Cover not available
Part of
Normativity in Language and Linguistics
Edited by Aleksi Mäkilähde, Ville Leppänen and Esa Itkonen
[Studies in Language Companion Series 209] 2019
► pp. 29–68

Concerning the scope of normativity

Wherever a mistake can be made, there is a corresponding norm. Normativity is divided into correctness and rationality. These two dimensions are independent of each other, as shown by the fact that rational actions can be performed by speaking incorrectly, and irrational actions can be performed by speaking correctly. The aim of this chapter is to discuss the scope of both aspects of normativity. The main focus is on the pervasiveness of normativity in linguistics, exemplified here in particular through linguistic semantics and the use of explanations in the field of ‘causal’ linguistics (e.g. psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics, diachronic linguistics). In addition, it is shown that normativity permeates such broader areas as scientific activity in general as well as our everyday lives.
Keywords: philosophy of linguistics, methodology, semantics, truth, belief, reasoning, rationality, causality, explanation, normativity, norms
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Generalities
    • 2.1Truth as norm
    • 2.2On knowledge and belief
    • 2.3The dual nature of beliefs
    • 2.4Descriptive vs. prescriptive attitude vis-à-vis norms
  • 3.Semantics
    • 3.1Necessary truth as the basis of philosophical/linguistic semantics
    • 3.2Necessary truth as an exemplification of normativity
    • 3.3Normativity prevails over psychology/cognition
    • 3.4Linguistic vs. cognitive semantics
  • 4.Rational explanation
    • 4.1Definition
    • 4.2Justification in three different situations
      • 4.2.1No laws
      • 4.2.2Statistical laws
      • 4.2.3Universal (= deterministic) laws
    • 4.3Theoretical vs. practical reasoning
      • 4.3.1Two inverse types of inference
      • 4.3.2Sufficient vs. necessary conclusions of practical reasoning
    • 4.4Conclusion
  • 5.The implicit normativity of everyday life
  • 6.Epilogue
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 December 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.209.02itk
References (85)
References
Anttila, Raimo. 1989. Historical and Comparative Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 6]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. [1960] 1980. The concept of scientific history. In Concepts and Categories. Philosophical Essays, 103–142. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Blomberg, Johan & Zlatev, Jordan. 2014. Actual and non-actual motion: Why experientialist semantics needs phenomenology (and vice versa). Phenomenology and Cognitive Science 13: 395–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bohnemeyer, Jürgen & Pederson, Eric (eds). 2011. Event Representation in Language and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Boudon, Raymond. 1974. The Logic of Sociological Explanation. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Brennan, Geoffrey, Eriksson, Lina, Goodin, Robert E. & Southwood, Nicholas. 2013. Explaining Norms. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of The Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. [1955] 1975. The Logical Structure of a Linguistic Theory. New York NY: The Plenum Press.Google Scholar
. 1976. Reflections on Language. Glasgow: Fontana/Collins.Google Scholar
. 1979. Language and Responsibility. New York NY: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Cohen, L. Jonathan. 1986. The Dialogue of Reason. An Analysis of Analytical Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio. [1958] 1974. Synchronie, Diachronie und Geschichte. München: Wilhelm Fink.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. [1963] 1968. Actions, reasons and causes. In The Philosophy of Action, Alan R. White (ed.), 79–94. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 1975. Thought and talk. In Mind and Language, Samuel Guttenplan (ed.), 7–23. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Diesing, Paul. 1972. Patterns of Discovery in the Social Sciences. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Edgley, Roy. 1970. Innate ideas. In Knowledge and Necessity. Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures, Vol. III, 1–33. London: Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. [1965] 1978. Practical reason. In Practical Reasoning, Joseph Raz (ed.), 18–32. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Givón, T. 1991. Serial verbs and the mental reality of ‘event’: Grammatical vs. cognitive packaging. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1 [Typological Studies in Language 19], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 181–227. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Language, 2nd edn, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 73–113. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1978. Typology and cross-linguistic generalizations. In Universals of Human Language, Vol. I: Method & Theory, Charles A. Ferguson & Edith Moravcsik (eds), 33–60. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hampshire, Stuart. [1969] 1979. Some difficulties in knowing. In Philosophy As It Is, Ted Honderich (ed.), 281–309. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1997. Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko. 1962. Knowledge and Belief. An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Itkonen, Esa. 1970. Zwei verschiedene Versionen der Bedeutungskomponente. Linguistics 59: 5–13.Google Scholar
. 1974. Linguistics and Metascience [Studia Philosophica Turkuensia 2]. Turku: Societas Philosophica et Phaenomenologica Findlandiae.Google Scholar
. 1976. Linguistics and Empiricalness. Answers to Criticisms. [Publications of the General Linguistics Department of the University of Helsinki 4]. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
. 1980. Qualitative vs. quantitative analysis in linguistics. In Evidence and Argumentation in Linguistic, Thomas A. Perry (ed.), 334–366. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1981. Review article on Lass (1980). Language 57: 688–697. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1983. Causality in Linguistic theory. A Critical Investigation into the Philosophical and Methodological Foundations of ‘Non-autonomus’ Linguistics. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
. 1988. A critique of the ‘post-structuralist’ conception of language. Semiotica 71: 305–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. Universal History of Linguistics. India, China, Arabia, Europe [Studies in the History of the Language Sciences 65]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. Concerning the generative paradigm. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 471–501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003a. Methods of Formalization beside and inside both Autonomous and Non-Autonomous Linguistics [Publications in General Linguistics 6]. Turku: University of Turku.Google Scholar
. 2003b. What is Language? A Study in the Philosophy of Linguistics [Publications in General Linguistics 8]. Turku: University of Turku.Google Scholar
. 2005. Analogy as Structure and Process. Approaches in Linguistics, Cognitive Psychology, and Philosophy of Science [Human Cognitive Processing 14]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008a. Concerning the role of consciousness in linguistics. Journal of Consciousness Studies 15(6): 15–33.Google Scholar
. 2008b. The central role of normativity in language and linguistics. In The Shared Mind. Perspectives on Intersubjectivity, Jordan Zlatev [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 12], Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinha & Esa Itkonen (eds), 279–305. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Concerning Coseriu’s legacy. Energeia 3: 1–29.Google Scholar
. 2013. Functional explanation and its uses. In Functional Approaches to Language, Shannon T. Bischoff & Carmen Jany (eds), 31–69. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013/2014. On explanation in linguistics. Energeia 5: 10–40.Google Scholar
. 2016a. An assessment of (mentalist) cognitive semantics. Public Journal of Semiotics 7(1): 1–42.Google Scholar
. 2016b. Pour l’analogie. In Analogie, figement et polysémie, Antonio Pamies, Philippe Monneret & Salah Mejri (eds), 1–11. Special issue of Language Design.Google Scholar
. 2019. Hermeneutics and generative linguistics. In Current Approaches to Syntax. A Comparative Handbook, András Kertész, Edith Moravcsik & Csilla Rákosi (eds), 441–467. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind. Chicago IL: The Chicago University Press.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Abraham. 1964. The Conduct of Inquiry. San Francisco CA: Chandler.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold. 1972. Semantic Theory. New York NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold & Postal, Paul. 1991. Realism and conceptualism in linguistics. Linguistics and Philosophy 14: 515–554. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward. 1978. Language variation and the logical structure of universal grammar. In Language Universals, Hans-Jakob Seiler (ed.), 89–123. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Kenny, Anthony. [1975] 1978. Practical reasoning and rational appetite. In Practical Reasoning, Joseph Raz (ed.), 63–80. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Koestler, Arthur. 1967. The Ghost in the Machine. London: Hutchinson & Co.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. I: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
. 1997. A dynamic account of grammatical function. In Essays on Language Function and Language Type, Joan Bybee, John Haiman & Sandra A. Thompson (eds), 249–274. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Cognitive Grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 421–462. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1980. On Language Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. 1997. Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehrer, Keith. 1974. Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1921. Linguistique historique et linguistique générale. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar
Möttönen, Tapani. 2016. Construal in Expression. An Intersubjective Approach to Cognitive Grammar. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Pap, Arthur. 1958. Semantics and Necessary Truth. An Inquiry into the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pawley, Andrew. 2011. Event representation in serial verb constructions. In Event Representation in Language and Cognition, Jürgen Bohnemeyer & Eric Pederson (eds), 13–42. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Pederson, Eric & Bohnemeyer, Jürgen. 2011. On representing events – an introduction. In Event Representation in Language and Cognition, Jürgen Bohnemeyer & Eric Pederson (eds), 1–12. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1981. Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard van Orman. [1953] 1963. Two dogmas of empiricism. In From a Logical Point of View 9, Logico-Philosophical Essays, 20–46. New York NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Rescher, Nicolas. 1979. Cognitive Systematization. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. [1940] 1967. An Inquiry into Meaning and Truth. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Salmon, Wesley C. 1971. Statistical Explanation and Statistical Relevance. Pittsburgh PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samuels, M. L. 1987. The status of the functional approach. In Explanation and Linguistic Change [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 45], Willem Koopman, Frederike van der Lee, Olga Fischer & Roger Eaton (eds), 239–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 2000. Towards a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, Nikolai S. [1939] 1958. Grundzüge der Phonologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Ullmann-Margalit, Edna. 1977. The Emergency of Norms. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Vennemann, Theo. 1972. Analogy in generative grammar: The origin of word order. Talk given at the World Congress of Linguists, Bologna, September 1972.
Weber, Max. [1922] 1973. Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Wedgwood, Ralph. 2007. The Nature of Normativity. Oxford: Clarendon Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Whitney, William Dwight. [1875] 1979. The Life and Growth of Language. New York NY: Dover.Google Scholar
Winch, Peter. 1958. The Idea of a Social Science and its Relation to Philosophy. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. [1953] 1958. Philosophical Investigations, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 1969. On Certainty. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
von Wright, Georg Henrik. 1963a. Norm and Action. A Logical Enquiry. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
. 1963b. The Varieties of Goodness. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
. 1971. Explanation and Understanding. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
. [1972] 1978. On so-called practical inference. In Practical Reasoning, Joseph Raz (ed.), 46–62. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan. 2007. Spatial semantics. In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, Dirk Geeraerts & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 318–350. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar