Cover not available
Part of
Late Modern English: Novel encounters
Edited by Merja Kytö and Erik Smitterberg
[Studies in Language Companion Series 214] 2020
► pp. 295–314

What it means to describe speech

Pragmatic variation and change in speech descriptors in Late Modern English

| University of Kansas
This article explores the form, frequency, and function of “speech descriptors” (such as softly in “It matters little,” she said, softly; CLMET3.0, A Christmas Carol, Period 2: 1839) in Late Modern English. Drawing on the narrative fiction category in the CLMET3.0 corpus, I show the rise of speech descriptors across the period, their linguistic characteristics, and their various pragmatic functions. Most descriptors are evaluative in that they indicate the narrator’s or author’s assessment of how the speech was delivered. Often, the usage is connected with characterization, demonstrating the evaluation of the original speaker in addition to the speech. I also stress the importance of approaching speech descriptors using variationist principles rather than word normalization.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous research
  • 3.Material and methodology
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Overall results and text dispersion
    • 4.2Linguistic realizations
    • 4.3Speech descriptor functions
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 18 March 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.214.13gru
References
Baynham, Mike & Slembrouck, Stef
1999 Speech representation and institutional discourse. Text 19(4): 439–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bednarek, Monika
2011 Expressivity and televisual characterization. Language and Literature 20(1): 3–21. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas
2004 Historical patterns for the grammatical marking of stance: A cross-register comparison. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 5(1): 107–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward
1999 Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar
Brown, Gillian
1990 Listening to Spoken English, 2nd edn. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Busse, Beatrix
2010 Adverbial expressions of stance in Early Modern “spoken” English. In Proceedings. Anglistentag 2009 Klagenfurt, Jörg Helbig & René Schallegger (eds), 47–63. Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation in 19th-Century Narrative Fiction. Oxford: OUP.
Camiciotti, Gabriella Del Lungo
2007 Discoursal aspects of the Legends of Holy Women by Osbern Bokenham. In Methods in Historical Pragmatics, Susan M. Fitzmaurice & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), 285–305. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chaemsaithong, Krisda
2012 Performing self on the witness stand: Stance and relational work in expert witness Testimony. Discourse & Society 23(5): 465–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Claridge, Claudia
2017 Voices in medieval history writing. Nordic Journal of English Studies 16(1), 7–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan
2001 Language and Characterisation: People in Plays and Other Texts. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
De Smet, Hendrik
2005 A Corpus of Late Modern English Texts. ICAME Journal 29: 69–82.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W.
2007 The stance triangle. In Englebretson (ed.), 139–182.Google Scholar
Eberhardt, Maeve
2017 Gendered representations through speech: The case of the Harry Potter series. Language and Literature 26(3): 227–246. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Englebretson, Robert
(ed.) 2007 Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, and Interaction, [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 164]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Evans, Mel
2017 Royal language and reported discourse in sixteenth-century correspondence. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18(1): 30–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, Bethany
2013 Interview with Douglas Biber. Journal of English Linguistics 41(4): 359–379. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gray, Bethany, Biber, Douglas & Hiltunen, Turo
2011 The expression of stance in early (1665–1712) publications of the Philosophical Transactions and other contemporary medical prose: Innovations in a pioneering discourse. In Medical Writing in Early Modern English, Irma Taavitsainen & Päivi Pahta (eds), 221–247. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grund, Peter J.
2017 Description, evaluation and stance: Exploring the forms and functions of speech descriptors in Early Modern English. Nordic Journal of English Studies 16(1): 41–73. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018 Beyond speech representation: Describing and evaluating speech in Early Modern English prose fiction. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 19(2): 265–285. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grund, Peter J. & Walker, Terry
Forthcoming. Introduction. In Speech Representation in the History of English: Topics and Approaches, Peter J. Grund & Terry Walker eds Oxford OUP
de Haan, Pieter
1996 More on the language of dialogue in fiction. ICAME Journal 20: 23–40.Google Scholar
Holt, Elizabeth & Clift, Rebecca
(eds) 2007 Reporting Talk: Reported Speech in Interaction. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Hunston, Susan & Thompson, Geoff
2000 Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Andreas & Jucker, Andreas H.
1995 The historical perspective in pragmatics. In Historical Pragmatics: Pragmatic Developments in the History of English [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 35], Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), 3–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra
(ed.) 2009 Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. & Berger, Manuel
2014 The development of discourse presentation in The Times, 1833–1988. Media History 20(1): 67–87. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1969 Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45(4): 715–762. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Diana M.
2012 Chapter 56: Late Modern English: Pragmatics and discourse. In English Historical Linguistics: An International Handbook, Vol. 1, Alexander Bergs & Laurel J. Brinton (eds), 901–915. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lippman, Louis G. & Tragesser, Sarah L.
2005 Constructing something funny: Levels of associative connection in Tom Swifties. Journal of General Psychology 132(3): 231–242.Google Scholar
Lutzky, Ursula
2015 Quotations in Early Modern English witness depositions. In The Pragmatics of Quoting Now and Then, Jenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz & Monika Kirner-Ludwig (eds), 343–368. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mahlberg, Michaela
2013 Corpus Stylistics and Dickens’s Fiction. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
McIntyre, Dan & Walker, Brian
2011 Discourse presentation in Early Modern English writing: A preliminary corpus-based investigation. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16(1): 101–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moore, Colette
2011 Quoting Speech in Early English. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Oostdijk, Nelleke
1990 The language of dialogue in fiction. Literary and Linguistic Computing 5(3): 235–241. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pichler, Heike
2013 The Structure of Discourse-Pragmatic Variation [Studies in Language Variation 13]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
San Segundo, Pablo Ruano
2016 A corpus-stylistic approach to Dickens’ use of speech verbs: Beyond mere reporting. Language and Literature 25(2): 113–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Semino, Elena & Short, Mick
2004 Corpus Stylistics: Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation in a Corpus of English Writing. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah
1989 Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Walker, Terry & Grund, Peter J.
2017 “speaking base approbious words”: Speech representation in Early Modern English witness depositions. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 18(1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waters, Cathleen
2016 Practical strategies for elucidating discourse-pragmatic variation. In Discourse-Pragmatic Variation and Change in English: New Methods and Insights, Heike Pichler (ed.), 41–55. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

[no author supplied]
2021. The Sociopragmatics of Stance [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 329], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.