 Google 03 https://play.google.com/store/books 21 01 00 Unqualified price 00 99.00 EUR 01 00 Unqualified price 00 83.00 GBP 01 00 Unqualified price 00 149.00 USD